1. Repeated cross-sectional analysis of hydroxychloroquine deimplementation in the AHA COVID-19 CVD Registry
- Author
-
R. Kannan Mutharasan, Tracy Y. Wang, Gregory A. Roth, Divya Gupta, Fatima Rodriguez, Ty J. Gluckman, Sandeep R Das, Steven M. Bradley, Rashmee U. Shah, Rohan Khera, Pamela N. Peterson, and Sophia Emmons-Bell
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Cross-sectional study ,Science ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Article ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Clinical information ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Registries ,Clinical care ,Psychology and behaviour ,Rapid response ,Aged ,Multidisciplinary ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,Hydroxychloroquine ,Middle Aged ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Hospitalization ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Viral infection ,Cardiovascular Diseases ,Antirheumatic Agents ,Female ,National registry ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
There is little data describing trends in the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 following publication of randomized trials that failed to demonstrate a benefit of this therapy. We identified 13,957 patients admitted for active COVID-19 at 85 U.S. hospitals participating in a national registry between March 1 and August 31, 2020. The overall proportion of patients receiving hydroxychloroquine peaked at 55.2% in March and April and decreased to 4.8% in May and June and 0.8% in July and August. At the hospital-level, median use was 59.4% in March and April (IQR 48.5–71.5%, range 0–100%) and decreased to 0.3% (IQR 0–5.4%, range 0–100%) by May and June and 0% (IQR 0–1.3%, range 0–36.4%) by July and August. The rate and hospital-level uniformity in deimplementation of this ineffective therapy for COVID-19 reflects a rapid response to evolving clinical information and further study may offer strategies to inform deimplementation of ineffective clinical care.
- Published
- 2021