Search

Purpose: Journal impact factor (IF) is often used to measure research quality and importance. We assessed trial factors associated with the publication of cancer trials in journals with higher IF and publications receiving higher citations. Materials and Methods: Cancer-specific phase III RCTs were screened through https://clinicaltrials.gov. We identified trials with published primary endpoints, along with their corresponding journal IF and relative citation ratio (RCR). Results: Seven-hundred ninety manuscripts were included in our study. Trials that met their primary endpoint were more commonly published in journals with higher IF (Median IF: positive trials 35.4 vs. negative trials 26.3, P < 0.001). Furthermore, trials that led to subsequent FDA drug approvals were also published in journals with higher IF (Median IF: 59.1 vs. 26.3 in trials not leading to FDA approvals, P < 0.001). When analyzing RCR, trial positivity (meeting primary endpoint) was not associated with increased citations on multivariable analysis (P = 0.56). Lastly, publications of trials leading to FDA approvals (P < 0.001), and publications of trials in journals with higher IF (P < 0.001) were associated with increased RCR. Conclusions: Positive trials are commonly published in journals with high IF, but do not necessarily lead to increased citations. Moreover, trials published in journals with higher IF are more likely to receive increased citations.

Literature supporting the efficacy of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) alongside radiotherapy is fragmented with varying outcomes and levels of evidence. This review summarizes the available evidence on CIM used with radiotherapy in order to inform clinicians. A systematic literature review identified studies on the use of CIM during radiotherapy. Inclusion required the following criteria: the study was interventional, CIM therapy was for human patients with cancer, and CIM therapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Data points of interest were collected from included studies. A subset was identified as high-quality using the Jadad scale. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between study results, outcome measured, and type of CIM. Overall, 163 articles met inclusion. Of these, 68 (41.7%) were considered high-quality trials. Articles published per year increased over time (p < 0.01). Frequently identified therapies were biologically based therapies (47.9%), mind-body therapies (23.3%), and alternative medical systems (13.5%). Within the subset of high-quality trials, 60.0% of studies reported a favorable change with CIM while 40.0% reported no change. No studies reported an unfavorable change. Commonly assessed outcome types were patient-reported (41.1%) and provider-reported (21.5%). Rate of favorable change did not differ based on type of CIM (p = 0.90) or outcome measured (p = 0.24). Concurrent CIM may reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities and improve quality of life, suggesting that physicians should discuss CIM with patients receiving radiotherapy. This review provides a broad overview of investigations on CIM use during radiotherapy and can inform how radiation oncologists advise their patients about CIM.

We have previously shown that ablative radiotherapy (A-RT) with a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is associated with longer survival. Despite recent large-scale sequencing efforts in ICC, outcomes following RT based on genetic alterations have not been described. We reviewed records of 156 consecutive patients treated with A-RT for unresectable ICC from 2008 to 2020. For 114 patients (73%), next-generation sequencing provided molecular profiles. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine the associations with the outcomes. The median tumor size was 7.3 (range: 2.2–18.2) cm. The portal vein thrombus (PVT) was present in 10%. The RT median BED10 was 98 Gy (range: 81–144 Gy). The median (95% confidence interval) follow-up was 58 (42–104) months from diagnosis and 39 (33–74) months from RT. The median OS was 32 (29–35) months after diagnosis and 20 (16–24) months after RT. The one-year OS, LC, and intrahepatic DMFS were 73% (65–80%), 81% (73–87%), and 34% (26–42%). The most common mutations were in IDH1 (25%), TP53 (22%), ARID1A (19%), and FGFR2 (13%). Upon multivariable analysis, the factors associated with death included worse performance status, larger tumor, metastatic disease, higher CA 19-9, PVT, satellitosis, and IDH1 and PIK3CA mutations. TP53 mutation was associated with local failure. Further investigation into the prognostic value of individual mutations and combinations thereof is warranted.

Purpose Prior research suggests that patient education materials on radiation therapy from various professional groups are written at reading levels above national recommendations of sixth to eighth grade. Since publication of these initial findings, many materials from these sources have been updated or newly created. However, the extent to which readability was considered in the design of these new documents remains unknown. Therefore, the goal of this investigation was to evaluate readability of online education materials for radiation therapy, comparing readability of updated materials with those included in the previous study. Methods and Materials Patient education materials related to radiation oncology were identified from websites of the 3 professional societies used in the original investigation (the American College of Radiology, the American Cancer Society, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology). The documents included in the first analysis were used as a comparator. To allow for accurate evaluation across groups, materials were matched by content; when necessary, documents were combined from the original cohort to create topically equivalent materials to reflect those currently available on society websites. Identified materials were analyzed using 7 validated readability indices, and results are reported in grade-level equivalents. Original materials were also reanalyzed with the same method. Results American Cancer Society materials had the lowest average baseline levels (9.4-11.3 grade level) and showed improved readability in the more recent materials (8.0-10.5 grade level). By contrast, the American Society for Radiation Oncology materials had high average baseline readability levels (11.1-13.9 grade level) that actually worsened in the more recent materials (11.7-16.2 grade level). The number of documents meeting national recommendations did not improve in the updated cohort. Conclusion Despite evidence that readability levels of patient education materials in radiation oncology are unacceptably high, the readability of newly created materials is not consistently improving across professional societies. Although certain groups may incorporate readability in the design of educational documents, more consistent consideration across all organizations is needed.

Background Little is known about the readability and utility of patient education materials for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Therefore, the goal of this investigation was to evaluate such materials from high-performing neurosurgery hospitals and professional societies through an analysis of readability and educational content. Methods In this cross-cross sectional study, 61 websites associated with the top 50 neurosurgery and neurology hospitals according to U.S. News & World Report (USNWR) and 11 predetermined professional medical societies were queried. Identified SRS education materials were analyzed by 6 readability indices. Educational content was assessed by 10 criteria based on surveys of patients’ perspectives about SRS. Results Fifty-four materials were identified from the target population (45 from USNWR hospital websites and 9 from professional society websites). Mean readability of materials ranged from 11.7 to 15.3 grade level, far more difficult than national recommendations of sixth and eighth grade. Materials were found to have deficiencies in educational content. Compared with high-performing hospitals, materials from websites of professional societies were longer (P = .002), and more likely to discuss risks and benefits specific to SRS (P = .008), alternative treatment options (P = .05) and expected outcomes or postprocedure descriptions (P = .004). Hospital materials were also more likely to favor brand-specific terminology (eg, GammaKnife) over generic terminology (eg, radiosurgery; P = .019). Conclusion Publicly available online patient educational materials for SRS are written at reading levels above national recommendations. Furthermore, many lack information identified as important by patients. Reevaluation and improvement of online SRS educational materials on a national scale are warranted.

BACKGROUND: As exemplified in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), metastatic salivary gland cancers display heterogenous behavior. Although anatomic site of metastasis has been suggested to be prognostic for survival in this population, this is not adequately characterized in the current literature. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with newly diagnosed metastatic salivary gland cancers with distant metastasis to a single organ were identified. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients (n = 284 bone-only, n = 322 lung-only, n = 252 other-site-only) were identified. Anatomic site of distant metastasis was not associated with survival in the cohort as a whole; however, on pre-planned subgroup analysis, lung-only metastasis, relative to bone-only metastasis, was the only factor associated with improved survival in patients with ACC (HR: 0.52, 95%CI: 0.30-0.93, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic site of metastasis is strongly associated with survival in patients with metastatic ACC and should be considered in future studies aiming to optimize therapy in this population.

Introduction/Background Myeloid sarcoma is a rare extramedullary manifestation of immature myeloid/monocyte cells. Radiotherapy (RT) yields good local control, but data on different fractionation schemes are limited. The goal of this retrospective study was to share our institutional experience and assess volumetric regression with differential fractionation. Materials and Methods We evaluated patients treated for myeloid sarcoma between 2000 and 2019 and categorized them into Group A (treated with RT) and Group B (no RT). We assessed local control using cumulative incidence function analysis. Post-treatment imaging sequences were analyzed for volumetric calculations. Results Forty-four patients with 80 lesions were assessed. Twenty-three patients with 52 lesions received RT (Group A), and 6 lesions received a single fraction of RT. There were 2 instances of local progression in Group A and 8 in Group B, with a cumulative incidence function estimate of local progression in Group A of 2.4% at 1 year and 6.9% at 2 years, significantly reduced compared to 29.7% and 35.5% in Group B, respectively (hazard ratio 0.13 [95% confidence interval 0.030.63], P = .011). No lesion treated with a single fraction of RT developed local progression. Volumetric analysis for 19 chronologically followed lesions (including 3 treated with a single fraction) revealed no difference in regression between single or multi-fraction treatment. Conclusion RT for myeloid sarcoma yields excellent local control and may be as effective in a single fraction as more protracted courses, though this requires validation. For a diagnosis associated with poor survival, a single palliative fraction may be optimal with potential for higher utilization.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Accessible, patient-centered educational resources improve health literacy and patient outcomes. Readability standards help create educational resources that are effective and comprehensible for most patients. However, many United States (US) professional societies fail to meet these standards. Language access is also an important consideration in treating an increasingly diverse and multilingual patient population. This study assesses the availability and readability of radiotherapy patient education resources, available in non-English languages, from three major US professional societies. We hypothesized that there would be limited available non-English resources, and that these resources would fail to meet recommended national readability levels. MATERIALS/METHODS Patient education resources in non-English languages were collected from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), the American Cancer Society (ACS), and a collaboration between the American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America (ACR/RSNA). Number of English resources were tabulated. The text from each non-English resource was extracted and analyzed using 4 previously validated Spanish readability indices that provide grade level equivalents: Gilliam-Pena-Mountain (GPM), Lasbarhetsindex (Lix), Rate Index (Rix), and Spanish Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SOL). One-sided t-test was used for comparisons to national standards. Fisher's exact test was used to assess for differences in proportions. RESULTS Of 51 identified English resources, 35 (69%) had a Spanish counterpart. English materials from ACR/RSNA were more likely than ACS and ASTRO materials to have a provided Spanish counterpart (100% vs 75% vs 24%, respectively; P < 0.01) There were no resources available in other languages. Mean readability levels for all resources in Spanish ranged from 10.0 to 12.0 grade levels, depending on the index, and were at a high school level: ACS (GPM, Lix, Rix, SOL) 9.0, 11.0, 11.2, 10.5; ASTRO 10.0, 11.0, 10.3, 9.6; and ACR/RSNA 10.0, 12.0, 11.8, 11.2. Using the most permissive scores for each resource, ACS had the only resources at or below the 8th grade level (50%, P < 0.01). The most permissive mean scores of all organizations significantly exceeded 6th grade levels (P < 0.01) and only ACS did not exceed an 8th grade level (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION Limited resources are available in non-English languages for patients undergoing radiotherapy in the US. Spanish was the only language with available translations. Available Spanish resources did not meet readability standards from the American Medical Association (6th grade) and National Institutes of Health (8th grade). These findings demonstrate a paucity of non-English language resources, and the need to improve readability levels in Spanish radiotherapy patient education resources.

OBJECTIVES Our understanding of odontogenic cancers is limited primarily to case studies given the rarity of these head and neck neoplasms. Using the National Cancer Database, we report the treatment patterns and survival outcomes for one of the largest cohorts of patients with odontogenic cancers. METHODS Patients with odontogenic tumors who did not have metastatic disease and received at least part of their care at the reporting facility were included. Patient and treatment variables were assessed using logistic regression. Survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS We identified 437 patients with odontogenic cancers, the majority of which had malignant ameloblastoma (n = 203) or odontogenic carcinoma (n = 217). Median follow-up was 44.8 months. On multivariate analysis, improved survival was associated with age

Purpose Although mentorship is described extensively in academic medical literature, there are few descriptions of mentorship specific to radiation oncology. The goal of the current study was to investigate the state of mentorship in radiation oncology through a scoping review of the literature. Methods and Materials A search protocol was defined according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Predefined search terms and medical subject headings were used to search PubMed for English language articles published after January 1, 1990, on mentorship in radiation oncology. Additionally, in-press articles from major radiation oncology and medical education journals were searched. Three reviewers determined article eligibility. Included articles were classified based on predefined evaluation criteria. Results Fourteen publications from 2008 to 2019 met inclusion criteria. The most commonly described form of mentorship was the dyad (64.3%), followed by team (14.3%) and peer (7.1%); 2 articles did not specify mentorship type (14.3%). The most commonly mentored participants were residents (35.7%), followed by medical students (35.7%) and attendings (21.4%); 1 study included participants of all levels (7.1%). Thirteen studies (92.9%) identified an experimental study design, most of which were cross-sectional (42.9%), followed by cohort studies (28.6%) and before/after (21.4%). Median sample size, reported in 12 of 13 experimental studies, was 132 (coefficient of variation, 1.06). Although outcomes varied widely, the majority described successful implementation of mentorship initiatives with high levels of participant satisfaction. Conclusions Although few initiatives are currently reported, the present study suggests that these initiatives are successful in promoting career development and increasing professional satisfaction. The interventions overwhelmingly described mentorship dyads; other forms of mentorship are either less common or understudied. Limitations included interventions not being evaluated in a controlled setting, and many were assessed using surveys with low response rates. This review highlights rich opportunities for future scholarship to develop, evaluate, and disseminate radiation oncology mentorship initiatives.

