Search

Hypercoagulability in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may aggravate disease severity during hospitalization but the reported survival benefits from anticoagulation (AC) vary among studies. We performed a literature research to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) of in-hospital mortality and major bleeding comparing among intermediate-to-therapeutic dose AC, prophylactic dose AC, and no AC. Until October 22, 2020, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Database were searched for studies reporting AC utilization and mortality in COVID-19. Studies with suspected risk of bias were excluded before the synthesis of pooled ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Of 37 identified studies (N = 19,510), 17 (N = 17,833) were aggregated in the meta-analysis. The overall mortality rate was 23.1% (95% CI 18.7-28.2). The pooled odds of mortality comparing anticoagulated to non-anticoagulated patients were similar, but lower in prophylactic dose AC group (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.95). Notably, intermediate-to-therapeutic dose AC increased mortality (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.11-2.31) and major bleeding compared to prophylactic dose AC (OR 3.33; 95% CI 2.34-4.72). Our findings support the optimal efficacy and safety profiles of prophylactic dose AC in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Coagulation activation has been reported in several cohorts of patients Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the true burden of systemic coagulopathy in COVID-19 remains unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we performed a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database to identify studies that reported the prevalence of systemic coagulopathy using established criteria in patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome was the prevalence of systemic coagulopathy (disseminated intravascular coagulation [DIC] and/or sepsis-induced coagulopathy [SIC]). Pooled prevalences and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] were calculated using random-effects model. A total of 5 studies including 1210 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. The pooled prevalence of systemic coagulopathy was 7.1% (95%CI: 3.2%,15.3%, I2 = 93%). The pooled prevalence of DIC (N = 721) and SIC (N = 639) were 4.3% (95%CI 1.7%, 10.4%, I2 = 84%) and 16.2% (95%CI: 9.3%, 26.8%, I2 = 74%), respectively. Only 2 studies reported the prevalence of elevated D-dimer levels with the pooled prevalence of 84.6% (95%CI: 52.0%,96.5%, I2 = 94%). Average D-dimer and fibrinogen levels were remarkably increased, while platelet counts, PT, and aPTT ratios were minimally affected in COVID-19. The estimated prevalence of systemic coagulopathy in patients with COVID-19 was low despite D-dimer elevation in most patients. Relatively low systemic coagulopathy in COVID-19 may contribute to the high incidence of thrombosis rather than bleeding in patients with COVID-19.

Background Hypereosinophilia (HE), defined by blood eosinophils > 1.5 ? 109/L persisting over one month, is commonly found in clinical practice. Objective This study aimed to explore etiologies, clinical characteristics, and outcome of HE. Methods The HE patients from a single center in Thailand during 2014-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Results Among 166 HE patients, 102 (61.5%) cases had reactive HE (HER) of which 52% was due to parasitic infestations. Two-thirds of these patients were diagnosed based on the patients' response to empirical anti-parasite therapy. Without secondary causes, eosinophil-related symptoms were found in 20 (12.0%) patients (Hypereosinophilic syndrome: HES) of which three of them had myeloid neoplasms (HESN) and one case had lymphocytic variant HES (L-HES). Among 11 of 16 idiopathic HES (HESI) patients who were treated with systemic steroid, nine (81.8%) patients responded well, and two cases obtained symptom improvement with stable eosinophilia. There was 44 (26.5%) asymptomatic HE of undetermined significance (HEUS) and 37 (84.1%) of them had HE for more than 6 months before diagnosis. Marked eosinophilia (> 10 ? 109/L) was more common in HES (37.5%), but it was also found in HER (16.7%) and HEUS (11.4%). During the median follow-up period of 16 months, 82.9% (34/41) of HEUS cases remained asymptomatic while seven (17.1%) patients spontaneously recovered. Conclusions A therapeutic trial of anti-parasite is reasonable for asymptomatic HE in tropical countries. Most HESI responded to systemic corticosteroids and HEUS showed benign courses without therapy.

Correlations between bleeding symptoms and von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels may help to predict hemorrhagic severity in the Westerners with von Willebrand disease (VWD), but data in Asians are lacking. In this study, Thai patients with VWF levels