Search

Summary Background Few options exist for treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after failure of first-line therapy. Lurbinectedin is a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription. In this phase 2 study, we evaluated the acti and safety of lurbinectedin in patients with SCLC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods In this single-arm, open-label, phase 2 basket trial, we recruited patients from 26 hospitals in six European countries and the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, measurable disease as per Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, absence of brain metastasis, adequate organ function, and pre-treated with only one previous chemotherapy-containing line of treatment (minimum 3 weeks before study initiation) were eligible. Treatment consisted of 3·2 mg/m2 lurbinectedin administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an overall response (complete or partial response) as assessed by the investigators according to RECIST 1.1. All treated patients were analysed for activity and safety. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02454972 . Findings Between Oct 16, 2015, and Jan 15, 2019, 105 patients were enrolled and treated with lurbinectedin. Median follow-up was 17·1 months (IQR 6·5–25·3). Overall response by investigator assessment was seen in 37 patients (35·2%; 95% CI 26·2–45·2). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events (irrespective of causality) were haematological abnormalities—namely, anaemia (in nine [9%] patients), leucopenia (30 [29%]), neutropenia (48 [46%]), and thrombocytopenia (seven [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 (10%) patients, of which neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were the most common (five [5%] patients for each). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation Lurbinectedin was active as second-line therapy for SCLC in terms of overall response and had an acceptable and manageable safety profile. Lurbinectedin could represent a potential new treatment for patients with SCLC, who have few options especially in the event of a relapse, and is being investigated in combination with doxorubicin as second-line therapy in a randomised phase 3 trial. Funding Pharma Mar.

Aim Preclinical evidence suggests that oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) may be involved in carcinogenesis. This phase 1 study (NCT01765790) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity of imalumab, an oxMIF inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer using '3 + 3' dose escalation. Methods In Schedule 1, patients with solid tumours received doses from 1 to 50 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. In Schedule 2, patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung, or ovarian cancer received weekly doses of 10 or 25 mg/kg IV (1 cycle = 28 days). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, dose-limiting toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results Fifty of 68 enrolled patients received imalumab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included fatigue (10%) and vomiting (6%); four grade 3 serious TRAEs (two patients) occurred. The dose-limiting toxicity was allergic alveolitis (one patient, 50 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The maximum tolerated and biologically active doses were 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks and 10 mg/kg weekly, respectively. Of 39 assessed patients, 13 had stable disease (≥4 months in 8 patients). Conclusions Imalumab had a maximum tolerated dose of 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours, with a biologically active dose of 10 mg/kg weekly. Further investigation will help define the role of oxMIF as a cancer treatment target.

Purpose:Sabatolimab (MBG453) and spartalizumab are mAbs that bind T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) and programmed death-1 (PD-1), respectively. This phase I/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sabatolimab, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:Primary objectives of the phase I/Ib part were to characterize the safety and estimate recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for future studies. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian (hierarchical) logistic regression model. Sabatolimab was administered intravenously, 20 to 1,200 mg, every 2 or 4 weeks (Q2W or Q4W). Spartalizumab was administered intravenously, 80 to 400 mg, Q2W or Q4W.Results:Enrolled patients (n = 219) had a range of cancers, most commonly ovarian (17%) and colorectal cancer (7%); patients received sabatolimab (n = 133) or sabatolimab plus spartalizumab (n = 86). The MTD was not reached. The most common adverse event suspected to be treatment-related was fatigue (9%, sabatolimab; 15%, combination). No responses were seen with sabatolimab. Five patients receiving combination treatment had partial responses (6%; lasting 12–27 months) in colorectal cancer (n = 2), non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), malignant perianal melanoma, and SCLC. Of the five, two patients had elevated expression of immune markers in baseline biopsies; another three had >10% TIM-3–positive staining, including one patient with NSCLC who received prior PD-1 therapy.Conclusions:Sabatolimab plus spartalizumab was well tolerated and showed preliminary signs of antitumor activity. The RP2D for sabatolimab was selected as 800 mg Q4W (alternatively Q3W or Q2W schedules, based on modeling), with or without 400 mg spartalizumab Q4W.

Background The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) pathway is a key regulator of tumor therapy resistance. We investigated M2698, an oral p70S6K/AKT dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer who failed standard therapies. Methods M2698 was administered as monotherapy (escalation, 15–380 mg daily; food effect cohort, 240–320 mg daily) and combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen. Results Overall, 101 patients were treated (M2698, n = 62; M2698/trastuzumab, n = 13; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 26). Patients were predominantly aged KRAS, EGFR, AKT2) were 1.4 months and 2.8 months, respectively. Two patients with breast cancer (M2698/trastuzumab, n = 1; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 1) had partial response; their PFS durations were 31 months and 2.7 months, respectively. Conclusions M2698 was well tolerated. Combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen, M2698 demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to multiple standard therapies, suggesting that it could overcome treatment resistance. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01971515. Registered October 23, 2013.

Background Expression of LAG-3, an inhibitory immunoreceptor, has been linked to reduced T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. LAG525 is a humanized IgG4 anti-LAG-3 antibody which inhibits LAG-3 binding to MHC class II. Spartalizumab is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 mAb which inhibits PD-1 binding with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Preclinical data have shown promising antitumor activity when blocking LAG-3 and PD-1. Methods The Phase II part of the first-in-human study (NCT02460224) explored LAG525 + spartalizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cutaneous and non-cutaneous melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), mesothelioma, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The dose/schedule of LAG525 and spartalizumab was 400 mg IV Q3W and 300 mg IV Q3W, respectively. Half of patients with TNBC naive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 received LAG525 at 600 mg IV Q4W and spartalizumab at 400 mg IV Q4W. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1. Results As of June 1, 2020, 235 patients were enrolled in the Phase II part of the study, including patients with NSCLC (n=42), melanoma (n=42), RCC (n=38), mesothelioma (n=57), or TNBC (n=56). In total, 142 patients were naive to, and 93 patients were pretreated with, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Overall, 232 patients (99%) discontinued treatment, 76% due to progressive disease.ORR and disease control rate by indication and prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment are summarized below (table 1). Best overall response was 3 (1.3%) CR, 23 (9.8%) PR, 84 (35.7%) SD, 95 (40.4%) PD, and 30 (12.8%) unknown. For patients naive to anti-PD-1/PD-L1, median progression free survival (mPFS) in months (90% CI) was 3.9 (1.7–5.6) for NSCLC, 2.2 (1.6–5.6) for melanoma, 4.4 (2.1–11.1) for RCC, 5.5 (3.5–6.4) for mesothelioma, and 1.9 (1.6–2.6) for TNBC. For patients pretreated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1, mPFS in months (90% CI) was 3.5 (1.9–4.9) for NSCLC, 1.9 (1.8–3.7) for melanoma, 3.0 (1.6–3.9) for RCC, 3.4 (1.8–3.8) for mesothelioma, and 1.7 (1.3–3.4) for TNBC. Adverse events of any grade, regardless of cause, were reported in 233 (99%) patients; the most common (occurring in >20%) were nausea (25%), fatigue (23%), and dyspnea (21%). Conclusions LAG525 + spartalizumab exhibited antitumor activity across different indications, including patients with melanoma, RCC, and mesothelioma who had been pretreated with PD-1/-L1 inhibitors, suggesting that this combination may salvage prior PD-1/-L1 resistance. The combination was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed. Biomarker analysis is ongoing. Trial Registration NCT02460224 Ethics Approval This study was approved by an independent ethics committee or institutional review board at each site.

Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend re-challenge with the first-line treatment for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI)≥180 days. A phase II study (NCT02454972) showed remarkable antitumor activity in SCLC patients treated with lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m2 1 -h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks as second-line therapy. We report results for the pre-planned subset of patients with CTFI ≥ 180 days. Material and Methods: Twenty patients aged ≥18 years with pathologically proven SCLC diagnosis, pretreated with only one prior platinum-containing line, no CNS metastases, and with CTFI ≥ 180 days were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) assessed by the Investigators according to RECIST v1.1. Results: ORR was 60.0 % (95 %CI, 36.1−86.9), with a median duration of response of 5.5 months (95 %CI, 2.9−11.2) and disease control rate of 95.0 % (95 %CI, 75.1−99.9). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95 %CI, 2.6−7.3). With a censoring of 55.0 %, the median overall survival was 16.2 months (95 %CI, 9.6-upper level not reached). Of note, 60.9 % and 27.1 % of patients were alive at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were hematological disorders (neutropenia, 55.0 %; anemia; 10.0 % thrombocytopenia, 10.0 %), fatigue (10.0 %) and increased liver function tests (GGT, 10 %; ALT and AP, 5.0 % each). No febrile neutropenia was reported. Conclusion: Lurbinectedin is an effective treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed SCLC, especially in patients with CTFI ≥ 180 days, with acceptable safety and tolerability. These encouraging results suggest that lurbinectedin can be another valuable therapeutic option rather than platinum re-challenge., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

PURPOSE: This phase 1 study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Patients were dosed according to hepatic function classified by modified National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria and group assignment [normal (A1 and A2), mild (B), moderate (C1 and C2), or severe (D)]. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints included area under the concentration–time curve as daily exposure (AUC(daily)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) at steady state. Safety endpoints included types, incidence, seriousness, and relationship to crizotinib of adverse events. RESULTS: The AUC(daily) and C(max) in patients with normal liver function were 7107 ng h/mL and 375.1 ng/mL (A1) and 5422 ng h/mL and 283.9 ng/mL (A2), respectively. The AUC(daily) and C(max) ratios of adjusted geometric means for Groups B, C2, and D versus Group A1 were 91.12 and 91.20, 114.08 and 108.87, and 64.47 and 72.63, respectively. Any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 75% of patients; grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 25%, including fatigue (6%), hyponatremia (5%), and hyperbilirubinemia (3%). CONCLUSIONS: No adjustment to the approved 250 mg twice daily (BID) dose of crizotinib is recommended for patients with mild hepatic impairment. The recommended dose is 200 mg BID for patients with moderate hepatic impairment, and the dose should not exceed 250 mg daily for patients with severe hepatic impairment. Adverse events appeared consistent among the hepatic impairment groups.

AIMS The effect of repeat oral supratherapeutic dosing of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib on QTc interval was assessed in patients with BRAF V600-mutant tumours. METHODS Part 1 of this phase 1, multicentre, 2-part study (BRF113773/NCT01738451) assessed safety/tolerability of dabrafenib 225 or 300 mg twice daily (BID) to inform part 2 dosing. Patients in part 2 received dabrafenib-matched placebo on day -1, single-dose dabrafenib 300 mg on day 1, 300 mg BID on days 2 to 7, and 300 mg on day 8 (morning), followed by 24-h Holter electrocardiographic monitoring and pharmacokinetics sample collection each dose day. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics analysis assessed combined dabrafenib and metabolite effects on QTc interval. RESULTS Part 1 (n = 12) determined supratherapeutic dosing, 300 mg BID, for part 2. Thirty-one patients completed part 2. Mean maximum ΔΔQTcF occurred on day 8, 10 h postdose (2.86 msec; 90% CI, -1.36 to 7.07). Categorical analysis showed no placebo and dabrafenib outliers (increase >60 msec; QTcF >500 msec). Day 1 dabrafenib 300 mg Cmax and AUC(0-∞) were ≈ 2-fold higher than with single-dose 150 mg. Day 8 AUC(0-τ) with 300 mg BID was ≈ 2.7-fold higher than with 150 mg BID. Dabrafenib metabolites showed similar trends. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modelling/simulation showed that median QTc increase was

REOLYSIN® (pelareorep) is an investigational new drug, consisting of a live, replication-competent, Reovirus Type 3 Dearing strain in a proprietary formulation. Several preclinical and clinical trials with REOLYSIN® on a wide range of cancer indications have demonstrated antineoplastic activity on cells with activated RAS-signaling pathway. Furthermore, long-term survival benefits were evident in post-treatment patients indicating a potential antitumor immune response triggered by REOLYSIN®. Numerous mono and/or combination therapy studies with the agent showed a consistent safety profile. The current study is a phase II, single-arm, open label trial of REOLYSIN® in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with advanced melanoma. Results from the 14 patients enrolled in the study exhibited no grade 4 adverse events or deaths but manageable grade-3 toxicities commonly attributed to REOLYSIN®, including pyrexia, chills, myalgia, pain, fatigue, and nausea. The number of treatment cycles ranged from 2 to 20 with a median of 6 cycles. The study met its treatment and efficacy goal for the first stage with three partial responses (ORR was 21%). No complete responses were noted. The median PFS and OS were 5.2 and 10.9 months, respectively. The 1-year OS was 43% with a disease control rate of 85%. In conclusion, REOLYSIN® combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel is a safe and potentially efficacious therapy for patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Additional combination studies using REOLYSIN® with chemo/immunotherapy drugs may support more favorable outcomes for patients in this indication.

Background: Mipsagargin (G-202) is a thapsigargin-based prodrug with cytotoxic activity masked by a peptide that is cleaved by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protease expressed in prostate cancer cells and the endothelium of tumor vasculature. It was hypothesized that PSMA-mediated activation of mipsagargin would result in disruption of the tumor vasculature, leading to a decrease in blood flow, and in direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells, resulting in anti-tumor activity. Method: In this open-label, Phase II study, mipsagargin was administered intravenously on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 28-day cycle to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progressed on or after treatment with sorafenib or intolerant of sorafenib. Assessments included time to disease progression (TTP), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Blood flow metrics in hepatic lesions were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: Of 25 treated patients, 19 were evaluable for efficacy. None had an objective response, 12 (63.2%) had a best response of stable disease, and 12 (63.2%) showed radiologic progression, seven patients (36.8%) were censored. The median TTP was 134.0 days, median PFS was 129.0 days, and median OS was 205.0 days. Of five patients with DCE-MRI data for 11 HCC lesions, all demonstrated a reduced Ktrans (mean, 52%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were Grade 1&ndash, 2 and consisted of increased blood creatinine (68.0%), fatigue (56.0%), and nausea (44.0%). Conclusions: Mipsagargin is relatively well tolerated and promotes prolonged disease stabilization in patients with advanced HCC that had progressed on prior treatment with sorafenib. A significant decrease in Ktrans upon treatment suggests mipsagargin reduces blood flow in hepatic lesions.

Osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), undergoes significant hepatic elimination. In this phase 1 study, we assessed the effects of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of osimertinib in patients with malignant solid tumors. In part A, patients with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment, according to the Child-Pugh classification, received a single 80 mg oral dose of osimertinib. Standard PK measures were assessed. In part B, patients could continue osimertinib treatment if deemed clinically appropriate. We compared these study results with a population PK analysis including other osimertinib clinical studies. Geometric mean osimertinib plasma concentrations were lower in patients with mild (n = 7) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 5) versus normal hepatic function (n = 10): Cmax was reduced to 51% and 61%, respectively; area under the curve was reduced to 63% and 68%, respectively. PK results for the metabolites were similar. No apparent differences in the safety profile were found between patients with normal hepatic function and patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Comparison of these study results with National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria from population PK analysis showed osimertinib exposure was not affected by hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for osimertinib when treating patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. No apparent differences in the safety of osimertinib were found between patients with normal hepatic function and mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effect of moderate or severe hepatic impairment on the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of the investigational anticancer agent, alisertib, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Patients with normal hepatic function (total bilirubin and alanine transaminase [ALT] ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN]), moderate hepatic impairment (1.5 × ULNtotal bilirubin ≤ 3 × ULN, with any ALT) or severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin3 × ULN, with any ALT), received a single 50-mg oral dose of alisertib. Blood samples for PK were collected up to 168 hours postdose. Predose samples were also used to assess alisertib plasma protein binding. Patients could continue to receive alisertib for 7 days in 21-day cycles (50, 30, or 10 mg twice daily for normal hepatic function, moderate hepatic impairment, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively). Alisertib was approximately 99% protein bound in all hepatic function groups. Alisertib exposure was similar in moderate and severe hepatic impairment groups, but higher than the normal hepatic function group. The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for unbound alisertib area under the curve extrapolated to infinity for moderate/severe impairment groups versus the normal hepatic function group was 254% (184%, 353%). Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment have approximately 150% higher unbound alisertib exposures compared with patients with normal hepatic function. An approximately 60% reduction of the starting dose of alisertib in patients with moderate/severe hepatic impairment is recommended based on pharmacokinetic considerations.

PURPOSE: Pralatrexate is a folate analogue indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. It has not been formally tested in patients with renal impairment. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of pralatrexate in patients with renal impairment and with relapsed/refractory advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. METHODS: This was an open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study. Eligible patients received pralatrexate administered as an IV push over 3–5 min once weekly for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Four cohorts of 6 patients were planned for a total of 24 patients. Patients with normal renal function (Cohort A), mild (Cohort B), and moderate renal impairment (Cohort C) received 30 mg/m(2) pralatrexate once weekly for 6 weeks in 7-week cycles, and patients with severe renal impairment (Cohort D) were to be administered 20 mg/m(2) once weekly for 6 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were collected at pre-specified time points to determine the PK profile of pralatrexate in each treatment cohort. Patients were followed for safety and tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were enrolled and 27 patients (14 male) received at least 1 dose of pralatrexate. Because of a qualifying toxicity in Cohort C, the starting dose for Cohort D was reduced to 15 mg/m(2). Chronic renal impairment led to a decrease in renal clearance of the pralatrexate diastereomers, PDX-10a and PDX-10b, but systemic exposure to these diastereomers was not dramatically affected by renal impairment. Pralatrexate exposure in Cohort D (15 mg/m(2)) was similar to the exposure in other cohorts (30 mg/m(2)). No apparent difference in toxicity between the four treatment cohorts was observed, except for an increase in cytopenias in patients with severe renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Pralatrexate exposure, at a dose of 30 mg/m(2), in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment was similar to the exposure in patients with normal renal function. For patients with severe renal impairment only, a pralatrexate dose of 15 mg/m(2) is recommended.

