Search

Statin use is associated with higher long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. However, the association between statin use and survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has not been established.We performed a review of prospectively collected data of all patients who had undergone TEVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2014 and 2020. We excluded patients aged 18 years, those who had presented with trauma, and those who had received custom-manufactured or physician-modified devices. We evaluated the association between preoperative statin therapy and in-hospital mortality and complications and 5-year mortality. We also analyzed the trend of preoperative statin use in elective cases for the previous 7 years. To account for nonrandom assignment to treatment, we used propensity score matching of patient characteristics, comorbidities, pathology, and urgency for preoperative statin use. We used logistic regression and Cox regression for the short-term and 5-year outcomes, respectively.Of 6266 patients who had undergone TEVAR and met the inclusion criteria, 3331 (53%) patients had been taking a statin preoperatively, including 1148 of 2267 (64%) treated for aneurysmal disease. After propensity score matching, 1875 patients were in each cohort. Preoperative statin use was associated with lower rates of any perioperative complication (16.7% vs 19.6%; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.97; P = .022). Overall, preoperative statin use was also associated with lower 5-year mortality (18.8% vs 24.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89; P = .001). When stratified by urgency, preoperative statin use was associated with lower 5-year mortality after elective TEVAR (14.9% vs 22.4%; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.79; P .001) but not after urgent or emergent TEVAR (27.4% vs 29.1%; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70-1.14; P = .37). When stratified by pathology, preoperative statin use was associated with significantly lower 5-year mortality for patients with aneurysms (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.83; P = .001). Although the mortality was also lower for patients with dissection and "other" pathology, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Between 2014 and 2019, a significant increase had occurred in statin use among patients undergoing elective TEVAR, from 56% in 2014 to 64% in 2019 (P = .007).Preoperative statin therapy is associated with lower perioperative complication rates and 5-year mortality for patients undergoing TEVAR. All patients with known thoracic aortic pathology should receive statin therapy unless contraindications for the drug are present. For patients undergoing elective TEVAR, the statin prescription percentage should be considered a quality metric, and further implementation research should occur to improve preoperative statin use.

Limited English proficiency has been shown to negatively affect health outcomes. However, as of now, little is known about survival rates of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) when compared to patients with English proficiency (EP) in an urban, non-safety net setting. We aimed to compare survival rates between patients with LEP and those with EP who had a diagnosis of PDAC. A single-institution retrospective propensity-matched cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven PDAC was undertaken. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and language information were collected for all participants. Patients were classified as having LEP or EP based on their preferred speaking language at the time of admission and matched on baseline characteristics using propensity scores. Survival analysis methods were used to study survival rates in patients with PDAC based on their EP status. Of 739 included patients, 71 (9.48%) had LEP, mean age was 68.4 ± 10.9, and 51.8% were female. Both groups of patients were comparable for age, gender, marital status, and time to treatment. LEP status was associated with higher odds of death in both unmatched (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.22–2.22) and matched (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.03–2.47) analyses. Additionally, patients with LEP had significantly decreased odds of receiving cancer-directed treatment and increased odds of advanced stage cancer at presentation. In this cohort of patients with PDAC, LEP predicted worse survival. The results of this study suggest that, after accounting for interpreter use, other factors contribute to this disparity. Such factors, as yet unmeasured, may include health literacy and cultural expectations, for which further investigation is warranted to better understand and limit this survival disparity.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed hospital resources worldwide, requiring widespread cancellation of non-emergency operations, including lung and esophageal cancer operations. In the United States, while hospitals begin to increase surgical volume and tackle the backlog of cases, the specter of a "second wave," with a potential vaccine months to years away, highlights the ongoing need to triage cases based upon the risk of surgical delay. We synthesize the available literature on time to surgery and its impact on outcomes along with a critical appraisal of the released triage guidelines in the United States. Methods We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines evaluating relevant literature from the past 15 years. Results Out of 679 screened abstracts, 12 studies investigating time to surgery in lung cancer were included. In stage I-II lung cancer, delayed resection beyond 6 to 8 weeks is consistently associated with lower survival. No identified evidence justifies a 2 cm cutoff for immediate versus delayed surgery. For stage IIIa lung cancer, time to surgery greater than 6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy is similarly associated with worse survival. For esophageal cancer, 254 abstracts were screened and 23 studies were included. Minimal literature addresses primary esophagectomy, but time to surgery over 8 weeks is associated with lower survival. In the neoadjuvant setting, longer time to surgery is associated with increased pathologic complete response, but also decreased survival. The optimal window for esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy is 6 to 8 weeks. Conclusions In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, timely resection of lung and esophageal cancer should be prioritized whenever possible based upon local resources and disease-burden.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to develop a response scale for aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) treated with sclerotherapy and determine its inter-rater reproducibility. METHODS Patients treated with sclerotherapy for an ABC between 1993 and 2014 were identified. An attending orthopaedic surgeon and an attending interventional radiologist independently reviewed the radiographic series for each patient and determined response to treatment using a novel grading system. Pain scores were collected from each visit. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). General estimating equations analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between radiographic and pain scores and outcome, to develop an algorithm for the study patient population. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the radiographic and pain scores in identifying the necessity of further treatment. To quantify the diagnostic utility, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS The inter-rater reliability was excellent for magnetic resonance imaging (ICC=0.83; 95% CI=0.74-0.89) and good for computed tomography/x-ray (ICC=0.69; 95% CI=0.51-0.81). The radiographic and pain scores proved to be independent predictors of treatment (P

