1. New Grading System for Cervical Paraspinal Soft Tissue Damage After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Major Fracture Based on the Short-T1 Inversion Recovery Mid-Sagittal MRI for Prediction of Neurological Improvements: The STIR-MRI Grade
- Author
-
Yasuyuki Ishibashi, Kazunari Takeuchi, Kanichiro Wada, Sunao Tanaka, Gentaro Kumagai, Takuya Numasawa, Toru Asari, Toru Yokoyama, Hironori Otsuka, and Kotaro Aburakawa
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Soft tissue ,Retrospective cohort study ,Inversion recovery ,Sagittal plane ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cervical spinal cord injury ,medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Surgery ,Neurology (clinical) ,Radiology ,Grading (education) ,business - Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To develop a grading method for cervical paraspinal soft tissue damage after cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture based on the short T1 inversion recovery (STIR) mid-sagittal magnetic resonance image (MRI) for prediction of neurological improvements. Methods: This study included 34 patients with CSCI without major fracture, treated conservatively for at least 1 year and graded using the STIR-MRI Grade. This system consists of anterior grades; A0: no high-intensity area (HIA), A1: linear HIA, and A2: fusiform HIA, and posterior grades; P0: no HIA, P1: HIA not exceeding the nuchal ligament, and P2: HIA exceeding the nuchal ligament, within 24 hours postinjury. The American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were examined. Results: Anterior grades were not significantly correlated with the AIS and JOA score. At both injury and final follow-up, the AIS in P2 patients was significantly more severe ( P = 0.007, P = 0.015, respectively) than that in P0 patients. At the injury, the AIS in P2 patients was significantly more severe ( P = 0.008) than that in P1 patients. Among P2 patients only, the JOA score at the injury (1.4 points) did not improve by the final follow-up (3.9 points). The final follow-up JOA score (3.9 points) in P2 patients was significantly lower than that (13.6 points) in P0 patients ( P = 0.016). Conclusions: Grade P2 led to poor neurological outcomes. The STIR-MRI Grade is a prognostic indicator for neurological improvements past-CSCI.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF