1. A randomised comparison of the efficacy of a Coopdech bronchial blocker and a double-lumen endotracheal tube for minimally invasive esophagectomy
- Author
-
Long-hui Cao, Tianhua Zhang, Jian-Hua Fu, Xiao-Qing Liu, and Wen-qian Lin
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,double-lumen tube (DLT) ,business.industry ,one-lung ventilation (OLV) ,bronchial blocker (BB) ,Double-lumen endobronchial tube ,Bronchial blocker ,Surgery ,Anaesthesia ,Oncology ,Invasive esophagectomy ,esophagectomy ,medicine ,Original Article ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,business - Abstract
Background Both a bronchial blocker (BB) and a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) can achieve lung collapse and one-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare these two airway devices in terms of efficacy in video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Methods A total of 55 patients underwent combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for cancer were enrolled and divided into a Coopdech bronchial blocker group (CBB group, n=27) or a DLT group (DLT group, n=28). The primary outcome was the lung collapse scores at 1, 5, 10 minutes after the opening of the pleural and assessed using a verbal analogue scale via a real-time video view. Secondary outcomes including time for tube localization, incidence of tube displacement, postoperative sore throats, and surgeons’ satisfaction with surgical manipulations were collected. Results The patients in the CBB group achieved better lung collapse scores at 5 minutes (7.4±1.3 vs. 6.4±0.9 minutes, P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF