1. Surgical treatment of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus—meta-analysis of the published literature
- Author
-
Andreas Unterberg, Steffen Fleck, Martin Májovský, Joham Choque-Velasquez, Andrzej Podgorski, Ali Ansaripour, Charles Teo, Andrzej Koziarski, Per Kristian Eide, Jacky T. Yeung, Moncef Berhouma, Henry W. S. Schroeder, Vladimír Beneš, Angelos G. Kolias, Juha Hernesniemi, Riccardo Masina, Stepan Fedorko, Thomas Santarius, Santarius, Thomas [0000-0002-1416-9566], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Clinicum, HUS Neurocenter, Neurokirurgian yksikkö, and Department of Neurosciences
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pediatrics ,RESECTION ,Nausea ,CASE SERIES ,Pineal Gland ,3124 Neurology and psychiatry ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pineal ,0302 clinical medicine ,MANAGEMENT ,medicine ,Humans ,Cyst ,Prospective Studies ,Symptomatic pineal cyst ,10. No inequality ,Prospective cohort study ,Retrospective Studies ,Non-hydrocephalic symptomatic pineal cyst ,Cysts ,business.industry ,3112 Neurosciences ,Headache ,3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology ,Review Article - CSF Circulation ,medicine.disease ,3. Good health ,Hydrocephalus ,Treatment Outcome ,GLAND ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Meta-analysis ,Pineal cyst ,Inclusion and exclusion criteria ,Female ,Surgery ,APOPLEXY ,Neurology (clinical) ,Neurosurgery ,SUPERIOR COLLICULUS ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cohort study - Abstract
Background To examine published data and assess evidence relating to safety and efficacy of surgical management of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus (nhSPC), we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched Pubmed and SCOPUS for all reports with the query ‘Pineal Cyst’ AND ‘Surgery’ as of March 2021, without constraints on study design, publication year or status (PROSPERO_CRD:42,021,242,517). Assessment of 1537 hits identified 26 reports that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results All 26 input studies were either case reports or single-centre retrospective cohorts. The majority of outcome data were derived from routine physician-recorded notes. A total of 294 patients with surgically managed nhSPC were identified. Demographics: Mean age was 29 (range: 4–63) with 77% females. Mean cyst size was 15 mm (5–35). Supracerebellar-infratentorial approach was adopted in 90% of cases, occipital-transtentorial in 9%, and was not reported in 1%. Most patients were managed by cyst resection (96%), and the remainder by fenestration. Mean post-operative follow-up was 35 months (0–228). Presentation: Headache was the commonest symptom (87%), followed by visual (54%), nausea/vomit (34%) and vertigo/dizziness (31%). Other symptoms included focal neurology (25%), sleep disturbance (17%), cognitive impairment (16%), loss of consciousness (11%), gait disturbance (11%), fatigue (10%), ‘psychiatric’ (2%) and seizures (1%). Mean number of symptoms reported at presentation was 3 (0–9). Outcomes: Improvement rate was 93% (to minimise reporting bias only consecutive cases from cohort studies were considered, N = 280) and was independent of presentation. Predictors of better outcomes were large cyst size (OR = 5.76; 95% CI: 1.74–19.02) and resection over fenestration (OR = 12.64; 3.07–52.01). Age predicted worse outcomes (OR = 0.95; 0.91–0.99). Overall complication rate was 17% and this was independent of any patient characteristics. Complications with long-term consequences occurred in 10 cases (3.6%): visual disturbance (3), chronic incisional pain (2), sensory disturbance (1), fatigue (1), cervicalgia (1), cerebellar stroke (1) and mortality due to myocardial infarction (1). Conclusions Although the results support the role of surgery in the management of nhSPCs, they have to be interpreted with a great deal of caution as the current evidence is limited, consisting only of case reports and retrospective surgical series. Inherent to such studies are inhomogeneity and incompleteness of data, selection bias and bias related to assessment of outcome carried out by the treating surgeon in the majority of cases. Prospective studies with patient-reported and objective outcome assessment are needed to provide higher level of evidence.
- Published
- 2021