Search

Background High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is inversely related to risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in epidemiologic studies but is a poorer predictor of MACE in patients with established coronary heart disease. HDL particle concentration (HDLP) has been proposed as a better predictor of risk. We investigated whether HDLP is associated with risk of MACE after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods The dal-Outcomes trial compared the CETP inhibitor dalcetrapib with placebo in patients with recent ACS. In a nested case-cohort analysis, total, large, medium, and small HDLPs were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at baseline (4-12 weeks after ACS) in 476 cases with MACE and 902 controls. Hazard ratios (HRs; case-control) for 1-SD increment of HDLP or HDL-C at baseline were calculated with and without adjustment for demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment variables. Similarly, HRs for MACE were calculated for changes in HDLP or HDL-C from baseline to month 3 of assigned treatment. Results Over median follow-up of 28 months, the risk of MACE was not associated with baseline HDLP (adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84-1.15, P = .81), any HDLP subclass, or HDL-C. Dalcetrapib increased HDL-C and total, medium, and large HDLP and decreased small HDLP but had no effect on MACE compared with placebo. There were no association of risk of MACE with change in HDLP or HDL-C and no interaction with assigned study treatment. Conclusions Neither baseline HDLP nor the change in HDLP on treatment with dalcetrapib or placebo was associated with risk of MACE after ACS.

Background: Inclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran. Methods: Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C–lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed. Results: A total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was −50.7% (95% confidence interval: −52.9% to −48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was −50.5% (95% confidence interval: −52.1% to −48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups. Conclusions: These pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents.

Introduction: Despite a later onset in life than males, ASCVD is the leading cause of death in females, additionally mortality is higher compared to males. Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of CVD risk factors may contribute to this difference. Inclisiran is a novel siRNA that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis and lowers LDL-C. Three Phase III placebo-controlled trials evaluated efficacy and safety of inclisiran in patients with HeFH (ORION-9), ASCVD (ORION-10, -11) and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11). Objective: To assess the impact of sex on the efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran. Methods: Patients from each trial were categorized by sex. The co-primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 and time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C from baseline after Day 90 up to Day 540. Secondary efficacy and safety parameters were assessed over 18 months. Results: Of a total 3660 patients, 1190 (32.5%) were females and 2470 (67.5%) were males. At baseline, females were less likely to receive statins [high-intensity statins] (90% [70%] vs 93% [76%]), or have ASCVD (73.6% vs 90.3%), were more likely to have ASCVD-risk equivalent (26.4% vs 9.7%) vs males. The efficacy of inclisiran vs placebo in both co-primary endpoints was similar in both sexes. Females had higher LDL-C at baseline (122.9 mg/dL vs 105.8 mg/dL) and (secondary endpoints) placebo-corrected mean absolute reduction in LDL-C at Day 510 (62.6 vs 54.0 mg/dL, P vs 51.5 mg/dL, P vs placebo for both sexes except for injection-site AEs that were higher in the inclisiran arm than placebo (females 9.4% vs 0.2%, males 2.8% vs 0.9%; Table). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran was generally similar in both sexes, except for more inclisiran injection-site AEs (mainly mild) vs placebo, which were more frequent in females.

Introduction: The risk of major atherosclerotic CV events increases with age, as do comorbidities, polypharmacy, and greater vulnerability to adverse drug reactions/events, posing challenges in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Three Phase III placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of inclisiran according to age. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of inclisiran in patients across age categories. Methods: Patients were categorized according to age: Results: Of a total 3660 patients, 1737 [47.5%] were not old, 1431 [39.1%] were old, and 492 [13.4%] were very old. At baseline, the prevalence of comorbidities increased with age (not old, old, very old): stage 3 CKD (8.4%, 19.9%, 31.2%), hypertension (72.9%, 85.2%, 88.1%) and diabetes mellitus (32.2%, 40.0%, 38.0%), respectively. The placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C with inclisiran was similar across all ages: from baseline to Day 510 [–51.3% (not old), –49.9% (old), –51.0% (very old); P P 5x ULN were more frequently elevated in the not old category (Table). Conclusion: Inclisiran lowered LDL-C similarly across all ages with an acceptable safety profile. Inclisiran added to maximally tolerated statin therapy could be a safe option for older patients with ASCVD who need more intensive lipid-lowering treatment.

Introduction Inclisiran, an investigational siRNA, has been shown to effectively and durably lower LDL-C in Phase 3 trials. Inter-individual variability in LDL-C reductions has been documented for statin therapy and ezetimibe. Purpose To evaluate the inter-individual variability in LDL-C lowering with inclisiran. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) who had LDL-C >70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. Co-primary endpoints were the LDL-C reduction from baseline to Day 510 and the time adjusted average % change in LDL-C reduction after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Measures of response variability were pre-specified secondary endpoints. This analysis examines the inter-individual variability of LDL-C reductions at day 510 using pooled data from both trials. Results The analysis included 3178 individuals (92% on statins). At Day 90, 97% of inclisiran-treated patients had an LDL-C reduction. At Day 510, the median percent reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline was 57.3% in the inclisiran group (interquartile range, 44%-70%). An LDL-C reduction ≥50% was reached by 1359 (86.6%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 97 (6.2%) placebo patients at any visit (odds ratio [OR] 97.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76–126). An LDL-C reduction ≥30% was reached by 1523 (97.0%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 371 (23.7%) placebo patients (OR 104.5, 95% CI 76–143). At Day 510, 921 patients (65.1%) in the inclisiran group had a reduction ≥50% in LDL-C compared to 34 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group, and 1228 (86.8%) had a reduction ≥30% compared to 148 (10.5%), respectively. Among placebo-treated patients, there was a substantial proportion with notable increases in LDL-C at Day 510 (figure). Conclusion In Phase 3 trials, inclisiran on top of maximally tolerated statins provided reliable, consistent and durable reductions in LDL-C. A large percentage of subjects randomized to inclisiran achieved substantial reductions (>50%) in LDL-C and nearly all achieved at least a 30% reduction suggesting inclisiran is potentially a promising novel therapy for patients needing sustained LDL-C reductions. Waterfall plot of pooled trials Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Introduction Statin-associated side effects prevent a substantial proportion of patients from being adequately treated with statin therapy and achieving adequate LDL-C reductions. Phase 3 trials showed that inclisiran, a new siRNA, durably lowers LDL-C by ≥50% on top of maximally tolerated statin therapy. Purpose To evaluate inclisiran's tolerability and LDL-C lowering effects among individuals who were not receiving statin therapy mainly because of statin intolerance. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) with LDL-C >70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. The primary efficacy endpoints were % change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 and time adjusted % change in LDL-C from baseline after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Absolute LDL-C reductions were secondary endpoints. This analysis included individuals who were not on statin therapy at baseline. Results The trials included 252 (7.9% of the pooled trial populations; mean age 68; male 62%; lipid-lowering therapy 28%). AE rates and LDL-C reductions are shown in the Table. Overall, 12 (4.7%) patients had myalgia (4.8% in the inclisiran groups, 4.7% in the placebo groups). There were 8 discontinuations in the inclisiran groups (6.5%) and 3 in the placebo groups (2.3%). The placebo-adjusted mean reduction in LDL-C at Day 510 was 45.8%, an absolute reduction of 68.0 mg/dL (p Conclusion Among statin intolerant individuals in ORION-10 and 11, inclisiran potently and durably lowered LDL-C with an adverse event profile comparable to placebo. Inclisiran may represent a new and potent therapeutic option for patients with elevated LDL-C unable to tolerate statins. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Background: \ud Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by an elevated level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Monoclonal antibodies directed against proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) have been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol levels by more than 50% but require administration every 2 to 4 weeks. In a phase 2 trial, a twice-yearly injection of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, was shown to inhibit hepatic synthesis of PCSK9 in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.\ud Methods: \ud In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, 482 adults who had heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia to receive subcutaneous injections of inclisiran sodium (at a dose of 300 mg) or matching placebo on days 1, 90, 270, and 450. The two primary end points were the percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level on day 510 and the time-adjusted percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level between day 90 and day 540.\ud Results: \ud The median age of the patients was 56 years, and 47% were men; the mean baseline level of LDL cholesterol was 153 mg per deciliter. At day 510, the percent change in the LDL cholesterol level was a reduction of 39.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], −43.7 to −35.7) in the inclisiran group and an increase of 8.2% (95% CI, 4.3 to 12.2) in the placebo group, for a between-group difference of −47.9 percentage points (95% CI, −53.5 to −42.3; P

Background: \ud Inclisiran inhibits hepatic synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9. Previous studies suggest that inclisiran might provide sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with infrequent dosing.\ud Methods: \ud We enrolled patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ORION-10 trial) and patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk equivalent (ORION-11 trial) who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels despite receiving statin therapy at the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran (284 mg) or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter over a period of 540 days. The coprimary end points in each trial were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline after day 90 and up to day 540.\ud Results: \ud A total of 1561 and 1617 patients underwent randomization in the ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials, respectively. Mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol levels at baseline were 104.7±38.3 mg per deciliter (2.71±0.99 mmol per liter) and 105.5±39.1 mg per deciliter (2.73±1.01 mmol per liter), respectively. At day 510, inclisiran reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 52.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8 to 55.7) in the ORION-10 trial and by 49.9% (95% CI, 46.6 to 53.1) in the ORION-11 trial, with corresponding time-adjusted reductions of 53.8% (95% CI, 51.3 to 56.2) and 49.2% (95% CI, 46.8 to 51.6) (P

Objective: To investigate the pharmacodynamic properties of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), in individuals with normal renal function and renal impairment (RI). Patients and Methods: The analysis included participants with normal renal function and mild, moderate, and severe RI from the phase 1 ORION-7 renal study (n=31) and the phase 2 ORION-1 study (n=247) who received 300 mg of inclisiran sodium or placebo. Results: In ORION-7, PCSK9 values were reduced at day 60 in the normal renal function group (68.1%±12.4%), mild RI group (74.2%±12.3%), moderate RI group (79.8%±4.9%), and severe RI group (67.9%±16.4%) (P

Background Among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who do not have diabetes, incident diabetes is common and associated with an adverse prognosis. Some data suggest that high density lipoprotein (HDL) has favourable effects on beta cell function and that cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors reduce incident type 2 diabetes in conjunction with increased HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration. Dalcetrapib is a CETP inhibitor under ongoing evaluation as a potential cardiovascular therapy. Purpose We compared the effect of treatment with dalcetrapib or placebo on incident diabetes in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods In the dal-OUTCOMES trial, 15,871 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with dalcetrapib 600 mg or placebo daily, beginning 4–12 weeks after ACS. Absence of diabetes at baseline was based upon medical history, no use of diabetes medication, haemoglobin A1c Results At baseline, 10621 patients (67% of the trial cohort) did not have diabetes and formed the analysis cohort. Over median follow-up of 31 months, incident diabetes was identified in 392 of 5314 patients (7.4%) assigned to dalcetrapib and 505 of 5307 (9.5%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.87; P Conclusions In patients with recent ACS who do not have diabetes at baseline, incident diabetes is common. Dalcetrapib treatment reduced the relative risk of incident diabetes by 24% and the absolute risk by 2.1% over a median of 31 months. The reduction in incident diabetes with dalcetrapib was associated with increased HDL-C on treatment. Acknowledgement/Funding The dal-OUTCOMES trial was funded by F. Hoffmann LaRoche

Importance: Sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with lipid-lowering therapies that require frequent dosing are reliant on patient adherence, and poor adherence is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Objective: To determine whether inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, reduces mean LDL-C exposure with an infrequent dosing regimen. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were followed up monthly for LDL-C levels and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) measurements as well as safety until their LDL-C levels had returned to within 20% of their change from baseline (maximum 360 days). The study included patients with elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Data were analyzed between January 11, 2016, and June 7, 2017. Interventions: One dose (200, 300, or 500 mg on day 1) or 2 doses (100, 200, or 300 mg on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran sodium or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Duration of time to return to within 20% of change from baseline for LDL-C levels and time-averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year. Results: At baseline, among the 501 participants, 65% were men (n = 326 of 501), mean age was 63 years, 6% had familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 28 of 501), and 69% had established ASCVD (n = 347 of 501). Baseline LDL-C was 128 mg/dL among 501 randomized participants. The percentage of participants who were followed up to day 360 because their LDL-C levels had not returned to within 20% of their change from baseline ranged from 48.3% to 65.0% for those receiving a single dose and between 55.9% and 83.1% of those receiving 2 doses, with similar effects observed for PCSK9. Time-averaged reduction in LDL-C levels over 1 year after a single dose ranged from 29.5% to 38.7% (P

It remains unclear whether changes in arterial wall inflammation are associated with subsequent changes in the rate of structural progression of atherosclerosis.In this sub-study of the dal-PLAQUE clinical trial, multi-modal imaging was performed using 18-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET, at 0 and 6 months) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, at 0 and 24 months). The primary objective was to determine whether increasing FDG uptake at 6 months predicted atherosclerosis progression on MRI at 2 years. Arterial inflammation was measured by the carotid FDG target-to-background ratio (TBR), and atherosclerotic plaque progression was defined as the percentage change in carotid mean wall area (MWA) and mean wall thickness (MWT) on MRI between baseline and 24 months.A total of 42 participants were included in this sub-study. The mean age of the population was 62.5 years, and 12 (28.6 %) were women. In participants with (vs. without) any increase in arterial inflammation over 6 months, the long-term changes in both MWT (% change MWT: 17.49 % vs. 1.74 %, p = 0.038) and MWA (% change MWA: 25.50 % vs. 3.59 %, p = 0.027) were significantly greater. Results remained significant after adjusting for clinical and biochemical covariates. Individuals with no increase in arterial inflammation over 6 months had no significant structural progression of atherosclerosis over 24 months as measured by MWT (p = 0.616) or MWA (p = 0.373).Short-term changes in arterial inflammation are associated with long-term structural atherosclerosis progression. These data support the concept that therapies that reduce arterial inflammation may attenuate or halt progression of atherosclerosis.

Background Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory condition with calcification apparent late in the disease process. The extent and progression of coronary calcification predict cardiovascular events. Relatively little is known about noncoronary vascular calcification. Objectives This study investigated noncoronary vascular calcification and its influence on changes in vascular inflammation. Methods A total of 130 participants in the dal-PLAQUE (Safety and efficacy of dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging) study underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography at entry and at 6 months. Calcification of the ascending aorta, arch, carotid, and coronary arteries was quantified. Cardiovascular risk factors were related to arterial calcification. The influences of baseline calcification and drug therapy (dalcetrapib vs. placebo) on progression of calcification were determined. Finally, baseline calcification was related to changes in vascular inflammation. Results Age >65 years old was consistently associated with higher baseline calcium scores. Arch calcification trended to progress more in those with calcification at baseline (p = 0.055). There were no significant differences between progression of vascular calcification with dalcetrapib compared to that with placebo. Average carotid target-to-background ratio indexes declined over 6 months if carotid calcium was absent (single hottest slice [p = 0.037], mean of maximum target-to-background ratio [p = 0.010], and mean most diseased segment [p Conclusions Across multiple arterial regions, higher age is consistently associated with higher calcium scores. The presence of vascular calcification at baseline is associated with progressive calcification; in the carotid arteries, calcification appears to influence vascular inflammation. Dalcetrapib therapy did not affect vascular calcification.

Patients with diabetes (DM) and metabolic syndrome (MS) have elevated risks for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Aggressive LDL-C lowering reduces risks. Inclisiran, a new siRNA, lowers LDL-C and was evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM), metabolic syndrome (MS) without DM or

IMPORTANCE: Infusing a high-density lipoprotein mimetic containing apolipoprotein A-I Milano demonstrated potential atheroma regression in patients following an acute coronary syndrome. To our knowledge, the effect of infusing a new mimetic preparation (MDCO-216) with contemporary statin therapy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of infusing MDCO-216 on coronary atherosclerosis progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in 22 hospitals in Canada and Europe compared the effects of 5 weekly intravenous infusions of MDCO-216 at a dose of 20 mg/kg weekly (n = 59) with placebo (n = 67) in statin-treated patients with an acute coronary syndrome. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to day 36 as measured by serial intravascular ultrasonography. The secondary efficacy measures were the nominal changes in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV), atheroma volume in the most diseased 10-mm segment, and the percentage of patients who demonstrated plaque regression. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 122 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [10.4] years; 93 men [76.2%]; 61 [50.0%] with prior statin use; and a mean [SD] low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level of 87.6 [40.5] mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259]), 113 (92.6%) had evaluable imaging results at follow-up. The receiving-treatment LDL-C levels were comparable with the placebo and MDCO-216 (68.6 vs 70.5 mg/dL; difference, −2.5 mg/dL; 95% CI, −10.1 to 5.0; P = .51). A reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels was observed in MDCO, but not placebo patients (−3.3 vs 3.0 mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259]; difference, −6.3 mg/dL; 95% CI, −8.5 to −4.1; P

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inclisiran by diabetes status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS ORION-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02597127) randomized 501 subjects with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents and high LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), despite maximally tolerated LDL-C–lowering therapies, to one or two doses of placebo or inclisiran. Levels of lipids and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) at baseline and day 180 were compared. RESULTS Inclisiran was associated with marked declines in LDL-C (median −28% to −52%, P < 0.0001 and −28% to −55%, P < 0.005 for all doses in the without- and with-diabetes groups, respectively) and PCSK9. The inclisiran-treated groups also had lower apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) but higher HDL cholesterol. Inclisiran had an adverse profile similar to that of placebo, and adverse events were proportionally balanced in the baseline with- and without-diabetes groups. CONCLUSIONS PCSK9-targeted siRNA-driven strategies may provide a novel therapeutic option for managing dyslipidemia in the presence and absence of diabetes.

Inclisiran, an investigational PCSK9-specific RNA silencing molecule with potential for a maintenance regimen of twice yearly dosing, significantly lowered LDL-C and PCSK9 in the dose-ranging ORION-1 trial. We report its efficacy and safety by diabetes status, and its impact on glycemia. ORION-1 randomized 501 persons with atherosclerosis (ASCVD) or ASCVD-risk equivalents, and high LDL-C despite maximally tolerated LDL-C lowering therapies, to inclisiran or placebo. Inclisiran significantly lowered LDL-C and PCSK9 similarly in persons with and without diabetes at day 180 (Table). Temporal A1C were similar in the placebo and incisiran arms (Figure). These data suggest that inclisiran is efficacious and does not worsen glycemia in persons with ASCVD or ASCVD-risk equivalents, regardless of their diabetes status, over 180 days. Disclosure L. Leiter: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Research Support; Self; GlaxoSmithKline plc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Research Support; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi. Advisory Panel; Self; Servier. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Servier. Research Support; Self; Servier. Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc.. Research Support; Self; Amgen Inc., Esperion Therapeutics, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., The Medicines Company. Advisory Panel; Self; Akcea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. H. Teoh: None. D. Kallend: Employee; Self; The Medicines Company. R. Wright: Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, The Medicines Company, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly and Company, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. U. Landmesser: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Medicines Company, Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc. P.L. Wijngaard: Employee; Self; The Medicines Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; The Medicines Company. J.J. Kastelein: Consultant; Self; The Medicines Company. K.K. Ray: Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc., Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Consultant; Self; The Medicines Company. Research Support; Self; Amgen Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Consultant; Self; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., AstraZeneca, Esperion Therapeutics, Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Pfizer Inc.. Consultant; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Research Support; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp..

Inclisiran is a novel drug that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis specifically in the liver, harnessing the natural mechanism of RNAi. Phase I and II data show that inclisiran lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on average by >50% with a duration of effect that enables twice-yearly dosing. Phases I, II and emerging Phase III data support inclisiran's safety, tolerability and risk–benefit profile. The ongoing ORION program includes Phase III trials that will provide robust evidence of inclisiran's safety and efficacy in individuals at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including established ASCVD and familial hypercholesterolemia. In addition, the ORION-4 trial will assess the impact of inclisiran on cardiovascular outcomes in approximately 15,000 ASCVD subjects.

Epidemiological data associate higher concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) with lower cardiovascular risk. HDL-C isolated from healthy subjects exhibits potentially protective properties, including anti-inflammatory effects [(1)][1]. However, some evidence suggests that

Background Aldosterone may have adverse effects in the myocardium and vasculature. Treatment with an aldosterone antagonist reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure (HF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, most patients with acute coronary syndrome do not have advanced HF. Among such patients, it is unknown whether aldosterone predicts cardiovascular risk. Methods and Results To address this question, we examined data from the dal‐OUTCOMES trial that compared the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor dalcetrapib with placebo, beginning 4 to 12 weeks after an index acute coronary syndrome. Patients with New York Heart Association class II (with LVEF III , or IV HF were excluded. Aldosterone was measured at randomization in 4073 patients. The primary outcome was a composite of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. Hospitalization for HF was a secondary endpoint. Over a median follow‐up of 37 months, the primary outcome occurred in 366 patients (9.0%), and hospitalization for HF occurred in 72 patients (1.8%). There was no association between aldosterone and either the time to first occurrence of a primary outcome (hazard ratio for doubling of aldosterone 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.78‐1.09, P =0.34) or hospitalization for HF (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 0.96‐1.99, P =0.08) in Cox regression models adjusted for covariates. Conclusions In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome but without advanced HF, aldosterone does not predict major cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00658515.

We investigated the effect of dalcetrapib treatment on phytosterol levels in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) or familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia (FHA) due to mutations in apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) or ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1). Patients (n = 40) with FCH or FHA received dalcetrapib 600 mg or placebo in this 4-week, double-blind, crossover study. Lipids, apolipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity and mass, and phytosterols were assessed. Dalcetrapib increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and ApoA1 levels to a similar extent in FHA (+22.8, +13.9 %) and FCH (+18.4, +12.1 %), both p < 0.001 vs. placebo. Changes in CETP activity and mass were comparable for FHA (−31.5, +120.9 %) and FCH (−26.6, +111.9 %), both p < 0.0001 vs. placebo. Campesterol and lathosterol were unchanged in FHA (+3.8, +3.0 %), but only campesterol was markedly increased in FCH (+25.0 %, p < 0.0001 vs. placebo). Campesterol increased with dalcetrapib treatment in FCH but not in FHA, despite comparable HDL-C and ApoA1 increases, suggesting that ApoA1 and/or ABCA1 is essential for HDL lipidation by enterocytes in humans.

Aims The effects of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition on lipids, inflammation, and markers of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function, following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), are unknown. Methods and results The dal-ACUTE study randomized 300 patients (1 : 1) to dalcetrapib 600 mg/day or placebo within 1 week of an ACS. The primary endpoint was per cent change in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) after 4 weeks. Secondary endpoints included apolipoprotein levels, markers of HDL function, and inflammation. Dalcetrapib treatment increased HDL-C and apolipoprotein A1 by 33.7 and 11.8%, respectively (both P < 0.001) and total cholesterol efflux by 9.5% ( P = 0.003) after 4 weeks, principally via an increase in non-ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC) A1-mediated efflux, without statistically significant changes in pre-β1-HDL levels. The increase in total efflux with dalcetrapib correlated most strongly with increases in apolipoprotein A1 and HDL-C ( r = 0.46 and 0.43, respectively) rather than the increase in pre-β1-HDL ( r = 0.32). Baseline and on-treatment ABCA1-mediated efflux correlated most strongly with pre-β1-HDL levels; in contrast, non-ABCA1-mediated efflux correlated better with apolipoprotein A1 and HDL-C levels. Conclusions High-density lipoprotein raised through CETP inhibition with dalcetrapib improves cholesterol efflux, principally via a non-ABCA1-mediated pathway. While HDL-C was increased by one-third, apolipoprotein A1 and total efflux were increased only by one-tenth, supporting the concept of dissociation between improvements in HDL function and HDL-C levels, which may be of relevance to ongoing trials and the development of therapeutic interventions targeting HDL.

Baseline predictors of response to treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with respect to vascular inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque burden are poorly understood. From post hoc analysis of the dal-PLAQUE study (NCT00655473), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET) imaging and carotid black blood magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to track changes in these vascular parameters. Baseline demographics, imaging, and biomarkers were collected/measured in 130 patients with CHD or CHD risk-equivalents, and imaging follow-up at 6 months (PET) and 24 months (MRI) was performed. Using stepwise linear regression, predictors of change in carotid plaque inflammation by PET [target-to-background ratio (TBR), n = 92] and plaque burden by MRI [wall area (WA) and total vessel area (TVA), n = 89] were determined. Variables with p

Objectives This study sought to longitudinally investigate the relationship between a broad spectrum of serum inflammatory biomarkers and plaque inflammation assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Background Both plaque inflammation and serum biomarkers of inflammation are associated with atherothrombotic events; however, the relationship between them is unclear. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of the dal-PLAQUE (A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of the Effect of RO4607381 on Progression or Regression of Atherosclerotic Plaque in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease [CHD] Including Patients With Other CHD Risk Factors), a randomized, placebo-controlled study of dalcetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, in 130 patients with coronary heart disease, or coronary heart disease risk equivalents on stable lipid-lowering therapy. Baseline and change after 3-month follow-up in inflammatory biomarker levels and baseline and change after 3-month follow-up in aorta and carotid 18F-FDG PET/CT (mean maximum target-to-background ratio of the most diseased segment [TBRmds]) were analyzed. Results Baseline myeloperoxidase positively correlated with baseline carotid TBRmds (rho = 0.25, p = 0.02). This correlation remained at the 3-month follow-up and was independent of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Baseline lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass correlated with aorta TBRmds (rho = 0.21, p = 0.03). However, this correlation disappeared at the 3-month follow-up and was not independent of cardiovascular disease risk factors. There was no association between change from baseline in myeloperoxidase or lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass and change from baseline in aorta and carotid TBRmds. Baseline and change from baseline in high sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, soluble P-selectin, soluble E-selectin, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule 1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and matrix-metalloproteinase 3 and 9 did not correlate with baseline or change from baseline in carotid or aorta TBRmds. Conclusions Our data show that, in patients with coronary heart disease or at high risk of coronary heart disease on stable lipid-lowering therapy, circulating myeloperoxidase levels are associated with carotid plaque inflammation. (A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of the Effect of RO4607381 on Progression or Regression of Atherosclerotic Plaque in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease [CHD] Including Patients With Other CHD Risk Factors [dal-PLAQUE]; NCT00655473)

Fenofibrate and extended-release (ER) niacin similarly raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration but their effects on levels of potent plasma antioxidant xanthophylls (lutein and zeaxanthin) and phytosterols obtained from dietary sources, and any relationship with plasma lipoproteins and pre-β1-HDL levels, have not been investigated. We studied these parameters in 66 dyslipidemic patients treated for 6 week with fenofibrate (160 mg/day) or ER-niacin (0.5 g/day for 3 week, then 1 g/day) in a cross-over study. Both treatments increased HDL-C (16 %) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I (7 %) but only fenofibrate increased apoA-II (28 %). Lutein and zeaxanthin levels were unaffected by fenofibrate but inversely correlated with percentage change in apoB and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and positively correlated with end of treatment apoA-II. ApoA-II in isolated HDL in vitro bound more lutein than apoA-I. Xanthophylls were increased by ER-niacin (each ~30 %) without any correlation to lipoprotein or apo levels. Only fenofibrate markedly decreased plasma markers of cholesterol absorption; pre-β1-HDL was significantly decreased by fenofibrate (−19 %, p < 0.0001), with little change (3.4 %) for ER-niacin. Although fenofibrate and ER-niacin similarly increased plasma HDL-C and apoA-I, effects on plasma xanthophylls, phytosterols and pre-β1-HDL differed markedly, suggesting differences in intestinal lipidation of HDL. In addition, the in vitro investigations suggest an important role of plasma apoA-II in xanthophyll metabolism.

There is a widely held belief that the use of non-invasive imaging can reduce the gap between basic science and clinical proof-of-concept, ultimately improving decision-making and therefore the efficiency of the drug development process. Imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used in oncology and neuroscience drug development. However, less attention has been paid to the systematic use of imaging in the cardiovascular and metabolic disease area. Here, with an emphasis on 'early clinical' development, we discuss the application of imaging in those areas, highlighting opportunities and challenges.

Background and aims Effects of single ascending doses of MDCO-216 on plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were assessed in human healthy volunteers and in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods MDCO-216 was infused at a single dose of 5, 10, 20, 30 or 40 mg/kg over 2 h and blood was collected at 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 720 h after start of infusion (ASOI). Lipoprotein lipids were assessed by FLPC and by 1H NMR. Results Plasma concentrations of free cholesterol (FC) displayed a rapid and dose-dependent rise, peaking at 8 h, but remaining above baseline until 48 h ASOI, whereas levels of esterified cholesterol (CE) increased at lower doses but not at higher doses, and even decreased below baseline at the highest dose. Plasma cholesterol esterification rate (CER) decreased with a first nadir between 4 and 8 h and a second nadir at 48 h ASOI. Taken over all subjects receiving MDCO-216, the increase in FC at 8 h correlated inversely with the drop in CER at 4 h but positively with the increase in basal and scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI)-mediated cholesterol efflux capacities at 2 h ASOI. Upon FPLC analysis, FC was found to increase first in high density lipoproteins (HDL) and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and later (at 48 or 168 h ASOI) in low density lipoproteins (LDL). CE initially decreased in LDL and HDL but after 24 h started to increase in VLDL and LDL whereas HDL-CE was still below baseline at 48 h. Phospholipids (PL) showed the same pattern as FC. Triglycerides (TG) also rose rapidly, most prominently in VLDL, but also in LDL and HDL. Apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) in VLDL increased at 4–8 h but returned to baseline at 24 h ASOI. 1H NMR analysis showed a rapid and dose-dependent increase in HDL particle size, peaking at 2 h and returning to baseline at 24 h, and a small increase in HDL particle concentration. After infusion of the 40 mg/kg dose, LDL and VLDL-particles also increased in number and size. Conclusions A single administration of MDCO-216 caused rapid changes in lipid levels and lipoprotein composition, some of which persisted for at least 7 days.

Importance It is uncertain whether lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which is associated with incident cardiovascular disease, is an independent risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objective To determine the association of Lp(a) concentration measured after ACS with the subsequent risk of ischemic cardiovascular events. Design, Setting, and Participants This nested case-cohort analysis was performed as an ad hoc analysis of the dal-Outcomes randomized clinical trial. This trial compared dalcetrapib, the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, with placebo in patients with recent ACS and was performed between April 2008 and September 2012 at 935 sites in 27 countries. There were 969 case patients who experienced a primary cardiovascular outcome, and there were 3170 control patients who were event free at the time of a case event and had the same type of index ACS (unstable angina or myocardial infarction) as that of the respective case patients. Concentration of Lp(a) was measured by immunoturbidimetric assay. Data analysis for this present study was conducted from June 8, 2016, to April 21, 2017. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with dalcetrapib, 600 mg daily, or matching placebo, beginning 4 to 12 weeks after ACS. Main Outcomes and Measures Death due to coronary heart disease, a major nonfatal coronary event (myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or resuscitated cardiac arrest), or fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke. Results The mean (SD) age was 63 (10) years for the 969 case patients and 60 (9) years for the 3170 control patients, and both cohorts were composed of predominantly male (770 case patients [79%] and 2558 control patients [81%];P = .40) and white patients (858 case patients [89%] and 2825 control patients [89%];P = .62). At baseline, the median (interquartile range) Lp(a) level was 12.3 (4.7-50.9) mg/dL. There was broad application of evidence-based secondary prevention strategies after ACS, including use of statins in 4030 patients (97%). The cumulative distribution of baseline Lp(a) levels did not differ between cases and controls atP = .16. Case-cohort regression analysis showed no association of baseline Lp(a) level with risk of cardiovascular events. For a doubling of Lp(a) concentration, the hazard ratio (case to control) was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96-1.06;P = .66) after adjustment for 16 baseline variables, including assigned study treatment. Conclusions and Relevance For patients with recent ACS who are treated with statins, Lp(a) concentration was not associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These findings call into question whether treatment specifically targeted to reduce Lp(a) levels would thereby lower the risk for ischemic cardiovascular events after ACS. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00658515

