Search

The aim of the diagnostic work-up of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is diagnosis and staging of the disease as (borderline) resectable, locally advanced (i.e., unresectable), or metastatic. The focus of this chapter is on the various challenges often encountered in this diagnostic work-up. For instance, one major challenge is that CCA involves three disease entities that differ in genomic alterations, signs, and symptoms: intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). A second challenge is that it is frequently difficult to obtain adequate tissue for a definitive diagnosis. A third challenge is that several nonmalignant diseases can masquerade as CCA. These and other challenges are illustrated herein with a series of case presentations which also help highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary effort of gastroenterologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists. In some cases, despite a meticulous patient history, physical examination, and evaluation of imaging and laboratory tests by multidisciplinary experts, a diagnosis cannot be established with absolute certainty, and treatment may sometimes be started based on CCA being the most likely diagnosis.

Background Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. Methods/design PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide. Discussion The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.

Purpose/objective(s) Patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) can only be cured by surgery. The standard of care for those with inoperable tumors is palliative chemotherapy. In an attempt to control the disease locally without adding severe toxicity in patients with unresectable pCCA, we investigated the safety and feasibility of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after chemotherapy. Materials/methods Patients were eligible with a diagnosis of unresectable pCCA, stage T1-T4N0-N1M0 (AJCC staging 7th edition), ECOG performance status of 0-1, and having finished 6-8 cycles chemotherapy treatment (cisplatin and gemcitabine). SBRT was planned in 15 fractions of 3.0-4.5Gy, aiming for a biologically effective dose > 80.5Gy, while not exceeding organs at risk (OAR) constraints. The primary endpoints were feasibility, defined as completing SBRT as planned, and toxicity evaluated within 3 months of treatment. A conventional '3+3'-design was used, corresponding to a sample size of 6 patients. Toxicity was scored with the CTCAE v4.03 grading system. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥4 hepatobiliary or grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Secondary endpoints, measured from start of radiotherapy, were local control, progression-free survival (RECIST 1.1), overall survival, and quality of life (QoL). QoL was measured using the QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L, and QLQ-BIL21 questionnaires. Results Six patients were enrolled between 1 November 2017 and 30 March 2020. All patients completed 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy. They were staged T4N0-1M0, each with unresectable disease due to vascular involvement. SBRT was completed as planned. A dose of 60Gy (15×4.0Gy) was prescribed at the 80% isodose. Due to OAR constraints, especially duodenum, the median PTV coverage was limited to 82.4% (75.7%-89.6%). No SBRT related DLT was observed. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity was cholangitis (n = 5), which could be resolved by improving biliary drainage. The 12-month local control rate was 80%. Metastases emerged in the form of peritoneal metastases/ascites (n = 3) and/or liver metastases (n = 1). Three of the 4 patients who developed distant metastases had lymph-node-positive disease at baseline. After a median follow up of 14 months, 4 of 6 patients were still alive. We observed no substantial changes in QoL. Median QLQ-C30 'global health status' scores were 75.0 at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. Conclusion Fractionated SBRT following standard chemotherapy was a feasible and safe local therapy option for unresectable pCCA, albeit with the use of hard constraints for OAR. Cholangitis was often observed, but was reversible and QoL was maintained. Based upon the observed safety and the promising local control, additional evaluation of effectiveness in larger studies is warranted.