Background This study was designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of alisertib (MLN8237) in combination with docetaxel and to identify a recommended dose for the combination. Methods Adults with metastatic cancer were treated on 21-day cycles with alisertib (10, 20, 30, or 40 mg) twice daily on days 1 to 7 or days 1 to 5 and with docetaxel (75 or 60 mg/m(2) ) on day 1. The primary objectives were to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for future studies. Secondary objectives included an efficacy assessment and PK analyses of docetaxel and alisertib. Results Forty-one patients participated. Eight dose levels were explored with various doses of alisertib and docetaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenic fever, neutropenia without fever, stomatitis, and urinary tract infection. The RP2D of this combination was 20 mg of alisertib twice daily on days 1 to 7 and intravenous docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 in 21-day cycles. Eight of the 28 patients (29%) who were efficacy-evaluable had objective responses. These included 1 complete response in a patient with bladder cancer, 6 partial responses in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, and 1 partial response in a patient with angiosarcoma. Concomitant administration of alisertib did not produce any clinically meaningful change in docetaxel PK. Conclusions Alisertib at 20 mg twice daily on days 1 to 7 with intravenous docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 in a 21-day cycle was well tolerated, and the combination demonstrated antitumor activity. Cancer 2016;122:2524-33. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Background: CSF-1R signaling regulates the function of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) which are poor prognostic indicators in several cancers. In animal models, including intracranial GBM, M-CSF/CSF-1 blockade may reduce TAM recruitment to the tumor microenvironment, inhibit tumor growth, and overcome resistance to PD-1 inhibitors. BLZ945, a highly selective brain penetrant CSF-1R kinase inhibitor, is being explored as single agent and with the anti-PD-1 mAb, spartalizumab. Here we present dose-escalation results from a Phase I/II, open-label study of BLZ945 ± spartalizumab (NCT02829723). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with advanced/metastatic solid tumors including GBM, received BLZ945 Q1W (300 mg-1600 mg QD and 600 mg BID), 7d on/7d off (150 mg-300 mg QD), or 4d on/10d off (300 mg-1200 mg QD and 600 mg BID); or BLZ945 Q1W (150 mg-1400 mg QD, 600 mg-800 mg BID) or 4d on/10d off (300 mg-1200 mg QD) + spartalizumab (400 mg IV, Q4W). Phase I objective was to characterize safety, tolerability, antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BLZ945 ± spartalizumab and determine the MTDs and/or RP2Ds using an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control, and considering overall safety including control of ALT/AST, PK, and clinical efficacy. Results: We report 146 pts receiving BLZ945 (77 pts) or the combination (69 pts), 57/43% M/F, median age 57.5 years. DLTs occurred in 7/77 pts in the BLZ945 arm (increases in amylase, lipase, AST, ALP, worsening of elevated amylase, sudden death) and 7/69 pts in the combination arm (increases in amylase, AST, ALT, dizziness, hyperuricemia). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) (≥20%) were AST increase (35%), nausea (29%) and vomiting (23%) in the BLZ945 arm and AST increase (38%), ALT increase (25%), vomiting (23%), and nausea (20%) in the combination arm. Gr ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 19/77 (25%) pts in the BLZ945 arm and 23/69 (33%) pts in the combination arm. Median duration of exposure (DOE) was 8 weeks for BLZ945 alone (1.0-66.6) and for the combination (2.1-85.0). BLZ945 half-life was 15hr-24hr, exposure increases were less than dose proportional after 600/700 mg. BLZ945 did not affect spartalizumab PK and vice versa. Overall response assessment (RECIST 1.1) showed a partial response in 1 pt with HNSCC in the combination arm; stable disease was observed in 21/61 (34%) and 22/49 (45%) pts in the BLZ945 and combination arms, respectively. In evaluable pts with relapsed/refractory GBM (n=18: 7 BLZ945 arm, 11 combination arm), 2 partial responses were reported per RANO (1 per arm). Among treated pts with GBM (n=24), the median DOE was 8 weeks, with 7/24 (29%) pts on treatment for >16 weeks. Conclusions: BLZ945 ± spartalizumab showed an acceptable safety pattern; RP2D was declared as 1200 mg (4d on/10d off) for single-agent BLZ945, the MTD was 700 mg (4d on/10d off) for BLZ945 + spartalizumab. Encouraging preliminary antitumor activity was observed in pts with GBM. Citation Format: Chia-Chi Lin, Marta Gil-Martin, Todd M. Bauer, Aung Naing, Darren Wan-Teck Lim, John Sarantopoulos, Ravit Geva, Yuichi Ando, Liqiong Fan, Somesh Choudhury, Pei-Jung Tu, Cornelia Quadt, Armando Santoro. Phase I study of BLZ945 alone and with spartalizumab (PDR001) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT171.

Purpose:Transcription factor retinoic acid receptor–related orphan receptor γ (RORγ) regulates type 17 effector T-cell differentiation and function and is key to immune cell regulation. Synthetic RORγ agonists modulate immune cell gene expression to increase effector T-cell activity and decrease immune suppression. A phase 1 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of LYC-55716 (cintirorgon), a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule RORγ agonist in adults with relapsed/refractory metastatic cancer.Patients and Methods:Patients received 28-day treatment cycles of oral LYC-55716; dose and dosing regimen were determined according to pharmacokinetic profile and safety. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and objective tumor response rate.Results:No dose-limiting toxicities occurred among the 32 enrolled patients who received LYC-55716 150 mg BID to 450 mg BID. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were primarily grade 1–2 and included diarrhea (n = 11), fatigue (n = 7), anemia (n = 4), decreased appetite (n = 4), and nausea (n = 4). Grade 3 AEs were anemia (n = 2), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (n = 1), and hypophosphatemia (n = 1). Pharmacokinetic concentrations achieved levels expected for target gene regulation. Pharmacodynamic results indicated RORγ pathway engagement. Two patients (NSCLC and sarcomatoid breast cancer) had confirmed partial responses; 11 had disease stabilization for 2 to 12 months (6 received >4 months of treatment).Conclusions:These data support the safety and tolerability of LYC-55716 and selection of 450 mg BID dose for a phase 2a study assessing LYC-55716 clinical activity, safety, and biomarkers in patients with NSCLC, head and neck, gastroesophageal, renal cell, urothelial, and ovarian cancers.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of renal impairment on eribulin mesylate pharmacokinetics following a single dose in adults with advanced solid tumors. Methods Patients were grouped by renal function: moderate impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 30–50 mL/min), severe impairment (CrCl 15–29 mL/min), or normal (CrCl ≥80 mL/min). During each 21-day cycle, eribulin mesylate doses (days 1 and 8) were administered intravenously: moderate, 1.1 mg/m2 (except cycle 1 day 1, 1.4 mg/m2); severe, 0.7 mg/m2; normal, 1.4 mg/m2. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled (normal, n = 6; moderate, n = 7; severe, n = 6). Renal impairment was associated with an increased mean dose-normalized area under the concentration–time curve (ratios for moderate/normal and severe/normal: 1.49; 90 % confidence interval [CI] 0.9, 2.45). CrCl and renal function correlated positively, with a numerically small slope (0.0184; 90 % CI −0.00254, 0.0394). A simulated dose reduction to eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment achieved the same exposure as 1.4 mg/m2 in those with normal renal function. All groups had similar toxicity profiles, with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusions Renal impairment decreased eribulin clearance and increased exposure. Pharmacokinetic evaluation supports an eribulin dose reduction to 1.1 mg/m2 in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01418677.

Purpose: BNC105P inhibits tubulin polymerization, and preclinical studies suggest possible synergy with everolimus. In this phase I/II study, efficacy and safety of the combination were explored in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Experimental Design: A phase I study in patients with clear cell mRCC and any prior number of therapies was conducted using a classical 3 + 3 design to evaluate standard doses of everolimus with increasing doses of BNC105P. At the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), patients with clear cell mRCC and one to two prior therapies (including ≥ 1 VEGF-TKI) were randomized to BNC105P with everolimus (arm A) or everolimus alone (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was 6-month progression-free survival (6MPFS). Secondary endpoints included response rate, PFS, overall survival, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: In the phase I study (N = 15), a dose of BNC105P at 16 mg/m2 with everolimus at 10 mg daily was identified as the RP2D. In the phase II study, 139 patients were randomized, with 69 and 67 evaluable patients in arms A and B, respectively. 6MPFS was similar in the treatment arms (arm A: 33.82% vs. arm B: 30.30%, P = 0.66) and no difference in median PFS was observed (arm A: 4.7 mos vs. arm B: 4.1 mos; P = 0.49). Changes in matrix metalloproteinase-9, stem cell factor, sex hormone-binding globulin, and serum amyloid A protein were associated with clinical outcome with BNC105P. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not met in an unselected population, correlative studies suggest several biomarkers that warrant further prospective evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(15); 3420–7. ©2015 AACR.