Aims Co-primary objectives were to evaluate dalcetrapib (JTT-705/RO4607381), which targets cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in participants with coronary heart disease or risk equivalents and to evaluate potential changes in mesenteric lymph nodes. Methods and results Double-blind trial with participants randomized (2:1) to dalcetrapib 900 mg/day (higher than 600 mg phase III dose) or placebo, both with atorvastatin, for 24 weeks ( n = 135; one without post-baseline efficacy data was excluded from intent-to-treat population); a subset continued for 24-week extension ( n = 77). Lipid changes and safety parameters were assessed. Mesenteric lymph nodes were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Dalcetrapib increased HDL-C (33.4%, Week 24; 33.8%, Week 48), decreased CETP activity (–53.5%, Week 24; –56.5%, Week 48), and increased apolipoprotein A-I (11.4%, Week 24; 16.4%, Week 48). Dalcetrapib showed no clinically relevant differences vs. placebo in adverse events, laboratory parameters including aldosterone, electrocardiograms, and vital signs including blood pressure (BP). Dalcetrapib had no measurable, clinically relevant effect on lymph node size. Conclusion Dalcetrapib 900 mg administered for up to 48 weeks showed no clinically relevant changes in lymph nodes, BP, or other safety parameters. Dalcetrapib effectively increased HDL-C over 48 weeks of treatment.

Efficacy and safety data for dalcetrapib (RO4607381/JTT-705) are presented, following a report of increased mortality and cardiac events with another cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, torcetrapib, associated with off-target adverse effects (hypertension and the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system). The efficacy and clinical safety of dalcetrapib 300, 600, and 900 mg or placebo were assessed (n = 838) in 4 pooled 4-week phase IIa trials (1 monotherapy, n = 193; 3 statin combination, n = 353) and 1 12-week phase IIb trial (with pravastatin, n = 292). Nonclinical safety, assessed by the induction of aldosterone production and aldosterone synthase (cytochrome P450 11B2) messenger ribonucleic acid, was measured in human adrenocarcinoma (H295R) cells exposed to dalcetrapib or torcetrapib. Dalcetrapib increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by up to 36% and apolipoprotein A-I by up to 16%. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between placebo (42%) and dalcetrapib 300 mg (50%) and 600 mg (42%), with more events with dalcetrapib 900 mg (58%) (p

Aims Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA-1), based on epidemiology, is inversely associated with cardiovascular (CV) events. Human carriers of the ApoA-1 Milano variant have a reduced incidence of CV disease. Regression of atherosclerotic plaque burden was previously observed on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with ETC-216, a predecessor of MDCO-216. MDCO-216, a complex of dimeric ApoA-1 Milano and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, is being developed to reduce atherosclerotic plaque burden and CV events. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a single infusion of MDCO-216 in healthy volunteers and in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results Twenty-four healthy volunteers and 24 patients with documented CAD received a 2-h infusion of MDCO-216 in a randomized, placebo controlled, single ascending dose study. Five cohorts of healthy volunteers and four cohorts of CAD patients received ApoA-1 Milano doses ranging from 5 to 40 mg/kg. Subjects were followed for 30 days. Dose-dependent increases in ApoA-1, phospholipid, and pre-beta 1 HDL and decreases in ApoE were observed. Prominent and sustained increases in triglyceride, and decreases in HDL-C, endogenous ApoA-1 and ApoA-II occurred at doses >20 mg/kg and profound increases in ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux were observed. Other lipid and lipoprotein parameters were generally unchanged. MDCO-216 was well tolerated. Conclusions MDCO-216-modulated lipid parameters profoundly increased ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux and was well tolerated. These single-dose data support further development of this agent for reducing atherosclerotic disease and subsequent CV events. [10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv042][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv042

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia who are receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, 135 postmenopausal women who had been taking a stable HRT regimen for at least 3 months were randomized to receive rosuvastatin 5 mg, 10 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Fasting levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) were assessed at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 12; apolipoprotein (Apo) B and Apo A-I were measured at weeks 0 and 12.Rosuvastatin 5 mg and 10 mg significantly reduced LDL-C by 38% (SE = 2.1) and 49% (SE = 2.1), respectively, compared with placebo (1% [SE = 2.1]; p0.001). TC, TG, Apo B, and all lipid ratios examined (LDL-C/HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C, and Apo B/Apo A-I) were also reduced significantly by both rosuvastatin doses (p0.001). HDL-C levels increased significantly in the rosuvastatin groups (11% and 8% for 5 mg and 10 mg, respectively, vs. -0.5% for placebo; p0.001), as did Apo A-I levels (p0.05). The combination of rosuvastatin plus HRT was well tolerated with no apparent differences among treatments in the numbers or types of adverse events reported.Rosuvastatin 5 mg or 10 mg once daily is a well-tolerated and highly efficacious lipid-lowering therapy in postmenopausal women receiving HRT.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes associated with combined hyperlipidaemia. A total of 216 patients with total cholesterol/=200 mg/dl (/=5.17 mmol/l) and triglycerides/=200 and800 mg/dl (/=2.26 and9.03 mmol/l) were randomised to one of two placebo groups, rosuvastatin 5 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks (fixed-dose phase). During the subsequent 18-week dose-titration phase, one placebo group received titrated rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg (placebo/rosuvastatin); one placebo group received titrated fenofibrate 67 mg once, twice and three times daily (placebo/fenofibrate); and patients receiving 5 or 10 mg rosuvastatin received titrated fenofibrate as above (rosuvastatin 5mg/fenofibrate and rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate groups). Doses were increased at 6-week intervals if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remained50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l). At 24 weeks, the placebo/rosuvastatin group and placebo per fenofibrate group had triglyceride reductions of 30.3% versus 33.6%, respectively (P = NS), and LDL cholesterol was reduced by 46.7% in the rosuvastatin group and increased by 0.7% in the fenofibrate group (P0.001). The triglyceride reduction in the rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate group (47.1%) was significantly greater than in the placebo/rosuvastatin group (P = 0.001), with no significant differences in other lipid measures found between these two groups. No significant differences in effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were observed among treatment groups. In the fixed-dose phase, rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced triglycerides by 24.5 and 29.5%, respectively, and decreased LDL cholesterol by 40.7 and 45.8%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. These results indicated that rosuvastatin produces marked reductions in triglycerides and LDL cholesterol when used alone or in combination with fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels and may constitute a valuable treatment option in the diabetic population.