Language barriers can limit access to care for patients with a non-English primary language (NEPL). The objective of this study was to define the association between primary language and emergency versus elective surgery among diverticulitis patients.Retrospective cohort study of adult patients from the 2009-2014 New Jersey State Inpatient Database. Patients were included if they had primary language data and underwent a partial colon resection for diverticulitis. Primary language was dichotomized into NEPL versus English primary language (EPL). The primary outcome was surgical admission type - urgent/emergent (referred to as "emergency") versus elective. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed.A total of 9,453 patients underwent surgery for diverticulitis, of which 592 (6.3%) had NEPL. Among NEPL patients, 300 (51%) had Spanish as primary language and 292 (49%) had another non-Spanish primary language. Patients with NEPL and EPL were similar in age (median age 58 versus 59 years; P = 0.54) and sex (52% versus 53% female; P = 0.45). Patients with NEPL were less likely to have commercial insurance (45% versus 59%; P0.001). On multivariable analysis, compared to patients with EPL, NEPL was associated with increased odds of emergency surgery for diverticulitis (OR 1.35; 95% Confidence Interval 1.13-1.62; P = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Patients with NEPL have higher odds of emergency versus elective surgery for diverticulitis compared to patients with EPL. Further research is needed to examine differences in referral pathways, patient-provider communication, and health literacy that may hinder access to elective surgery in patients with diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND Our aim was to examine differences in clinical outcomes between Hispanic subgroups who underwent emergency general surgery (EGS). METHODS Retrospective cohort study of the HCUP State Inpatient Database from New Jersey (2009-2014), including Hispanic and non-Hispanic White (NHW) adult patients who underwent EGS. Multivariable analyses were performed on outcomes including 7-day readmission and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS 125,874 patients underwent EGS operations. 22,971 were Hispanic (15,488 with subgroup defined: 7,331 - Central/South American; 4,254 - Puerto Rican; 3,170 - Mexican; 733 - Cuban). On multivariable analysis, patients in the Central/South American subgroup were more likely to be readmitted compared to the Mexican subgroup (OR 2.02; p

Background. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) is a new clinical assessment for children and youth from birth through 20 years of age. Objective. To determine the discriminant validity of the PEDI-CAT according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Design. A prospective convenience cross-sectional sample of 101 school-age children with CP was stratified by GMFCS level. Methods. Participants were excluded if they underwent recent surgery ( Results. Mean age was 11 years, 11 months (SD 3.7). Mobility and Daily Activities domains exhibited excellent discriminant validity distinguishing between ambulatory and nonambulatory participants [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively] and the Daily Activities domain exhibited excellent discriminant validity distinguishing between independent and dependent hand function (AUC = 0.93). All PEDI-CAT domains were able to discriminate between ambulatory (GMFCS levels I–III) or nonambulatory (GMFCS levels IV–V) as well as manually independent (MACS levels I–II) or manually dependent functional levels (MACS levels III–V) (P < .001). Limitations. Our convenience cross-sectional sample included school-age children with primarily Caucasian, middle-income parents and may not be representative of other cultural, socioeconomic backgrounds. Not all participants had a MACS level assigned, however, no differences were found in PEDI-CAT scores between those with and without MACS scores. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that the PEDI-CAT is a valid outcome instrument for measuring functional abilities in children with CP, able to differentiate across fine and gross motor functional levels.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread cancelation of electively scheduled surgeries, including for colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancer. The American College of Surgeons and the Society of Surgical Oncology have released guidelines for triage of these procedures. We seek to synthesize available evidence on delayed resection and oncologic outcomes, while also providing a critical assessment of the released guidelines. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify literature between 2005 and 2020 investigating the impact of time to surgery on oncologic outcomes in colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancer. Results For colorectal cancer, 1066 abstracts were screened and 43 papers were included. In primarily resected colon cancer, delay over 30 to 40 days is associated with lower survival. In rectal cancer, time to surgery over 7 to 8 weeks following neoadjuvant therapy is associated with decreased survival. Three hundred ninety-four abstracts were screened for pancreatic cancer and nine studies were included. Two studies demonstrate increased unexpected progression with delayed surgery over 30 days. Out of 633 abstracts screened for gastric cancer, six studies were included. No identified study demonstrated worse survival with increased time to surgery. Conclusion Moderate evidence suggests that delayed resection of colorectal cancer worsens survival; the impact of time to surgery on gastric and pancreatic cancer outcomes is uncertain. Early resection of gastrointestinal malignancies provides the best chance for curative therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, prioritization of procedures should account for available evidence on time to surgery and oncologic outcomes.

