Search

Purpose Cardiotoxicities induced by cancer therapy can negatively affect quality of life and survival. We investigated whether high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels could serve as biomarker for early detection of cardiac adverse events (CAEs) after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and Materials This study included 225 patients who received concurrent platinum and taxane-doublet chemotherapy with thoracic radiation therapy to a total dose of 60 to 74 Gy for NSCLC. All patients were evaluated for CAEs; 190 patients also had serial hs-cTnT measurements. Results Grade ≥3 CAEs occurred in 24 patients (11%) at a median interval of 9 months after CRT. Pretreatment hs-cTnT levels were higher in men, in patients aged ≥64 years, and in patients with pre-existing heart disease or poor performance status (P 10 ng/L or the Δ during CRT was ≥5 ng/L. Conclusions Elevation of hs-cTnT during CRT was radiation heart dose-dependent, and high hs-cTnT levels during the course of CRT were associated with CAEs and mortality. Routine monitoring of hs-cTnT could identify patients who are at high risk of CRT-induced CAEs early to guide modifications of cancer therapy and possible interventions to mitigate cardiotoxicity.

Summary Background A previous pooled analysis of the STARS and ROSEL trials showed higher survival after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) than with surgery for operable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but that analysis had notable limitations. This study reports long-term results of the revised STARS trial, in which the SABR group was re-accrued with a larger sample size, along with a protocol-specified propensity-matched comparison with a prospectively registered, contemporary institutional cohort of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (VATS L-MLND). Methods This single-arm prospective trial was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) and enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with a Zubrod performance status of 0–2, newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed NSCLC with N0M0 disease (squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, large cell, or NSCLC not otherwise specified), and a tumour diameter of 3 cm or less. This trial did not include patients from the previous pooled analysis. SABR dosing was 54 Gy in three fractions (for peripheral lesions) or 50 Gy in four fractions (for central tumours; simultaneous integrated boost to gross tumour totalling 60 Gy). The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival. For the propensity-matching analysis, we used a surgical cohort from the MD Anderson Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery's prospectively registered, institutional review board-approved database of all patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent VATS L-MLND during the period of enrolment in this trial. Non-inferiority could be claimed if the 3-year overall survival rate after SABR was lower than that after VATS L-MLND by 12% or less and the upper bound of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) was less than 1·965. Propensity matching consisted of determining a propensity score using a multivariable logistic regression model including several covariates (age, tumour size, histology, performance status, and the interaction of age and sex); based on the propensity scores, one patient in the SABR group was randomly matched with one patient in the VATS L-MLND group using a 5:1 digit greedy match algorithm. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02357992 . Findings Between Sept 1, 2015, and Jan 31, 2017, 80 patients were enrolled and included in efficacy and safety analyses. Median follow-up time was 5·1 years (IQR 3·9–5·8). Overall survival was 91% (95% CI 85–98) at 3 years and 87% (79–95) at 5 years. SABR was tolerated well, with no grade 4–5 toxicity and one (1%) case each of grade 3 dyspnoea, grade 2 pneumonitis, and grade 2 lung fibrosis. No serious adverse events were recorded. Overall survival in the propensity-matched VATS L-MLND cohort was 91% (95% CI 85–98) at 3 years and 84% (76–93) at 5 years. Non-inferiority was claimed since the 3-year overall survival after SABR was not lower than that observed in the VATS L-MLND group. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two patient cohorts (hazard ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·45–1·65], p=0·65) from a multivariable analysis. Interpretation Long-term survival after SABR is non-inferior to VATS L-MLND for operable stage IA NSCLC. SABR remains promising for such cases but multidisciplinary management is strongly recommended. Funding Varian Medical Systems and US National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health).

Background and purpose The efficacy of clinical trials and the outcome of patient treatment are dependent on the quality assurance (QA) of radiation therapy (RT) plans. There are two widely utilized approaches that include plan optimization guidance created based on patient‐specific anatomy. This study examined these two techniques for dose‐volume histogram predictions, RT plan optimizations, and prospective QA processes, namely the knowledge‐based planning (KBP) technique and another first principle (FP) technique. Methods This analysis included 60, 44, and 10 RT plans from three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) multi‐institutional trials: RTOG 0631 (Spine SRS), RTOG 1308 (NSCLC), and RTOG 0522 (H&N), respectively. Both approaches were compared in terms of dose prediction and plan optimization. The dose predictions were also compared to the original plan submitted to the trials for the QA procedure. Results For the RTOG 0631 (Spine SRS) and RTOG 0522 (H&N) plans, the dose predictions from both techniques have correlation coefficients of >0.9. The RT plans that were re‐optimized based on the predictions from both techniques showed similar quality, with no statistically significant differences in target coverage or organ‐at‐risk sparing. The predictions of mean lung and heart doses from both methods for RTOG1308 patients, on the other hand, have a discrepancy of up to 14 Gy. Conclusions Both methods are valuable tools for optimization guidance of RT plans for Spine SRS and Head and Neck cases, as well as for QA purposes. On the other hand, the findings suggest that KBP may be more feasible in the case of inoperable lung cancer patients who are treated with IMRT plans that have spatially unevenly distributed beam angles.

PurposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and is often used for recurrent lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT), including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is a major concern for which it is important to understand dosimetric and clinical predictors.Methods and materialsThis study was undertaken through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Working Group on Biological Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Data from studies of lung SBRT published through the summer of 2016 that provided detailed information about RILT were analyzed.ResultsNinety-seven studies were ultimately considered. Definitions of the risk organ and complication endpoints as well as dose-volume information presented varied among studies. The risk of RILT, including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, was reported to be associated with the size and location of the tumor. Patients with interstitial lung disease appear to be especially susceptible to severe RILT. A variety of dosimetric parameters were reported to be associated with RILT. There was no apparent threshold "tolerance dose-volume" level. However, most studies noted safe treatment with a rate of symptomatic RILT of

Highlights • First study to investigate lymphopenia in NSCLC with postoperative radiotherapy. • Radiation-induced lymphopenia is common is this population. • Lymphopenia is correlated with radiation fraction number and total mean lung dose. • Lymphopenia is an independent risk factor for PFS and OS, particularly in stage III NSCLC., Purpose To investigate the incidence and prognosis of severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (sRIL) after postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for resected NSCLC. Patients and methods Between 1998 and 2017, 170 patients treated with PORT for NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. Lymphopenia was divided into tertiles with severe lymphopenia defined as absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC)

Introduction Late cardiotoxicity related to radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma has been well-reported. However, the relatively higher cardiac dose exposure for esophageal cancer (EC) may result in the earlier onset of cardiac diseases. In this report, we examined the incidence, onset, and long-term survival outcomes of high-grade cardiac events after RT in a large cohort of patients with EC. Methods Between March 2005 and August 2017, a total of 479 patients with EC from a prospectively maintained institutional database at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed. All patients were treated with either intensity-modulated RT or proton beam therapy, either preoperatively or definitively. We focused on any grade 3 or higher (G3+) cardiac events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Results G3+ cardiac events occurred in 18% of patients at a median of 7 months with a median follow-up time of 76 months. Preexisting cardiac disease (p = 0.001) and radiation modality (intensity-modulated RT versus proton beam therapy) (p = 0.027) were significantly associated with G3+ cardiac events. Under multivariable analysis, the mean heart dose, particularly of less than 15 Gy, was associated with reduced G3+ events. Furthermore, G3+ cardiac events were associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.041). Conclusions Severe cardiac events were relatively common in patients with early onset EC after RT, especially those with preexisting cardiac disease and higher radiation doses to the heart. Optimal treatment approaches should be taken to reduce cumulative doses to the heart, especially for patients with preexisting cardiac disease.