Background Carfilzomib is approved in the United States and Europe for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or progressive advanced malignancies and varying degrees of impaired hepatic function. Methods Patients with normal hepatic function (normal) or hepatic impairment (mild, moderate, or severe) received carfilzomib infusion in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was to assess the influence of hepatic impairment on carfilzomib PK following 27 and 56 mg/m2 doses. Results The majority of patients enrolled in this study had solid tumors (n = 44) vs. MM (n = 2) since patients with multiple myeloma do not tend to have severe hepatic impairment in the same way as patients with solid tumors. A total of 11 normal and 17 mild, 14 moderate, and 4 severe hepatic impairment patients were enrolled. Compared with patients with normal hepatic function, patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment had 44 and 26% higher carfilzomib AUC0–last, respectively (27 mg/m2 dose); increases at the 56 mg/m2 dose were 45 and 21%, respectively. Considerable PK variability (% coefficient of variation in AUC ≤100%) was discerned and no consistent trend of increasing exposure resulting from increasing hepatic impairment severity (moderate vs. mild) was seen. The observed adverse event (AE) profile in patients of mostly solid tumors was consistent with the known safety profile of carfilzomib, with the exception of an increased frequency of AEs consistent with hepatic function abnormalities. Conclusions In this population of primarily advanced solid tumor patients, patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment had approximately 20–50% higher carfilzomib AUC vs. normal hepatic function patients. These increases are unlikely to be clinically significant, in light of the intrinsic PK variability and exposure–response relationship of carfilzomib. Trial registrationhttp://clinicaltrials.gov NCT01949545; date of registration: September 6, 2013

ATI-1123 is a liposomal formulation of docetaxel and may be administered without the premedications and hypersensitivity reactions. This Phase I study examines the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and antitumor activity of ATI-1123.Patients with advanced solid malignancies received escalating doses of ATI-1123 intravenously over 1-h every 3 weeks. The dosing commenced using an accelerated titration design and was followed by a modified 3 + 3 Fibonacci schema to determine maximally tolerated dose (MTD). Plasma was analyzed for encapsulated/non-encapsulated docetaxel; PK analyses were performed using model independent method. Response was assessed using RECIST criteria.In total, 29 patients received doses ranging from 15 to 110 mg/m(2). At 110 mg/m(2), two of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities including grade 3 stomatitis and febrile neutropenia. The 90 mg/m(2) cohort was expanded to ten patients and identified as the MTD. The most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia, and diarrhea. ATI-1123 exhibited linear and dose proportional PKs. One patient with lung cancer had confirmed partial response, and stable disease was observed in 75 % patients.ATI-1123 demonstrated an acceptable tolerability and favorable PK profile in patients with solid tumors. Our results provide support for Phase II trials to determine the antitumor activity of this drug.

Introduction Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with in vivo activity against taxane-sensitive and -resistant tumor cell lines and tumor xenografts. Cabazitaxel/cisplatin have therapeutic synergism in tumor-bearing mice, providing a rationale for assessing this combination in patients with solid tumors. Methods The primary objectives of this study were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cabazitaxel/cisplatin combined regimen (Part 1) and to assess antitumor activity at the MTD (Part 2). Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also examined. Results Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (10 in Part 1; 15 in Part 2). In Part 1, two dose levels were evaluated; the MTD for cabazitaxel/cisplatin (given Q3W) was 15/75 mg/m2. DLTs occurring during Cycle 1 at the maximum administered dose (20/75 mg/m2; acute renal failure and febrile neutropenia) and the MTD (febrile neutropenia and hypersensitivity despite pre-medication) were as expected for taxane/platinum combinations. For the 18 patients treated at the MTD, the most frequent possibly related non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (Grade ≥3) were nausea (16.7 %), fatigue, acute renal failure and decreased appetite (each 11.1 %). Neutropenia was the most frequent treatment-emergent Grade ≥3 hematologic laboratory abnormality at the MTD (77.8 %). The best overall response at the MTD was stable disease, observed in 66.7 % of patients. PK results of the combination did not appear to differ from single-agent administration for each agent. Conclusion Combination treatment with cabazitaxel/cisplatin had a manageable safety profile; no PK interactions were evident. The recommended Phase II dose for this combination is cabazitaxel/cisplatin 15/75 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity findings suggest that further evaluation of this combination in disease-specific trials is warranted.

Melanomas are vascular tumors with a high incidence of BRAF mutations driving tumor proliferation. Complete inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling has potential for enhanced antitumor efficacy.Patients with advanced melanoma and adequate organ function were eligible. Sorafenib was given orally at 200 mg BiD for 5 days every week; bevacizumab was administered 5 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days. The primary objective was to determine clinical biological activity. The secondary objectives were safety, tolerability, and time to progression (TTP). Pharmacodynamic analysis included serum VEGF and soluble VEGF receptor-1 and VEGF receptor-2 performed at baseline, C1D15 and C2D1. The study was terminated during the first stage of a Simon two-stage design, after 14 of planned 21 subjects were enrolled.Of the 14 patients who received treatment, no objective tumor responses were observed. Stable disease (SD) ≥16 weeks was observed in 57 % patients, including three patients with SD lasting ≥1 year. Median TTP was 32 weeks. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot syndrome (57.1 %), fatigue (57.1 %), hypertension (64.3 %), and proteinuria (35.7). Grade 3/4 drug-related AEs were hypertension (14.2 %), hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and thrombocytopenia (7 % each). Patients with low VEGF (300 pg/ml) experienced longer TTP than those with high VEGF [median 50 vs. 15 weeks, p = 0.02). A similar pattern was seen for VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, although it did not reach statistical significance.Combined VEGF/VEGFR blockade using bevacizumab with sorafenib shows clinical activity. The linkage between VEGF levels and time to tumor progression needs further exploration.

Introduction The goal of organ dysfunction Phase I trials is to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of novel agents in cancer patients with liver or kidney dysfunction, but the clinical benefit is not well established. Methods We reviewed 170 patients across 15 liver dysfunction studies at our institution, grouped based on the NCI-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria or Child-Pugh Score. Results The median survival for the entire cohort was two months and just one month amongst patients with severe liver dysfunction. Patients with normal or mild liver dysfunction, absence of tumor in liver, good performance status, higher serum albumin and lower bilirubin, aspartate transaminase and alkaline phosphatase had improved survival by univariate analysis. Serum albumin and liver function classification remained significant by multivariate analysis. Conclusion Given poor survival of patients with liver dysfunction, we need better criteria, such as albumin levels, for optimally selecting patients for liver dysfunction studies.

Background TP-0903 is a novel, oral small molecule AXL kinase inhibitor impacting oncogenesis and resistance. AXL is upregulated in many solid tumors and influences the mesenchymal phenotype, which drives resistance to targeted cancer therapeutics, traditional chemotherapies, and immuno-oncology agents. Methods A dose escalation study was performed to examine the safety and clinical activity of TP-0903 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral TP-0903 once daily for 21 of 28-day cycles. Nine dose levels were explored using modified 3 + 3 dose escalation rules. The primary objective of the trial was to identify the maximum tolerated dose of TP-0903 prior to expanding into refractory colorectal, platinum refractory/resistant ovarian cancer and TP-0903 in combination with immunotherapy or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in immunotherapy-resistant tumors or non-small cell lung cancers. Potential biomarkers were evaluated using liquid biopsies and pre-and post-dose tumor biopsies will be reported. Results Thirty-six patients were enrolled between December 2016 and April 2019 receiving 1.5 to 37mg/m2 over 9 cohorts. The most frequently observed >Gr3 AEs were thrombocytopenia (3), anemia (2), nausea (2), syncope (2), and vomiting (2), all manageable with supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was the dose limiting toxicity observed in one patient in cohort 8 (28 mg/m2), reoccurring as grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 2 patients in cohort 9 (37mg/m2) without meeting DLT criteria. Patients are currently still ongoing in cohort 9. Eleven patients, (11/36, 30.6%), had stable disease with a median duration of 3.7 months (range 1.6 to 7.4+ months). Baseline serum soluble AXL of all enrolled patients was determined by immunoassay and indicated higher levels in patients with documented stable disease vs. progressive disease (p = 0.0332). Conclusions The oral small molecule AXL kinase inhibitor TP-0903 is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. Hematologic toxicity was observed as a DLT. Future studies will evaluate the role of TP0903 in selected disease cohorts as monotherapy and in combination. Serum soluble AXL will be evaluated as a potential predictive biomarker of response. Clinical trial identification NCT: 02729298. Legal entity responsible for the study Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Funding Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Disclosure J. Sarantopoulos: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero. G. Fotopoulos: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals. F.Y. Tsai: Advisory / Consultancy: Tempus Lab; Officer / Board of Directors, Co-Founder: Caremission LLC; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Salarius Pharmaceuticals. M.S. Beg: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals. A.A. Adjei: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals. Y. Lou: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Stem Centrx; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Blueprint Medicines; Research grant / Funding (institution): Vaccinex; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): MacroGenics. M. Seetharam: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals. M.A. Villalona-Calero: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol Meyers; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novocure; Research grant / Funding (institution): Guardant. J. Melear: Research grant / Funding (institution): Tolero Pharmaceuticals. M. Janat-Amsbury: Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals. H. Beever: Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals. L. Mouritsen: Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals. M. Wade: Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals. B.V. Bryan: Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals. D.J. Bearss: Leadership role, Full / Part-time employment: Tolero Pharmaceuticals.

