1. Economic Burden of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Compared to Alternative Therapy Methods in Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy
- Author
-
Andreas Pascher, M. G. Laukötter, Wolf Arif Mardin, Sarah Ismail, Daniel Palmes, Jennifer Merten, Ann-Kathrin Eichelmann, and Patrycja Slepecka
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Esophageal Neoplasms ,Alternative therapy ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Esophageal cancer ,Anastomotic Leak ,Cost of Illness ,Intensive care ,Stent ,Medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,Endoscopic vacuum therapy ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Esophagectomy ,Parenteral nutrition ,Treatment Outcome ,Anastomotic leakage ,Original Article ,business ,Profit center analysis ,Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - Abstract
Background Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become a promising option in the management of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy. However, EVT is an effortful approach associated with multiple interventions. In this study, we conduct a comparative cost analysis for methods of management of AL. Methods All patients who experienced AL treated by EVT, stent, or reoperation following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were included. Cases that were managed by more than one modality were excluded. For the remaining cases, in-patient treatment cost was collected for material, personnel, (par)enteral nutrition, intensive care, operating room, and imaging. Results 42 patients were treated as follows: EVT n = 25, stent n = 13, and reoperation n = 4. The mean duration of therapy as well as length of overall hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stent than the EVT group (30 vs. 44d, p = 0.046; 34 vs. 53d, p = 0.02). The total mean cost for stent was €33.685, and the total cost for EVT was €46.136, resulting in a delta increase of 37% for EVT vs. stent cost. 75% (€34.320, EVT), respectively, 80% (€26.900, stent) of total costs were caused by ICU stay. Mean pure costs for endoscopic management were relatively low and comparable between both groups (EVT: €1.900, stent: €1.100, p = 0.28). Conclusion Management of AL represents an effortful approach that results in high overall costs. The expenses directly related to EVT and stent therapy were however comparatively low with more than 75% of costs being attributable to the ICU stay. Reduction of ICU care should be a central part of cost reduction strategies.
- Published
- 2021