Background Although mindfulness-based interventions have been widely examined in patients with nonmetastatic cancer, the feasibility and efficacy of these types of programs are largely unknown for those with advanced disease. We pilot-tested a couple-based meditation (CBM) relative to a supportive-expressive (SE) and a usual care (UC) arm targeting psychospiritual distress in patients with metastatic lung cancer and their spousal caregivers. Patients and Methods Seventy-five patient-caregiver dyads completed baseline self-report measures and were then randomized to one of the three arms. Couples in the CBM and SE groups attended four 60-minute sessions that were delivered via videoconference. All dyads were reassessed 1 and 3 months later. Results A priori feasibility benchmarks were met. Although attendance was high in both groups, dyads in the CBM group indicated greater benefit of the sessions than those in the SE group (patients, CBM mean = 2.63, SE mean = 2.20, p = .003; spouses, CBM mean = 2.71, SE mean = 2.00, p = .005). Compared with the UC group, patients in the CBM group reported significantly lower depressive symptoms (p = .05; d = 0.53) and marginally reduced cancer-related stress (p = .07; d = 0.68). Medium effect sizes in favor of the CBM compared with the SE group for depressive symptoms (d = 0.59) and cancer-related stress (d = 0.54) were found. Spouses in the CBM group reported significantly lower depressive symptoms (p < .01; d = 0.74) compared with those in the UC group. Conclusion It seems feasible and possibly efficacious to deliver dyadic interventions via videoconference to couples coping with metastatic lung cancer. Mindfulness-based interventions may be of value to managing psychological symptoms in the palliative care setting. Clinical trial identification number. NCT02596490 Implications for Practice The current randomized controlled trial has established that a mindfulness approach to the management of patients’ and spouses’ psychospiritual concerns is acceptable and subjectively deemed more beneficial than a supportive-expressive treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also revealed that videoconference delivery, here FaceTime, is an acceptable approach even for geriatric patients with metastatic NSCLC and that patients and their spousal caregivers prefer a dyadic delivery of this type of supportive care strategy. Lastly, this trial has laid the foundation for the role of mindfulness-based interventions in the palliative care setting supporting patients with advanced NSCLC and their spousal caregivers.

Purpose Clinical trials are considered the gold standard in evidence-based medicine, yet few patients with cancer ultimately enroll. Here we examine patients screened for thoracic radiation oncology clinical trials to better understand enrollment trends. Methods and Materials A prospective database tracking screening and enrollment for patients referred for thoracic radiation oncology consultation at our institution from 2016 to 2019 was evaluated. Proportional enrollment rates, patient and disease characteristics, self-reported socioeconomic factors, and reasons for ineligibility or nonenrollment across 17 radiation therapy trials were compared. Results Enrollment data on 2372 patients were available for analysis. Of these patients, 40.0% (949) were deemed “not eligible” (NE) for any trial or were unwilling to be further screened. Reasons for ineligibility included stage (44%), histology (13%), radiation therapy not indicated (12%), patient decision (7%), and enrollment in a competing medical or surgical oncology trial (5%). The remaining 60.0% (1423) were “potentially eligible” (PE) for one or more trials. Most had non-small cell lung cancer (71%) or esophageal cancer (16%), and there were significantly fewer stage IV PE (29%) versus NE (49%) patients (P Conclusions Only 12% of patients screened for radiation therapy trials ultimately enrolled, and more than two-thirds had no trial available or were found ineligible. In addition, 19% of potential eligible patients did not enroll because the patient or physician declined. Future trials may benefit from pragmatic designs with more inclusive enrollment criteria and multidisciplinary engagement of referring providers.

Introduction The standard of care for stage IIIA (N2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes concurrent definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) followed by durvalumab, thus challenging the role of surgery in resectable patients. We assessed locoregional disease control and survival in patients with surgically resected and unresected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC disease. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis from prospectively collected databases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or dCRT for clinical stage IIIA (N2) disease (2004-2014) were evaluated. Primary outcomes included locoregional disease control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier outcome analyses were performed. Results Of the 159 resected patients, the majority had lobectomy (82.4%), followed by pneumonectomy (11.9%) and sublobar resection (5.7%). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively. At median follow-up of 52.8 months, recurrence was 55.3%, with 44.0% having distant and 15.1% locoregional recurrence. At 5 years, OS was 50.8% and DFS was 33.1% Median OS was 61.2 months. A total of 366 patients underwent dCRT, with intensity-modulated radiation in 64.5%, proton therapy in 26.0%, and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 9.6%. The mean dose was 68.1 Gy. At median follow-up of 20.8 months, recurrence was 53.6%, with distant and locoregional recurrence of 40.7% and 30.3%, respectively. At 5 years, OS was 29.2% and DFS was 20.5%. Median OS was 27.5 months. Conclusion Stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC continues to be a heterogeneous disease, and patients with surgically resected and unresected disease represent different risk populations. Ongoing immunotherapy trials may further redefine treatment algorithms in this complex patient population.

Purpose The goal of this study was to assess whether a model-based approach applied retrospectively to a completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) would have significantly altered the selection of patients of the original trial, using the same selection criteria and endpoint for testing the potential clinical benefit of protons compared to photons. Methods and materials A model-based approach, based on three widely used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for radiation pneumonitis (RP), was applied retrospectively to a completed non-small cell lung cancer RCT (NCT00915005). It was assumed that patients were selected by the model-based approach if their expected Δ N T C P value was above a threshold of 5%. The endpoint chosen matched that of the original trial, the first occurrence of severe (grade ≥3) RP. Results Our analysis demonstrates that NTCP differences between proton and photon therapy treatments may be too small to support a model-based trial approach for lung cancer using RP as the normal tissue endpoint. The analyzed lung trial showed that less than 19% (32/165) of patients enrolled in the completed trial would have been enrolled in a model-based trial, prescribing photon therapy to all other patients. The number of patients enrolled was also found to be dependent on the type of NTCP model used for evaluating RP, with the three models enrolling 3%, 13% or 19% of patients. This result does show limitations in NTCP models which would affect the success of a model-based trial approach. No conclusion regarding the development of RP in patients randomized by the model-based approach could statistically be made. Conclusions Uncertainties in the outcome models to predict NTCP are the inherent drawback of a model-based approach to clinical trials. The impact of these uncertainties on enrollment in model-based trials depends on the predicted difference between the two treatment arms and on the set threshold for patient stratification. Our analysis demonstrates that NTCP differences between proton and photon therapy treatments may be too small to support a model-based trial approach for specific treatment sites, such as lung cancer, depending on the chosen normal tissue endpoint.

Background Metastatic head and neck cancers (HNCs) predominantly affect the lungs and have a two-year overall survival (OS) of 15% to 50%, if amenable for pulmonary metastasectomy. Methods Retrospective review of the two-year local control (LC), local-regional control (LRC) within the same lobe, OS, and toxicity rates in consecutive patients with metastatic pulmonary HNC who underwent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) January 2007 to May 2018. Results Evaluated 82 patients with 107 lung lesions, most commonly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 64%). Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 9.0-97.6). Systemic therapy administered in 34%. LC, LRC, and OS rates were 94%, 90%, and 62%. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a higher OS than polymetastatic disease, 72% vs 44% (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64; P = .008). OS in oligometastatic non-SCC and SCC were 100% and 66% (P = .03). There were no grade ≥3 toxicities. Conclusions Metastatic pulmonary HNCs after SABR have a two-year OS rate comparable to pulmonary metastasectomy.

Introduction Consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiation (CRT) is the current standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC. We hypothesized that adding immunotherapy concurrently with CRT (cCRT) would increase efficacy without additive toxicity. Methods This phase II study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 (n = 10) involved administration of conventionally fractionated CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (atezolizumab [two cycles] and maintenance atezolizumab up to 1 y). Part 2 (n = 30) involved administration of cCRT with atezolizumab followed by the same consolidation and maintenance therapies as in part 1. Programmed cell death ligand-1 staining cutoffs (1% or 50%) using Dako 22C3 immunohistochemistry were correlated with clinical outcomes. Results The overall toxicities for part 1/2 were overall adverse events of grade 3 and above of 80%/80%; immune-related adverse events of grade 3 and above of 30%/20%; and pneumonitis of grade 2 and above of 10%/16%, respectively. In part 1, for preliminary efficacy results, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 18.6 months, and the overall survival was 22.8 months. In part 2, with a median follow-up time of 15.1 months, the median progression-free survival was 13.2 months, and the overall survival was not reached. There was no difference in cancer recurrence regardless of programmed cell death ligand-1 status. Conclusions Atezolizumab with cCRT is safe and feasible and has no added toxicities compared with historical rates.

Radiotherapy is known to influence immune function, including T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire. We evaluated the TCR repertoire before and after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explored correlations between TCR indexes and distant failure after SBRT. TCR repertoires were analyzed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before and after SBRT from 19 patients. TCR combinational diversity in V and J genes was assessed with multiplex PCR of genomic DNA from PBMCs and tested for associations with clinical response. All patients received definitive SBRT to a biologically effective dose of >=100 Gy. The number of unique TCR clones was decreased after SBRT versus before, but clonality and the Shannon Entropy did not change. Four patients (21%) developed distant metastases after SBRT (median 7 months); those patients had lower Shannon Entropy in post-SBRT samples than patients without metastasis. Patients with a low change in Shannon Entropy from before to after SBRT [(post-SBRT Shannon Entropy minus baseline Shannon)/(baseline Shannon) * 100] had poorer metastasis-free survival than those with high change in Shannon Entropy (P

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) molecular residual disease (MRD) following curative-intent treatment strongly predicts recurrence in multiple tumor types, but whether further treatment can improve outcomes in patients with MRD remains unclear. We applied CAPP-Seq ctDNA analysis to 218 samples from 65 patients receiving chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced NSCLC, including 28 patients receiving consolidation immune checkpoint inhibition (CICI). Patients with undetectable ctDNA after CRT had excellent outcomes whether or not they received CICI. Among such patients, one died from CICI-related pneumonitis, highlighting the potential utility of only treating patients with MRD. In contrast, patients with MRD after CRT who received CICI had significantly better outcomes than patients who did not receive CICI. Furthermore, the ctDNA response pattern early during CICI identified patients responding to consolidation therapy. Our results suggest that CICI improves outcomes for NSCLC patients with MRD and that ctDNA analysis may facilitate personalization of consolidation therapy.

Purpose In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) exacerbates a cluster of difficult-to-manage symptoms, especially cancer-related fatigue. Minocycline is a readily available, low-cost antibiotic with antiinflammatory properties. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of minocycline in reducing CRT-symptom burden in NSCLC. Methods and Materials Patients with NSCLC scheduled to receive CRT provided consent and were randomized to receive either minocycline (100 mg twice daily) or a matching placebo during 6 to 7 weeks of CRT. Patient-reported fatigue and other symptoms were assessed on MD Anderson Symptom Inventory weekly from the start of CRT for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was 12-week (±2 days) area under the curve for symptom burden, which was compared between treatment groups. Results Forty of 49 enrolled patients (80%) were evaluable (19 on minocycline and 21 on placebo). There were no grade 3 + adverse events related to the study medication. Fatigue was significantly reduced in the minocycline group compared with placebo group during the 12-week trial period (area under the curve = 31.2 ± 14.2 vs 45.0 ± 20.9, P = .011), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.77). Pain (Cohen’s d = 0.54) and shortness of breath (Cohen’s d = 0.55) were also significantly reduced in the minocycline group (all P Conclusions Minocycline during CRT for NSCLC was feasible, had a low toxicity profile, and yielded a clinically and statistically significant positive signal in reducing symptom burden related to NSCLC and CRT. This study is a proof of concept so a larger trial in CRT patients is warranted.

Introduction Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) results in excellent local control of stage I NSCLC. Radiobiology models predict greater tumor response when higher biologically effective doses (BED10) are given. Prior studies support a BED10 greater than or equal to 100 Gy with SBRT; however, data are limited comparing outcomes after various SBRT regimens. We therefore sought to evaluate national trends and the effect of using “low” versus “high” BED10 SBRT courses on overall survival (OS). Methods This retrospective study used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage I (cT1-2aN0M0) NSCLC from 2004 to 2014 treated with SBRT. Patients were categorized into LowBED (100-129 Gy) or HighBED (≥130 Gy) groups. A 1:1 matched analysis based on patient and tumor characteristics was used to compare OS by BED10 group. Tumor centrality was not assessed. Results O 25,039 patients treated with LowBED (n = 14,756; 59%) or HighBED (n = 10,283; 41%) SBRT, 20,542 were matched. Shifts in HighBED to LowBED SBRT regimen use correlated with key publications in the literature. In the matched cohort, 5-year OS rates were 26% for LowBED and 34% for HighBED groups (p = 0.039). On multivariate analysis, receipt of LowBED was associated with significantly worse survival (hazard ratio = 1.046, 95% confidence interval: 1.004–1.090, p = 0.032). Conclusions LowBED SBRT for treating stage I NSCLC is becoming more common. However, our findings suggest SBRT regimens with BED10 greater than or equal to 130 Gy may confer an additional survival benefit. Additional studies are required to evaluate the dose-response relationship and toxicities associated with modern HighBED SBRT.

Purpose Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is commonly associated with thoracic radiation therapy, and its incidence is related to dose and volume of the normal lung in the path of radiation. Our aim was to investigate dose patterns associated with RP in patients enrolled in a randomized trial of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods We analyzed 178 patients prospectively treated with PSPT or IMRT for non-small cell lung cancer to a prescribed dose of 66 or 74 Gy in conventional daily fractionation with concurrent chemotherapy. Forty patients (22%) developed clinically symptomatic RP. Voxel-based analysis of local dose differences was done with a nonparametric permutation test accounting for multiple comparisons. From the obtained 3-dimensional significance maps, we derived clusters of voxels that exhibited dose differences between groups at a statistical significance level of 0.05. Results The voxel-based analysis highlighted that (1) significant dose differences between patients with and without RP were found in the lower part of the lungs and in the heart and (2) the anatomic regions significantly spared by PSPT and the clusters in which doses were significantly correlated with RP development were disjoint. Conclusions The analyzed trial data provide an unprecedented opportunity to substantiate previous hypotheses regarding the role of the heart and the lower lungs in the development of RP. Knowledge of this relationship between RP and thoracic regional radiosensitivity should be considered in clinical practice and in the design of future trials.

Highlights • Dosimetric parameters for the heart and lung are associated with overall survival in esophageal cancer patients. • Heart and lung doses were associated with cardiac and pulmonary complications. • Patients with cardiac and pulmonary complications are strongly correlated with survival outcomes. • Dosimetric relationship with clinical outcomes are predictive for surgical and non-surgical patients., Purpose To analyze associations between heart and lung dose and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) with or without surgery. Patients and methods Patients received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (median dose 50.4 Gy) from 2004 through 2016. Cutoff points for continuous variables were calculated using the method of Contal and O’Quigley. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used to calculate survival. OS was analyzed with both univariate and multivariable Cox models. Results In all, 560 patients were analyzed; median follow-up time was 29.3 months, and 5-year OS rate was 41.7%. Heart V30 >45% and mean lung dose (MLD) >10 Gy were found to be independently associated with worse survival after adjustment for other clinical and dosimetric factors (P 45% (P = 0.046); 18.8% of patients with MLD ≤10 Gy had pulmonary complications vs. 27% for MLD >10 Gy (P = 0.020). Having cardiac complications was associated with worse survival (5-year OS rates 27.6% with vs. 43.2% without, P = 0.012), and having pulmonary complications was associated with worse survival as well (5-year OS rates 23.1% with vs. 47.4% without, P

Purpose Proton therapy is increasingly prescribed for cancer treatment, given its potential for improvements in clinical outcomes and toxicity reduction; however, insurance coverage continues to be a barrier to patient access. This study examined insurance approval and appeal outcomes at a large-volume proton therapy center to clarify the process and identify areas for improvement. Methods and Materials In 2013 to 2016, 1753 patients with thoracic or head and neck cancer were considered for proton therapy; 903 (553 thoracic, 350 head and neck) entered the insurance process. Rates of and times to approval and successful appeal after initial denial were calculated. Clinical factors were evaluated for association with insurance outcomes via logistic regression. Results Approval rates by Medicare (n = 538) and private insurance (n = 365) were 91% and 30% on initial request, at a median 3 days and 14 days from inquiry to determination. Of the 306 patients initially denied coverage, 276 appealed the decision, and denial was overturned for 189 patients (68%; median time, 21 days from initial inquiry). On multivariable analysis, Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 14.20; P Conclusions Despite an 87% ultimate approval rate for proton therapy, the insurance process is a resource-intensive barrier to patient access associated with significant time delays to cancer treatment. These findings, plus the lack of clinical correlates with insurance outcomes, highlight a need for increased efficiency, transparency, and collaboration among stakeholders to promote timely patient care and research.

Objective Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may result in toxicities that are associated with performance declines and poor quality of life (QOL) for patients and their family caregivers. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to establish feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a dyadic yoga (DY) intervention as a supportive care strategy. Methods Patients with stage I to III non-small cell lung or esophageal cancer undergoing TRT and their caregivers (N = 26 dyads) were randomized to a 15-session DY or a waitlist control (WLC) group. Prior to TRT and randomization, both groups completed measures of QOL (SF-36) and depressive symptoms (CES-D). Patients also completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Dyads were reassessed on the last day of TRT and 3 months later. Results A priori feasibility criteria were met regarding consent (68%), adherence (80%), and retention (81%) rates. Controlling for relevant covariates, multilevel modeling analyses revealed significant clinical improvements for patients in the DY group compared with the WLC group for the 6MWT (means: DY = 473 m vs WLC = 397 m, d = 1.19) and SF-36 physical function (means: DY = 38.77 vs WLC = 30.88; d = .66) and social function (means: DY = 45.24 vs WLC = 39.09; d = .44) across the follow-up period. Caregivers in the DY group reported marginally clinically significant improvements in SF-36 vitality (means: DY = 53.05 vs WLC = 48.84; d = .39) and role performance (means: DY = 52.78 vs WLC = 48.59; d = .51) relative to those in the WLC group. Conclusions This novel supportive care program appears to be feasible and beneficial for patients undergoing TRT and their caregivers. A larger efficacy trial with a more stringent control group is warranted.

This multi-institutional review explored associations between radiation dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and cardiopulmonary toxicities with trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer.We reviewed 465 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery at 2 tertiary-care institutions between 2007 and 2013. Using logistic regression, we assessed associations between lung and heart DVH parameters and cardiopulmonary toxicities and survival. Statistically significant variables were subsequently included in multivariable models, which incorporated age, smoking history, previous history of heart disease, and type of chemotherapy.The median age of the patients was 61 years (interquartile range, 54-68 years), and 86% were men. At baseline, 60% of the patients had known cardiac risk factors, 64% were current or former smokers, and 10% had other pulmonary comorbidities. Most patients had stage II to III (96%) adenocarcinoma (94%) of the distal esophagus. The radiation therapy (RT) modalities used were 3-dimensional conformal RT (38%), intensity modulated RT (41%), and proton therapy (20%). An increased heart dose was associated with increased risk of cardiac toxicity on univariable analysis (V20 Gy: odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.33; P = .001) (V30 Gy: OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.38; P.0001) (V40 Gy: OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35; P = .018). No lung DVH metrics were associated with lung toxicity. Heart V30 Gy was associated with adverse events on multivariable analysis (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.26; P = .0047).We observed an association between heart dose and cardiac toxicity for esophageal cancer. The risk of cardiac toxicity was 5%, 10%, and 15% when the heart V30 Gy dose was 14%, 20%, and 30%, respectively. For every 10% increase in V30 Gy, there was a corresponding 24% increase in the relative risk of cardiac toxicity.

Purpose To investigate thoracic dose–response patterns for pericardial effusion (PCE) and mortality in patients treated for locally advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) by Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) or Passive-Scattering Proton Therapy (PSPT). Methods Among 178 patients, 43.5% developed grade ≥ 2 PCE. Clinical and dosimetric factors associated with PCE or overall survival (OS) were identified via multi-variable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The Voxel-Based Analyses (VBAs) of local dose differences between patients with and without PCE and mortality was performed. The robustness of VBA results was assessed by a novel characterization of spatial properties of dose distributions based on probabilistic independent component analysis (PICA) and connectograms. Results Several non-dosimetric variables were selected by the multivariable analysis for the considered outcomes, while the time-dependent PCE onset was uncorrelated with the OS (p = 0.34) at a multi-variable Cox analysis. Despite the significant PSPT dosimetric advantage, the RT technique did not affect the occurrence of PCE or OS. VBAs highlighted largely overlapping clusters significantly associated with PCE endpoints in heart and lungs. No significant dosimetric patterns related to mortality endpoints were found. PICA identified 43 components homogeneously scattered within thorax, while connectograms showed modest correlations between doses in main cardio-pulmonary substructures. Conclusions Spatially resolved analysis highlighted dose patterns related to radiation-induced cardiac toxiciy and the observed organ-based dose–response mismatch in PSPT and IMRT. Indeed, the thoracic regions spared by PSPT poorly overlapped with the areas involved in PCE development, as highlited by VBA. PICA and connectograms proved valuable tools for assessing the robusteness of obtained VBA inferences.

In the United States, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused profound changes in radiation oncology practices, including delays to treatment and reductions in patient volume, staff, and practice revenue....