Purpose/objectives Three‐dimensional (3D) printing is recognized as an effective clinical and educational tool in procedurally intensive specialties. However, it has a nascent role in radiation oncology. The goal of this investigation is to clarify the extent to which 3D printing applications are currently being used in radiation oncology through a systematic review of the literature. Materials/methods A search protocol was defined according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included articles were evaluated using parameters of interest including: year and country of publication, experimental design, sample size for clinical studies, radiation oncology topic, reported outcomes, and implementation barriers or safety concerns. Results One hundred and three publications from 2012 to 2019 met inclusion criteria. The most commonly described 3D printing applications included quality assurance phantoms (26%), brachytherapy applicators (20%), bolus (17%), preclinical animal irradiation (10%), compensators (7%), and immobilization devices (5%). Most studies were preclinical feasibility studies (63%), with few clinical investigations such as case reports or series (13%) or cohort studies (11%). The most common applications evaluated within clinical settings included brachytherapy applicators (44%) and bolus (28%). Sample sizes for clinical investigations were small (median 10, range 1–42). A minority of articles described basic or translational research (11%) and workflow or cost evaluation studies (3%). The number of articles increased over time (P

Early stage glottic cancer has traditionally been treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been recently adopted as an alternative to decrease toxicity. Here, we compared the usage and outcomes of IMRT and 3DCRT for patients with early stage squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottic larynx. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with Stage I&ndash, II SCC of the glottis who received 55&ndash, 75 Gy using IMRT (n = 1623) or 3DCRT (n = 2696). Median follow up was 42 months with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 72%. Using a nominal logistic regression, race, ethnicity, year of diagnosis and fraction size were associated with the receipt of IMRT (p &lt, 0.05). Using Kaplan&ndash, Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models as well as a propensity matched cohort, there was no difference in OS for patients who received IMRT versus 3DCRT (hazard ratio (HR), 1.08, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.93&ndash, 1.26, p = 0.302). However, there was a survival benefit for patients receiving slight hypofractionation as compared to conventional fractionation (HR, 0.78, 95% CI, 0.69&ndash, 0.92, p = 0.003). IMRT was associated with similar survival as 3DCRT, supporting the implementation of this potentially less toxic modality without compromising survival.

11044 Background: Despite an increasing number of female physicians in the workforce, a gender disparity remains in many leadership roles in medicine. Endowed chairs can provide a multitude of research and career opportunities; thus, they are coveted positions in academic medicine. We examined factors associated with holding endowed chairs in oncology across the US, with a focus on whether a gender difference existed, as has been demonstrated in top internal medicine departments more generally. Methods: In 2019, we identified 95 academic oncology divisions/departments in the US, using the Oncology Division Chiefs & Department Chairs listing in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) myConnection forum to define the institutions included. We requested a list of full professors and endowed chairs in those divisions/departments, relying on public data on websites when an institution did not respond. Using public data (e.g., institutional websites, NIH reporter, Scopus, state licensing boards), we collected information on gender, degree, total NIH funding as PIs, H-indices, publication and citation numbers, and graduation year for these individuals. We then created a multivariable logistic regression model to examine if, after controlling for other variables, gender was independently associated with an increased likelihood of holding an endowed chair. Results: One thousand thirty-three oncology full professors were identified, 290 (25.6%) of whom held endowed chairs. Overall, and in an adjusted model, greater research productivity (as measured through publications, citations, and h-index) and greater levels of NIH funding were significantly associated with having an endowed chair. Gender was not significantly associated with endowed chair status (21.9% [95% CI:17.2-27.3] of females and 26.8% [23.8-29.9] for males held endowed chairs; p = 0.11) on bivariable analysis, nor was it significant in the adjusted multivariable model (p = 0.50). Power to detect the observed difference given the total number of professors and their gender distribution was found to be ̃53%, suggesting a 47% chance of failing to reject the null hypothesis of equal gender distributions in endowed chairs when the observed difference is as large as estimated. Conclusions: Among oncology full professors, gender was not significantly associated with endowed chair status, although the number of professors in this field is too small to definitively rule out a modest gender difference. This finding contrasts with prior work that revealed a more substantial difference by gender that remained significant after controlling for other factors in a study, including all divisions in the Departments of Internal Medicine at top medical institutions. Further work is necessary to understand what specialty-specific and institutional cultural factors may help mitigate challenges in the pursuit of equity, diversity, and inclusion.

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a subtype of adenocarcinoma characterized histologically by cells with abundant intracellular mucin production, creating a distinctive “signet-ring” appearance. SRCC typically arises in tissues of the gastrointestinal tract. In the breast, SRCC is a rare subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma defined by the presence of signet-ring cells. Mammary SRCC has unique patterns of metastatic spread compared to more common breast cancers, more often spreading viscerally to involve the serosal surfaces of stomach, urinary tract, and spleen. We report a case of metastatic mammary SRCC presenting in the stomach, thereby mimicking primary gastric SRCC. Recognition of this unusual presentation is critical as treatments for these malignancies are vastly different; misdiagnosis could lead to significant morbidity and mortality for patients.

Importance Appropriate informed consent processes are crucial to preservation of patient autonomy and shared decision making. Although half of patients with cancer receive radiotherapy, it is unknown whether current consent practices are comprehensible for patients. Objective To characterize use, specificity, and readability of clinical informed consent forms for radiotherapy, hypothesizing that forms would be higher than the recommended sixth- to eighth-grade readability level. Design, Setting, and Participants This nationwide cross-sectional survey study and readability analysis was conducted from 2016 to 2018 and included 89 academic radiation oncology departments that were part of the 2016 Electronic Residency Application Service. Department leaders (clinical directors, chairs, and personal contacts of study authors) at academic radiation oncology departments were contacted via email. Main Outcomes and Measures Readability levels were measured by 7 validated readability indices, including the Ford, Caylor, Sticht (FORCAST) index for nonnarrative texts. Difficult words were identified usingThe Living Word Vocabulary, which describes the readability grade levels of 40 000 common words. Results Of 89 departments, 67 (75%) responded to questions and 57 (64%) provided 113 forms for analysis. Departments providing forms did not differ substantially from others in terms of region, residency size, research output, rural vs urban location, or public vs private institution status. All departments obtained patient written informed consent before radiotherapy; 38 (57%) used body site–specific forms. Using the most conservative (low-score) estimate, mean form readability ranged from grade level 10.6 to 14.2. By 7 distinct indices, only 9 (8%) of 113 forms met the recommended eighth-grade readability level, and 4 (4%) forms met a sixth-grade level. Not a single form met either recommendation based on the FORCAST index. Forms used an average of 7.2 difficult words. Body site–specific forms had considerably better readability than general consent forms. Conclusions and Relevance This nationwide study of informed consent practices for cancer treatment with radiotherapy demonstrates that while all US academic radiotherapy departments use written consent forms, it is rare for templates to meet the recommended readability levels for patient materials. These data suggest the need for reevaluation and modification of the approach to radiotherapy consent, ideally with guidance and templates designed by national professional organizations.

e23188 Background: Recent data suggest that prostate cancer mortality may be increasing for the first time in 20 years, possibly related to a decrease in PSA screening. Most professional societies recommend men aged 55 to 69 make screening decisions using a shared-decision making (SDM) model. However the quality and time of SDM can vary significantly, often leaving patients uncertain about the implications of pursuing or foregoing screening. In this setting of individualized decisions, patients may seek supplemental information. However, little is known about the accuracy, breadth and readability of available education materials, which if designed optimally could improve SDM. Methods: For 11 predetermined professional societies (ACP, ACPM, ACS, AFP, AMA, ASCO, AUA, CDC, NCI, NIH, USPSTF), patient education materials designed for prostate cancer screening were queried. Materials were analyzed using seven well-validated readability metrics and evaluated for educational content. For content comparison, 10 materials from academic cancer centers and independent organizations were identified using top public search engine results. Results: We identified 12 professional society materials and 20 from popular non-society sources. Mean readability level for society materials ranged from 9.7 to 11.3 grade, well above AMA and NIH recommended 6th and 8th grade reading levels (P < 0.0001). In comparison to general materials, professional society materials more often discussed the role of risk factors in making screening decisions (70% vs 100%, P = 0.03). However, society materials did often omit important guideline-based content, including statements that decisions should involve patient values and preferences (42%) and can vary by patient age (35%). Conclusions: Widely available prostate cancer screening education materials are written at inappropriately high reading levels and often omit important content. Improvement of such materials would encourage SDM for patients considering screening.[Table: see text]

e22152Background: Given the importance of informed consent in cancer care, we sought to characterize readability and specificity of consent forms for radiation therapy, hypothesizing that readabili...