In a previous study, a single injection of inclisiran, a chemically synthesized small interfering RNA designed to target PCSK9 messenger RNA, was found to produce sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels over the course of 84 days in healthy volunteers.We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose trial of inclisiran administered as a subcutaneous injection in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of placebo or 200, 300, or 500 mg of inclisiran or two doses (at days 1 and 90) of placebo or 100, 200, or 300 mg of inclisiran. The primary end point was the change from baseline in LDL cholesterol level at 180 days. Safety data were available through day 210, and data on LDL cholesterol and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels were available through day 240.A total of 501 patients underwent randomization. Patients who received inclisiran had dose-dependent reductions in PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels. At day 180, the least-squares mean reductions in LDL cholesterol levels were 27.9 to 41.9% after a single dose of inclisiran and 35.5 to 52.6% after two doses (P0.001 for all comparisons vs. placebo). The two-dose 300-mg inclisiran regimen produced the greatest reduction in LDL cholesterol levels: 48% of the patients who received the regimen had an LDL cholesterol level below 50 mg per deciliter (1.3 mmol per liter) at day 180. At day 240, PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels remained significantly lower than at baseline in association with all inclisiran regimens. Serious adverse events occurred in 11% of the patients who received inclisiran and in 8% of the patients who received placebo. Injection-site reactions occurred in 5% of the patients who received injections of inclisiran.In our trial, inclisiran was found to lower PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels among patients at high cardiovascular risk who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels. (Funded by the Medicines Company; ORION-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02597127 .).

Purpose Inflammation and neovascularization in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques are key features for severe clinical events. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and FDG PET are two noninvasive imaging techniques capable of quantifying plaque neovascularization and inflammatory infiltrate, respectively. However, their mutual role in defining plaque vulnerability and their possible overlap has not been thoroughly investigated. We studied the relationship between DCE-MRI and F-18-FDG PET data from the carotid arteries of 40 subjects with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalent, as a substudy of the dal-PLAQUE trial (NCT00655473). Methods The dal-PLAQUE trial was a multicenter study that evaluated dalcetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein modulator. Subjects underwent anatomical MRI, DCE-MRI and F-18-FDG PET. Only baseline imaging and biomarker data (before randomization) from dal-PLAQUE were used as part of this substudy. Our primary goal was to evaluate the relationship between DCE-MRI and F-18-FDG PET data. As secondary endpoints, we evaluated the relationship between (a) PET data and whole-vessel anatomical MRI data, and (b) DCE-MRI and matching anatomical MRI data. All correlations were estimated using a mixed linear model. Results We found a significant inverse relationship between several perfusion indices by DCE-MRI and F-18-FDG uptake by PET. Regarding our secondary endpoints, there was a significant relationship between plaque burden measured by anatomical MRI with several perfusion indices by DCE-MRI and F-18-FDG uptake by PET. No relationship was found between plaque composition by anatomical MRI and DCE-MRI or F-18-FDG PET metrics. Conclusion In this study we observed a significant, weak inverse relationship between inflammation measured as F-18-FDG uptake by PET and plaque perfusion by DCE-MRI. Our findings suggest that there may be a complex relationship between plaque inflammation and microvascularization during the different stages of plaque development. F-18-FDG PET and DCE-MRI may have complementary roles in future clinical practice in identifying subjects at high risk of cardiovascular events.

Item does not contain fulltext AIMS: Mixed dyslipidaemia, characterized by low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and high levels of triglycerides, is common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or metabolic syndrome. Dalcetrapib effectively increases HDL-C levels by modulating cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the lipid modifying efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib in patients with T2DM and/or metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of dalcetrapib therapy in five placebo-controlled, Phase II trials (4-48 weeks of duration) involving T2DM and/or metabolic syndrome, in dyslipidaemic patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalent. RESULTS: Both in patients with and without T2DM and/or metabolic syndrome, dalcetrapib decreased CETP activity by 26-58% and increased HDL-C levels by 23-34%, depending on dose and duration of treatment. Dalcetrapib did not significantly affect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or apolipoprotein B levels. Treatment with dalcetrapib was generally well tolerated with a similar number of adverse events reported between patient groups and between those receiving dalcetrapib compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Dalcetrapib similarly decreased CETP activity and increased HDL-C levels in patients with and without T2DM or metabolic syndrome; the ongoing Phase III dal-OUTCOMES study will help to determine if dalcetrapib's improvement in lipid levels also reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. 01 januari 2012

Background Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is involved in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) remodeling and transfer of lipids between HDL particles and other lipoproteins. Epidemiologic studies show that both elevated HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and reduced CETP activity attenuate cardiovascular risk, making inhibition or modulation of CETP a potential therapeutic target. This study analyzed the effect of dalcetrapib on lipoprotein profile, CETP activity, and cellular cholesterol efflux when co-administered with pravastatin in patients with low or average HDL-C. Methods Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive placebo or dalcetrapib 300, 600, or 900 mg once daily for 12 weeks. All patients were concomitantly treated to their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target with pravastatin. Lipoprotein profile was analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Composition of the HDL fraction was assessed after polyethylene glycol precipitation. Contribution of this fraction to cholesterol efflux was assessed using radiolabeled donor cells. Results Co-administration of dalcetrapib with pravastatin increased HDL-C, apolipoproteins (apo) A-I and A-II, and CETP mass, and decreased CETP activity. A relative increase in large HDL and low-density lipoprotein subparticle fractions was observed. High-density lipoprotein composition showed increased association of esterified cholesterol, free cholesterol, phospholipids, apo A-I, and apo E. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate–binding cassette A1- and scavenger receptor type BI–mediated cholesterol efflux increased. Conclusions Dalcetrapib up to 600 mg, combined with pravastatin, increased HDL-C and altered lipoprotein profile, HDL composition, and HDL function, with little further change at a 900-mg dose. The impact on cardiovascular events in dyslipidemic patients is being evaluated.

Subjects with high HDL-C show elevated plasma markers of cholesterol absorption and reduced markers of cholesterol synthesis. We evaluated the effect of dalcetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein modulator, on markers of cholesterol homeostasis in healthy subjects.Dalcetrapib was administered daily with or without ezetimibe in a randomized, open-label, crossover study in 22 healthy subjects over three 7-day periods: dalcetrapib 900 mg, ezetimibe 10mg, dalcetrapib 900 mg plus ezetimibe 10mg. Plasma non-cholesterol sterols lathosterol and desmosterol (cholesterol synthesis markers) and campesterol, β-sitosterol and cholestanol (intestinal cholesterol absorption markers) were measured. A hamster model was used to compare the effect of dalcetrapib and torcetrapib with or without ezetimibe on these markers and determine the effect of dalcetrapib on cholesterol absorption.Dalcetrapib increased campesterol, β-sitosterol, and cholestanol by 27% (p = 0.001), 32% (p0.001), and 12% (p = 0.03), respectively, in man (non-cholesterol sterol/cholesterol ratio). Dalcetrapib+ezetimibe reduced campesterol by 11% (p = 0.02); β-sitosterol and cholestanol were unaffected. Lathosterol and desmosterol were unchanged with dalcetrapib, but both increased with ezetimibe alone (56-148%, p0.001) and with dalcetrapib + ezetimibe (32-38%, p0.001). In hamsters, dalcetrapib and torcetrapib increased HDL-C by 49% (p = 0.04) and 72% (p = 0.003), respectively. Unlike torcetrapib, dalcetrapib altered cholesterol homeostasis towards increased markers of cholesterol absorption; cholesterol synthesis markers were unaffected by either treatment. Dalcetrapib did not change plasma (3)H-cholesterol level but increased (3)H-cholesterol in plasma HDL vs non-HDL, after oral dosing of labeled cholesterol.Dalcetrapib specifically increased markers of cholesterol absorption, most likely reflecting nascent HDL lipidation by intestinal ABCA1, without affecting markers of synthesis.

Dalcetrapib increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels through effects on cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). As part of the dalcetrapib dal-HEART clinical trial programme, the efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib is assessed in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients in the dal-VESSEL study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00655538), the design and methods of which are presented here. RESEARCH DESIGN AND STUDY METHOD: Men and women with CHD or CHD risk equivalent, with HDL-C levels50 mg/dL were recruited for a 36-week, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. After a pre-randomisation phase of up to 8 weeks, patients received dalcetrapib 600 mg/day or placebo in addition to their existing treatments. Brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) measured by B-mode ultrasound represents endothelial function and is a validated marker for early atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease risk.The primary efficacy outcome is change from baseline in brachial FMD after 12 weeks. The primary safety endpoint is 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) assessed at week 4. Secondary endpoints include brachial FMD at 36 weeks, ABPM at 12 and 36 weeks, lipid profile, CETP mass and activity, and markers of inflammation, oxidation, and cardiovascular risk. Clinical endpoints are assessed as a composite endpoint for the dal-HEART Program.In 19 European clinical centres, 476 subjects met inclusion criteria and have entered the study. In conclusion, the dal-VESSEL study is the largest multicentre trial with brachial FMD ever performed. The study assesses efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib on endothelial function, blood pressure, lipids, and clinical outcomes in CHD patients with below average HDL-C and will therefore provide vital information regarding its potential role in the preventative treatment of CHD risk.

Summary Background Dalcetrapib modulates cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity to raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). After the failure of torcetrapib it was unknown if HDL produced by interaction with CETP had pro-atherogenic or pro-inflammatory properties. dal-PLAQUE is the first multicentre study using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging to assess structural and inflammatory indices of atherosclerosis as primary endpoints. Methods In this phase 2b, double-blind, multicentre trial, patients (aged 18–75 years) with, or with high risk of, coronary heart disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to dalcetrapib 600 mg/day or placebo for 24 months. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation code and was stratified by centre. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. Coprimary endpoints were MRI-assessed indices (total vessel area, wall area, wall thickness, and normalised wall index [average carotid]) after 24 months and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT assessment of arterial inflammation within an index vessel (right carotid, left carotid, or ascending thoracic aorta) after 6 months, with no-harm boundaries established before unblinding of the trial. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00655473. Findings 189 patients were screened and 130 randomly assigned to placebo (66 patients) or dalcetrapib (64 patients). For the coprimary MRI and PET/CT endpoints, CIs were below the no-harm boundary or the adverse change was numerically lower in the dalcetrapib group than in the placebo group. MRI-derived change in total vessel area was reduced in patients given dalcetrapib compared with those given placebo after 24 months; absolute change from baseline relative to placebo was −4·01 mm 2 (90% CI −7·23 to −0·80; nominal p=0·04). The PET/CT measure of index vessel most-diseased-segment target-to-background ratio (TBR) was not different between groups, but carotid artery analysis showed a 7% reduction in most-diseased-segment TBR in the dalcetrapib group compared with the placebo group (–7·3 [90% CI −13·5 to −0·8]; nominal p=0·07). Dalcetrapib did not increase office blood pressure and the frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. Interpretation Dalcetrapib showed no evidence of a pathological effect related to the arterial wall over 24 months. Moreover, this trial suggests possible beneficial vascular effects of dalcetrapib, including the reduction in total vessel enlargement over 24 months, but long-term safety and clinical outcomes efficacy of dalcetrapib need to be analysed. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Aim: The metabolic syndrome (MS) increases the risk of coronary heart disease, yet few data are available on the effects of statin treatment in improving lipid measures in patients with the syndrome. This analysis compares the effects of statin therapy on plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement and lipid levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without the MS. Methods: The Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin TherapY I (MERCURY I) trial compared rosuvastatin 10 mg with atorvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg and pravastatin 40 mg over 8 weeks in patients with coronary or other atherosclerotic diseases or diabetes who had fasting levels of LDL-C of ≥2.99 mmol/l and triglycerides of