Background Erlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) demonstrated a favorable objective response rate in a phase II single-arm trial of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. We assessed whether concurrent erlotinib with WBRT is safe and benefits patients in a phase III, randomized trial. Methods NSCLC patients with two or more brain metastases were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to WBRT (n = 115) or WBRT combined with erlotinib arms (n = 109). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and cognitive function (CF) was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results A total of 224 patients from 10 centers across China were randomized to treatments. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. Median iPFS for WBRT concurrent erlotinib was 11.2 months vs 9.2 months for WBRT-alone (P = .601). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) of combination group were 5.3 vs 4.0 months (P = .825) and 12.9 vs 10.0 months (P = .545), respectively, compared with WBRT-alone. In EGFR-mutant patients, iPFS (14.6 vs 12.8 months; P = .164), PFS (8.8 vs 6.4 months; P = .702), and OS (17.5 vs 16.9 months; P = .221) were not significantly improved in combination group over WBRT-alone. Moreover, there were no significant differences in patients experiencing MMSE score change between the treatments. Conclusion Concurrent erlotinib with WBRT didn’t improve iPFS and excessive CF detriment either in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population or in EGFR-mutant patients compared with WBRT-alone, suggesting that while safe for patients already taking the drug, there is no justification for adding concurrent EGFR-TKI with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases. Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01887795

Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non-small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity.Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P.01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P.01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P.01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P.01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104).PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation.

Background Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs) are polynucleated circulating stromal cells found in the bloodstream of numerous solid-tumor malignancies. Variations within CAML size have been associated with poorer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a variety of cancers; however, no study has evaluated their clinical significance in esophageal cancer (EC). Methods To examine this significance, we ran a 2 year prospective pilot study consisting of newly diagnosed stage I-III EC patients (n = 32) receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT). CAML sizes were sequentially monitored prior to CRT (BL), ~ 2 weeks into treatment (T1), and at the first available sample after the completion of CRT (T2). Results We found CAMLs in 88% (n = 28/32) of all patient samples throughout the trial, with a sensitivity of 76% (n = 22/29) in pre-treatment screening samples. Improved 2 year PFS and OS was found in patients with CAMLs p = 0.004) and OS (HR = 9.0, 95%CI = 1.9–43.5, p = 0.019). Conclusions Tracking CAML sizes throughout CRT as a minimally invasive biomarker may serve as a prognostic tool in mapping EC progression, and further studies are warranted to determine if presence of these cells prior to treatment suggest diagnostic value for at-risk populations.

Highlights • Lung Cancer patients are at high risk for COVID-19 infection. • All steps should be taken to protect patients and the healthcare workforce. • Shortened RT overall treatment time is an important consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Twelve recommendations in the use of RT are proposed by an international panel. • The proposed recommendations require urgent consideration during this pandemic., COVID-19 has spread around the planet, sending billions of people into lockdown as health services struggle to cope. By April 2020, there are over a million two hundred thousand confirmed cases and more than sixty-five thousand deaths worldwide Meanwhile in Asia, where the disease began, the spread continues, in China it seems for now to have passed its peak. Italy, Spain, France, and the US have been the countries more affected in terms of deaths. The coronavirus is more dangerous to the elderly and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions which is precisely the profile of lung cancer patients. Essential cancer services should be delivered but all steps should be taken to protect patients and the health workforce from infection with COVID-19. This presents a major challenge to radiotherapy (RT) departments worldwide in curbing the spread of COVID-19 while ensuring the continuity of services. In RT, shortening overall treatment time to reduce the number of patients present in the department is an important consideration. An international panel, including the majority of countries most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with expertise in the management of cancer in high-volume comprehensive centres from the largest societies of radiation oncology worldwide have come together to share their experience on COVID-19 preparedness in the context of lung cancer RT to deliver optimal care in such exceptional circumstances, based on the latest evidence. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature through a PubMed search was undertaken. Given that lung cancer is one of the most common and severe pathologies in radiation oncology departments, the following recommendations require particularly urgent consideration. The decision-making paths strongly depend on locally available resources, and a tailored approach should be used to attend lung cancer patients during this pandemic.

Despite the advancements of modern radiotherapy, radiation-induced heart disease remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality amongst cancer survivors. This review outlines the basic mechanism, clinical presentation, risk stratification, early detection, possible mitigation, and treatment of this condition.

Background: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is effective, but some patients die during treatment or too soon afterward to experience benefit. This study investigates end-of-life RT patterns to inform shared decision-making and facilitate treatment consistent with palliative goals. Materials and Methods: All patients who died ≤6 months after initiating palliative RT at an academic cancer center between 2015 and 2018 were identified. Associations with time-to-death, early mortality (≤30 days), and midtreatment mortality were analyzed. Results: In total, 1,620 patients died ≤6 months from palliative RT initiation, including 574 (34%) deaths at ≤30 days and 222 (14%) midtreatment. Median survival was 43 days from RT start (95% CI, 41–45) and varied by site (PPPPP=.008), whereas stereotactic technique (HR, 0.77; PP10 fractions (median, 40 vs 47 days; P=.272), although the latter entailed longer courses. The 30-day mortality group included 335 (58%) inpatients, who were 27% more likely to die midtreatment (P=.031). On multivariable analysis, midtreatment mortality among these inpatients was associated with thoracic (odds ratio [OR], 2.95; P=.002) and central nervous system (CNS; OR, 2.44; P=.002) indications, >5-fraction courses (OR, 3.27; PP=.050). Conversely, palliative/supportive care consultation was associated with decreased midtreatment mortality (OR, 0.60; P=.045). Conclusions: Earlier referrals and hypofractionated courses (≤5–10 treatments) should be routinely considered for palliative RT indications, given the short life expectancies of patients at this stage in their disease course. Providers should exercise caution for emergent thoracic and CNS indications among inpatients with poor prognoses due to high midtreatment mortality.

Highlights • Prospective cohort of 121 cancer patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 over 35 days. • Of 7 positive cases, 6 were admitted with 4 warranting intensive care, and 2 died. • RT was delayed in one-third of patients while awaiting RT-PCR test results. • With a dual PPE policy, newly quarantined employees decreased 6-fold per day. • Each patient was an exposure risk to 5 employees, most commonly RTTs (38%), Background and purpose The COVID-19 pandemic warrants operational initiatives to minimize transmission, particularly among cancer patients who are thought to be at high-risk. Within our department, a multidisciplinary tracer team prospectively monitored all patients under investigation, tracking their test status, treatment delays, clinical outcomes, employee exposures and quarantines. Materials and methods Prospective cohort tested for SARS-COV-2 infection over 35 consecutive days of the early pandemic (03/19/2020-04/22/2020). Results A total of 121 Radiation Oncology patients underwent RT-PCR testing during this timeframe. Of the 7 (6%) confirmed-positive cases, 6 patients were admitted (including 4 warranting intensive care), 2 of whom died from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Radiotherapy was deferred or interrupted for 40 patients awaiting testing. As the median turnaround time for RT-PCR testing decreased from 1.5 (IQR: 1-4) to ≤1-day (P

Key Points Question Is Medicaid coverage associated with a survival benefit compared with being uninsured among US patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)? Findings This cohort registry analysis of 181 784 patients with SCLC included in the US National Cancer Database found no association of Medicaid coverage with a survival advantage compared with no insurance. Patients with private insurance, managed care plans, and Medicare had better survival than did Medicaid recipients or uninsured patients even after adjusting for confounding factors. Meaning Medicaid coverage was not associated with improved overall survival among patients with SCLC, thus highlighting an opportunity for health care policy intervention in this population., This cohort study examines the association of Medicaid coverage with survival, compared with other insurance statuses, among patients with small cell lung cancer., Importance Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neoplasm requiring rapid access to subspecialized multidisciplinary care. For this reason, insurance coverage such as Medicaid may be associated with oncologic outcomes in this disproportionately economically vulnerable population. With Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, it is important to understand outcomes associated with Medicaid coverage among patients with SCLC. Objective To determine the association of Medicaid coverage with survival compared with other insurance statuses. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included adult patients with limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC in the US National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013. Data were analyzed in January 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Patients were analyzed with respect to insurance status. Associations of insurance status with survival were interrogated with univariate analyses, multivariable analyses, and propensity score matching. Results A total of 181 784 patients with SCLC (93 131 [51.2%] female; median [interquartile range] age; 67 [60-75] years for patients with LS-SCLC and 68 [60-75] years for patients with ES-SCLC) were identified, of whom 70 247 (38.6%) had LS-SCLC and 109 479 (60.2%) had ES-SCLC. On univariate analyses of patients with LS-SCLC, Medicaid coverage was not associated with a survival advantage compared with being uninsured (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08; P = .49). Likewise, on multivariable analyses of patients with ES-SCLC, compared with being uninsured, Medicaid coverage was not associated with a survival advantage (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03; P = .78). After propensity score matching, median survival was similar between the uninsured and Medicaid groups both among patients with LS-SCLC (14.4 vs 14.1 months; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; P = .17) and those with ES-SCLC (6.3 vs 6.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.04; P = .92). Conclusions and Relevance Despite of billions of dollars in annual federal and state spending, Medicaid was not associated with improved survival in patients with SCLC compared with being uninsured in the US National Cancer Database. These findings suggest that there are substantial outcome inequalities for SCLC relevant to the policy debate on the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.

Background To examine the effect of radiotherapy field size on survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 216 patients with T1-4 N1-2 NSCLC following surgery and PORT using whole mediastinum (WM) or high-risk (HR) nodal fields from 1998 to 2015. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards modeling for outcomes and logistic regression analysis for treatment toxicities. Results Median follow-up was 28 months (interquartile range [IQR] 13-75 months) and 38 months (IQR 19-73 months) for WM (n=131) and HR (n=84) groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between groups (median OS: HR 49 vs. WM 32 months; P=0.08). There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from locoregional recurrence (LRR), or freedom from distant metastasis (P>0.2 for all). Field size was not associated with OS, PFS, or LRR (P>0.40 for all). LRR rates were 20% for HR and 26% for WM groups (P=0.30). There was no significant difference in patterns of initial site of LRR between groups (P>0.1). WM fields (OR 3.73, P=0.001) and concurrent chemotherapy (OR 3.62, P=0.001) were associated with grade ≥2 toxicity. Conclusions Locoregional control and survival rates were similar between PORT groups; an improved toxicity profile was observed in the HR group. Results from an ongoing prospective randomized clinical trial will provide further insight into the consequences of high-risk PORT fields.

Background Cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are a potential peripheral blood biomarker for disease progression. This study used data from a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate prognostic utility of CAMLs for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and atezolizumab (DETERRED; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02525757 ). Patients and Methods Sample collection occurred at baseline (T0), during CRT (T1), at end of CRT (T2), and at first follow-up (T3). CAMLs were captured and quantified by the CellSieve system using multiplex immunostaining. Giant CAMLs were defined as characteristic CAMLs ≥ 50 μm. Kaplan-Meier methodology estimated progression-free survival, distant failure-free survival, relapse-free survival, and overall survival at 30 months. Results Thirty-nine patients were evaluated between December 2015 and March 2018. Median follow-up was 27 months. Most disease was stage III (85%) and comprised squamous-cell carcinoma (38%) or adenocarcinoma (59%). In total, 267 blood samples were analyzed. Giant CAMLs were identified in 57%, 60%, 64%, and 63% of patients at T0, T1, T2, and T3, respectively. Patients with giant CAMLs at T3, occurring at a median of 30 days after completion of CRT, had significantly worse distant failure-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9, P = .015), progression-free survival (HR 2.5, P = .025), recurrence-free survival (HR 2.4, P = .036), and overall survival (HR 3.5, P = .034) compared to patients with small or no CAMLs. Conclusions Presence of giant CAMLs after CRT completion was associated with development of metastatic disease and poorer survival despite the use of maintenance immunotherapy. Monitoring CAMLs may help risk-stratify patients for adaptive treatment strategies.

Purpose: To examine national care patterns in proton radiation therapy (PBT) use for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the effect of facility type on survival. Patients and Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 506 patients with a diagnosis of NSCLC from 2004-2014 who underwent PBT. Patients were categorized as having received treatment at an academic/research facility (ARF) or a form of community cancer program (CCP). Descriptive analysis was performed, and overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Treatments at ARFs and CCPs were equally distributed with 253 patients at each facility type. A positive trend in PBT use over time was observed with 2.8% of cases being treated in 2008 compared to 21.5% in 2014 (P = .001). Definitive doses (≥60 Gy) were more commonly given at ARFs than CCPs (72% versus 45%, respectively; P

PURPOSE: We evaluated the feasibility of using an automatic segmentation tool to delineate cardiac substructures from noncontrast computed tomography (CT) images for cardiac dosimetry and toxicity analyses for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used an in-house developed multi-atlas segmentation tool to delineate 11cardiac substructures, including the whole heart, four heart chambers, and six greater vessels, automatically from the averaged 4D-CT planning images of 49 patients with NSCLC. Two experienced radiation oncologists edited the auto-segmented contours. Times for automatic segmentation and modification were recorded. The modified contours were compared with the auto-segmented contours in terms of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface distance (MSD) to evaluate the extent of modification. Differences in dose-volume histogram (DVH) characteristics were also evaluated for the modified versus auto-segmented contours. RESULTS: The mean automatic segmentation time for all 11 structures was 7–9 min. For the 49 patients, the mean DSC values (±SD) ranged from 0.73±0.08 to 0.95±0.04, and the mean MSD values ranged from 1.3±0.6 mm to 2.9±5.1mm. Overall, the modifications were small; the largest modifications were in the pulmonary vein and the inferior vena cava. The heart V30 (volume receiving dose ≥30 Gy) and the mean dose to the whole heart and the four heart chambers were not different for the modified versus the auto-segmented contours based on the statistically significant condition of p

Purpose To report the feasibility of conducting a randomized study to compare the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) for high-risk, medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with medically inoperable NSCLC with high-risk features (centrally located or Results The study closed early owing to poor accrual, largely because of insurance coverage and lack of volumetric imaging in the SBPT group. Ultimately, 21 patients were enrolled, and 19 patients who received 50 Gy in 4 fractions were included for analysis (9 SBRT, 10 SBPT). At a median follow-up time of 32 months, median overall survival time was 28 months in the SBRT group and not reached in the SBPT group. Three-year overall survival was 27.8% and 90%, 3-year local control was 87.5% (8 of 9) and 90.0% (9 of 10), and 3-year regional control was 47.6% (5 of 9) and 90% (9 of 10) in the SBRT and SBPT groups, respectively. One patient in the SBPT group developed grade 3 skin fibrosis. No patients experienced grade 4/5 toxicity. Conclusion Poor accrual, due to lack of volumetric imaging and insurance coverage for proton therapy, led to early closure of the trial and precluded accurate assessment of efficacy and toxicity. Comparable maturity of 2 radiation therapy modalities, particularly on-board imaging, and better insurance coverage for SBPT should be considered for future studies.

Objective: The DNA repair capacity (DRC) of tumor cells is an important contributor to resistance to radiation and platinum-based drugs. Because DRC may be affected by tumor cell metabolism, we measured DRC in lymphocytes from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compared the findings with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) after (chemo)radiation therapy. Methods: This study included 151 patients with stage IA-IV NSCLC who had FDG PET at a single institution and donated blood samples before chemotherapy. We assessed the correlation of DRC, measured in peripheral T lymphocytes by a host-cell reactivation assay with SUVmax and their associations with overall survival (OS) time by hazards ratios calculated with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: SUVmax of the primary tumor at diagnosis was inversely associated with lymphocyte DRC (r = -0.175, P = 0.032), particularly among patients with advanced disease (r = -0.218, P = 0.015). However, ΔSUVmax of primary tumor was not significantly associated with DRC (r = 0.005, P = 0.968). SUVmax of regional lymph nodes at diagnosis (r = -0.307, P = 0.0008) and after (chemo)radiation treatment (r = -0.329, P = 0.034) and SUVmax of the primary tumor after (chemo)radiation treatment (r = -0.253, P = 0.045) were also inversely associated with OS time. Conclusion: DRC was inversely associated with primary tumor SUVmax before treatment but not with ΔSUVmax after (chemo)radiation. Key words: DNA repair capacity; Standardized uptake value; 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Outcome; Non-small-cell lung cancer

Hepcidin is crucial in regulating iron metabolism, and increased serum levels were strongly linked with poor outcomes in various malignancies. Thus, we investigated if genetic variants in the BMP/Smad4/Hamp hepcidin‐regulating pathway were associated with outcomes in patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for NSCLC. Subjects were 664 NSCLC patients who received ≥60 Gy radiotherapy for NSCLC retrospectively identified from a single‐institution database. Potentially, functional and tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of BMP2 (rs170986, rs1979855, rs1980499, rs235768, and rs3178250), BMP4 (rs17563, rs4898820, and rs762642), Smad4 (rs12456284), and Hamp (rs1882694, rs10402233, rs10421768, and rs12971321) were genotyped by TaqMan real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Cox proportional hazard's analyses were used to assess potential influences of SNPs on overall survival (OS), local‐regional progression‐free survival (LRPFS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). Nomogram of each endpoint model was developed using R project. The median patient age was 66 years. Most (488 [73.2%]) had stage III NSCLC. Age, disease stage, receipt of concurrent chemotherapy, and gross tumor volume were independent factors of OS. Hamp rs1882694 AC/CC genotypes were associated with poor OS, LRPFS, PFS, and DMFS in multivariate analyses. Besides, BMP2 rs1979855, rs3178250, and rs1980499 associated with PFS; Hamp rs10402233 and BMP2 rs1979855 associated with LRPFS; BMP2 rs3178250 associated with DMFS after adjustment for clinical factors. After adding SNPs to each model, all the likelihood ratios were increased; the nomograms were improved significantly to predict LRPFS (P

The standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA NSCLC) includes surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or some combination of these modalities. Many clinical trials have been conducted in attempts to intensify treatment for LA NSCLC, but with little improvement. A therapeutic plateau had been reached, with no major progress in extending survival for patients with this disease. However, several recent trials of newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies may shed new light on potential therapeutic breakthroughs. The potential benefits from new targeted therapies and immunotherapies in combination with other forms of therapy for LA NSCLC are sufficiently striking as to change current treatment paradigms. Trials of these agents are moving forward from patients with advanced disease to those with earlier stage disease, and from palliative intent to curative intent, which may well revolutionize treatment strategies that have been considered standard over the past several decades. Future studies are needed to explore the role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in combination with existing therapies for earlier stage disease and for frontline treatment, either as concurrent or perhaps neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches.

Introduction Autophagy not only plays an important role in the progression of cancer but is also involved in tissue inflammatory response. However, few published studies have investigated associations between functional genetic variants of autophagy-related genes and radiation pneumonitis (RP) as well as clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC after definitive radiotherapy. Methods We genotyped nine potentially functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in four autophagy-related genes (autophagy related 2B gene [ATG2B], autophagy related 10 gene [ATG10], autophagy related 12 gene [ATG12], and autophagy related 16 like 2 gene [ATG16L2]) in 393 North American patients with NSCLC treated by definitive radiotherapy and assessed their associations with RP, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results We found that patients with the ATG16L2 rs10898880 CC variant genotype had a better LRFS, PFS, and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.59, 0.64, and 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.45–0.79, 0.48–0.84, and 0.48–0.86; p = 0.0004, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively), but a greater risk for development of severe RP (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–3.12, p = 0.037) than did patients with AA/AC genotypes. Further functional analyses suggested that the ATG16L2 rs10898880 C variant allele modulated expression of the ATG16L2 gene. Conclusion This is the first report that one potentially functional SNP rs10898880 in ATG16L2 may be a predictor of RP, LRFS, PFS, and OS in patients with NSCLC after definitive radiotherapy. Additional larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The finite range of proton beams in tissues offers unique dosimetric advantages that theoretically allow the dose to the target to be escalated while minimizing exposure of surrounding tissues and thereby minimizing radiation-induced toxicity. These theoretical advantages have led to widespread adoption of proton therapy around the world for a wide variety of tumors at different anatomic sites. Many treatment-planning comparisons have shown that proton therapy has substantial dosimetric advantages over conventional photon (X-ray) radiation therapy. However, given the typically significant difference in cost between proton therapy versus conventional photon therapy, strong evidence of proton therapy’s clinical benefits in terms of toxicity and survival is warranted. Some findings from retrospective studies, single-arm prospective studies, and a very few randomized clinical trials comparing these modalities are beginning to emerge. In this review, we examine the available data on proton therapy for (non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC). We begin by discussing the unique challenges involved in treating moving targets with significant tissue heterogeneity and the technologic efforts underway to overcome these challenges. We then discuss the rationale for minimizing normal tissue toxicity, particularly pulmonary, cardiac, and hematologic toxicity, within the context of previously unsuccessful attempts at dose escalation for lung cancer. Finally, we explore strategies for accelerating the development of trials aimed at measuring meaningful clinical endpoints and for maximizing the value of proton therapy by personalizing its use for individual patients.

PURPOSE: Clinician ratings of concurrent chemoradiation (CRT)-induced radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are based on both imaging and patient-reported lung symptoms. We compared the value of patient-reported outcomes versus normal-lung uptake of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose in positron emission computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) during the last week of treatment, for indicating the development of grade ≥2 RP within 4 months of CRT completion. METHODS: 132 patients with NSCLC reported RP-related symptoms (coughing, shortness of breath) repeatedly using the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory lung cancer module. Of these patients, 68 had FDG PET/CT scans that were analyzed for normal-lung mean standardized FDG uptake values (SUV(mean)) before, during, and up to 4 months after CRT. Clinicians rated RP using CTCAE version 3. Logistic regression models examined potential predictors for developing CTCAE RP ≥2. RESULTS: For the entire sample, patient-rated RP-related symptoms during the last week of CRT correlated with clinically meaningful CTCAE RP ≥2 post-CRT (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.25-5.99, P=0.012), controlled for sex, age, mean lung radiation dose, comorbidity, and baseline symptoms. Moderate/severe patient-rated RP-related symptom score (≥4 on a 0–10 scale, P=0.001) and normal-lung FDG uptake (SUV(mean)>0.78, P=0.002) in last week of CRT were equally strong predictors of post-CRT CTCAE RP ≥2 (C-index=0.78, 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: During the last week of CRT, routine assessment of moderate to severe RP-related symptoms provides a simple way to identify patients with NSCLC who may be at risk for developing significant post-CRT RP, especially when PET/CT images of normal-lung FDG uptake are not available.

Context Given the generally incurable nature of metastatic lung cancer, patients and their spouses/partners are at risk for psychological and spiritual distress. To address this concern, we developed a couple-based mind-body (CBMB) intervention. Objectives This formative research aimed at examining the intervention's acceptability and initial efficacy in patients with metastatic lung cancer undergoing treatment and their spouses. Methods Intervention content evaluation sessions and an ensuing single-arm trial were conducted. To evaluate intervention content, participants performed intervention exercises and then participated in semistructured interviews and completed written evaluations. In the single-arm trial, four intervention sessions were delivered over two weeks, focusing on cultivating mindfulness, interpersonal connection, gratitude, and purpose. Newly recruited couples completed measures of depressive symptoms, cancer distress, spiritual well-being, and sleep disturbances before and after the intervention. Results Content evaluations by seven dyads of patients and their partners revealed high acceptability ratings for the CBMB intervention (e.g., all participants would recommend the intervention). Consent and adherence rates (54% and 67%, respectively) were acceptable in the single-arm trial. All patients ( n = 7 dyads; 67% male; mean age, 55 years) and partners (33% male; mean age, 59 years) rated the intervention as useful. Paired t-test analyses revealed large effect sizes for reduced sleep disturbances ( d = 1.83) and medium effect sizes for cancer-specific distress ( d = 0.61) for patients and large effect sizes for depressive symptoms ( d = 0.90) for partners. Conclusion Based on these results, the CBMB intervention appears to be acceptable and subjectively useful. In addition, we observed preliminary evidence of quality of life gains in both patients and their partners.

Purpose To identify predictors of local control and overall survival (OS) for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Methods and Materials We identified 491 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIA-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who had received 60 to 74 Gy (with concurrent chemotherapy) from January 2005 through December 2013 and grouped them by radiation dose received: 60 to 63 Gy, 64 to 66 Gy, 67 to 70 Gy, or 71 to 74 Gy. Local progression (LP) was that appearing within the high-dose volume (planning target volume plus 1-cm margin). Times to events were calculated from the completion of radiation therapy. Potential predictors of LP and OS were analyzed with a Cox regression model. Results Rates of LP for all patients were 16.2% at 1 year, 26.2% at 2 years, 31.0% at 3 years, 32.9% at 4 years, and 32.9% at 5 years; corresponding OS rates were 85.3%, 61.2%, 44.5%, 37.0%, and 31.6%. Median OS time was 21 months (range, 2.9-99.9 months). In multivariate analysis, receipt of 67 to 70 Gy was associated with improved LP-free survival (LPFS) relative to 60 to 63 Gy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.062-3.150, P=.030) or 64 to 66 Gy (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.159-3.969, P=.015). Non-squamous histology (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.114-0.478, P=.000), gross tumor volume (HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.000-1.003, P=.018) and induction chemotherapy (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.239-2.778, P=.003) were independent predictors of LPFS. Local progression–free survival was the only independent predictor of OS (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.331-5.512, P=.006). Incidence of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis was no different among dose groups (P=.307). Conclusions Squamous histology, large tumor volumes, and receipt of induction chemotherapy all predicted worse LPFS. Doses of 67 to 70 Gy were associated with improved LP-free survival after chemoradiotherapy. The link between LP and reduced OS suggests that more effective local control strategies are warranted.

Historically, academic medical centers conducted oncologic clinical research trials, which limited trial access for the majority of cancer patients, who are treated at community centers. Over the l...

Purpose We analyzed overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) after definitive (chemo)radiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer with 2 statistical methods: Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, with diagnosis as index date, and conditional survival (CS) analysis, with a variety of disease-free index dates, and determined whether prognostic factors varied based on the reference date. Materials and methods All 651 patients analyzed received definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in November 1998 to December 2010 at a single institution; all had Karnofsky performance status scores ≥60 and received ≥60 Gy. OS and DFS were first calculated with the KM method, and then CS was used to calculate 2 outcomes: OS conditioned on DFS time (OS|DFS) and DFS conditioned on DFS time (DFS|DFS). Factors predicting OS and DFS conditioned on 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS were sought in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results KM analysis produced 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS rates of 48%, 30%, and 26%; OS rates were 64%, 41%, and 29%. By CS analysis, both OS|DFS and DFS|DFS showed an increase in 5-year OS after 6 months, and CS after 30 months approached 100%. On multivariate analyses, age and concurrent chemoradiation predicted OS|DFS; age, smoking history, tumor histology, disease stage, and radiation dose predicted DFS|DFS. Conclusions CS analysis showed that the probability of long-term survival increases sharply after 6 months with no evidence of disease; factors predicting survival differed based on the method and endpoint used.

Background Given the generally incurable nature of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), patients and their romantic partners are at risk for existential/spiritual distress. Although a handful of dyadic psychosocial interventions for lung cancer patients and their caregivers exist, none of them target spiritual well-being. Informed by the mindfulness-based intervention literature and our pilot work in couples affected by lung cancer, we developed a brief couple-based mind-body (CBMB) intervention. The primary aim of this research protocol is to determine the feasibility of implementing the CBMB intervention versus an active control (AC) or wait list control (WLC) group in patients with mNSCLC and their partners using a randomized controlled trial design. Methods Seventy-five patients with mNSCLC receiving treatment and their partners are randomized to the CBMB intervention, an AC or a WLC group. Those in the CBMB intervention and AC groups receive four intervention sessions of 60 min each over 4 weeks and complete weekly homework assignments. The first session is delivered in person, and the remaining sessions are delivered via videoconference. The dyads in the AC group discuss cancer-related and personal growth concerns with the interventionist but are not taught coping skills. Patients and partners in all groups complete baseline assessments of quality of life (QOL) prior to randomization. Follow-up assessments are performed 4 weeks and then again 3 months later. The primary outcome is feasibility (i.e., ≥ 30% of eligible couples consent, ≥ 70% of enrolled couples are retained, and ≥ 50% of all CBMB and AC sessions are attended). We will also perform primarily descriptive analyses of the self-reported outcomes (e.g., spiritual well-being and psychological distress) and explore potential intervention mediators (i.e., compassion, communication, mindfulness, and closeness) to inform a larger, future trial. Discussion This trial will provide important information regarding the feasibility of a behavioral intervention in a vulnerable yet understudied population using videoconferencing and descriptive data regarding spiritual well-being and other indices of QOL in both mNSCLC patients and their partners. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596490

Purpose To determine whether there exists any significant difference in normal tissue toxicity between intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods and Materials A total of 134 study patients (n=49 treated with proton therapy, n=85 with IMRT) treated in a randomized trial had a previously validated esophageal toxicity imaging biomarker, esophageal expansion, quantified during radiation therapy, as well as esophagitis grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0), on a weekly basis during treatment. Differences between the 2 modalities were statically analyzed using the imaging biomarker metric value (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance), as well as the incidence and severity of esophagitis grade (χ 2 and Fisher exact tests, respectively). The dose-response of the imaging biomarker was also compared between modalities using esophageal equivalent uniform dose, as well as delivered dose to an isotropic esophageal subvolume. Results No statistically significant difference in the distribution of esophagitis grade, the incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis (15 and 11 patients treated with IMRT and proton therapy, respectively), or the esophageal expansion imaging biomarker between cohorts ( P >.05) was found. The distribution of imaging biomarker metric values had similar distributions between treatment arms, despite a slightly higher dose volume in the proton arm ( P >.05). Imaging biomarker dose-response was similar between modalities for dose quantified as esophageal equivalent uniform dose and delivered esophageal subvolume dose. Regardless of treatment modality, there was high variability in imaging biomarker response, as well as esophagitis grade, for similar esophageal doses between patients. Conclusions There was no significant difference in esophageal toxicity from either proton- or photon-based radiation therapy as quantified by esophagitis grade or the esophageal expansion imaging biomarker.