Search

Background: It is unclear whether proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) resection or fusion leads to superior clinical outcome in patients undergoing hammertoe surgery. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a series of patients undergoing this surgery. Methods: Patients with one or more toes with rigid PIP flexion deformity were prospectively enrolled. These patients were randomly assigned to undergo either PIPJ resection or PIPJ fusion. In addition to the PIPJ procedure, a metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) release was performed if deemed necessary. Follow-up was up to 1 year postoperatively. Twenty-six patients (39 toes) were included in the PIPJ resection group and 29 (50 toes) in the PIPJ fusion group. Results: Thirty-four underwent an MTPJ release. No significant difference in foot outcome scores (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scale, the Foot Function Index, and visual analog scale pain) could be detected after 1-year follow-up. A statistically significant difference was found regarding the toe alignment in the sagittal plane in favor of PIPJ fusion. Conclusions: Our randomized controlled study did not show any clinical outcome difference between PIPJ fusion and PIPJ resection. Both procedures resulted in good to excellent outcome in pain and activity scores. Level of Evidence: Level II, lesser quality RCT or prospective comparative study.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Despite impressive results of the pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis, still certain patients suffer from rheumatoid forefoot problems. Surgical treatment of these forefoot deformities can be an option. In literature no high-quality studies on this topic can be found. The goal of present study is to compare the results of a metatarsal head (MTH) resecting technique with a MTH preserving technique in the operative treatment of severe rheumatoid forefoot deformity. METHODS: Patients suffering from well-defined rheumatoid forefoot deformity were prospectively enrolled in three institutions. This non-blinded study had a randomised clinical design and eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo either resection of preservation of the MTH. The primary outcome measure consisted of the AOFAS score. Secondary outcome measures were: the FFI, the VAS for pain and the SF-36. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (10 in MTH preservation group) were included and analysed. After one year follow-up no significant differences in AOFAS score and additional outcome factors were found. A total of 10 complications in 23 patients were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised clinical study did not show significant clinical difference between a MTH resecting and a preserving procedure in patients suffering from rheumatoid forefoot deformity. Both procedures resulted in considerable improvement of pain and activity scores.

Background: Lesser toe surgery is among the most conducted interventions in general orthopedic practice. However, the definitions of hammer toe and claw toe are not uniform. The objective of this literature study is to propose clear definitions for these deformities to establish unambiguous communication. Methods: A literature search was performed in the PubMed database (May 2006). Of 81 eligible articles, 42 that stated a clear definition of hammer toe or claw toe were selected. Results: In all 35 articles in which hammer toe was clearly defined, flexion in the proximal interphalangeal joint was part of the definition. Seventeen articles (49%) defined hammer toe as a combination of metatarsophalangeal extension and proximal interphalangeal flexion. Thirteen articles showed flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint as the single criterion. Twenty-three articles with a clear definition of claw toe were selected. Twenty-one articles (91%) showed metatarsophalangeal extension as part of the claw toe deformity. Twelve articles (52%) regarded metatarsophalangeal extension and flexion of the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints as the essential characteristics. Seven articles described a claw toe as metatarsophalangeal extension with flexion in the proximal interphalangeal joint. Conclusions: There are variations in the definitions of lesser toe deformities in the literature. We propose that extension of the metatarsophalangeal joint is the discriminating factor and essential characteristic for claw toe. Claw toe and hammer toe should be characterized by flexion in the proximal interphalangeal joint, which is the single criterion for a hammer toe. The flexibility of these joints could be a basic factor in discriminating between these deformities. The development of these deformities should be regarded as a continuum in the same pathophysiologic process. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(3): 194–197, 2009)

Background: Wide variations in definitions of lesser toe deformities exist. In addition, a general consensus regarding treatment of lesser toe deformities is lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate of the definitions, current concepts, and treatment protocols for lesser toe deformities among orthopaedic departments in The Netherlands. Methods: A questionnaire with statements regarding lesser toe deformities was sent to all 101 Dutch departments of orthopaedic surgery. Results: In total 76 (75%) completed forms were analyzed. A wide variation regarding definitions, concepts, and treatment strategies of lesser toe deformities was reported among the Dutch orthopaedic departments. Only half of all responding departments had a protocol or consensus in the treatment. Conclusions: The definitions of lesser toe deformities used in Dutch orthopaedic departments do not coincide. This might explain the variations in indications and the various performed interventions for different deformities. The differences of opinion among the Dutch orthpaedic departments may have important clinical consequences because an indication for surgery depends on the correct diagnosis. To correctly interpret and improve treatment results, a consensus on this topic should be introduced.

Background Up to a third of patients may be dissatisfied with the outcome of hallux valgus surgery. This stresses the importance of uniform and relevant outcome measures. The purpose of the current systematic review is to identify and rate available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hallux valgus surgery. Methods We performed a systematic literature search for outcome measures directed at hallux valgus. We searched electronic databases for relevant content according to the PRISMA standard. Eligible articles were used to give an overview of available PROMs, with qualitative evaluation of their properties. Results Twenty-eight eligible studies were included. Most adapted general health assessment tools, in studies on hallux valgus surgery, were the EQ5D and the SF-36 score. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was most cited as pain score. Three disease-specific outcome scores were identified: the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ), the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) and the self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS). The MOXFQ showed the best psychometric properties. Conclusions The MOXFQ scores best on positively rated qualities based on our criteria. The SEFAS may be a good alternative, however it contains less items which are regarded as important by patients with foot/ankle complaints. A relative drawback of the MOXFQ consists of the copyright licence. The VAS is the best pain score and the SF36 the best general health assessment tool. Availability in native languages and future research should lead to uniformity in application of these tools.

Introduction:Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is estimated to occur in 4-49% of patients. Some orthopedic surgeons use circumpatellar electrocautery (diathermy) to reduce the prevalence of postsurgical anterior knee pain; however, the extent of its use is unknown.Materials and Methodology:In April 2009, a postal questionnaire was sent to all 98 departments of orthopedic surgery in The Netherlands. The questions focused on the frequency of total knee arthroplasties, patellar resurfacing, and the use of circumpatellar electrocautery.Results:The response rate was 92%. A total of 18,876 TKAs, 2,096 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 215 patellofemoral arthroplasties are performed yearly in The Netherlands by the responding orthopedic surgeons. Of the orthopedic surgeons performing TKA, 13% always use patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, 49% use selective patellar resurfacing, and 38% never use it. Fifty-six percent of orthopedic surgeons use circumpatellar electrocautery when not resurfacing the patella, and 32% use electrocautery when resurfacing the patella.Conclusion:There is no consensus among Dutch orthopedic surgeons on the use of patellar resurfacing or circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement performed for osteoarthritis. A prospective clinical trial is currently underway to fully evaluate the effect of circumpatellar electrocautery on the prevalence of anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty.

Forearm fractures are the most common injury in paediatric traumatology. The unique properties of the juvenile skeleton make it possible to cope well with traumatic deformities such as angulation, apposition and displacement. While we make use of these properties, the exact mechanism and degree of healing remains obscure. Different types of forearm fractures require specific treatment options, each with its limitations. A meta-analysis of recent literature was carried out, and together with the opinions of 18 international experts an effort was made to provide insight into the limits of acceptance of angular deformation in the non-operative treatment of paediatric forearm fractures. With this information we constructed graphs (age versus angulation) for each of the eight types of paediatric forearm fractures. In the absence of proper trials, it is our opinion that the presented Isala graphs can provide useful support in the decision-making process of acceptance of angular deformities in paediatric forearm fractures.