Background: MBG453 and spartalizumab, humanized IgG4 mAbs, block binding of TIM-3 to PtdSer and PD-1 to PD-L1/2, respectively. Preclinical studies show synergistic anti-tumor activity of TIM-3 and PD-1 co-blockade. Here we report the dose escalation results from a Ph I-Ib/II study of MBG453 ± spartalizumab in metastatic solid tumors (NCT02608268). Methods: Metastatic cancer pts received intravenous MBG453 alone at 80-1200 mg Q2W or Q4W, or combination therapy (Q2W/Q4W) with MBG453 (20-800/80-1200 mg) + spartalizumab (80-240 mg/80-400 mg). The recommended Ph II dose (RP2D) was determined using an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model guided by escalation with overdose control together with Ph I-Ib endpoints (dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] at 8 weeks). Results: As of July 26, 2018, 87 pts received MBG453 alone (14% were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated; common tumors [≥9%]: pancreatic cancer [11%], sarcoma [10%], and colorectal cancer [CRC; 9%]) and 86 pts received MBG453 + spartalizumab (27% were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated; common tumors [≥6%]: melanoma [8%], NSCLC [7%], CRC [7%], and ovarian cancer [6%]). One DLT (myasthenia gravis grade [G] 4) was reported in a pt with thymoma treated with MBG453 (240 mg Q4W) + spartalizumab (80 mg Q4W). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 40% and 59% of pts treated with MBG453 and MBG453 + spartalizumab, and G3/4 AEs in 0% and 11% of pts; the most common AE (≥10%) was fatigue in 10% and 15% of pts, respectively. MBG453 exposure generally increased in a dose-proportional manner. Maximum tolerated doses were not identified with the tested dose/schedule. MBG453 800 mg Q4W (n=9 pts treated) and MBG453 800 mg + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W (n=6 pts treated) were declared as RP2Ds. Stable disease (SD) was seen in 25/87 (29%) pts treated with MBG453 alone (common tumors [≥2 pts]: sarcoma [n=5], and breast cancer, CRC, ovarian cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and NSCLC [n=2 pts each]); 4 of 25 pts with SD were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated. Of 86 MBG453 + spartalizumab pts, partial responses were seen in 4 pts (5%); 1 anti-PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated pt (out of 6 with NSCLC; DOR: 392 d), 3 anti-PD-1/PD-L1 naïve pts (CRC [n=2 out of 6, DOR: 223 d, 109 d]; SCLC [n=1 out of 3; DOR: 112 d]). SD was seen in 34/86 (40%) MBG453 + spartalizumab pts (common tumors [≥3 pts]: melanoma [n=5; 2 cutaneous, 2 uveal, and 1 non-cutaneous], ovarian cancer [n=3], and urothelial carcinoma [n=3]); 10 of 34 pts with SD were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 pre-treated. RNAseq analysis of screening and on-treatment biopsies revealed a pharmacodynamic trend of increased IFN-γ-associated gene signatures following MBG453 + spartalizumab treatment. Conclusions: MBG453 + spartalizumab was well tolerated with preliminary signs of anti-tumor activity. MBG453 800 mg Q4W and MBG453 800 mg + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W were selected as the RP2Ds; dose expansion is ongoing in pts with melanoma or NSCLC resistant to anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Citation Format: Giuseppe Curigliano, Hans Gelderblom, Nicolas Mach, Toshihiko Doi, Wai Meng David Tai, Patrick Forde, John Sarantopoulos, Philippe L. Bedard, Chia-Chi Lin, Stephen Hodi, Sofie Wilgenhof, Armando Santoro, Catherine Sabatos-Peyton, Tyler Longmire, Kitty Wan, Panagiotis Nikolopoulos, Luigi Manenti, Aung Naing. Phase (Ph) I/II study of MBG453± spartalizumab (PDR001) in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT183.

Aurora kinase inhibitors (AKIs) are a class of antimitotic, small-molecule anticancer agents. MSC1992371A is an AKI being evaluated for the treatment of patients with solid tumors. This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MSC1992371A in different dosing schedules in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. MSC1992371A was administered on days 1 and 8 (schedule 1) or on days 1, 2, and 3 (schedule 2) of a 21-day cycle. The study was expanded with a third schedule (study drug on days 1-3 and 8-10). Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Antitumor efficacy, drug pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Ninety-two patients were enrolled. MSC1992371A was dosed over eight levels in schedules 1 and 2, and the MTD was determined as 74 mg/m(2) per cycle for both schedules and as 60 mg/m(2) in schedule 3, albeit only in three patients due to discontinuation of the study. Overall, the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and fatigue. The most frequent dose-limiting toxicity over all schedules was neutropenia. MSC1992371A plasma concentrations tended to increase with increasing dose levels. Although no complete or partial responses were seen, stable disease ≥3 months was observed in 11 patients. Analysis for markers of target modulation and pharmacodynamics effects was unsuccessful. MSC1992371A was generally well tolerated in patients, with mainly transient hematologic toxicities apparent at an MTD of 60-74 mg/m(2)/21-day cycle, independent of dosing frequency.

Purpose: Pazopanib is a potent, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; however, there is limited information regarding the effects of liver function on pazopanib metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The objective of this study was to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic profile of pazopanib in patients with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction. Experimental Design: Patients with any solid tumors or lymphoma were stratified into four groups based on the degree of hepatic dysfunction according to the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria. Pazopanib was given orally once a day on a 21-day cycle. A modified 3+3 design was used. Results: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. Patients in the mild group tolerated 800 mg per day. The moderate and severe groups tolerated 200 mg per day. Pharmacokinetic data in the mild group were similar to the data in the normal group. Comparison of the median Cmax and area under the curve [AUC(0–24)] in the moderate or severe groups at 200 mg per day to the values in the normal and mild groups at 800 mg per day indicated less than dose–proportional systemic exposures in patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment. This suggests that the lower maximum-tolerated dose in the moderate and severe group is not due to a decrease in drug clearance or alteration in the proportion of metabolites. Conclusions: In patients with mild liver dysfunction, pazopanib is well tolerated at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved dose of 800 mg per day. Patients with moderate and severe liver dysfunction tolerated 200 mg per day. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3631–9. ©2013 AACR.

Background Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR with evidence of antitumor activity in an I.V. formulation. This multicenter, open-label, 3 + 3 design nonrandomized, dose-escalation, phase I/IIa trial was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters, maximum tolerated dose, and antitumor activity of oral ridaforolimus. Patients and methods Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors refractory to therapy were eligible. Seven different continuous and intermittent dosing regimens were examined. Results One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study among which 85 were patients with sarcoma. Stomatitis was the most common DLT observed. The dosing regimen, 40 mg QD × 5 days/week, provided the best combination of cumulative dose, dose density, and cumulative exposure, and was the recommended dosing regimen for subsequent clinical development. PK was nonlinear, with less than proportional increases in day-1 blood AUC0–∞ and Cmax, particularly with doses >40 mg. The terminal half-life estimate of ridaforolimus (QD × 5 40 mg) was 42.0 h, and the mean half-life ∼30–60 h. The clinical benefit rate, (complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥4 months was 24.5% for all patients and 27.1% for patients with sarcoma. Conclusion Oral ridaforolimus had an acceptable safety profile and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with sarcoma and other malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00112372.

Purpose: GRN1005 is a peptide–drug conjugate with the ability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and tumor cells by targeting the low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein-1. We conducted a first-in-human phase I trial of GRN1005 in patients with recurrent glioma. Methods: Patients received GRN1005 by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Doses were escalated using a modified Fibonacci scheme. Study objectives included safety, tolerability, identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Tumor extracted from patients undergoing surgery following administration of GRN1005 was analyzed to determine whether therapeutic concentrations of GRN1005 were achieved. Results: Sixty-three patients received GRN1005 at doses of 30 to 700 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Therapy was well tolerated with neutropenia, leucopenia, and fatigue as the most frequent drug-associated grade 3/4 or higher toxicities. The MTD was 650 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 neutropenia. There was no evidence of central nervous system toxicity or antibody production. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that exposure to GRN1005 was dose proportional. We observed one complete and two partial responses. Eight of 27 patients dosed ≥420 mg/m2 had stable disease, which lasted a median of 51 days. Therapeutic concentrations of GRN1005 and free paclitaxel were shown in tumor tissue of surgical patients dosed with ≥200 mg/m2. Conclusion: GRN1005 delivers paclitaxel across the BBB and achieves therapeutic concentrations in tumor tissue. It has similar toxicity to paclitaxel and appears to have activity in recurrent glioma. The recommended phase II dose is 650 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Clin Cancer Res; 19(6); 1567–76. ©2013 AACR.

A capsule formulation of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dovitinib (TKI258) was recently studied in a phase 3 renal cell carcinoma trial; however, tablets are the planned commercial formulation. Therefore, this randomized 2-way crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of dovitinib tablet and capsule formulations in pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, excluding breast cancer. In this 2-part study, eligible patients received dovitinib 500 mg once daily on a 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule. During the 2-period bioequivalence phase, patients received their initial formulation (capsule or tablet) for 3 weeks before being switched to the alternative formulation in the second period. Patients could continue to receive dovitinib capsules on the same dosing schedule during the post-bioequivalence phase. A total of 173 patients were enrolled into the bioequivalence phase of the study (capsule → tablet, n = 88; tablet → capsule, n = 85), and 69 patients had evaluable pharmacokinetics (PK) for both periods. PK analyses showed similar exposure and PK profiles for the dovitinib capsule and tablet formulations and supported bioequivalence [geometric mean ratios: AUClast, 0.95 (90 % CI 0.88–1.01); C max, 0.98 (90 % CI 0.91–1.05)]. The most common adverse events, suspected to be study drug related, included diarrhea (60 %), nausea (53 %), fatigue (45 %), and vomiting (43 %). Of 168 patients evaluable for response, 1 achieved a partial response, and stable disease was observed in 32 % of patients. Dovitinib capsules and tablets were bioequivalent, with a safety profile similar to that observed in other dovitinib studies of patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors.

