1. The Histomorphometry of Rabbit Bone Tissue with Experimental Osteoporosis after Implantation of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Materials
- Author
-
Andrejs Skagers, Vladimir Kasyanov, Ilze Šalma, Janis Vetra, Vladislavs Ananjevs, Janis Locs, and Arnis Abolins
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Mechanical Engineering ,Osteoporosis ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Rabbit (nuclear engineering) ,030206 dentistry ,02 engineering and technology ,Calcium ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Bone tissue ,Biphasic calcium phosphate ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Trabecular bone ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Endocrinology ,chemistry ,Mechanics of Materials ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,General Materials Science ,0210 nano-technology - Abstract
The histomorphometry of the rabbit bone tissue from the lower jaw was done. Authors hypothesized that local enhancement with biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic materials in the femur trochanter major area increase the trabecular bone volume outside the implantation zone in vivo. Twenty-two California female rabbits were included in this study and were divided into four groups. Four healthy rabbits composed a control group (A group), while other eighteen underwent ovariectomy. Bone defects were created in femur trochanter major region. Sham surgery group (B group) consisted of four female rabbits with osteoporosis and bone defect, but no biomaterials were implanted. In C group (seven rabbits) created defects were filled with granules of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (hydroxyapatite (HAP) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) 30/70); in D group (seven rabbits) defects were filled with the same granules (HAP/TCP 30/70) together with strontium (5% by mass). Twenty-two bone samples were taken from lower jaw premolar region. Trabecular bone area was measured using Image Pro Plus 7 program, where three equal fields (0.975 mm2) of view were at random chosen in all bone samples. Results have shown that the trabecular bone area in A group was 0.201 mm2 (0.176-0.233), which is statistically significantly higher (p 2 (0.118 – 0.149), C group 0.136 mm2 (0.108 – 0.166) and D group 0.135 mm2 (0.126 – 0.164), respectively. Statistically significant differences between B, C and D groups were not found (p > 0.05).
- Published
- 2020