1. Long-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs
- Author
-
Alex Soriano, Laura Soldevila, Laia Albiach, Oscar Murillo, Maria Luisa Pedro-Botet, Ariadna Padullés, Laura Morata, Eva Benavent, Esteban Reynaga, and Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,musculoskeletal diseases ,tedizolid ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,030106 microbiology ,Antibiotics ,Biochemistry ,Microbiology ,Article ,Drug interactions ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,osteoarticular infections ,Interquartile range ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics ,Adverse effect ,Interaccions dels medicaments ,diabetic foot infections ,Cytopenia ,Diabetis ,business.industry ,lcsh:RM1-950 ,Diabetes ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,humanities ,body regions ,oxazolidinones ,Infectious Diseases ,lcsh:Therapeutics. Pharmacology ,chemistry ,Linezolid ,Tedizolid ,business ,Rifampicin ,drug-drug interaction ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of tedizolid in osteoarticular infections. Methods: Multicentric retrospective study (January 2017&ndash, March 2019) of osteoarticular infection cases treated with tedizolid. Failure: clinical worsening despite antibiotic treatment or the need of suppressive treatment. Results: Cases (n = 51, 59% women, mean age of 65 years) included osteoarthritis (n = 27, 53%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 17, 33.3%), and diabetic foot infections (n = 9, 18%), where, 59% were orthopedic device-related. Most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus spp. (65%, n = 47, S. aureus, 48%). Reasons for choosing tedizolid were potential drug-drug interaction (63%) and cytopenia (55%), median treatment duration was 29 days (interquartile range -IQR- 15&ndash, 44), 24% received rifampicin (600 mg once daily) concomitantly, and adverse events were scarce (n = 3). Hemoglobin and platelet count stayed stable throughout treatment (from 108.6 g/L to 116.3 g/L, p = 0.079, and 240 ×, 109/L to 239 ×, 109/L, p = 0.942, respectively), also in the subgroup of cases with cytopenia. Among device-related infections, 33% were managed with implant retention. Median follow-up was 630 days and overall cure rate 83%, among failures (n = 8), 63% were device-related infections. Conclusions: Long-term use of tedizolid was effective, showing a better safety profile with less myelotoxicity and lower drug-drug interaction than linezolid. Confirmation of these advantages could make tedizolid the oxazolidinone of choice for most of osteoarticular infections.
- Published
- 2021