Purpose Cabazitaxel has not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment (HI). This phase I study assessed cabazitaxel safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with HI. Methods Patients with advanced, non-hematologic cancer, and normal hepatic function (Cohort 1: C-1), or mild (C-2), moderate (C-3), severe (C-4) HI received cabazitaxel starting doses of 25, 20, 10, and 10 mg/m2, respectively. Doses were escalated in patients with HI based on Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Adverse events and the cabazitaxel pharmacokinetic profile were assessed. Results In C-2, three patients receiving cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 experienced DLTs; maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg/m2. In C-3, two patients receiving 20 mg/m2 experienced DLTs; MTD was 15 mg/m2. C-4 was discontinued early due to DLTs. The most frequent cabazitaxel-related, grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (42%). Cabazitaxel clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) was lower in C-1 (geometric mean [GM] 13.4 L/h/m2) than expected (26.4 L/h/m2), but similar in C-2 (23.5 L/h/m2) and C-3 (27.9 L/h/m2). CL/BSA in C-4 was 18.1 L/h/m2. Compared with C-2, CL/BSA increased 19% in C-3 (GM ratio 1.19; 90% CI 0.74–1.91), but decreased 23% in C-4 (0.77; 0.39–1.53). Cabazitaxel free fraction was unaltered. No significant correlation was found between grade 3–4 toxicities and pharmacokinetic parameters. Conclusions Mild–moderate HI did not cause substantial decline in cabazitaxel clearance. Cabazitaxel dose reductions in patients with mild–moderate HI, and a contraindication in patients with severe HI, are justified based on safety data.

// Sukeshi Patel 1 , Vincent Hurez 1 , Steffan T. Nawrocki 1 , Martin Goros 1 , Joel Michalek 1 , John Sarantopoulos 1 , Tyler Curiel 1 , Devalingam Mahalingam 1 1 Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA Correspondence to: Devalingam Mahalingam, email: mahalingam@uthscsa.edu Keywords: vorinostat, hydroxychloroquine, colorectal cancer, autophagy, immunity Received: May 06, 2016 Accepted: June 30, 2016 Published: July 23, 2016 ABSTRACT Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) enhances the anti-cancer activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat (VOR), in pre-clinical models and early phase clinical studies of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Mechanisms could include autophagy inhibition, accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, and subsequent tumor cell apoptosis. There is growing evidence that autophagy inhibition could lead to improved anti-cancer immunity. To date, effects of autophagy on immunity have not been reported in cancer patients. To address this, we expanded an ongoing clinical study to include patients with advanced, refractory mCRC to evaluate further the clinical efficacy and immune effects of VOR plus HCQ. Refractory mCRC patients received VOR 400 milligrams orally with HCQ 600 milligrams orally daily, in a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). Secondary endpoints include median overall survival (mOS), adverse events (AE), pharmacodynamic of inhibition of autophagy in primary tumors, immune cell analyses, and cytokine levels. Twenty patients were enrolled (19 evaluable for survival) with a mPFS of 2.8 months and mOS of 6.7 months. Treatment-related grade 3–4 AEs occurred in 8 patients (40%), with fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and anemia being the most common. Treatment significantly reduced CD4 + CD25 hi Foxp3 + regulatory and PD-1 + (exhausted) CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and decreased CD45RO-CD62L + (naive) T cells, consistent with improved anti-tumor immunity. On-study tumor biopsies showed increases in lysosomal protease cathepsin D and p62 accumulation, consistent with autophagy inhibition. Taken together, VOR plus HCQ is active, safe and well tolerated in refractory CRC patients, resulting in potentially improved anti-tumor immunity and inhibition of autophagy.

Purpose: The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib undergoes oxidative hepatic metabolism. This study (NCI-6432; NCT00091117) was conducted to evaluate bortezomib pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment, to inform dosing recommendations in these special populations. Experimental Design: Patients received bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Patients were assigned to four hepatic function groups based on the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group classification. Those with normal function received bortezomib at the 1.3 mg/m2 standard dose. Patients with severe, moderate, and mild impairment received escalating doses from 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mg/m2, respectively, up to a 1.3 mg/m2 maximum. Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours postdose on days 1 and 8, cycle 1, for bortezomib plasma concentration measurements. Results: Sixty-one patients were treated, including 14 with normal hepatic function and 17, 12, and 18 with mild, moderate, and severe impairment, respectively. Mild hepatic impairment did not alter dose-normalized bortezomib exposure (AUC0-tlast) or Cmax compared with patients with normal function. Mean dose-normalized AUC0-tlast was increased by approximately 60% on day 8 in patients with moderate or severe impairment. Conclusions: Patients with mild hepatic impairment do not require a starting dose adjustment of bortezomib. Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment should be started at a reduced dose of 0.7 mg/m2. Clin Cancer Res; 18(10); 2954–63. ©2012 AACR.

GRN1005 is a novel peptide–drug conjugate composed of paclitaxel covalently linked to a peptide, angiopep-2, that targets the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of GRN1005 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients in sequential cohorts (one patient per cohort until grade 2 toxicity, then 3 + 3 design) received intravenous GRN1005 at escalating doses between 30 and 700 mg/m2 once in every 21 days. In the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) expansion group, patients were required to have brain metastases. Fifty-six patients received GRN1005, including 41 with brain metastases (median number of prior therapies = 4). MTD was 650 mg/m2; the main dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Sixteen of 20 patients dosed at the MTD had brain metastases. Pharmacokinetics was dose linear and the mean terminal-phase elimination half-life was 3.6 hours. No evidence of accumulation was observed after repeat dosing. No anti-GRN1005 antibodies were detected. Five of the 20 patients (25%) dosed at 650 mg/m2 (MTD), three of whom had previous taxane therapy, achieved an overall partial response (breast, n = 2; non–small cell lung cancer, n = 2; and ovarian cancer, n = 1); responses in all five patients were also accompanied by shrinkage of brain lesions (−17% to −50%). In addition, six patients (11%; doses 30–700 mg/m2) experienced stable disease that lasted 4 months or more. GRN1005 was well tolerated and showed activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, including those who had brain metastases and/or failed prior taxane therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(2); 308–16. ©2011 AACR.

This phase I study was conducted primarily to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tesetaxel, a novel, orally active, semisynthetic microtubule inhibitor of the taxane class, administered with oral capecitabine to patients with advanced solid tumors.During each 21-day cycle, patients were to receive tesetaxel on Day 1 and capecitabine twice daily on Days 1 through 14. The starting dose was tesetaxel 18 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/day. These doses were increased based on tolerability during the first cycle according to the protocol-specified dose-escalation scheme. Response was evaluated every other treatment cycle according to RECIST. Serial blood samples were collected during the first and second cycles to explore possible pharmacokinetic drug interactions.Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and treated. The most frequently reported dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, with individual patients experiencing dose-limiting stomatitis and diarrhea. The MTD for the treatment regimen was defined as tesetaxel 27 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2)/day. The most common ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (44% of patients) and neutropenia (41%). Of 22 evaluable patients, the best overall response was stable disease in 82% and progressive disease in 18%. No meaningful pharmacokinetic drug interactions were apparent.The results of this study demonstrate that these two orally active agents can be combined at the individual MTD of each drug with acceptable toxicity. These data further support the continued clinical development of tesetaxel both as a single agent and in combination with other active cancer therapeutics.

To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib in patients with renal impairment and to develop dosing guidelines for such a patient population.Sixty-two adult cancer patients received intravenous bortezomib at 0.7-1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by 24-h creatinine clearance (CrCl) normalized to body surface area (BSA) 1.73 m(2) into five cohorts: normal renal function (≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); mild dysfunction (40-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); moderate dysfunction (20-39 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); severe dysfunction (20 ml/min/1.73 m(2)); and dialysis. Dose escalation was planned for the four cohorts with renal dysfunction. Plasma bortezomib concentrations and blood 20S proteasome inhibition were assayed.Bortezomib escalation to the standard 1.3 mg/m(2) dose was well tolerated in all patients with CrCl ≥ 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2); 0.7 mg/m(2) was tolerated in three patients with severe renal dysfunction (20 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Bortezomib dose escalation was well tolerated in nine dialysis patients, including to 1.3 mg/m(2) in four patients. Decreased CrCl did not affect bortezomib pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Bortezomib-related side-effects were neither more common nor severe in patients with renal dysfunction versus those with normal renal function.Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) is well tolerated, and dose reductions are not necessary in patients with renal dysfunction. Extrapolation from clinical and pharmacologic data suggests patients with severe renal dysfunction, including dialysis patients, can receive bortezomib at the full dose established to be clinically effective in the general patient population.

Background: ADT results in metabolic syndrome, characterized by hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and obesity. The hyperinsulinemia may result in ADT resistance; therefore preventing metabolic syndrome could have a therapeutic impact on PCa. Metformin decreases glucose & insulin by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis. There is preclinical evidence for additional antineoplastic activity due to mTOR inhibition secondary to AMPK activation. Methods: We analyzed serum and PBMC from a recently completed clinical study of men with advanced PCa on ADT that were randomized 1:1 to metformin at 500mg TID or color matched placebo. Subjects serum insulin/glucose, metformin levels, weight and waist circumference (WC) was assessed at baseline, week 12 and 28. The primary endpoint of study was the metabolic consequences of metformin vs placebo cohort. Secondary endpoints were PSA response and PBMC analysis of downstream target of mTOR, phospho-S6 kinase. Results: There were 36 evaluable men. The mean age on study was 68.4. Mean weight, WC and insulin at baseline in metformin cohort was 187 lbs, 41.14 cm and 10.03 mIU/L respectively, and 177.65 lbs, 40.52 cm and 8.02 mIU/L in placebo cohort. An increase in mean weight, WC and insulin levels was seen in both cohorts. At week 12 and 28, no statistical difference in weight, WC and insulin was observe in either cohort. Four men randomized to metformin had undetectable serum drug levels despite drug-diary suggesting compliance; excluding them did not result in significant metabolic change. Assessing efficacy, 50% in metformin and 53.3% in placebo cohort achieved undetectable PSA at week 28; difference not statistically significant. PBMC analysis demonstrated variable down-regulation of phospho-S6 kinase in the metformin cohort. Conclusion: This study detected no impact of MET addition to ADT on the risk of metabolic syndrome and no additional anti-tumor effects. Control of hyperinsulinemia related to diabetes by MET does not necessarily imply MET has a similar action on hyperinsulinemia due to ADT. Citation Format: Devalingam Mahalingam, Salih Hanni, Christos Fountzilas, Joel Michalek, John Sarantopoulos, Sureshkumar Mulampurath Achuthan Pillai, John Kuhn, Michael Pollak, Ian Thompson. Metformin to prevent metabolic syndrome associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): Metabolic analysis from a placebo-controlled study of metformin in non-diabetic men initiating ADT for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3269.

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) belong to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily. RANK mRNA is expressed widely in bone and bone marrow. It has a significant role in stimulating osteoclast differentiation and maturation, and also in preventing apoptosis. Because osteoclast activity is an important aspect of bone resorption in malignancy, targeting these cells is a good rationale for preventing skeletal-related events in malignancies. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of denosumab in preventing bone loss in mice and improving bone mineral density. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, which has been shown to be effective in reducing signaling via RANK and thus osteoclast activity. It has been demonstrated in large, randomized, phase 3 studies to be effective in preventing fractures and bone loss, and improving the bone mineral density in various cancerous and noncancerous settings. This article reviews the latest evidence of RANKL inhibition and its clinical implications.

Purpose: The study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior of satraplatin under fasted and fed conditions, and its safety and preliminary antitumor activity in adults with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: Satraplatin was administered orally at 80 mg/m2 once daily with prophylactic antiemetics for 5 consecutive days every 5 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive day 1 and day 5 doses of satraplatin in either the fed or fasted state, the order being reversed for cycle 2. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done during the first two cycles. For all subsequent cycles, patients received satraplatin in the fasted state. Results: Seventeen patients were treated with 60 total cycles of satraplatin. There was no dose-limiting toxicity during cycle 1. Severe hematologic toxicity was rare and the hematologic nadir occurred during week 4. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were grade 1/2. No significant cardiac, renal, hepatic, or neurologic toxicity was observed. The hypothesis that food decreased ultrafiltrate platinum bioavailability could not be rejected, as the lower limit of the 90% confidence intervals for peak plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours were 56.14% and 73.53%, respectively, both below the 80% bioequivalence acceptance criterion. One partial response (hormone refractory prostate cancer) and four durable stable diseases (breast, ovarian, parotid, and hormone refractory prostate cancer) were confirmed. Conclusions: There is an effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of satraplatin, the clinical significance of which is unclear. It is recommended that satraplatin be administered in the fasting state. This 5-week interval schedule of satraplatin was well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients.

Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX, also called Xyotax or CT-2103) is a water soluble macromolecular drug conjugate that links paclitaxel with a biodegradable polymer, poly-L-glutamic acid. The recommended phase II dose of PPX every 3 week is 235 mg/m(2) administered over a 10-min infusion without premedication. This study was designed to determine the MTD and pharmacology of PPX administered weekly to patients with solid malignancies.The starting dose of weekly PPX was 20 mg/m(2). Each cycle consists of 6 weekly treatments with pharmacokinetics of PPX (the conjugated paclitaxel) and unconjugated paclitaxel obtained after the first and sixth dose. Three to six patients were enrolled at each dose level. Toxicity and response were assessed by the NCI Common Toxicity criteria version 2 and RECIST criteria, respectively.Twenty-six patients were treated with PPX at the following dose levels: 20 mg/m(2) (five patients), 40 mg/m(2) (four patients), 60 mg/m(2) (four patients), 70 mg/m(2) (eight patients) and 80 mg/m(2) (five patients). Dose-limiting toxicities, consisting of grade 3 neutropenia, occurred in the 80 mg/m(2) cohort during cycle 1. Therefore, the dose recommended for phase II studies was 70 mg/m(2). In this cohort, a single dose-limiting event, consisting of diarrhea, was seen. Neuropathy and fatigue were the most common toxicities. No objective responses were noted. Pharmacokinetics was dose-proportional, and the degree of neutropenia related to drug exposure, but not to peak plasma concentration. There was no significant accumulation of conjugated or unconjugated paclitaxel with this dosing schedule.The recommended dose of PPX for subsequent disease-directed studies is 70 mg/m(2) weekly.

Purpose: AQ4N is a novel prodrug that is selectively bioreduced to AQ4, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, in hypoxic tumor. This study assessed the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of AQ4N when administered weekly in patients with advanced cancers. Experimental Design: AQ4N was administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in eight dose cohorts ranging from 12 to 1,200 mg/m2. Accelerated titration design was used and the maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose at which fewer than two of six patients had a dose-limiting toxicity. Results: Sixteen patients were treated with cumulative doses of AQ4N ranging from 61.6 through 9,099.1 mg/m2. A single patient per cohort was treated up to 384 mg/m2 without toxicities. At 1,200 mg/m2, two of five patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 5 respiratory failure and grade 3 fatigue). Five cohort assigned patients were treated without toxicity at 768 mg/m2, establishing this dose as the maximum tolerated dose. Among the most common adverse events observed were fatigue (38%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (25%), vomiting (25%), and anorexia (13%). Anticipated blue coloration of body fluids or skin was observed in all patients. The pharmacokinetics of AQ4N were dose proportional over all doses studied. Three patients experienced stable disease, including a patient with collecting duct renal cancer stable for 25 months. Conclusion: AQ4N is well tolerated when administered weekly on a 3-of-4-week schedule at 768 mg/m2. Further combination studies investigating the safety and efficacy of AQ4N are ongoing.

Complex interrelationships exist between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor pathways. EGFR activation elicits cell proliferation and increased VEGF expression. To maximally inhibit EGFR and then downstream VEGF activity, this phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib with fixed-dose cetuximab, and then combine with bevacizumab in patients with advanced malignancies.Patients with advanced malignancies likely to express EGFR were treated with a full dose of cetuximab intravenous weekly, combined with various doses of oral erlotinib daily (Part 1). Once the MTD was determined in Part 1, escalating doses of bevacizumab were administered intravenously biweekly (Part 2).Forty patients were enrolled and received 155 courses over four dose levels. In Part 1, dose-limiting grade 3 rash occurred in two patients administered with erlotinib at 100 mg daily, and the MTD of erlotinib for this combination was 50 mg daily with standard-dose cetuximab (11 patients treated). Other adverse events included rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia. In Part 2, bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks was safely added, with additional nondose-limiting headache, proteinuria, and hypertension. There was one partial response in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. Durable stable disease was observed in five patients for 6-11 months.The MTD for Part 1 was 50 mg daily of erlotinib combined with standard cetuximab. Bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg biweekly can be safely administered with the MTD for erlotinib and cetuximab combination.

KHK2866 is a recombinant, humanized, non-fucosylated, monoclonal antibody directed at heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF). To determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, potential immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of KHK2866 monotherapy in patients with advanced and refractory cancer in a first-in-human, phase 1 study. Using a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, 20 patients received KHK2866 (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) intravenously once weekly. Two additional patients received 0.1 mg/kg in a cohort which was subsequently added following protocol amendment. The first three patients enrolled experienced grade 2 hypersensitivity (acute infusion reactions) after the first dose of KHK2866. After prophylactic treatment with an H1-blocker and corticosteroids in subsequently recruited patients, two grade 2 hypersensitivity reactions were observed in the remaining 19 patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity appeared to be dose-limiting at 3 mg/kg in the original dose-escalation cohorts (n = 2), at 1 mg/kg in the MTD dose expansion cohort (n = 1), and at 0.1 mg/kg (n = 1). Neurotoxicity was manifested as complex partial seizure activity, aphasia, and confusion after first-dose administration. Pharmacokinetic exposure to KHK2866 increased proportionally to dose. Mean elimination half-life was 71.9–118 h over the dose range from 0.3 to 3 mg/kg. All KHK2866 doses decreased serum free HB-EGF levels, generally below the lower limit of quantification. The study was terminated because of neuropsychiatric toxicity. The only predictive factor for neuropsychiatric toxicity was administration of KHK2866. These effects were reversible, but were not predictable. Their etiology is not presently understood. [Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT0179291]

The development of venous thromboembolism is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. The standard treatment of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurring in patients with active malignancy remains the use of low molecular weight heparins. However, in clinical practice, practitioners are frequently asked about the efficacy and safety of various new oral anticoagulants in cancer patients. In the United States, there are currently 4 different novel oral anticoagulants commercially available with the indication of the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. These include dabigatran (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixaban (Eliquis), and edoxaban (Savaysa). Use of these new medications is appealing due to the ease of administration, avoidance of injections, ability to use in patients with decreased renal or liver function, and consistent efficacy without fooddrug interactions. Currently, the only available data for the use of these new oral anticoagulants in cancer patients is from subgroup analysis of larger studies with no statistical significance. However, this preliminary data is encouraging that the novel oral anticoagulants may be effective and safe for primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Further clinical trials are greatly needed for the head-tohead comparison of these novel oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparins. Although the routine use of novel oral anticoagulants for the prevention or treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients cannot be recommended at this time, we strongly support the development of Phase III trials assessing their efficacy and safety in patients with active malignancies compared to the current standard of care treatment with low molecular weight heparin.

