Search

Myelolipomas are uncommon benign tumors composed of mature adipose tissue mixed with hematopoietic elements; these tumors can occur in both the adrenal glands and extra-adrenal locations, the presacral region being the most frequent extra-adrenal site. We present a case of presacral myelolipoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in a 55-year-old woman with concurrent invasive ductal breast cancer. TC and RM imaging were consistent with the diagnosis of presacral myelolipoma. The lesion was discovered incidentally during the staging procedure for breast malignancy. The purpose of our work is to describe the FNA and CNB finding in combination with the imaging features of this uncommon lesion.

Background In case of clinical suspicion of lymphoma, the histological examination of lymphadenopathy is essential for defining a correct diagnosis and for developing a proper treatment plan. An open surgical biopsy (OSB) is still the "gold standard", owing to the large amount of tissue obtained. The sensitivity of lymph node core-needle biopsy under imaging guidance requires validation. Aims This randomized study compared the ultrasound-guided core-needle cutting biopsy (CNCB) approach with OSB approach. Patient and methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. In a single center between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2015, patients with lymph node enlargement suspected for lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to biopsy with either OSB (standard group) or ultrasound-guided 16 gauge modified Menghini needle (core-needle group). In the core-needle group, the lymph node to undergone biopsy was determined by power Doppler US, in particular, the main criterion to select the node to be biopsied was the hypervascularization. The primary endpoint was to test the superiority of sensitivity for diagnosis of malignancy for ultrasound-guided CNCB compared with OSB. Secondary endpoints were negative predictive values, likelihood ratio of negative test, biopsy related complications, costs and times to biopsy. Results A total of 372 patients were randomized either to standard group (N= 187) or core-needle group (N= 185). Sensitivity for detection of malignancy was significantly better for US-guided CNCB [98.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 95.9-99.9] than standard biopsy [88.7%; 95% CI, 82.9-93] (P Conclusions This study is the first to compare in a randomized fashion the sensitivity of US-guided CNCB and OSB in detecting lymphoma. Power Doppler US and CNCB are diagnostic tools that enable effective, safe, fast and low-cost routine biopsy for patients with suspected lymphoma, avoiding psychological and physical pain of an unnecessary surgical intervention. We suggest this approach as first-line mini-invasive procedure for patients with a suspected lymphoma and not merely when surgical intervention is not possible, or to document relapse. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.