1. Split course palliative radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer with 3D planning based analysis of outcome: a retrospective review
- Author
-
Grace S. Ahn, James D. Murphy, Reith R Sarkar, Andrew Bruggeman, Emily I Fuster, Anna Dornisch, Andrew B. Sharabi, and Ajay Sandhu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Systemic therapy ,medicine ,Humans ,Lung cancer ,Prospective cohort study ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Retrospective Studies ,Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,Lung ,business.industry ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Palliative Care ,Hazard ratio ,medicine.disease ,Radiation therapy ,Regimen ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cohort ,Radiation Oncology ,Female ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND Durable palliation of advanced lung cancer is a common objective for radiation oncologists. However, there is no consensus on how to deliver the radiation course. Herein we report our experience of using split course radiotherapy and our assessment of outcomes based on planning from three-dimensional (3D) simulation before each treatment course. METHODS All lung cancer patients from 2006-2020 were identified. Of these, 52 patients received a split course treatment of 50-60 Gy in 18-25 fractions intended to provide durable palliation for disease not amenable to curative therapy. Treatment involved 3D planning with repeat computed tomography (CT) simulation prior to the second course. Survival and symptomatic response were analyzed via chart review. We categorized rapid responders versus non-rapid responders from the initial radiation course based on ≥30% gross tumor volume (GTV) reduction at the second CT simulation. We evaluated the impact of response on overall survival and palliative response. RESULTS Among our cohort treated with split course palliative radiotherapy, 33 (63%) had a rapid response to initial treatment. There was no difference in survival between groups [hazard ratio (HR) =1.30, P=0.47]. There was no significant difference in palliative response rates between rapid and non-rapid responders. On multivariable analysis, only female sex (HR =0.26, P
- Published
- 2022