Search

Purpose: To establish recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in phase I and evaluate safety and efficacy of abivertinib in patients with EGFR Thr790Met point mutation (T790M)-positive(+) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with disease progression from prior EGFR inhibitors in phase II. Patients and Methods: This multicenter, open-label study included 367 adult Chinese patients. Abivertinib at doses of 50 mg twice a day to 350 mg twice a day was evaluated in phase I in continual 28-day cycles, and the RP2D of 300 mg twice a day was used in phase II in continual 21-day cycles. Primary endpoints include RP2D in phase I and objective response rate (ORR) at RP2D in phase II. Results: The RP2D of 300 mg twice a day for abivertinib was established based on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profiles across doses in phase I. In phase II, 227 patients received RP2D for a median treatment duration of 24.6 weeks (0.43–129). Among 209 response–evaluable patients, confirmed ORR was 52.2% [109/209; 95% confidence interval (CI): 45.2–59.1]. Disease control rate (DCR) was 88.0% (184/209; 95% CI: 82.9–92.1). The median duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months (95% CI: 6.1–9.2) and 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.0–8.8), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.9 months [95% CI: 22.4–not reachable (NR)]. All (227/227) patients reported at least 1 adverse event (AE), with 96.9% (220/227) of treatment-related AEs. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 13.7% (31/227) of patients. Death was reported in 4.4% (10/227) of patients, and none was deemed as treatment-related. Conclusions: Abivertinib of 300 mg twice a day demonstrated favorable clinical efficacy with manageable side effects in patients with EGFR T790M+ NSCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond well to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK-rearranged NSCLC accounts for the majority of those patients. However, few studies have evaluated ALK-TKIs treatment for patients with huntingtin-interacting protein 1 (HIP1)-ALK fusions. This retrospective study evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics, genomic features, response to ALK-TKIs, and resistance mechanisms in 11 cases with HIP1-ALK fusions from five Chinese centers. Patients who received crizotinib at the Chinese centers had an objective response rate of 90% [9/10 cases, 95% confident index (CI): 54.1%-99.5%], median progression-free survival of 17.9 months (95% CI: 5.8-NA months), and median overall survival of 58.8 months (95% CI: 24.7-NA months). One patient who received first-line lorlatinib treatment achieved partial response for > 26.5 months. Despite the small sample size, HIP1-ALK (H21:A20) variant was the most common variant (four of 11 cases, 36.4%) and associated with better outcomes. Among the 11 cases, there were eight patients having available specimens for genetic testing before ALK-TKIs treatment and four patients undergoing biopsy after ALK-TKIs failure. The most common coexisting gene was TP53 among 11 patients and two of four patients after crizotinib failure harbored acquired ALK mutations (e.g., L1152V/Q1146K and L1196M). Brigatinib treatment appeared to be effective for a patient who failed crizotinib treatment because of the L1152V/Q1146K mutations, which might be related to increased binding affinity to these mutants. Although HIP1-ALK-rearranged NSCLC appears to initially respond well to ALK-TKIs, crizotinib resistance may be correlated with the AKAP9-BRAF fusion, ALK compound mutations (L1152V/Q1146K), and the ALK L1196M mutation. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the significance of HIP1-ALK-rearranged NSCLC.

BackgroundMETamplification plays an important role in the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) either de novo or in resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) settings. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard method forMETamplification. With more and more discoveries of oncogenic driver genes, next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays a significant role in precision oncology. Meanwhile, the role of NGS inMETamplification remains uncertain.MethodsForty patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were included. FISH and NGS were conducted prior to MET inhibitors treatment.METamplification by FISH was defined as a MET/CEP7 ratio of > 2.0 and/or copy number (CN) > 5.METamplification by NGS was defined as gene copy number (GCN) ≥ 5.ResultsThe concordance rate among FISH and NGS was 62.5% (25/40).METamplification identified by FISH showed the optimal predictive value. The partial response (PR) rate was 68.0% (17/25 withMETamplification) vs. 6.7% (1/15 withoutMETamplification); the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months versus 1.0 months (P METamplification identified by NGS failed to distinguish significant clinical outcomes. The PR rate was 60.0% (6/10, withMETGCN ≥ 5) vs. 40.0% (12/30, withMETGCN ConclusionsMETamplification identified by FISH remains the optimal biomarker to identify suitable candidates for MET-TKI therapy. In comparison, amplification identified by NGS seems not as robust to be effective predictive biomarker. Further exploration is needed regarding the focal amplification by NGS in predicting the efficacy.

Background Currently, there is no standard context that conforms to the Chinese national framework for evaluating medical decisions regarding the treatment of lung cancer. Methods This draft was formulated after a systematic review and a focus group discussion among 20 experts, who were senior physicians with extensive clinical experience from the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG) task force. Subsequently, a draft and a five-point Likert scale were sent to 300 CTONG working group members. These were modified according to feedback from a four-round modified Delphi approach. Hence, the first version of the 'Therapeutic option of lung cancer: CTONG scoring system' was formulated. Afterward, a corresponding questionnaire was designed to collect opinions on the weight allocation of various indicators. This was issued through the WeChat platform, "Oncology News" application and e-mails from October 23, 2020, to November 25, 2020. Participants from numerous occupations in cancer-related fields from various regions of China were included in the study. Overall and subgroup analyses regarding weight allocations were performed. The differences between participant-allocated and reference weights were considered to adjust the framework. Results The framework contained four aspects and six indicators, including efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) and subsequent treatment], safety [treatment-related severe adverse event (SAE), dose adjustment], quality of life (Qol), and compensation. The reference weights were 50%, 5%, 10%, 5%, 10%, and 20% for each indicator. By November 25, 2020, 1,043 valid questionnaires had been obtained. The majority of the questionnaires were completed by physicians (86.5%). Subgroup analysis among the various groups showed an overall consistent trend. Besides, significant differences between the participant-allocated and reference weights were found among PFS/OS (difference: -11.5%), compensation (difference: -10.1%), and subsequent treatment (difference: 9.7%) indicators. After discussion, the final weight allocations were set at 45%, 10%, 15%, 5%, 10%, and 15% for PFS/OS, subsequent treatment, treatment-related SAE, dose adjustment, Qol, and compensation, respectively. Conclusions The CTONG scoring system, as an objective evaluation model that involves multiple parameters, is a breakthrough method for evaluating the therapeutic value of lung cancer treatment options in China, which is worthy of further verification in future clinical practice.

Objective Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) occur in up to 5% of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and often develop after previous systemic treatments. In this article, we explored whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhanced the dismal survival of patients with LM. Materials and methods Data on NSCLC patients with LM prescribed ICIs were collected at the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute. Furthermore, relevant literature was reviewed. Results A total of 255 NSCLC patients diagnosed with LM were screened from January 2015 to March 2020 at our institute. Cases reported by literature were also included. Finally, 32 NSCLC patients received ICIs after LM diagnosis; their median age was 55 years. Druggable genes were detected in 37.5% of all patients. The ICI regimens included nivolumab (n = 21), pembrolizumab (n = 9), and atezolizumab (n = 2). Ultimately, 62.5% of patients evidenced neurological symptom controlled. Two patients exhibited both intracranial and extracranial complete tumour response; one patient showed both intracranial and extracranial partial response (PR), one patient indicated intracranial PR and a systemic PR, and one patient showed central nervous system PR without extracranial response reported. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the single-agent subgroup was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–2.9 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 4.0 months (95% CI: 0.1–13.3 months). In the combined subgroup, the median PFS and OS were 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.1–4.9 months) and 5.4 months (95% CI: 0.5–10.3 months), respectively. Three patients exhibited remarkable PFS of over 20 months: all patients had ICI single agent, received cranial radiotherapy before ICI prescription, and took ICIs as second-line therapy, and two patients were EGFR/ALK wild type. Multivariate analysis showed that a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) score was associated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.04). No difference in survival was seen between monotherapy and combination therapy groups. Conclusion NSCLC patients with LM may benefit from ICIs of both monotherapy and combination with other therapies, especially those with good ECOG-PS scores. Further work in this regard is required.

Objective: To investigate the application of virtual reality training in vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: Three certified robotic urologists who underwent virtual reality training were enrolled in the study group. The other three without training were enrolled in the control group. Parameters were recorded before and after the training. Then a total of 18 patients undergoing RARP were enrolled and randomized assigned to receive anastomosis procedures with certified urologists who either obtained or did not obtain training. The quality of the anastomosis was evaluated. Results: For the virtual training evaluation, the overall score was significantly improved from 65.0±10.8 to 92.7±3.5 (p=0.014); the time of anastomosis was shortened; the economy of motion improved; instrument collisions decreased after training (p

PURPOSE ADJUVANT-CTONG1104 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01405079 ), a randomized phase III trial, showed that adjuvant gefitinib treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VP) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) results. METHODS From September 2011 to April 2014, 222 patients from 27 sites were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant gefitinib (n = 111) or VP (n = 111). Patients with resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) NSCLC and EGFR-activating mutation were enrolled, receiving gefitinib for 24 months or VP every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was DFS (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Secondary end points included OS, 3-, 5-year (y) DFS rates, and 5-year OS rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted for subsequent therapy data. RESULTS Median follow-up was 80.0 months. Median OS (ITT) was 75.5 and 62.8 months with gefitinib and VP, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.36; P = .674); respective 5-year OS rates were 53.2% and 51.2% ( P = .784). Subsequent therapy was administered upon progression in 68.4% and 73.6% of patients receiving gefitinib and VP, respectively. Subsequent targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.38) compared with no subsequent therapy. Updated 3y DFS rates were 39.6% and 32. 5% with gefitinib and VP ( P = .316) and 5y DFS rates were 22. 6% and 23.2% ( P = .928), respectively. CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy with gefitinib in patients with early-stage NSCLC and EGFR mutation demonstrated improved DFS over standard of care chemotherapy. Although this DFS advantage did not translate to a significant OS difference, OS with adjuvant gefitinib was one of the longest observed in this patient group compared with historic data.

Introduction Patients with NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) presented dismal prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is suggested as a medium of liquid biopsy of LM. However, the clinical implications of CSF genotyping on treatment outcomes remained elusive. Methods Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with LM were included: cohort 1, patients with LM who were treated with osimertinib with CSF and plasma genotyping performed before the first dosing of osimertinib (baseline, n = 45); cohort 2, CSF genotyping on progression on osimertinib and development of LM (the progression event on osimertinib is the diagnosis of LM, n = 35). Circulating tumor DNA in CSF underwent next-generation sequencing. Results Sensitivity of CSF genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was 93.3% (42 of 45) and 97.1% (34 of 35) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In cohort 1, patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion had higher median intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) than those with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation (11.9 versus 2.8 mo; p = 0.02). Median iPFS was significantly longer in patients with T790M-positive CSF genotyping (15.6 mo) than T790M-negative CSF (7.0 mo, p = 0.04). Concurrent CDK4 (2.8 versus 11.6 mo, p = 0.002) and CDKN2A (2.5 versus 9.6 mo, p = 0.04) mutation with EGFR-sensitizing mutations indicated lower median iPFS. Patients with T790M-negative CSF, EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, concurrent FGF3 alteration, and over first-line osimertinib had shortened iPFS. In cohort 2, possible EGFR-related and EGFR-independent resistance mechanisms were found including C797S mutation, MET dysregulation, and TP53 plus RB1 co-occurrence. Patients with loss of T790M in CSF had a shorter median iPFS (7.4 mo) compared with those with reserved T790M (13.6 mo, p = 0.01). Conclusions Genotyping of CSF indicated heterogeneous response to osimertinib and revealed the genetic characteristic of LM on osimertinib failure in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC diagnosed with LM.

Background This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to investigate the impact of rebiopsy analysis after osimertinib progression in improving the survival outcomes. Methods Eighty-nine patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who received second- or further-line osimertinib between January 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study. The co-primary study endpoints were post-progression progression-free survival (pPFS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until progression from further-line treatment, and post-progression overall survival (pOS), defined as the time from osimertinib progression until death or the last follow-up date. Results Pairwise analysis revealed that receiving targeted therapy as further-line treatment after osimertinib progression did not statistically improve the pPFS (P = 0.285) or the pOS (P = 0.903) compared to chemotherapy. However, patients who submitted rebiopsy samples at osimertinib progression for histological and molecular analyses, particularly those who had actionable markers and received highly matched therapy, had significantly longer pPFS and pOS as compared to those who received low-level matched therapy (pPFS = 10.0 m vs. 4.1 m, P = 0.005; pOS = 19.4 m vs. 10.0 m, P = 0.023), unmatched therapy (pPFS = 10.0 m vs. 4.7 m, P = 0.009; pOS = 19.4 m vs. 7.0 m, P = 0.001), and those without rebiopsy data (Rebiopsy vs Non-rebiopsy; pPFS = 6.1 m vs. 3.3 m, P = 0.014; pOS = 11.7 m vs. 6.8 m, P = 0.011). Conclusion Our real-world cohort study demonstrates that integrated histological and molecular analyses of rebiopsy specimens after osimertinib progression could provide more opportunities for individualized treatments to improve the post-progression survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. Our findings provide clinical evidence that supports the inclusion of NGS-based analysis of rebiopsy specimens as standard-of-care after osimertinib progression and warrants further prospective evaluation.

Background In previous studies, the predictive role of BIM deletion polymorphism with respect to responses to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) has been controversial. The potential reasons for these inconsistent findings were unknown. Methods Data from CTONG0901 clinical trial and medical records of Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (GLCI) were retrospectively pooled. A total of 194 and 141 EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first‐ and second‐generation EGFR‐TKIs were examined in the CTONG0901 and GLCI cohorts, respectively. Sixty‐eight patients were treated with third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs in the GLCI cohort. The BIM gene status was examined by next‐generation sequencing. Results The frequency of BIM deletion polymorphism was 11.3% and 17.0% in CTONG0901 and GLCI cohorts, respectively. For first‐ and second‐generation EGFR‐TKIs in CTONG0901 cohort, objective response (ORR) was 54.5% in BIM deletion group versus 56.4% in wild‐type BIM group (P = .87); disease control rate (DCR) was 90.9% versus 88.4% (P = 1.00); progression‐free survival (PFS) was 10.5 versus 11.2 months (P = .59); and overall survival (OS) was 20.5 versus 20.5 months (P = .73). In GLCI cohort, ORR was 54.2% versus 60.7% (P = .55); DCR was 91.7% versus 96.6% (P = .27); PFS was 10.1 versus 11.6 months (P = .63); and OS was 58.5 versus 45.0 months (P = .93). For third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs, ORR was 18.2% versus 63.2% (P = .02); DCR was 81.8% versus 96.5%, (P = .12); PFS was 5.8 versus 9.0 months (P = .13); and OS was 30.0 versus 24.8 months (P = .85). Cox regression analysis showed that concomitant genetic alterations could adversely affect the response to EGFR‐TKIs, but not BIM deletion. Conclusions The presence of BIM deletion showed no relation to an impaired response to first‐, second‐, and third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs in NSCLC patients. The factors influencing the response of EGFR‐TKIs were concomitant genetic alterations, but not BIM deletion.

Background Rearranged during transfection (RET) has been proven to be a tumorigenic target in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In RET-rearranged NSCLCs, molecular features and their impact on prognosis were not well illustrated, and the activity of mainstay therapeutics has not currently been well compared. Methods Patients diagnosed with NSCLCs with RET rearrangements were analyzed for concomitant mutations, tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, T cell receptor repertoire and clinical outcomes with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Results Among 129 patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC who were analyzed, 41.1% (53/129) had co-occurring genetic alterations by next-generation sequencing, and concomitant TP53 mutation appeared most frequently (20/53, 37.7%). Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation (n = 15) had shorter overall survival than those without (n = 30; median, 18.4 months [95% CI, 8.6–39.1] vs 24.8 months [95% CI, 11.7–52.8]; P < 0.05). Patients with lower peripheral blood TCR diversity (n = 5) had superior overall survival compared with those with higher diversity (n = 6; median, 18.4 months [95% CI, 16.9–19.9] vs 4.8 months [95% CI, 4.5–5.3]; P = 0.035). An association with overall survival was not observed for PD-L1 expression nor for tumor mutation burden level. Median progression-free survival was not significantly different across chemotherapy, ICIs, and MKIs (median, 3.5 vs 2.5 vs 3.8 months). For patients treated with ICIs, the disease control rate was 60% (6/10) and the objective response rate was 20% (2/10). Conclusions RET-rearranged lung cancers can be heterogeneous in terms of concomitant genetic alterations. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation or high peripheral blood TCR repertoire diversity have relatively inferior overall survival in this series. Outcomes with traditional systemic therapies in general are suboptimal.

The ADJUVANT study reported the comparative superiority of adjuvant gefitinib over chemotherapy in disease-free survival of resected EGFR-mutant stage II–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), raising the necessity for further biomarker assessment. In this work, by comprehensive genomic profiling of 171 tumor tissues from the ADJUVANT trial, five predictive biomarkers are identified (TP53 exon4/5 mutations, RB1 alterations, and copy number gains of NKX2-1, CDK4, and MYC). Then we integrate them into the Multiple-gene INdex to Evaluate the Relative benefit of Various Adjuvant therapies (MINERVA) score, which categorizes patients into three subgroups with relative disease-free survival and overall survival benefits from either adjuvant gefitinib or chemotherapy (Highly TKI-Preferable, TKI-Preferable, and Chemotherapy-Preferable groups). This study demonstrates that predictive genomic signatures could potentially stratify resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and provide precise guidance towards future personalized adjuvant therapy., Adjuvant gefitinib improves outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients compared to chemotherapy, but not in all cases. Here, the authors find genomic biomarkers of response to gefitinib in NSCLC patients from the ADJUVANT trial, and propose a score to stratify them by potential benefit from the treatment.

Purpose: This study aimed at developing and validating a novel noninvasive urinary exosome-based post-DRE (digital rectal examination) lncRNA assay to diagnose PCa (prostate cancer) and clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥ 7) from the initial prostate biopsy. Methods: A total of 602 urine samples from eligible participants were collected. The expression levels of urinary exosomal PCA3 (prostate cancer antigen 3) and MALAT1 (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1) were detected by qPCR (quantitative real-time PCR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PCA3, MALAT1 and the lncRNA assay. A decision curve analysis (DCA) and waterfall plots were used to assess the clinical value of the lncRNA assay. Results: Urinary exosomal PCA3 and MALAT1 were overexpressed in PCa and clinically significant PCa (p &lt, 0.001). The lncRNA assay combining PCA3 and MALAT1 had a better diagnostic performance (AUC 0.828) than the current clinical parameters in detecting PCa. More importantly, the lncRNA assay yielded an AUC of 0.831 to detect clinically significant PCa, which is much higher than that of the current clinical parameters. The lncRNA assay was superior to PSA, f/tPSA and the base model for detecting PCa and clinically significant PCa, with a higher net benefit for almost all threshold probabilities. At the cutoff value of 95% sensitivity, the lncRNA assay could avoid 24.2% unnecessary biopsies while only missing 1.2% of the cases of clinically significant PCa. Conclusion: We developed and validated a novel noninvasive post-DRE urine-based lncRNA assay that presented good diagnostic power and clinical utility for the early diagnosis of PCa and high-grade PCa.

This phase II study evaluated camrelizumab in different PD-L1 expression cohorts of patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT03085069, registered March 21, 2017). Patients who progressed during/after chemotherapy were enrolled and divided into four cohorts based on PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with EGFR/ALK alterations and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% were also eligible. All enrolled patients received camrelizumab at 200 mg IV Q2W. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. A total of 146 patients were enrolled. As of data cutoff on Aug 20, 2020, the median follow-up was 29.5 months (95% CI 27.4–30.8). Objective response rate was 17.8% (95% CI 12.0–25.0) and improved with the increasing PD-L1 TPS (TPS

Background Pleural effusion (PE) has been one of the promising sources of liquid biopsy in advanced lung cancer patients. However, its clinical utility is not widely accepted due to the lack of full estimation of its potential versus routine clinical samples. Method A total of 164 advanced lung cancer patients were enrolled with 164 matched tumor tissue and PE-cfDNA, 153 accompanied plasma and 63 1 PE-sDNA. Result PE-cfDNA displayed significantly higher median mutant allele frequency and an overall mutation concordance rate of 65% to tissue, which was higher than PE-sDNA (43%) and plasma-cfDNA (43%). The discrepancies between PE-cfDNA and tumor tissue were high in several genes, including SMARCA4, PIK3CA, ERBB2, KM T2A, ALK and NF1. For clinically actionable mutations, the concordance rate between PE-cfDNA and tumor tissue is 87%. Eleven patients were identified with actionable mutations in PE-cfDNA and four patients benefited from PE-cfDNA-guided targeted. Meanwhile, PE-cfDNA recapitulated mutations of diverse tissue origins and provided more mutational information under the circumstance that tumor tissue or tumor tissue of different origins were unavailable. The combination of tumor tissue and PE-cfDNA profiling increased positive detection rates of patients compared to tumor tissue alone. Our finding highlighted the importance of PE-cfDNA in the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy. Conclusion The PE-cfDNA-based liquid biopsy displays better performance in the characterization of gene alterations than PE-sDNA and plasma-cfDNA. PE-cfDNA together with tumor tissue profiling optimizes comprehensively genomic profiling of lung cancer patients, which might be important for selecting patients for better treatment management.

ObjectivesTo identify and validate a biomarker panel by serum metabolic profiling for improvement of PCa diagnosis.Materials and MethodsTotally, 134 individuals were included in this study. Among them, 39 PCa patients and 45 control patients (negative prostate biopsy) were involved in the discovery phase and 50 healthy controls were enrolled for validation phase of metabolomics study. LC-MS Analysis was used for the identification of the serum metabolites of patients.ResultsLogistics regression analysis shows that 5 metabolites [dMePE(18:0/18:2), PC(16:0/20:2), PS(15:0/18:2), SM(d16:0/24:1], Carnitine C14:0) were significantly changed in PCa patients compared with control patients. A metabolic panel (MET) was calculated, showing a significantly higher diagnostic performance than PSA in differentiating PCa from control patients [AUC (MET vs. PSA): 0.823 ± 0.046 vs. 0.712 ± 0.057, pvs. PSA]: 0.836 ± 0.050 vs. 0.656 ± 0.067, pConclusionsThe metabolite biomarker panel discovered in this study presents a good diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa.

Bevacizumab was demonstrated to have efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. However, cerebral toxicities were a major concern. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and risk factors of toxicity of bevacizumab in brain metastases. All patients with advanced NSCLC hospitalized in our institute were screened and only those, who underwent bevacizumab administration after the diagnosis of brain metastases, were included. Fifty-one patients, who were treatment naive or pretreated prior to bevacizumab regimens, were enrolled. Regardless of treatment lines, the objective response rate (ORR) was 62.7% (32/51), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 6.2 months (95%CI, 5.0–7.4) and 14.0 months (95%CI, 9.6–18.4), respectively, and intracranial PFS was 7.8 months (95%CI, 7.1–8.5). For 41 patients with measurable brain metastatic lesions, the intracranial ORR was 46.3% (19/41). Ten patients (19.6%, 10/51) experienced cerebral toxicities (seven cases of grade 1 and three cases of grade 3), including cerebral or intratumoral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. Cardiovascular disease was the risk factor contributing to cerebral toxicities (OR 16.645; 95%CI, 2.443–113.430; P = 0.004). This retrospective study shows that bevacizumab has efficacy and favorable toxicity in patients with NSCLC and brain metastases and cardiovascular disease might be a risk factor for cerebral toxicity.

PURPOSE To assess the benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies in locally advanced EGFR mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter (17 centers in China), open-label, phase II, randomized controlled trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non–small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21 (EMERGING). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postsurgery. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. RESULTS Of 386 patients screened, 72 were randomly assigned to treatment (intention-to-treat population), and 71 were included in the safety analysis (one patient withdrew before treatment). The ORR for neoadjuvant erlotinib versus GC chemotherapy was 54.1% versus 34.3% (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.87 to 5.84; P = .092). No pathologic complete response was identified in either arm. Three (9.7%) of 31 patients and zero of 23 patients in the erlotinib and GC chemotherapy arms, respectively, had a major pathologic response. Median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib (21.5 months) versus GC chemotherapy (11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.67; P < .001). Observed adverse events reflected those most commonly seen with the two treatments. CONCLUSION The primary end point of ORR with 42 days of neoadjuvant erlotinib was not met, but the secondary end point PFS was significantly improved.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the navigation of intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis (IQQA) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techn...

BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate the tumor (T) descriptors of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) for T1 tumors (

Purpose: Besides the smoking and occupational exposures, heritable factors have been proven to be a risk factor for lung cancer by several population-based studies, which would misestimate the risk of lung cancer. Patients and methods: To quantify the magnitude of the high risk of lung cancer with family history, we performed a case-based study with 1373 enrolled individuals, which may be more accurate than a population-based study. Results: Risk of lung cancer was higher in people with lung cancer family history than in the control group (OR 2.50, p

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) had increased in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last 10 years. The survival outcome remained overall poor, heterogeneous and was reported in association with genotypes in lung cancer patients with LM. Graded prognostic assessment model integrated with molecular alterations (molGPA) might be accurate for outcome prediction of LM patients, but needs to be established.We retrospectively screened 8921 consecutive lung cancer patients from January 2011 to March 2018. A total of 301 patients diagnosed as LM were enrolled, and randomly divided into training and validation sets after stratified by gender and age. A molGPA score for each patient was calculated based on the weighted significant parameters including gene mutations.The median OS for the 301 patients was 9.2 months (95%CI: 7.9-10.5). In the training set, EGFR/ALK positivity, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) score≥60 and absence of extracranial metastasis (ECM) independently predicted better OS. We developed a molGPA model based on above significant prognostic factors. This molGPA model classified LM patients into three prognosis groups of high, intermediate and low risk (molGPA score of 0, 0.5-1.0 and 1.5-2.0, respectively. The median OS of high, intermediate and low risk LM patients in the training set was 0.3, 3.5 and 15.9 months, respectively (p 0.001). In the validation set, the median OS was 0.9, 5.8 and 17.7 months in the three molGPA subgroups, accordingly (p 0.001). The C-index of this model in training and validation sets was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66-0.73) and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.58-0.70) respectively.The LM molGPA model with integration of gene status, KPS and ECM can accurately classify lung cancer patients with LM into diverse prognosis.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is capable of sequencing millions or billions of DNA molecules simultaneously. Therefore, it represents a promising tool for the analysis of molecular targets for the initial diagnosis of disease, monitoring of disease progression, and identifying the mechanism of drug resistance. On behalf of the Tumor Biomarker Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and the China Actionable Genome Consortium (CAGC), the present expert group hereby proposes advisory guidelines on clinical applications of NGS technology for the analysis of cancer driver genes for precision cancer therapy. This group comprises an assembly of laboratory cancer geneticists, clinical oncologists, bioinformaticians, pathologists, and other professionals. After multiple rounds of discussions and revisions, the expert group has reached a preliminary consensus on the need of NGS in clinical diagnosis, its regulation, and compliance standards in clinical sample collection. Moreover, it has prepared NGS criteria, the sequencing standard operation procedure (SOP), data analysis, report, and NGS platform certification and validation.

The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be a prognostic marker in prostate cancer. In this study, we assessed the association between preoperative NLR and the clinicopathological characteristics, biomolecular features and prognosis of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. A total of 994 subjects were retrospectively enrolled, and the histological specimens of 210 patients were retrieved for constructing a tissue microarray. Immunohistochemistry was then performed to assess the expression of AR, ERG, PTEN, p‐AKT, Bcl‐2, Beclin‐1, Ki‐67, CD3, CD4, CD8, IFN‐γ and TNF‐α. No significant differences in the NLR distributions among clinicopathological variables were observed (P > 0.05) when the original NLR data were utilized. When we dichotomized the NLR value into the high‐NLR group (NLR ≥ 2) and low‐NLR group (NLR 0.05). When we analyzed the data of patients without postoperative adjuvant hormone therapy or radiotherapy, univariate and multivariate survival analysis indicated that a high NLR was a predictor of better BCR‐free survival (P

This study evaluated whether tumor expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) could predict the response of EGFR-mutated NSCLC to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.We retrospectively evaluated patients who received EGFR-TKIs for advanced NSCLC at the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute between April 2016 and September 2017 and were not enrolled in clinical studies. The patients' EGFR and PD-L1 statuses were simultaneously evaluated.Among the 101 eligible patients, strong PD-L1 expression significantly decreased objective response rate, compared with weak or negative PD-L1 expression (35.7% versus 63.2% versus 67.3%, p = 0.002), and shortened progression-free survival (3.8 versus 6.0 versus 9.5 months, p0.001), regardless of EGFR mutation type (19del or L858R). Furthermore, positive PD-L1 expression was predominantly observed among patients with de novo resistance rather than acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs (66.7% versus 30.2%, p = 0.009). Notably, we found a high proportion of PD-L1 and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) dual-positive cases among patients with de novo resistance (46.7%, 7 of 15). Finally, one patient with de novo resistance to EGFR-TKIs and PD-L1 and CD8 dual positivity experienced a favorable response to anti-programmed death 1 therapy.This study revealed the adverse effects of PD-L1 expression on EGFR-TKI efficacy, especially in NSCLC patients with de novo resistance. The findings indicate the reshaping of an inflamed immune phenotype characterized by PD-L1 and CD8 dual positivity and suggest potential therapeutic sensitivity to programmed death 1 blockade.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that contributes to 60-70% dementia around the world. One of the hallmarks of AD undoubtedly lies on accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain. Aβ is produced from the proteolytic cleavage of the beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase and γ-secretase. In pathological circumstances, the increased β-cleavage of APP leads to overproduction of Aβ, which aggregates into Aβ plaques. Since Aβ plaques are a characteristic of AD pathology, detecting the amount of Aβ is very important in AD research. In this protocol, we introduce the immunofluorescent staining method to visualize Aβ deposition. The mouse model used in our experiments is 5×FAD, which carries five mutations found in human familial AD. The neuropathological and behavioral deficits of 5xFAD mice are well-documented, which makes it a good animal model to study Aβ pathology. We will introduce the procedure including transcardial perfusion, cryosectioning, immunofluorescent staining and quantification to detect Aβ accumulation in 5×FAD mice. With this protocol, researchers can investigate Aβ pathology in an AD mouse model.

The landscape and characteristics of circulating exosomal messenger RNAs (emRNAs) are poorly understood, which hampered the accurate detection of circulating emRNAs. Through comparing RNA sequencing data of circulating exosomes with the corresponding data in tissues, we illustrated the different characteristics of emRNAs compared to tissue mRNAs. We then developed an improved strategy for emRNA detection based on the features of circulating emRNAs. Using the optimized detection strategy, we further validated prostate cancer (PCa) associated emRNAs discovered by emRNA-seq in a large cohort of patients and identified emRNA signatures for PCa screening and diagnosis using logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that the circulating emRNA-based screening signature yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.948 in distinguishing PCa patients from healthy controls. The circulating emRNA-based diagnostic signature also showed a great performance in predicting prostate biopsy results (AUC: 0.851). In conclusion, our study developed an optimized emRNA detection strategy and identified novel emRNA signatures for the detection of PCa. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-021-01349-z.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins) is a common mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with EGFR ex20ins generally respond poor to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). EGFR ex20ins are often co-occurring with EGFR amplification. However, the impact of EGFR amplification on the survival of patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations has not been determined. Methods This is an observational longitudinal cohort study. A prospectively managed database included consecutive treatment-naive adult patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR ex20ins confirmed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between November 2017 and February 2019. The participants were enrolled from the database and extracted their clinical characteristics, treatment and clinical outcomes. NGS was used to establish whether EGFR amplification was present in tumor tissue. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between EGFR amplification and non-EGFR amplification groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the treatment used (EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy). Results Fifteen different EGFR ex20ins mutation subtypes were identified in the 39 patients included in the analysis, and the most common subtypes were p.A767_D770dup (25.6%), p.S768_D770dup (23.1%) and p.N771_H773dup (10.3%). Among 31 patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations and NGS data for tumor tissue, EGFR amplification was identified in 12 patients (38.7%) and there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics. Among 26 patients, there were no significant differences between the EGFR amplification (n=11) and non-EGFR amplification (n=15) groups in median OS (715 vs. 452 days, P=0.912). Among 20 patients administered chemotherapy, there were no significant differences between the EGFR amplification and non-EGFR amplification groups in median PFS (206 vs. 112 days, P=0.425). Among 24 patients administered an EGFR-TKI, median PFS was longer in the non-EGFR amplification group than in the EGFR amplification group (110 vs. 31 days, P=0.030). Conclusions There is a tendency that EGFR amplification might be a poor predictor in EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak throughout the world has affected millions of people in many ways, putting a huge burden on the health care system. The ongoing outbreak of this respiratory disease has posed critical challenges to public health, research, and medical communities around the world. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with lung cancer in the People's Republic of China. Methods We collected data on 397 inpatients from a single center during 4 weeks of the pandemic (2020 group) and that of 2504 inpatients during the same period (4 wk) in the past 5 years (2015–2019 group). A questionnaire was used to investigate the medical demands of 803 patients with lung cancer at 65 hospitals in 20 provinces in the People's Republic of China during the pandemic. We evaluated the incidence data of COVID-19 in Guangdong to analyze the tendency of the pandemic and compared it with inpatient data. Results The number of hospitalizations and lung cancer–related operations had steadily increased from 2015 to 2019 but reduced by an average of 26.72% (133.8) and 57.18% (45.4) in 2020. The hospital capacity decreased by 28.00% (35 inpatient beds) during the pandemic period of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The pandemic caused a greater impact on medical work related to lung cancer after the Chinese New Year holiday. Patients were most concerned about long waiting times for outpatient services, inpatient beds, physical examinations, or operations (406; 50.56%); the possibility of infection with the novel coronavirus (359; 44.71%); and the difficulties in getting to a hospital owing to transportation outages (279; 34.74%). Patients in stage I and II revealed having less fear about disease progression (14 [18.18%] and four [14.81%], respectively), had lower proportions of delayed medical arrangement (15 [19.48%] and six [22.22%], respectively), and complained less about complex treatment procedures (12 [15.58%] and five [18.52%], respectively). Patients in the high-infected area (345, 56.74%) complained more frequently about longer booking periods than those in the low-infected area (61, 31.28%). Conclusions The treatment of patients with lung cancer has been affected by the pandemic to some extent. We provide suggestions on both clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies for lung cancer to optimize the process, given the urgency of the current circumstances. The demand for medical support among patients with lung cancer or other life-threatening diseases should be given sufficient attention, especially during the current COVID-19 outbreak.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended first-line treatments in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance (e.g. MET amplification) is frequently observed. Savolitinib (volitinib, HMPL-504, AZD6094) is an oral, potent, and highly selective MET-TKI. In this phase Ib, open-label, multicenter study, we enrolled Chinese patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC, whose disease progressed following prior EGFR-TKI treatment. In the safety run-in, patients received savolitinib 600 or 800 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily, and dose-limiting toxicities were recorded. In the expansion phase, patients with MET amplification received savolitinib plus gefitinib. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity. Thirteen patients were enrolled in the safety phase (median age 52 years, 46% female) and 51 enrolled in the expansion phase (median age 61 years, 67% female). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in either dose group during the safety run-in. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 in the safety run-in and expansion phases (n = 57) were reported in 21 (37%) patients. The most frequently reported adverse events (all grades) were: vomiting (n = 26, 46%), nausea (n = 23, 40%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 22, 39%). Of four deaths, none were treatment-related. The objective response rates in EGFR T790M-negative, −positive, and -unknown patients were 52% (12/23), 9% (2/23), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Savolitinib 600 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily had an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in EGFRm, MET-amplified advanced NSCLC patients who had disease progression on EGFR-TKIs. NCT02374645, Date of registration: March 2nd 2015.

Background The KRAS mutation is the second most common genetic variant in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. At the 2019th World Conference of Lung Cancer, the KRAS G12C-specific inhibitor AMG510 showed promising results in the phase I clinical trial. However, the frequency, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of the KRAS G12C mutation in Chinese NSCLC patients are rarely reported. Methods Next-generation sequencing was used to confirm the KRAS mutation status in 40,804 NSCLC patients from multiple centers (mCohort). Survival data were collected retrospectively from 1456 patients at one of the centers, the Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (iCohort). Results In the mCohort, 3998 patients (9.8%) were confirmed to harbor a KRAS mutation, of whom 1179 (29.5%) had the G12C subtype. In the iCohort, 130 NSCLC patients (8.9%) had a KRAS mutation and 42 (32.3%) had the G12C subtype. The G12C subgroup included more male patients (85.2% vs 67.4%, P P = 0.02) than did the non-G12C subgroup. Both the KRAS mutation group and KRAS G12C mutation subgroup were associated with a shorter median overall survival (OS) than wildtype tumors (15.1 vs 26.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]KRAS = 1.50, P = 0.002; 18.3 vs 26.7 months, HRG12C = 1.66, P = 0.007). In Cox regression analysis, smoking (HR = 1.39, P = 0.05) and stage IV disease (HR = 2.72, P KRAS mutation (HR = 1.30, P = 0.07) and KRAS G12C mutation (HR = 1.47, P = 0.07) reached borderline significance. Conclusions In the largest sample used thus for, our study found that approximately 10% of Chinese NSCLC patients had KRAS mutations. Of these, nearly 30% harbored the KRAS G12C mutation subtype, which was most common in male smokers. The KRAS G12C mutation is a biomarker of poor prognosis in Chinese NSCLC patients, which could potentially be improved by G12C-specific inhibitors in the future. (296 words)

Fruquintinib is an orally active kinase inhibitor that selectively targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor. A Phase II trial has demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) for fruquintinib-treated patients with locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed after second-line chemotherapy. This Phase III trial is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to confirm fruquintinib's efficacy in the same patient population.From December 2015 to February 2018, 730 patients were screened, of whom 527 were enrolled into the study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib (n = 354) or placebo (n = 173) once daily for 3 weeks on-treatment, and 1 week off-treatment. Patients were stratified according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and prior use of VEGF inhibitors. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).Median OS was 8.9 months for the fruquintinib group and 10.4 months for placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.28; P = 0.841), with median PFS of 3.7 months and 1.0 months, respectively (HR 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.28-0.43; P 0.001). Objective response rate and disease control rate were 13.8 % and 66.7 % for fruquintinib, and 0.6 % and 24.9 % for placebo, respectively (P 0.001). Hypertension was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (≥grade 3) observed in fruquintinib-treated patients (21.0 %). Post hoc analysis revealed that fruquintinib prolonged the median OS for patients who did not receive subsequent antitumor therapy: 7.0 months versus 5.1 months for placebo (HR 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.46-0.91; P = 0.012). Patients receiving fruquintinib also reported improvements in quality of life for most functional scales measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires.Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, fruquintinib could be effective in combination with other agents for the treatment of patients with NSCLC who have failed second-line chemotherapy.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended first-line treatments in EGFR- mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance (e.g. MET amplification) is common. Savolitinib (volitinib, HMPL-504, AZD6094) is an oral, potent, and highly selective MET-TKI. Methods: In this phase 1b, open-label, multicentre study, we enrolled Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC, whose disease progressed during or after treatment with prior EGFR-TKIs. In the safety run-in, patients received savolitinib 600 or 800 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg orally, once-daily and dose-limiting toxicities were recorded. In the expansion phase, patients with MET amplification received savolitinib plus gefitinib. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included antitumour activity and pharmacokinetics. Findings: No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in either dose group during the safety run-in (n=13). Savolitinib 600 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose and evaluated in the expansion phase (n=51). The objective response rates in EGFR T790M-negative, -positive and -unknown patients were 52% (12/23), 9% (2/23), and 40% (2/5), respectively. Thirty-five patients (69%) were evaluable for longitudinal circulating tumour DNA analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters for savolitinib plus gefitinib were consistent with previous monotherapy studies, showing no evidence of drug-drug interactions. Adverse events of grade 3 or more in the safety run-in and expansion phases (n=57) were reported in 21 (37%) patients. The most common adverse events (all grades) were: vomiting (n=26, 46%), nausea (n=23, 40%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=22, 39%). There were four deaths, none treatment-related. Interpretation: Savolitinib 600 mg plus gefitinib 250 mg once daily had an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated promising antitumour activity in EGFR-mutated, MET- amplified advanced NSCLC patients who had progressed on EGFR-TKIs. Trial Registration: NCT02374645. Funding Statement: The study was funded by AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK, the manufacturer of savolitinib and gefitinib. Hutchison MediPharma authorised AstraZeneca to conduct this study. Declaration of Interests: MF, RH, GFA, CE, SM, RBV and AM are AstraZeneca employees and shareholders. RH also owns shares in Foundation medicine, and has a patent pending for Foundation Medicine. MF is also a patent holder for AstraZeneca. Y-LW has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingeiheim, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim. J-JY, JF, Y-QS, J-HC, G-YC, J-XH, WL, X-QL, NY, CZ, J-AH and LY declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by Institutional Review Boards/Independent Ethics Committees at each study centre, and by the Human Genetics Resources Administration of China. The trial was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, applicable regulatory requirements, and the AstraZeneca policy on Bioethics and Human Biological Samples. All patients provided written informed consent before study procedures.

Background: The ADJUVANT study reported the comparative superiority of adjuvant gefitinib over chemotherapy in disease-free survival (DFS) of resected EGFR-mutated stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, inconsistent clinical benefits have necessitated precise genetic categorization to reevaluate the benefit and risk assessment. Methods: Total 171 baseline surgical specimens from the ADJUVANT trial (n=95, gefitinib arm; n=76, VP arm) underwent targeted sequencing of 422 cancer-related genes. Predictive biomarkers of DFS were identified by Cox proportional hazard regression with gene-by-treatment interactions. A multi-gene composite score, MINERVA (Multiple-gene INdex to Evaluate the Relative benefit of Various Adjuvant therapies), that incorporates the predictive value of selected biomarkers, was developed for survival stratification based on the ratio of 2-year DFS rate and the difference in median DFS. The model was internally validated using ten-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation methods. Findings: TP53 exon4/5 mutations, RB1 alterations, and copy number gains of NKX2-1, CDK4, and MYC were identified as significant predictors for DFS and integrated into MINERVA score. Although updated overall OS presented no difference between adjuvant TKI and chemotherapy, MINERVA categorized patients into three subgroups. In Highly TKI-Preferable group (n=60, 35%), gefitinib achieved significantly longer median DFS than chemotherapy (34.5 vs 9.1 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.21; p

Highlights • Predictive power of PD response for ICIs was superior than traditional biomarkers; • Predictive efficacy was improved by integrating tumor-immune-related features; • When tumor-specific feature was replaced, the model has pan-cancer applicability. • NRAS and PDPK1 have the potential to induce primary resistance to ICIs., Background Treatment by immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) provides a remarkable survival benefit for multiple cancer types. However, disease aggravation occurs in a proportion of patients after the first couple of treatment cycles. Methods RNA sequencing data was retrospectively collected. 6 tumour-immune related features were extracted and combined to build a lung cancer-specific predictive model to distinguish responses as progression disease (PD) or non-PD. This model was trained by 3 public pan-cancer datasets and a lung cancer cohort from our institute, and generated a lung cancer-specific integrated gene expression score, which we call LITES. It was finally tested in another lung cancer dataset. Results LITES is a promising predictor for checkpoint blockade (area under the curve [AUC]=0.86), superior to traditional biomarkers. It is independent of PD-L1 expression and tumour mutation burden. The sensitivity and specificity of LITES was 85.7% and 70.6%, respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) was longer in high-score group than in low-score group (median PFS: 6.0 vs. 2.4 months, hazard ratio=0.45, P=0.01). The mean AUC of 6 features was 0.70 (range=0.61-0.75), lower than in LITES, indicating that the combination of features had synergistic effects. Among the genes identified in the features, patients with high expression of NRAS and PDPK1 tended to have a PD response (P=0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Our model also functioned well for patients with advanced melanoma and was specific for ICB therapy. Conclusions LITES is a promising biomarker for predicting an impaired response in lung cancer patients and for clarifying the biological mechanism underlying ICB therapy.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) score in Han Chinese patients with prostate cancer (PCa) through urine sediment analysis. We collected 292 urine sediment samples after digital rectal examination. Levels of AMACR and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) messenger RNA (mRNAs) were evaluated by quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction. The diagnostic value of AMACR score was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic analysis (ROC), Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression analysis and decision curve analysis. In all patients (n = 292), the area under the curve (AUC) for serum PSA, AMACR score, and a combinative model of these 2 parameters were 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.691-0.794), 0.753 (95% CI: 0.700-0.802), and 0.784 (95% CI: 0.732-0.830). No statistical difference was found between AMACR score and serum PSA ( P = .826), while the combinative model was better than AMACR score (Z = 5.222, P < .001). Among patients with serum PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/mL (n = 121), the AMACR score was significantly higher in patients with PCa ( P = 0.0002), while serum PSA showed no difference ( P = 0.3023). Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase score (AUC = 0.712, 95% CI: 0.623-0.790) and a combinative model (AUC = 0.714, 95% CI: 0.626-0.793) showed a better diagnostic value than serum PSA (AUC = 0.559, 95% CI: 0.466-0.649), ( P = .048, P = .042). Decision curve analysis showed a biopsy prediction model including AMACR score have a better net benefit when the threshold probability greater than 20%. The diagnostic model combing serum PSA and AMACR score has a better diagnostic value in patients with abnormal PSA level (including PSA level ranging from 4-10 ng/mL), and could reduce unnecessary prostate biopsy in clinical use.

Purpose The Iressa Mutation-Positive Multicentre Treatment Beyond ProgRESsion Study (IMPRESS) compared the continuation of gefitinib plus chemotherapy with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation–positive advanced non–small-cell lung cancer with progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) after first-line gefitinib. Primary results indicated no difference between treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). The current analysis presents final, mature, overall survival (OS) data, together with exploratory analyses that examined whether specific biomarkers, including T790M mutation status, were able to differentiate a relative treatment effect. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo, in addition to cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy). EGFR mutation status was determined from plasma-derived circulating free tumor-derived DNA samples (beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics digital polymerase chain reaction assay, allelic fraction analysis). Results A total of 265 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned, and overall data maturity was 66%. Continuation of gefitinib plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was detrimental to OS when compared with placebo plus cisplatin and pemetrexed (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.94; P = .016; median OS, 13.4 v 19.5 months). The detriment was statistically significant in patients with T790M mutation–positive plasma samples (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.21), whereas statistical significance was not reached in T790M mutation–negative patients (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.94). PFS in T790M mutation–positive patients was similar between treatments, and the difference observed in T790M mutation–negative patients did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; P = .0745). Conclusion Final OS data from IMPRESS are supportive of earlier PFS results and are sufficient to warn physicians against the continuation of treatment with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond radiologic disease progression when chemotherapy is initiated. Plasma biomarker analyses suggest that this effect may be driven by T790M-positive status.

The goal of this study is to evaluate PD-L1 prevalence and its association with major clinical characteristics in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to inform the clinical development of anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents in this population. We used phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression through IHC as a surrogate tissue quality marker to screen surgical NSCLC samples in tissue microarray (TMA; 172 cases) or whole-section (268 cases) format. The samples were then analyzed with a clinically validated PD-L1 IHC assay. The results were correlated with baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. PTEN IHC showed that 108 TMA samples and 105 whole-section samples qualified for PD-L1 IHC. With a clinically relevant cutoff, 41.7% of the TMA samples were PD-L1 positive. PD-L1 level was much lower in EGFR-mutant patients and seemed to be a favorable prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). These findings were confirmed in the whole-section samples except that their survival data were not mature enough for correlation analysis. In summary, PD-L1 expression was detected in approximately 40% of PTEN-qualified Chinese NSCLC samples, negatively correlated with EGFR mutation and seemed to be a favorable prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. Notably, the different results from PTEN-qualified and PTEN-disqualified samples underscore the importance of tissue quality control prior to biomarker testing.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (exon 19 deletions and L858R) benefit from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, some researchers have reported that responses to TKIs differ by subtypes of EGFR exon 19 mutations. We retrospectively analyzed EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes and their correlation with clinical outcomes of treatment with TKIs. A cohort of 2664 consecutive patients with NSCLC was enrolled. A total of 440 EGFR exon 19 deletions were defined as 39 subtypes. Among them, 158 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations received EGFR-TKIs. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival among patients with non-LRE deletions, delE746, or delL747 (P = 0.463 and P = 0.464, respectively). Furthermore, two patients with EGFR exon19 insertion had durable response to EGFR-TKIs. In conclusion, EGFR exon 19 is highly fragile, resulting in many different deletion and insertion subtypes. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes after TKI treatment across the different subtypes. It is necessary to attempt to identify all patients with exon 19 deletions so that they can be offered TKI treatment.

BACKGROUND Excessive catecholamine leads to pressure overload and left ventricular (LV) remodeling. The goal of this study was to explore subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and the mechanism of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. METHODS A total of 48 patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma and preserved LVEF and 38 age- and gender-matched volunteers were studied. Echocardiographic parameters including LVEF, and global peak longitudinal and circumferential strains were measured. The correlation between echocardiographic parameters and blood pressure as well as biochemical parameters was analyzed. RESULTS LVEF was similar between patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma and controls. The amplitude of LV longitudinal strain was decreased, and the amplitude of LV circumferential strain was increased in the pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma group (P = .003 and P = .009). LV mass index and blood pressure were positively correlated with 24-hour urinary norepinephrine (r = .696, P

Objective Conventional smear (CS) using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been established as the test of choice for diagnosing thyroid lesions, despite low sample adequacy and inter-individual variations. Although a liquid-based preparation (LBP) technique has been recently applied to overcome these limitations, its clinical utility and its accuracy over CS are controversial. This study aimed to determine the true sensitivity and specificity of LBP in thyroid FNAC by meta-analysis. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods We searched major electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Google Scholar) with queries of ‘thyroid’, ‘LBP’ and ‘liquid-based cytology’. Original articles including cytohistologic correlation data comparing the accuracy of any LBP technique, such as ThinPrep, SurePath and Liqui-Prep, with CS were included for qualitative meta-analysis and preparation of synthesized reporter-operating curves (sROC). Results A total of 372 studies were screened and 51 original articles were eligible for full-text review; finally, 24 studies were chosen for the meta-analysis. Average sample inadequacy was significantly lower in two mainstream LBP methods (ThinPrep and SurePath) than CS. Specificity and sensitivity by sROC were similar or slightly superior for LBP vs CS. Various cytomorphologic changes by each method have been reported. Conclusions Although a learning curve is essential for adapting to the cytomorphologic features of the LBP technique, our results support the use of two mainstream LBPs alone in thyroid FNAC that LBP will increase the sample adequacy and reduce the workload with similar accuracy. More data and further evaluation are needed for the other LBP methods.

Summary Dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways may delay therapeutic resistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 3 study investigated the efficacy and safety of an erlotinib plus bevacizumab regimen in untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. In total, 311 patients received bevacizumab plus erlotinib (n = 157) or erlotinib only (n = 154). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.2–19.9) for bevacizumab plus erlotinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.7–13.8) for erlotinib only (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41–0.73; p

e21081 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas they also can cause various adverse events (AEs). We reported the incidences, spectrum and severity of AEs in real-life practice after the approval of ICIs in Chinese NSCLC patients. Methods: In this single center, retrospective study, anonymized electronic medical record data were collected from the dedicated lung cancer immunotherapy outpatient clinic of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital through the LinkDoc database. The patients (≥18 years old) with pathologically diagnosed metastatic NSCLC who receiving ICIs between 1 June 2019 and 31 December 2020 were included. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were diagnosed and assessed by oncologists. All AEs were classified and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE V5.0). Results: A total of 203 patients with a median age of 60.5 years were included in this study. Most patients were male (81.8%), smokers (49.8%), non-squamous histological type (51.7%). 61.1% of patients visited the outpatient clinic more than once. Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab were given to the majority of patients (80.8%). 114 patients (56.2%) received single-agent and 89 patients (43.8%) received combination therapy. The median duration of ICIs therapy was 271.2 days. In our study, 68.0% of patients experienced any-grade AEs, and 19.7% experienced grade≥3 AEs. The most commonly AEs were abnormal laboratory findings (57.1%), blood and lymphatic system disorders (25.1%), and respiratory disorders (19.7%). All of 93 patients (45.8%) experienced irAEs and 6 patients (8.4%) developed grade≥3 irAEs. The most frequent irAEs included blood and lymphatic system disorders (25.1%), hepatobiliary disorders (17.7%), and cardiac disorders (9.9%). Cough (3.4%), sputum (2.5%), and pain (2.0%) were the most frequent AEs which received treatment. Conclusions: Our results showed 68.0% and 45.8% patients experienced AEs and irAEs, respectively. The AEs and irAEs were primarily low grade. This study also demonstrated the information of AEs could be well collected and managed through our dedicated lung cancer immunotherapy outpatient clinic. [Table: see text]

8502 Background: Median Overall survival (mOS) of stage IIIA resected NSCLC was 59.4 months (m) in CTONG 1104 adj gefitinib and 26.2m in SAKK neoadjuvant chemo trial. EMERGING-CTONG1103 showed neo-adjuvant/adjuvant erlotinib treatment significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs standard doublet chemotherapy in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results from the study. Methods: This was a multicenter (17 centers in China) phase II randomized controlled trial of erlotinib（E）versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in pts with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21. From Dec 2011 to Dec. 2017, 386 pts sites were screened and 72 pts were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant/adjuvant E arm (N = 37) or GC arm(N = 35). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postoperative. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, downstaging rates of pathological lymph nodes, PFS, OS, safety, and tolerability. Data cut-off date was January, 29 2021. Results: With a median follow-up of 62.5 months, the median OS was 42.2months based on 47 (65.3%) events in ITT whole population. The mOS was 42.2m in E and 36.9m in GC (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.47-1.47, p = 0.513). The 3-,5-year OS rate were 58.6%, 40.8% in E and 55.9%, 27.6% in GC respectively (p3-y = 0.819, p5-y = 0.252). All predefined subgroups including age, gender, EGFR mutation type had no significant difference in statistics between two arms. Subsequent treatments (ST) especially targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR = 0.35,95% CI 0.18- 0.70). Median OS of pts receiving ST was 45.8m (n = 38), 34.6m in other treatment (n = 12), 24.6m in without ST (n = 15). For E mOS were 46.4 (n = 15; target therapy), 42.2m (n = 8; other) and 24.6m (n = 9; without, p = 0.021), for GC 42.6 (n = 23; target therapy), 30.1m (n = 4;other) and 24.6m(n = 6; without, p = 0.130). The RR was 53.3%, DCR 93.3%, mPFS 10.9m and mPPS 21.9m for patients with rechallenged EGFR TKI in E arm (n = 15). No novel unexpected SAE was observed during follow up. Conclusion: Erlotinib as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy for resected N2 NSCLC was feasibility and had a promising OS. The PFS survival advantage of E did not translate to OS difference in EMERGING trial (NCT01407822). Clinical trial information: NCT01407822.

Purpose: Leptomeningeal metastases are more common in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. The diagnosis is difficult by traditional imaging only, and leads to poor understanding of resistance mechanisms of leptomeningeal metastases. Experimental Design: We compared the CellSearch Assay, the Thinprep cytologic test (TCT), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 21 NSCLC patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastases. Next-generation sequencing that included 416 cancer-associated genes was also performed on cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor cells (CSFCTC) of 19 patients. Results: Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastases, and CSFCTCs were captured by CellSearch in 20 patients (median, 969 CSFCTCs/7.5 mL; range, 27–14,888). CellSearch had a sensitivity of 95.2% for leptomeningeal metastases diagnosis, which was higher than that of TCT (12/21, 57.1%), MRI (10/21, 47.6%), and MRI plus TCT (19/21, 90.5%), respectively. CTCs were found only in 5 of 14 patients (median, 2 CTCs/7.5 mL; range, 2–4), which was a much lower ratio than CSFCTCs. Genetic profiles of CSFCTCs were highly concordant with molecular mutations identified in the primary tumor (17/19, 89.5%). The resistance gene EGFR T790M was detected in 7 of 9 patients with extracranial lesions, but was detected in only 1 of 14 CSFCTC samples. Other potential resistant mutations, such as MET amplification and ERBB2 mutation, were also identified in CSFCTCs. Conclusions: CSFCTCs captured by CellSearch may be a more sensitive and effective way to diagnose leptomeningeal metastases, and may serve as a liquid biopsy medium for gene profiles in NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5480–8. ©2017 AACR.

Summary Background For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and multiple brain metastases, whole-brain irradiation (WBI) is a standard-of-care treatment, but its effects on neurocognition are complex and concerning. We compared the efficacy of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), icotinib, versus WBI with or without chemotherapy in a phase 3 trial of patients with EGFR -mutant NSCLC and multiple brain metastases. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel randomised controlled trial (BRAIN) at 17 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations, who were naive to treatment with EGFR-TKIs or radiotherapy, and had at least three metastatic brain lesions. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to either icotinib 125 mg orally (three times per day) or WBI (30 Gy in ten fractions of 3 Gy) plus concurrent or sequential chemotherapy for 4–6 cycles, until unacceptable adverse events or intracranial disease progression occurred. The randomisation was done by the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group with a web-based allocation system applying the Pocock and Simon minimisation method; groups were stratified by EGFR gene mutation status, treatment line (first line or second line), brain metastases only versus both intracranial and extracranial metastases, and presence or absence of symptoms of intracranial hypertension. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment assignment, but individuals involved in the data analysis did not participate in the treatments and were thus masked to allocation. Patients receiving icotinib who had intracranial progression only were switched to WBI plus either icotinib or chemotherapy until further progression; those receiving icotinib who had extracranial progression only were switched to icotinib plus chemotherapy. Patients receiving WBI who progressed were switched to icotinib until further progression. Icotinib could be continued beyond progression if a clinical benefit was observed by the investigators (eg, an improvement in cognition or intracranial pressure). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to either intracranial disease progression or death from any cause. We assessed efficacy and safety in the intention-to-treat population (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment), hypothesising that intracranial PFS would be 40% longer (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60) with icotinib compared with WBI. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01724801. Findings Between Dec 10, 2012, and June 30, 2015, we assigned 176 participants to treatment: 85 to icotinib and 91 to WBI. 18 withdrew from the WBI group before treatment, leaving 73 for assessment. Median follow-up was 16·5 months (IQR 11·5–21·5). Median intracranial PFS was 10·0 months (95% CI 5·6–14·4) with icotinib versus 4·8 months (2·4–7·2) with WBI (equating to a 44% risk reduction with icotinib for an event of intracranial disease progression or death; HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·36–0·90; p=0·014). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported in seven (8%) of 85 patients in the icotinib group and 28 (38%) of 73 patients in the WBI group. Raised concentrations of alanine aminotransferase and rash were the most common adverse events of any grade in both groups, occurring in around 20–30% of each group. At the time of final analysis, 42 (49%) patients in the icotinib group and 37 (51%) in the WBI group had died. 78 of these patients died from disease progression, and one patient in the WBI group died from thrombogenesis related to chemotherapy. Interpretation In patients with EGFR -mutant NSCLC and multiple brain metastases, icotinib was associated with significantly longer intracranial PFS than WBI plus chemotherapy, indicating that icotinib might be a better first-line therapeutic option for this patient population. Funding Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Translational Medicine, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau, Betta Pharmaceuticals, and the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group.