1. Developing a cosmetic series: Results from the <scp>ESSCA</scp> network, 2009‐2018
- Author
-
Marie L A Schuttelaar, Vera Mahler, Heinrich Dickel, Margarida Gonçalo, Barbara Ballmer-Weber, Andrea Bauer, Javier Sánchez-Pérez, Thomas Rustemeyer, Ana Giménez-Arnau, Andreas J. Bircher, Dagmar Simon, Johannes Geier, Wolfgang Uter, S. Mark Wilkinson, Swen Malte John, Emma Horton, Elke Weisshaar, University of Zurich, Horton, Emma, Public Health Research (PHR), Dermatology, and AII - Inflammatory diseases
- Subjects
antioxidant ,IRRITANT DERMATITIS ,MULTICENTER ,Cosmetics ,Antioxidants ,030207 dermatology & venereal diseases ,ANHYDRIDE/TRIMELLITIC ANHYDRIDE/GLYCOLS COPOLYMER ,0302 clinical medicine ,preservative ,Prevalence ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,610 Medicine & health ,cosmetic ,media_common ,10177 Dermatology Clinic ,Patch test ,Patch Tests ,STEARYL ALCOHOL ,Europe ,Population Surveillance ,antiseptic ,ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS ,Dermatology clinic ,Dermatitis, Allergic Contact ,EUROPEAN SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ,2723 Immunology and Allergy ,RUBBER SERIES ,medicine.medical_specialty ,CETYL ALCOHOL ,surfactant ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Dermatology ,Patch testing ,2708 Dermatology ,03 medical and health sciences ,emollient ,Humans ,PANTHENOL ,Irritant dermatitis ,emulsifier ,Contact allergens ,patch testing ,Allergic contact dermatitis ,PHOTOPATCH TEST ,Emollients ,business.industry ,Preservatives, Pharmaceutical ,Allergens ,medicine.disease ,Contact allergy ,Emulsifying Agents ,Anti-Infective Agents, Local ,contact allergy ,business - Abstract
Background There is considerable variability across European patch test centres as to which allergens are included in local and national cosmetics series. Objectives To propose a standardised, evidence-based cosmetic series for Europe based on up-to-date analysis of relevant contact allergens. Methods We collated data from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) from 2009-2018 to determine which cosmetic allergens produce a high yield of contact allergy. Contact allergens with a prevalence of >0.3% that were considered relevant were included. Rare contact allergens were excluded if deemed no longer relevant or added to a supplemental cosmetic series for further analysis. Results Sensitisation prevalence rates of 39 cosmetic contact allergens are tabulated. Thirty of these allergens yield >0.3% positive reactions and are therefore included in our proposed European Cosmetic Series. Six are considered no longer relevant and therefore excluded. Three are included in a supplementary European cosmetic series. An additional 9 allergens are included in either the core or supplemental European cosmetic series following literature review. Conclusion We have derived a potential European cosmetic series based upon the above methods. This will require ongoing investigation based upon the changing exposure profiles of cosmetic allergens as well as new and evolving substances. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF