Search

Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) have a known prothrombotic effect. Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) can be seen in patients with underlying hypercoagulability. We present a case of a 19-year-old female patient taking OCPs who presented with obstructive jaundice. Her main concern was pruritis. An extensive workup was done to reach a diagnosis but it came back negative. A liver biopsy showed OPV. This was thought secondary to her OCP use. Her OCPs were discontinued which resulted in a complete resolution of her symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. Cases with a direct relationship between OPV and OCP use are extremely rare. More studies are required to establish a correlation between OPV and OCPs. OPV should be considered in the differential diagnosis among patients with obstructive jaundice without an obvious cause, especially in patients taking OCPs. Treatment is stopping the OCPs with close follow-up to confirm disease resolution. J Med Cases. 2021;12(11):446-450 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3779

Histologic features of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH), loosely termed as obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), are heterogenous, often subtle, and overlap with other entities. To this date, no consensus histopathologic diagnostic criteria have been established for INCPH. For these reasons, rendering a reproducible consensus histologic diagnosis of OPV on a liver biopsy may often be challenging even for experienced hepatopathologists. We report herein a two-phase interobserver agreement study on the diagnosis of OPV and assessed the relative value of histologic features in 104 liver biopsies in distinguishing between INCPH and non-INCPH with the goal to obtain a consensus on specific practical diagnostic criteria. Six hepatopathologists blinded to clinical information and original pathologic diagnosis reviewed internet-based case study sets with high-resolution whole-slide images. The initial interobserver agreement on OPV was expectedly low, but significantly improved (moderate agreement in most categories) upon adopting a consensus view recognizing portal vein sclerosis as the only strong independent histologic predictor for INCPH, and that contrary to the conventional view, aberrant portal/periportal vessels does not significantly contribute to the positive assignment of OPV status. We propose a three-tiered classification with diagnostic criteria to facilitate the histologic assignment of OPV status for the evaluation of INCPH. Furthermore, we have validated the performance of the proposed criteria either based on histology alone or coupled with clinicopathologic correlation. This classification may aid in practical histologic assessment of liver biopsies with or without portal hypertension and help to improve diagnostic consistency and accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Hepatoportal sclerosis HPS or obliterative portal venopathy (OPV), one of the differential diagnoses for non-cirrohtic portal hypertension, is characterized by the disappearance of the portal branches, portal and septal fibrosis, perisinusoidal fibrosis and regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH). It is a spectral disease that may progress to severe portal hypertension. Its etiopathogenesis is still little understood, especially in Brazil, it has been probably misdiagnosed due to its histopatological similarities with the hepatosplenic form of schistosomiasis. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the profile of patients with HPS in Northeastern Brazil and to demonstrate the pathological characteristics of HPS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cases of OPV in liver biopsies and explants from a referral center for liver in Bahia - Brazil. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the portal tracts and liver parenchyma was made so that comparisons could be done among the HPS findings of our population and the findings described by other authors. RESULTS: From the 62 patients identified with HPS, 42% were male, while 58% were female. The average age at diagnosis was 48.3 years. From this group, we analyzed the liver biopsy of 10 patients whose diagnosis of schistosomiasis could be ruled out. From these 100% (10/10) presented dense portal fibrosis and portal venous obliteration. Liver parenchymal atrophy was present in 60% (6/10) of the patients, sinusoidal dilation was present in 30% (3/10), the presence of portal septa occurred in 50% (5/10) and dense portal fibrosis in all patients analyzed. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia was found in 30% (3/10) of the patients. CONCLUSION: HPS seems to be neglected and misdiagnosed in Brazil, due to its similarities with schistossomiasis. In our study dense portal fibrosis, obliteration of the portal vein branches, parenchymal atrophy, sinusoidal dilatation and parenchymal nodular hyperplasia were the main histopathological findings and were similar to that described in other countries. RESUMO CONTEXTO: Esclerose hepatoportal EHP ou venopatia portal obliterativa VPO, um dos diagnósticos diferenciais para a hipertensão portal não cirrótica, é caracterizada pelo desaparecimento dos ramos portais, fibrose portal e septal, fibrose sinusoidal e hiperplasia nodular regenerativa HNR. A EHP é um doença espectral, que pode progredir para hipertensão portal severa. Sua etiopatologia é ainda pouco compreendida, especialmente no Brasil, onde ela é provavelmente subdiagnoticada devido as suas similaridades com a forma hepatoesplênica da esquistossomose. OBJETIVO: Analizar o perfil dos pacientes com EHP no Nordeste do Brasil, e demontrar as características patológicas da EHP. MÉTODOS: Analisamos restrospectivamente os casos de VPO em biópsias hepáticas e explantes de um centro de referência em fígado na Bahia, Brasil. A análise qualiquantitativa dos tratos portais e parênquima hepático foi realizada, permitindo a comparação entre os nossos paciente e os achados descritos por outros autores. RESULTADOS: Entre os 62 paciente identificados com EHP, 42% era do sexo masculino, 58% era do sexo feminino. A média de idade no diagnótico foi 48,3 anos. Desse grupo, analizamos a biópsia hepática de 10 pacientes nos quais o diagnóstico de esquistossomose pode ser excluído. Desses pacientes, 100% 10/10 se apresentou com fibrose portal densa e obliteração venosa portal. Atrofia do perênquima hepático estava presente em 60% 6/10 dos pacientes, dilatação sinusiodal em 30% 3/10 a presença de septos portais ocorreu em 50% 5/10 e fibrose portal densa foi achada em todos os pacientes. Hiperplasia nodular regenerativa foi encontrada em 30% dos pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: A EHP parece ser negligenciada e subdiagnosticada no Brasil, devido as suas similaridades com esquistossomose. Em nosso estudo, fibrose portal densa, obliteração dos ramos da veia porta, atrofia do parênquima, dilatação sinusoidal e hiperplasia nodular do parênquima foram os principais achados histopatológicos e foram semelhantes aos descritos em outros países.

Porto sinusoidal vascular liver disease (PSVD) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are distinct vascular liver diseases characterized, respectively, by an intrahepatic and a prehepatic obstacle to the flow in the liver portal system. PVT may also occur as a complication of the natural history of PSVD, especially if a prothrombotic condition coexists. In other cases, it is associated to local and systemic pro-thrombotic conditions, even if its cause remains unknown in up to 25% despite an active search. In our opinion, the presence of PSVD should be suspected in patients with PVT especially in those with PVT “sine causa” and the active search of this condition should be included in their diagnostic work-out. However, sometimes the diagnosis of pre-existing PSVD is very hard. Biopsy cannot be fully discriminant as similar histological data have been described in both conditions. Liver stiffness may help as it has been shown to be higher in PSVD than in “pure” PVT, due to the presence of sclerosis in the portal venous radicles observable in PSVD patients. Nevertheless, comparing liver stiffness between PVT and PSVD has until now been restricted to very limited series of patients. In conclusion, even if it is still totally hypothetical, our point of view may have clinical consequences, especially when deciding to perform a liver biopsy in patients with a higher liver stiffness and suspending the anticoagulation in patients with PVT and no detectable prothrombotic factors.

Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension but there are many causes of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Many of these etiologies may be diagnosed by liver biopsy. Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is being increasingly diagnosed and has varied histopathological findings as well as overlapping definitions. Many of these histological changes can be subtle, thus making it a challenging diagnosis for the pathologist to make. This review summarizes the clinical aspects of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension and outlines the different definitions and histological features of the entity. In addition, pearls and pitfalls for the pathologist in making this diagnosis are included.

Idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a rare vascular liver disease that has attracted new interest in recent years. It is characterised by clinical signs of portal hypertension in the absence of cirrhosis or severe fibrosis and any known cause of portal hypertension. As much uncertainty exists about INCPH pathophysiology, and no definite diagnostic tests are available, liver biopsy is an essential tool for achieving a definite diagnosis. Unfortunately, the histological diagnosis of INCPH is not always straightforward, as the characteristic lesions are unevenly distributed, vary greatly in their severity, are often very subtle, and are not all necessarily present in a single case. Furthermore, specifically for the characteristic portal vessel changes observed in INCPH, the terminology and definition are ambiguous, which adds complexity to the already complex clinicopathological scenario. An international study group of liver pathologists and hepatologists pursued a consensus on nomenclature for the portal vascular lesions of INCPH. Such standardisation may assist pathologists in the recognition of such lesions, and will possibly facilitate further advancement in this field.

The purpose of this article is to review the classic and uncommon imaging findings of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (acute, chronic, congenital, and septic thrombus) as visualized on multiple modalities, with an emphasis on MRI findings. Additional aims are to understand the imaging of obliterative portal venopathy and its clinical significance, appreciate morphologic changes of the biliary system that may accompany PVT, and recognize changes in liver enhancement patterns seen with PVT related to the hepatic arterial buffer response. The review also addresses morphologic changes of the liver that may occur after PVT, including nodular regenerative hyperplasia, central hepatic hypertrophy, and peripheral fibrosis that may stimulate cirrhosis, as well as the importance of portal vein mapping and the diagnostic findings and clinical significance of tumor within the portal vein in the liver transplant population.PVT may be a complication of liver cirrhosis, but it may also occur as a primary vascular disorder without liver disease. PVT can result in portal hypertension and may present with variceal bleeding or hypersplenism. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging of PVT in patients of various ages and in different clinical scenarios. PVT can influence hepatic perfusion, the shape of the bile ducts, and liver architecture. Bland PVT and tumor-related PVT have major implications for hepatic transplant.

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is a poorly defined clinical condition of unknown etiology. Patients present with signs and symptoms of portal hypertension without evidence of cirrhosis. The disease course appears to be indolent and benign with an overall better outcome than cirrhosis, as long as the complications of portal hypertension are properly managed. This condition has been recognized in different parts of the world in diverse ethnic groups with variable risk factors, resulting in numerous terminologies and lack of standardized diagnostic criteria. Therefore, although the diagnosis of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension requires clinical exclusion of other conditions that can cause portal hypertension and histopathologic confirmation, this entity is under-recognized clinically as well as pathologically. Recent studies have demonstrated that variable histopathologic entities with different terms likely represent a histologic spectrum of a single entity of which obliterative portal venopathy might be an underlying pathogenesis. This perception calls for standardization of the nomenclature and formulation of widely accepted diagnostic criteria, which will facilitate easier recognition of this disorder and will highlight awareness of this entity.

In India, an unexplained enteropathy is present in a majority of non-cirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension (NCIPH) patients. Small intestinal bacterial contamination and tropical enteropathy could trigger inflammatory stimuli and activate the endothelium in the portal venous system. Groundwater contaminated with arsenic is an environmental factor of epidemic proportions in large areas of India which has similar consequences. Von Willebrand factor (a sticky protein) expressed by activated endothelium may promote formation of platelet microthrombi and occlusion of intrahepatic portal vein branches leading to NCIPH. Environmental factors linked to suboptimal hygiene and sanitation, which enter through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, predispose to platelet plugging onto activated endothelium in portal microcirculation. Thus, NCIPH, an example of poverty linked thrombophilia, is a disease mainly affecting the lower socio-economic strata of Indian population. Public health measures to improve sanitation, provide clean drinking water and eliminate arsenic contamination of drinking water are urgently needed. Till such time as these environmental factors are addressed, NCIPH is likely to remain 'an Indian disease'.

Background Liver involvement in Turner syndrome (TS) patients has been more clearly clarified in recent years. Most of the clinical manifestations in TS are asymptomatic and can be detected as liver test abnormalities; however, a few cases may present with end-stage liver disease and thus require liver transplantation (LT). To the best of our knowledge, only three cases undergoing LT for liver involvements in TS have been previously reported. Case presentation A 30-year-old female successfully underwent living donor LT for liver dysfunction related to TS syndrome. The diagnosis of TS was established by a cytogenetic analysis at 16 years of age. She received several sessions of endoscopic therapy for recurrent esophageal varices, which was complicated by ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis since 27 years of age. Radiological findings of her liver before LT chronologically showed the progression of atrophy with disturbance of the major portal inflow. And then, she was finally indicated for LT. Pathologic findings of the explanted liver showed vascular abnormalities, obliterative portal venopathy, which may have induced liver dysfunction with severe portal hypertension. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful. Conclusions The clinicopathologic information obtained by the current case can provide an insight into understanding pathophysiological mechanisms of liver involvement in TS patients. TS patients presenting with severe liver atrophy and disturbance of the major portal inflow should be indicated for LT.

The term idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) has been recently proposed to replace terms, such as hepatoportal sclerosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, incomplete septal cirrhosis, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia, used to describe patients with a hepatic presinusoidal cause of portal hypertension of unknown etiology, characterized by features of portal hypertension (esophageal varices, nonmalignant ascites, porto-venous collaterals), splenomegaly, patent portal, and hepatic veins and no clinical and histological signs of cirrhosis. Physicians should learn to look for this condition in a number of clinical settings, including cryptogenic cirrhosis, a disease known to be associated with INCPH, drug administration, and even chronic alterations in liver function tests. Once INCPH is clinically suspected, liver histology becomes mandatory for the correct diagnosis. However, pathologists should be familiar with the histological features of INCPH, especially in cases in which histology is not only requested to exclude liver cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Obliterative portal venopathy without portal hypertension has been described by a single study in a limited number of patients, thus very little is known about this clinical condition. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of obliterative portal venopathy and its clinical-pathological correlations in patients with cryptogenic chronic liver test abnormalities without clinical signs of portal hypertension. Methods: We analysed 482 liver biopsies from adults with non-cirrhotic cryptogenic chronic liver disorders and without any clinical signs of portal hypertension, consecutively enrolled in a 5-year period. Twenty cases of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension diagnosed in the same period, were included for comparison. Histological findings were matched with clinical and laboratory features. Results: Obliterative portal venopathy was identified in 94 (19.5%) of 482 subjects and in all 20 cases of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: both groups shared the entire spectrum of histological changes described in the latter condition. The prevalence of incomplete fibrous septa and nodular regenerative hyperplasia was higher in the biopsies of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (P=0.006 and P=0.002), a possible hint of a more advanced stage of the disease. The two groups also shared several clinical laboratory features, including a similar liver function test profile, concomitant prothrombotic conditions and extrahepatic autoimmune disorders. Conclusion: Obliterative portal venopathy occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with unexplained chronic abnormal liver function tests without portal hypertension. The clinical-pathological profile of these subjects suggests that they may be in an early (non-symptomatic) stage of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. See Editorial on Page 325

Obliterative portal venopathy—which is characterized clinically by the presence of portal hypertension in the absence of liver insufficiency—has recently been described as a non–AIDS-defining hepatic disease in patients with the human immunodeficiency virus, and its imaging findings—other than the usual sings of portal hypertension—include liver morphologic changes, multifocal thrombosis of intrahepatic portal branches, parenchymal enhancement abnormalities, focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules, and extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis.

The significance of post-transplant HLA DSA and chronic AMR in LT is an emerging field of study. Although OPV has previously been described as a histopathologic finding in DSA-positive adult LT recipients, it was not included in the recent Banff criteria for chronic AMR. Our aim was to describe the association between OPV and chronic AMR in pediatric LT recipients. A retrospective review of 67 liver biopsies performed between November 2014 and April 2016 in 45 pediatric LT recipients identified four patients with OPV. Clinical status, liver biochemistry, the presence of DSA, and available non-HLA antibody testing, as well as histopathologic features of chronic AMR, were assessed. All four patients with OPV had class II DSA and histopathologic features of chronic AMR based on the Banff criteria. Two patients were noted to have non-HLA antibodies. Three patients are undergoing treatment with IVIG but have persistent DSA. Two patients have graft failure and are awaiting retransplantation. In conclusion, OPV is a histopathologic finding associated with chronic AMR in pediatric LT recipients. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether OPV is reversible and/or amenable to medical therapy.

Childhood obliterative portal venopathy presents at any age and may be genetic in origin. We report 48 children with obliterative portal venopathy, based on strict histologic criteria, investigated between 1972 and 2011. Diagnosis requires histology and is suggested by ultrasonography findings. Portal hypertension is the main complication but is absent in some cases. Prognosis is relatively good, but the detection of cardiopulmonary complications is essential.

To retrospectively analyze the computed tomographic (CT) findings in a single-center series of adult patients with biopsy-proved obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) and to compare them with those observed in patients with cirrhosis.The requirement for informed consent was waived. This institutional review board-approved study included 42 consecutive patients with a histologically proved diagnosis of OPV who underwent CT at diagnosis. The clinical characteristics at diagnosis were recorded, and CT examination results were reviewed. Two radiologists evaluated portal vein patency and intrahepatic portal branches, the morphologic changes in the liver, the presence of hepatic nodules, and signs of portal hypertension in consensus. The control group consisted of 42 patients who had histologically proved cirrhosis. CT findings were compared between the OPV patient group and the cirrhotic group and also among the conditions associated with patients with OPV. The Fisher exact test was used. P values of .05 or less were considered to indicate significant differences.The following CT findings were observed significantly more frequently in OPV than in cirrhosis: extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (18 [43%] of 42 vs five [12%] of 42); intrahepatic portal abnormalities (18 [58%] of 31 vs one [2%] of 42) such as reduced caliber, occlusive thrombosis, and lack of visibility; focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules (six [14%] of 42 vs 0 [0%] of 42); and perfusion disorders (15 [36%] of 42 vs six [14%] of 42). Conversely, the combination of hypertrophy of the caudate lobe and atrophy of segment IV (27 [64%] of 42 vs 10 [24%] of 42) and nodular surface (37 [88%] of 42 vs seven [17%] of 42) were seen significantly more often in cirrhosis.Characteristic CT findings in patients with OPV that differ from those in patients with cirrhosis were shown, the most common being the presence of intra- or extrahepatic portal abnormalities.

Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) is a rare hepatic vascular disorder that has only recently become well recognized, in part from explanted liver of transplant patients. OPV often presents as a sudden onset of portal hypertension with no significant liver enzyme derangement. Histopathology remains the only means of diagnosis. We report a case of OPV in …

Excerpt In 1962 a syndrome in 16 patients from northern India (New Delhi) with portal hypertension of insidious onset was described as distinct from both cirrhosis and extrahepatic obstruction of t...