In the present issue of Investigative and Clinical Urology, Janssen and Waldinger [1] publish an important mathematical contribution on the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) distributions of men in the general adult population compared to the IELT distribution of men with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE). Data used to study these distributions were derived from earlier studies on Caucasian males in Europe and North America. Although both populations (normal and lifelong PE) are small due to the experimental design with stopwatch methodology, the authors have convincing and valid arguments that both populations have distinct mathematical IELT distributions. This leads to interesting consequences, hypotheses and research possibilities. Lifelong PE has convincingly been shown to be a very stable putative endophenotype within the range of all IELT's measured all over the world in different populations and cultures [2]. This stability strongly suggests that this endophenotype is caused by underlying biological mechanisms, presumably anchored in the central nervous system. The mathematical different distribution models of the IELT in the general population and lifelong PE males furthermore strongly supports biological differences underlying these IELT distributions and argues against psychological or behavioral interventions aimed at elongation of the IELTs in PE males. Whether such biological and fundamental different processes in the IELT of lifelong PE can be considered as 'pathological' remains a tricky question. As long as men present their PE as an unwished phenomenon from which they and their partner suffer and look for help, PE can be considered as pathological and deserves treatment if possible. Further studies into the underlying mechanisms of life long PE is urgently needed as the only efficient treatment of PE so far are the SSRI. Apart from their side effects, SSRIs have to be taken daily and life long, i.e., as long as a wish for a 'normal' sex life exists. Ideally, an 'on demand' treatment should be used, but the existing SSRI's, including dapoxetine as an approved 'on-demand' prescription drug for PE, hardly fulfill such claims [3]. Much more fundamental insight into the brain and spinal cord mechanisms involved in sexual behavior and ejaculatory processes are needed to possibly develop new pharmacological approaches to better treatment of lifelong PE. Several strategies have to be developed and applied, in particular genetic, genomic and epigenetic approaches and techniques have to be implemented. The biological hardware differences in IELT between the normal and abnormal (lifelong PE) populations and the high familiar occurrence of PE [4] suggest that genetic technology (e.g., GWAS and expression studies) might help to identify factors (e.g., functional SNPs) that are involved. Moreover, central nervous system (CNS) functional magnetic resonance imaging studies (including spinal cord imaging) comparing normal IELT with lifelong PE men, where males are challenged with various sexual stimuli (visual, tactile) might unravel or differentiate activity (or lack of) in brain/spinal cord areas that generate new ideas and hypotheses on brain mechanisms involved. Similarly, comparison of SSRI-treated (by preference chronically treated) males with normal IELT and lifelong PE males using brain/spinal cord imaging might further contribute to understanding of the mechanisms and brain localizations of the SSRI-induced changes in focal areas. Fundamental results from such brain studies in untreated and SSRI-treated populations might also generate hypotheses that can be used in a translational way in animal models of sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions. The serotonergic (5-HT) system seems an extremely important neurotransmitter system in the modulation of sexual behavior including ejaculatory processes [5]. Most research into this topic derives from animal studies, but the translational prediction of rat models of ejaculatory speed for human ejaculation latencies (IELT) appears rather high [6]. In general, increased 5-HT levels in the CNS elevate ejaculatory thresholds probably via activation of 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C receptors, whereas 5-HT depletion decreases the ejaculatory threshold. 5-HT1A receptor activation strongly facilitates ejaculatory processes, either mediated by lowering 5-HT levels via activation of presynaptic (somatodendritic) 5-HT1A autoreceptors and/or stimulation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A heteroreceptors. We found that concurrent treatment of SSRIs and a silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, strongly facilitated the inhibiting effects of SSRIs on male ejaculation [6], both after acute and chronic dosing. This suggests a new approach to an 'on-demand' treatment of PE; acute SSRI administration (e.g., paroxetine or escitalopram) plus a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (e.g., pindolol, a relative weak 5-HT1A receptor antagonist and a β-adrenoceptor antagonist-with the intrinsic risk of cardiovascular side effects). Safarinejad [7] used a high dose of pindolol (7.5 mg/d) for 6 weeks to men with PE who were refractory to paroxetine (20 mg/d) treatment for at least 2 months. Pindolol had a slight facilitating effect on PE in these paroxetinetreated men over the 6 weeks treatment. Although in this case pindolol appears a mild augmentation strategy in paroxetine-refractory patients, the data suggest that pindolol exerts its effects via blockade of 5-HT1A receptors interfering with the SSRI-induced enhancement of overall 5-HT neurotransmission. Further support for an important role of the 5-HT1A receptor in the inhibitory action of SSRIs on sexual behavior and ejaculation, in depression treatment considered as unwanted side effect, comes from findings with vilazodone in sexual behavior. Vilazodone exerts blockade of the serotonin transporter (SERT) concomitant with 5-HT1A receptor agonistic activity. In a rat model of measuring sexual side effects, vilazodone has no inhibitory effects on male sexual behaviors after acute or chronic treatment, whereas paroxetine or citalopram, SSRI, had strong inhibitory effects [8]. This suggests that vilazodone is probably not very (or not at all) effective in lifelong PE, but a potential attractive antidepressant/anxiolytic with no or less sexual side effects. The serotonergic system in the brain is a complex, extremely ramified system emerging in the raphe nuclei in the midbrain and projecting to practically all areas of the brain and spinal cord [3]. The 5-HT complex (in)directly interacts with all neurotransmitter systems in the CNS via 14 different postsynaptic (hetero) receptors and presynaptic autoreceptors; the serotonin transporter (SERT or 5-HTT) is the main regulatory mechanism in the modulation of the serotonergic tone via uptake of released 5-HT, thereby terminating 5-HT-ergic stimulation [3]. The SERT is the target of SSRI's that are known to delay ejaculation. Having a high affinity for 5-HT, the SERT controls the duration, availability and signaling capacity of synaptic 5-HT and therefore might determine the speed of ejaculation. If SERT activity is high, serotonergic neurotransmission is low(er) and this seems associated with a short IELT (5-HT functions as a brake on ejaculation). The 5-HTT functioning is moderated by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT promoter region of the SERT gene (SCL6A4) which encodes for the SERT protein (5-HT transporter-linked promoter region: 5-HTTLPR). The latter has a short (S) and a long (L) variant allele associated with low (S) and high (L) transcriptional activity. Thus, SS genotypes have much lower SERT activity than LL genotypes (SL are intermediate) and it has been postulated that men with SS genotype have longer IELT durations than men with LL genotypes. This was confirmed in a population of men with life long PE [9]. This is indeed a remarkable finding because in a population with already extremely short ejaculation latencies, a functional polymorphism (LL) was associated with a reduction of IELT of 50%. Data in the normal population are lacking, but a comparable pattern might be expected. An important remark, however, is that the promoter length polymorphism in the SERT gene cannot be the genetic base for lifelong PE but only a modulatory factor [9]. Moreover, the ejaculatory process itself is not critically dependent on the serotonergic system; it seems logical to postulate that many other neurotransmitter systems in the CNS contribute to the complex ejaculatory process although much research is needed to unravel the complex processes involved [3]. In conclusion: the finding by Janssen and Waldinger [1] that the ejaculatory process in lifelong PE essentially differs from that in normal ejaculating males, strongly indicates that PE can be considered as a dysfunction of the ejaculatory process. Future studies have to support this finding and might lead to new ideas about PE and possibly new treatments.