4 results on '"Jan Frederic Weller"'
Search Results
2. Anchor Site Fracture Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair – A Case Report and Review of the Literature
- Author
-
Björn Birkner, Kristian Nikolaus Schneider, Holger Durchholz, and Jan Frederic Weller
- Subjects
Rotator cuff ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,anchor ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Arthroscopy ,osteochondral defect ,Case Report ,complication ,Speed Bridge ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Head fracture ,fracture ,Medicine ,Internal fixation ,business ,Surgical treatment ,Complication ,Reduction (orthopedic surgery) ,arthroscopy - Abstract
Introduction: Fractures at the anchor site following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are rare and only a few case reports have been described. We report two additional well-documented cases of this uncommon post-operative complication and provide a review of the current literature. Case Report: A 48-year-old male underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) due to a massive rotator cuff tear. Nine weeks postoperatively, the patient suffered a humeral head fracture at the anchor site of the ARCR after trauma. Despite subsequent surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation, the patient demonstrates with excellent functional outcome scores at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Humeral head fractures are a rare complication after ARCR. The use of intraosseous anchors requires careful consideration regarding positioning and quantity used. Keywords: Rotator cuff, arthroscopy, complication, anchor, Speed Bridge, fracture, osteochondral defect.
- Published
- 2021
3. Recurrence of Hepatic Encephalopathy after TIPS: Effective Prophylaxis with Combination of Lactulose and Rifaximin
- Author
-
Martin Schoster, Jan Frederic Weller, Leon Louis Seifert, Hauke Heinzow, Max Masthoff, Miriam Maschmeier, Moritz Wildgruber, Michael Köhler, Hartmut Schmidt, Philipp Schindler, and Christian Wilms
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,hepatic encephalopathy ,Medizin ,Tertiary care ,Gastroenterology ,Article ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Lactulose ,Internal medicine ,transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt ,medicine ,In patient ,complications of liver cirrhosis ,Hepatic encephalopathy ,business.industry ,portal hypertension ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Rifaximin ,chemistry ,Medicine ,Portal hypertension ,Complication ,business ,Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt ,medicine.drug ,decompensated liver cirrhosis - Abstract
Background: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation is an established procedure to treat portal hypertension with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) as a common complication. There is lack of evidence concerning HE prophylaxis after TIPS. Methods: N = 233 patients receiving TIPS between 2011 and 2018 at a German tertiary care center were included. Of them, 21% (n = 49) had a history of HE. The follow-up period was 12 months. The risk factors of post-TIPS HE were analyzed via multivariate analysis. The efficacy of prophylactic medication regimens was studied. The results show that 35.6% (n = 83) received no medication (NM), 36.5% (n = 85) received lactulose monoprophylaxis (LM), 2.6% (n = 6) rifaximin monoprophylaxis (RM) and 25.3% (n = 59) lactulose and rifaximin (LR) of which 64.4% received l-ornithin-l-aspartate (LOLA) additionally (LR + LOLA) and 36.6% did not (LRonly). Results: Multivariate analysis revealed higher age (p = 0.003) and HE episodes prior to TIPS (p = 0.004) as risk factors for HE after TIPS. LM has no prophylactic effect. LR prevents HE recurrence at 1, 3 and 12 months after TIPS (p = 0.003, p = 0.003, p = 0.006) but does not prevent HE in patients with no history of HE (p = 0.234, p = 0.483, p = 0.121). LR prevents HE recurrence compared with LM/NM (25.0% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.007) within 12 months after TIPS, whereas de novo occurrence is unaffected (p = 0.098). The additional administration of LOLA to LR has no benefit (LRonly: 25.0%, LR + LOLA: 29.7%, p = 0.780). Conclusions: Higher age and previous HE are risk factors post-TIPS HE. In patients with HE prior to TIPS, effective prophylaxis of HE is feasible via combination of lactulose and rifaximin with no additional benefit from LOLA.
- Published
- 2021
4. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged ≥70 Years: Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Risk Factors Based on the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST)
- Author
-
Christof Scheid, Jan Frederic Weller, Katharina Fleischhauer, Jürgen Finke, Maximilian Christopeit, Nicolaus Kröger, Ahmet H. Elmaagacli, Martin Bornhäuser, Wolfgang Bethge, Sandra Frank, Hermann Einsele, Peter Dreger, Dietrich W. Beelen, Johanna Tischer, Christoph Faul, Gerald Wulf, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Johannes Schetelig, Louisa Kaufmann, Matthias Stelljes, Uwe Platzbecker, Claudia Lengerke, and Helga Neidlinger
- Subjects
Oncology ,0303 health sciences ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Immunology ,Cell Biology ,Hematology ,Biochemistry ,language.human_language ,3. Good health ,German ,Transplantation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,language ,In patient ,Stem cell ,business ,030304 developmental biology ,030215 immunology - Abstract
Introduction. Malignant diseases treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) predominantly occur beyond the 7 th decade of life. Numerical age per se is not regarded an adverse risk factor in alloHSCT. In an aging society, interventions historically deemed high risk are increasingly used in elder patients. Methods. Epidemiology, outcomes and risk factors of patients aged ≥70 years undergoing alloHSCT in Germany 1999-2019 and registered with the DRST/EBMT database were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline patient, disease, and transplant data were collected from MED-A forms. Centers were contacted to provide additional treatment and follow-up information. Results. Between 1999 and 2019, 1648 patients aged ≥70 years (median 72, range 70-79.7; 585 female) were transplanted in 50 German centers. More than 90% of all patients were transplanted 2010-2019. Centers transplanted between 2 and 192 patients, with 14 centers contributing 100 patients each. Most patients suffered acute leukemia (1084, 65.8%) or MDS/MPN (410, 24.9%). Karnofsky index before start of conditioning was 100% (n=230, 14%), 90% (n=651, 39.5%), 80% (n=480, 29.1%), 70% (n=94, 5.7%), Conclusion. AlloHSCT is increasingly used to treat elder patients in Germany with a sharp increase during the last decade. Age per se is a modest adverse risk factor for adult patients after alloHSCT with slightly increased mortality in patients 70-80 versus those at 60-69. Further research might concentrate on patient selection and further reduction of procedural toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dreger: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Wulf: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Clinigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scheid: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bethge: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.