Search

The influence of BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) on the cancer risk and their association with the response to treatment is uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of BRCA VUS in patients with breast cancer. A total of two cases of breast cancer patients with the BRCA VUS were described. The complete coding sequence of BRCA1/2 genes was analyzed from the genomic DNA material by next generation sequencing on the Ion Torrent platform. The presence of c.3454G>A (p.Asp1152Asn) VUS in the BRCA1 gene was reported in a 64-year-old woman with invasive breast carcinoma. The characteristics of the breast tumors were the following: moderately differentiated-intermediate grade (NG-2 G-2), HER2 (+), estrogen receptor (ER) (+++), progesterone receptor (PR) (+++), luminal A subtype and pT2 N1a Mx. The second detected VUS was the c.2374T>C (p.Tyr792His) variant in the BRCA2 gene. This variant was reported in a 33-year-old woman who was diagnosed with right breast cancer (cT2N1M0). The invasive breast carcinoma was characterized as follows: NG-2 G-2, ER (+++), PR (+++), Ki-67 10%, HER2 (+++) and luminal B subtype. The data demonstrated that patients with VUSs should be managed based on their family history of cancer and clinicopathological characteristics. The clinical significance of the VUS in BRCA1/2 may change over time and reclassification of the variant to ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ should be undertaken. Patients with VUS should be followed up regularly.

Objective: The suppressor gene CHEK2 encodes a cell cycle checkpoint kinase, involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and response to DNA damage. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between CHEK2 mutation carriers (CHEK2*1100delC/I157T) and noncarriers with respect to clinicopathological factors. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 100 early breast cancer patients (46 mutation carriers and 54 noncarriers) who were treated with chemotherapy, hormonotherapy or trastuzumab. Results:CHEK2 mutation carriers were older (>65 years) than noncarriers (17 vs. 7%; p = 0.215). Twenty-five (54%) of them had a history of cancer in the family. Gastric cancer in the family history was detected in 11% of mutation carriers and in 2% of noncarriers (p = 0.092). There was a trend for more frequent lymph node metastases in patients without the mutation in comparison to mutation carriers (46 vs. 28%; p = 0.098). Luminal B type breast cancer was detected more often in carriers (39 vs. 20%; p = 0.048). Breast-conserving treatment was also conducted more often in mutation carriers (57 vs. 31%; p = 0.015). Histologic grades G1/G2 were detected more frequently in mutation carriers (82 vs. 70%; p = 0.212). Conclusion: Mutation carriers were characterized by older age, a history of gastric cancer in the family, locally advanced disease, lower histologic grade and luminal B type breast cancer.