2552 Background: Crizotinib is a kinase inhibitor approved for treating ALK+ and ROS1+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Since crizotinib undergoes hepatic metabolism, this phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of crizotinib in pts with liver dysfunction. Methods: Crizotinib-naïve pts with different types of advanced cancer (ALK and ROS1 status unknown), ≥ 18 yr old, and ECOG PS 0–2 were enrolled. Pts were assigned to groups A1 – D based on liver function: normal (A1/A2) = both AST and TB ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN); mild impairment (B) = AST > ULN and TB ≤ ULN, or TB > 1.0 – 1.5 × ULN; moderate (C1/C2) = TB > 1.5 – 3 × ULN; severe (D) = TB > 3 × ULN. Starting dose was based on HI. Pts in A1 and A2 were matched for weight, age, gender, race and ECOG PS to pts in B and C2, respectively. Study objectives included PK, safety and antitumor activity. Results: 88 pts were enrolled in A1 (n=11), A2 (n=15), B (n=20), C1 (n=10), C2 (n=16) and D (n=16). The geometric means of PK parameters at steady-state (Cycle 2 Day 1) are shown below. 75% of pts experienced treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), 9 (81.8%), 14 (93.3%), 15 (75.0%), 6 (60.0%), 11 (68.8%) and 11 (68.8%) in groups A1, A2, B, C1, C2 and D, respectively. 25% of pts experienced Grade 3/4 TRAEs, 3 (27.3%), 3 (20.0%), 3 (15.0%), 1 (10%), 7 (43.8%), 5 (31.3%) in groups A1, A2, B, C1, C2 and D, respectively. Three (3.4%) pts, all in A2, experienced treatment-related SAEs. Two pts (10%) in B and 1 (6.3%) in C2 required dose reductions for TRAEs. TRAEs associated with permanent discontinuation of treatment occurred in 1 pt in A1, A2, C2 and D. Overall, 3 pts had partial responses with durations of 96, 17 and 17 wks; 25 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: Systemic exposures of crizotinib in pts with mild HI receiving 250 BID and in pts with moderate HI receiving 200 mg BID are comparable with that of pts with normal hepatic function at 250 mg BID. All TRAEs were manageable across the various levels of hepatic function. Clinical trial information: NCT01576406. [Table: see text]

e16502 Background: ADT results in metabolic syndrome, characterized by hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and obesity. The hyperinsulinemia may result in ADT resistance; therefore preventing metabolic syndrome could have a therapeutic impact on PCa. In diabetes, metformin (MET) decreases glucose & insulin by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis. There is preclinical evidence for additional antineoplastic activity due to mTOR inhibition secondary to AMPK activation. Methods: Men with biochemical relapse or advanced PCa due to receive ADT were randomized 1:1 in a double blind manner to MET (500mg TID) or placebo (P). Subjects required normal oral glucose tolerance test at baseline, with fasting serum insulin/glucose, PSA, MET, weight and waist circumference (WC) monitored at baseline, week 12 and 28. The primary endpoint of study was the metabolic consequences of MET vs P. Secondary endpoints were PSA response and PBMC analysis of downstream target of mTOR, phospho-S6 kinase. Results: 36 men were randomized to MET or P, mean age 68.4; biochemical failure (n = 15) & metastatic disease (n = 21). Mean weight, WC and insulin at baseline in MET cohort was 187 lbs, 41.14 cm and 10.03 mIU/L respectively, and 177.65 lbs, 40.52 cm and 8.02 mIU/L in P cohort. An increase in mean weight, WC and insulin levels was seen in both cohorts. At wk 12 and 28, no statistical difference in weight, WC and insulin was observe in either cohort. 4 men randomized to MET had undetectable serum drug levels despite drug-diary suggesting compliance; excluding them did not result in significant metabolic change. Assessing efficacy, 50% in MET and 53.3% in P cohort achieved undetectable PSA at wk 28; difference not statistically significant. PBMC analysis demonstrated variable down-regulation of phospho-S6 kinase in the metformin cohort. Conclusions: This study detected no impact of MET addition to ADT on the risk of metabolic syndrome and no additional anti-tumor effects. Control of hyperinsulinemia related to diabetes by MET does not necessarily imply MET has a similar action on hyperinsulinemia due to ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02620423.

Introduction: The PK profile of carfilzomib is well characterized in patients with multiple myeloma. However, during clinical development of carfilzomib, patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (HI) were excluded from initial clinical studies. To support carfilzomib dose recommendations for patients with baseline HI, this study evaluated PK and safety of carfilzomib in patients with varying degrees of HI and relapsed or progressive advanced malignancies. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study evaluated adult patients with normal (Norm) hepatic function or, mild, moderate (Mod), severe HI receiving carfilzomib infusion on days (D) 1-2, 8-9, 15 and 16 in 28-D cycles (C). Dose was escalated from 20 mg/m2 on C1 D1-D2 to 27 mg/m2 on D8 of C1 and if tolerated, further to 56 mg/m2 on D1 of C2. Norm hepatic function defined as bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels 1-1.5 x ULN, or AST >ULN but with bilirubin 1.5-3 x ULN with any AST; or severe: bilirubin >3 x ULN and any AST. The primary objective was to assess the effect of HI on area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last concentration measured (AUC0-last) and from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) of carfilzomib. Secondary objectives included evaluation of carfilzomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), clearance (CL), terminal half-life (T1/2), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), mean residence time (MRT), and safety and tolerability, as well as PK parameters for carfilzomib's major metabolites. Plasma for analysis of PK parameters were collected on C1D16 for carfilzomib 27 mg/m2 and on C2D1 for the 56 mg/m2 dose. PK parameters were evaluated using a non-compartmental approach. The carfilzomib PK in HI patients was compared with Norm patients using summary statistics and analysis of variance. Due to enrollment challenges and lack of demonstrable efficacy with carfilzomib monotherapy, enrollment of severe HI patient (mostly advanced solid tumors) was discontinued. Results: 11 Norm, 17 Mild, 14 Mod, and 4 severe patients were enrolled; 61% male, mean age 62 years. Of these patients, 10 Norm, 14 Mild, 9 Mod, and 0 severe HI patients were PK evaluable. Following carfilzomib 27 and 56 mg/m2, considerable PK variability was seen within each of the treatment groups, with an overlapping exposure observed between groups (Table 1). Median Tmax ranged from 0.29 to 0.48 hour with peak concentrations of carfilzomib most often observed at 15 minutes after start or immediately before the end of infusion. Thereafter, concentrations of carfilzomib declined rapidly with a mean T1/2 of approximately 0.5 to 0.7 hour in all patient groups. A dose-dependent increase in mean AUC and Cmax of carfilzomib was observed between 27 mg/m2 and 56 mg/m2 in all 3 patient groups (Table 1); however, there was no consistent trend of increasing exposure (AUC0-last, AUC0-inf, and Cmax) with increasing severity of HI (Table 1 and 2). The mean AUC of the most abundant metabolite, PR-389/M14 was similar across all groups. A mean increase of approximately 60%-80% was observed for M15 and M16 AUC0-last, AUC0-inf and Cmax in patients with Mod HI vs Norm patients. These metabolites have no known biological activity. Median duration of exposure was 6 (Norm), 4.3 (Mild), 2.3 (Mod), and 0.8 (severe) wks. Thirty-five (76%) patients had grade >/=3 adverse events (AEs) including 15 patients with treatment-related grade >/=3 AEs. Grade >/=3 increased blood bilirubin (22%; Mod HI patients only), anemia (15%), fatigue (15%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (9%; Mod HI patients only) occurred in >3 patients. Conclusions: No marked differences in exposures (AUC and Cmax) were observed between Norm patients and mild/Mod HI patients following carfilzomib doses of 27 and 56 mg/m2.No consistent trend in carfilzomib exposure related to HI severity was seen. With the exception of the increased frequency of AEs consistent with hepatic function abnormalities, the observed AE profile in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of carfilzomib. HI did not appear to substantially increase severity of AEs; however, the number of patients was limited. Based on the results in this study, no carfilzomib dose adjustment appears to be warranted in patients with relapsed or progressive advanced malignancies and mild or Mod HI. Disclosures Anthony: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Paradigm Diagnostics: Consultancy. De Vos:European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dutch Working Group Neuro-Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University Medical Center Utrecht: Employment. White:Amgen: Employment. Schupp:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ou:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.