1. Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
- Author
-
Chen-Chi Duan, Chao-Yi Shi, Cheng Li, Yi-Chen He, Han Liu, Yu Wang, Jing-Jing Xu, Jian-Zhong Sheng, Lei Chen, He-Feng Huang, Jie Wang, and Yanting Wu
- Subjects
Adult ,China ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pregnancy Rate ,Gestational hypertensive disorder ,Hormone Replacement Therapy ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cholestasis, Intrahepatic ,Endometrium ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ovulation Induction ,Pre-Eclampsia ,Pregnancy ,Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy ,Frozen-thawed embryo transfer ,medicine ,Humans ,Retrospective Studies ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Infant, Newborn ,Pregnancy Outcome ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Hormone replacement therapy (menopause) ,Retrospective cohort study ,Small for gestational age ,Gynecology and obstetrics ,Embryo Transfer ,medicine.disease ,Embryo transfer ,Pregnancy Complications ,Low birth weight ,Logistic Models ,Infant, Small for Gestational Age ,RG1-991 ,Female ,Endometrium preparation ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Live birth ,Live Birth ,Cholestasis of pregnancy ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Previous studies have focused on pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) performed using different endometrial preparation protocols. Few studies have evaluated the effect of endometrial preparation on pregnancy-related complications. This study was designed to explore the association between different endometrial preparation protocols and adverse obstetric and perinatal complications after FET. Methods We retrospectively included all FET cycles (n = 12,950) in our hospital between 2010 and 2017, and categorized them into three groups, natural cycles (NC), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and ovarian stimulation (OS) protocols. Pregnancy-related complications and subsequent neonatal outcomes were compared among groups. Results Among all 12,950 FET cycles, the live birth rate was slightly lower for HRT cycles than for NC (HRT vs. NC: 28.15% vs. 31.16%, p p p = 0.001). Among 3864 women with live birth, preparing the endometrium using OS or HRT protocols increased the risk of preeclampsia, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) in both singleton and multiple deliveries. Additionally, OS and HRT protocols increased the risk of low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) in both singletons and multiples after FET. Conclusion Compared with HRT or OS protocols, preparing the endometrium with NC was associated with the decreased risk of pregnancy-related complications, as well as the decreased risk of LBW and SGA after FET.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF