1. Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Obesity and Diabetes
- Author
-
Yen-Wen Chen, Brahim Bookhart, Matthew R. Weir, Veronica Ashton, Alicia Campbell, and Jinghua He
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Overweight ,Anticoagulation ,Diabetes mellitus ,Rivaroxaban ,Healthcare resource utilization ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Obesity ,Stroke ,Original Research ,Real-world evidence ,business.industry ,Warfarin ,Atrial fibrillation ,medicine.disease ,Costs ,Emergency medicine ,Cohort ,Propensity score matching ,Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation ,medicine.symptom ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with a substantial economic burden, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes. Methods A de-identified healthcare claims database was used to identify adult patients newly initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin and having at least one medical claim with a diagnosis of AF, obesity determined by validated algorithm, and at least one claim with a diagnosis of diabetes or for antidiabetic medication from December 2011 to March 2020. Propensity score matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts on the basis of demographics and baseline characteristics. All-cause and NVAF-related HRU rates and costs were compared between treatments using rate ratios, and mean cost differences were calculated on a per patient per year (PPPY) basis. Results A total of 9999 matched pairs of patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes were identified in the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts. Rate ratios of all-cause HRU were significantly reduced with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all healthcare settings evaluated, except emergency room visits. The greatest impact was on physician office visits followed by hospital outpatient and inpatient visits. NVAF-related HRU was significantly lower for rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all care settings. Consistent with these findings, the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced by approximately 4 days among all patients for both all-cause and NVAF-related hospitalizations in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort. Rivaroxaban was associated with reductions in all-cause total healthcare costs by more than $5000 PPPY and NVAF-related medical costs by approximately $1100 PPPY. Conclusion In comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban reduced HRU and costs, particularly hospital inpatient and outpatient visits and physician office visits, in patients with NVAF and comorbidities of obesity and diabetes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01161-4., Plain Language Summary People who are overweight or obese are at risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) along with other medical conditions, such as diabetes. Standard therapy with oral anticoagulants or blood thinners is recommended to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF). In this study, we evaluated healthcare insurance claims for people with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes who started therapy with warfarin or rivaroxaban from 2011 to 2020 to compare the use and cost of healthcare services, such as hospitalizations and doctor visits, using diagnosis and procedure codes. The study included nearly 20,000 patients with similar characteristics. Patients who started treatment with rivaroxaban used fewer healthcare services for any cause and for those related to NVAF than those who started treatment with warfarin. The difference in use of services was largest for hospital outpatient and inpatient visits and doctor office visits; emergency room visits were only different for those related to NVAF. Length of hospital stay was also shorter for patients receiving rivaroxaban versus those receiving warfarin. These differences in healthcare service use translated into lower costs associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. The findings of this study suggest that treatment with rivaroxaban reduces the use of healthcare services compared with warfarin. This difference may be related, in part, to the reduced risks of stroke and systemic embolism observed in other real-world studies with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin. In addition, rivaroxaban does not require routine blood testing, which is required with warfarin treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01161-4.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF