1. Evaluating the Effect of the Injectable PRF in comparison with the hyaluronic acid as an Intra-articular Medication Following Arthrocentesis in the Treatment of Internal Derangement
- Author
-
Mosaad Khalifah
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Group ii ,Arthrocentesis ,Surgery ,Derangement ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Intra articular ,chemistry ,Treatment modality ,Hyaluronic acid ,medicine ,business - Abstract
Background: Internal derangement (ID) is the most common cause for TMDs. Various invasive, minimally invasive, andnon-invasive treatment modalities have been attempted. Arthrocentesis as a minimally invasive maneuver either if followedwith various intra-articular medications or not has been attempted to treat ID. Hyaluronic acid (HA) has been used as an intraarticularmedication due to its lubricant effect that improves joint movement and mechanically reduces friction pain. However,the i-PRF had both anti-inflammatory action to reduce the level of the cytokines; aided by the regenerative capacity to the tornand degenerated tissues of the joint including the synovial tissue.Purpose: The current study aimed at comparing both factors.Materials and Methods: Forty TMJs from thirty patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group I, arthrocentesiswas followed by intra-articular injection of AH; however, in group II, arthrocentesis was followed i-PRF injection.Results: In general, group II patients recorded better results with respect to clicking, pain, and movement limitation. Superiorresults of i-PRF might be the result of the regenerative capability that not only reduced the existing inflammatory mediators;but also replaced the degenerated cytokines-releasing tissues by healthy synovial fluid-releasing tissues provides endogenoussustained source of HA.Conclusion: Although both treatments are acceptable, i-PRF was a rather recommended treatment.
- Published
- 2022