Background Ingestion of cylindrical batteries is uncommon. Management can include removal via upper endoscopy, surgical excision, or observation. This case demonstrates the rare phenomenon of cylindrical battery ingestion causing an electrocardiogram (ECG) artifact that mimics ST segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). Case Report A 51-year-old man who ingested 13 small pencils and 18 AA batteries was found to have ST segment elevation in the inferior leads of the ECG. Further cardiac workup including cardiac biomarkers and transthoracic echocardiogram was negative, and his ECG changes resolved after extraction of the batteries. The ST segment changes were most likely caused by electrical artifact from battery ingestion. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? When faced with an ECG finding that is unexpected and that does not fit the patient's overall clinical picture, emergency physicians should consider artifact as a possible cause. Recognition of artifact as the cause of an ECG abnormality can obviate the need for a prolonged and potentially invasive cardiac workup.

The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the construct validity and (2) test-retest reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).A prospective convenience cross-sectional sample.Multidisciplinary CP clinic in a tertiary level pediatric children's hospital.English- and Spanish-speaking school-aged children (N=101) with a diagnosis of CP, stratified by Gross Motor Function Classification System level, who presented to our multidisciplinary clinic. Participants were excluded if they underwent recent surgery (6mo) or botulinum neurotoxin A injection (3mo). A subset of 17 families participated in retest reliability.Convergent and divergent validity were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient analysis; test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).Mean age was 12±3.7 years. Convergent validity was established between Mobility (PEDI-CAT) and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) (5 m, r=0.85; 50 m, r=0.84; 500 m, r=0.76; P.001). In ambulant children, convergent validity was established between Daily Activities (PEDI-CAT vs Pediatric Quality of Life CP [PedsQL-CP] [r=0.85, P.001]) and between Social/Cognitive (PEDI-CAT) and Speech and Communication (PedsQL-CP) (r=0.42, P.001). In nonambulant children, convergent validity was established between Daily Activities (PEDI-CAT) and Personal Care (Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities [CPCHILD]) (r=0.44, P.001) and between social/cognitive (PEDI-CAT) and Communication (CPCHILD) (r=0.64, P.001). A lack of correlation between Daily Activities, Social/Cognitive, and Responsibility (PEDI-CAT) and FMS and between the Mobility (PEDI-CAT) and Communication (PedsQL) domains confirmed divergent validity. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all domains of the PEDI-CAT (ICC=0.96-0.99).The PEDI-CAT is an outcome measure that demonstrates strong construct validity and reliability in children with CP.

UNLABELLED We retrospectively reviewed the treatment and outcomes of diaphyseal femur fractures in a cohort of nonambulatory children. There were 30 patients (38 fractures) reviewed [average age of 10.1 years (range: 1.8-17.8)]. Fractures were treated with locked plate/screw fixation (n=18), with a complication rate of 24% (9/38). Patients with elastic stable intramedullary nailing experienced the highest complication rate (5/7, 71%) compared with plate/screw fixation (2/18, 11%) (P=0.01) and underwent greater subsequent procedures (n=5, 63%). Surgeons should consider locked plate and screw fixation as their first treatment choice in this challenging patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, therapeutic study; retrospective comparative study.

Resection of the distal fibula is used to treat malignant or benign locally aggressive tumors involving this region. Current reconstructive techniques are limited by undesirable functional deficits. The authors present a part-retrospective and part-prospective case-comparison of 2 patient groups (study and control) treated for malignant or benign locally aggressive primary bone tumors of the distal fibula. Patients in the study group underwent a novel surgical technique involving distal transportation of the ipsilateral proximal portion of the fibula after periosteal dissection and osteotomy with subsequent proximal periosteal reconstruction. Patients in the control group underwent other limb-salvage or amputation procedures. Patients were evaluated at follow-up appointments for oncologic, radiographic, and functional outcomes. The groups had similar demographic and perioperative data. Operative time was longer in the study group. Radiographic union occurred in 75% of the study group vs 50% of the control group. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were similar between groups. According to American Foot and Ankle scores, activity limitations and support requirements were greater in the study group; according to Foot and Ankle Disability Index scores, patients in the control group reported more difficulty with squatting. All patients in the study group were without recurrence at follow-up. One patient in the control group had recurrence of disease. Complications occurred in 3 of 4 study group patients and in all control group patients. With the authors' technique for distal fibular reconstruction involving transporting the ipsilateral remaining proximal fibula as a nonvascularized autograft, the regenerative capability of the periosteum allows for restoration of the proximal fibula, preserving osseous stock. [ Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e687–e694.]