1. The Position of Neuromuscular Patients in Shared Decision Making. Report from the 235th ENMC Workshop: Milan, Italy, January 19-20, 2018
- Author
-
Mike Snape, Aad Tibben, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Mencia de Lemus, Hanns Lochmüller, Alexandra Breukel, Holly L. Peay, Nathalie Bere, Ellen Sterrenburg, George W. Padberg, Raffaella Willmann, Erik Landfeldt, Ingeborg Meijer, Lucia Monaco, Anna Ambrosini, Guus Schrijvers, Elena S. Mazzone, Mats G. Hansson, and Anne Lennox
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Psychological intervention ,Context (language use) ,Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3] ,Biobank ,Clinical trial ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life (healthcare) ,Neurology ,Family medicine ,Health care ,medicine ,Observational study ,Neurology (clinical) ,Patient participation ,Psychology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 207092.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) In the era of patient-centered medicine, shared decision-making (SDM) - in which healthcare professionals and patients exchange information and preferences and jointly reach a decision - has emerged as the gold standard model for the provision of formal healthcare. Indeed, in many geographical settings, patients are frequently invited to participate in choices concerning the design and delivery of their medical management. From a clinical perspective, benefits of this type of patient involvement encompass, for example, enhanced treatment satisfaction, improved medical compliance, better health outcomes, and maintained or promoted quality of life. Yet, although the theory and enactment of SDM in healthcare are well-described in the literature [1-3], comparatively less attention has been devoted to contextualizing questions relating to if, when, and how to include patients in decisions within medical research. In this context, patient involvement would be expected to be potentially relevant for and applicable to a wide range of activities and processes, from the identification of research priorities and development of grant applications, to the design of patient information and consent procedures, formulation of interventions, identification and recruitment of study sample populations, feasibility of a clinical trial, identification, selection, and specification of endpoints and outcomes in clinical trials and observational studies, data collection and analysis, and dissemination of results. To this end, 45 clinicians, healthcare professionals, researchers, patients, caregivers, and representatives from regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies from 15 different countries met to discuss the level of involvement of patients with neuromuscular diseases, specifically in the following settings of medical research for neuromuscular diseases: i) registries and biobanks; ii) clinical trials; and iii) regulatory processes. In this report, we present summaries of the talks that were given during the workshop, as well as discussion outcomes from the three topic areas listed above.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF