Search

OBJECTIVE As novel therapies improve survival for men with prostate cancer, intracranial metastatic disease has become more common. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of intracranial prostate cancer metastases. METHODS Demographic data, primary tumor characteristics, SRS treatment parameters, and clinical and imaging follow-up data of patients from nine institutions treated with SRS from July 2005 to June 2020 for cerebral metastases from prostate carcinoma were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Forty-six patients were treated in 51 SRS procedures for 120 prostate cancer intracranial metastases. At SRS, the mean patient age was 68.04 ± 9.05 years, the mean time interval from prostate cancer diagnosis to SRS was 4.82 ± 4.89 years, and extracranial dissemination was noted in 34 (73.9%) patients. The median patient Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at SRS was 80, and neurological symptoms attributed to intracranial involvement were present prior to 39 (76%) SRS procedures. Single-fraction SRS was used in 49 procedures. Stereotactic radiotherapy using 6 Gy in five sessions was utilized in 2 procedures. The median margin dose was 18 (range 6–28) Gy, and the median tumor volume was 2.45 (range 0.04–45) ml. At a median radiological follow-up of 6 (range 0–156) months, local progression was seen with 14 lesions. The median survival following SRS was 15.18 months, and the 1-year overall intracranial progression-free survival was 44%. The KPS score at SRS was noted to be associated with improved overall (p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (p = 0.03). Age ≥ 65 years at SRS was associated with decreased overall survival (p = 0.04). There were no serious grade 3–5 toxicities noted. CONCLUSIONS SRS appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective management option for patients with prostate cancer intracranial metastases.

Purpose/objectives To report our dosimetric analysis of the hippocampi (HC) and the incidence of perihippocampal tumor location in patients with ≥25 brain metastases who received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in single or multiple sessions. Materials/methods Analysis of our prospective registry identified 89 patients treated with SRS for ≥25 brain metastases. HC avoidance regions (HA-region) were created on treatment planning MRIs by 5 mm expansion of HC. Doses from each session were summed to calculate HC dose. The distribution of metastases relative to the HA-region and the HC was analyzed. Results Median number of tumors irradiated per patient was 33 (range 25–116) in a median of 3 (range 1–12) sessions. Median bilateral HC Dmin (D100), D40, D50, Dmax, and Dmean (Gy) was 1.88, 3.94, 3.62, 16.6, and 3.97 for all patients, and 1.43, 2.99, 2.88, 5.64, and 3.07 for patients with tumors outside the HA-region. Multivariate linear regression showed that the median HC D40, D50, and Dmin were significantly correlated with the tumor number and tumor volume (p Conclusions Hippocampal dose is higher in patients with tumors in the HA-region; however, even for patients with a high burden of intracranial disease and tumors located in the HA-regions, SRS affords hippocampal sparing. This is particularly relevant in light of our finding of eventual perihippocampal metastases in more than half of our patients.

Purpose This study assesses a large multi-institutional database to present the outcomes of World Health Organization grade 2 meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We also compare the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) to that reported in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0539 phase 2 cooperative group meningioma trial. Methods and Materials From an international, multicenter group, data were collected for grade 2 meningioma patients treated with SRS for demonstrable tumor from 1994 to 2019. Statistical methods used included the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards analysis, and recursive partitioning analysis. Results Two hundred thirty-three patients treated at 12 institutions were included. Patients presented at a median age of 60 years (range, 13-90), and many had at least 2 prior resections (30%) or radiation therapy (22%). Forty-eight percent of patients had prior gross total resection. At SRS, the median treatment volume was 6.1 cm3 (0.1-97.6). A median 15 Gy (10-30) was delivered to a median percent isodose of 50 (30-80), most commonly in 1 fraction (95%). A model was developed using recursive partitioning analysis, with one point attributed to age >50 years, treatment volume >11.5 cm3, and prior radiation therapy or multiple surgeries. The good-prognostic group (score, 0-1) had improved PFS (P 50 years (hazard ratio = 1.85 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.14]) and multiple prior surgeries (hazard ratio = 1.80 [1.09-2.99]) also portended reduced PFS in patients without prior radiation therapy. Two hundred eighteen of 233 patients in this study qualified for the high-risk group of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0539, and they demonstrated similar outcomes (3-year PFS: 53.9% vs 58.8%). The good-prognostic group of SRS patients demonstrated slightly improved outcomes (3-year PFS: 63.1% vs 58.8%). Conclusions SRS should be considered in carefully selected patients with atypical meningiomas. We suggest the use of our good-prognostic group to optimize patient selection, and we strongly encourage the initiation of a clinical trial to prospectively validate these outcomes.

BACKGROUND Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas have reduced progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) compared to benign meningiomas. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AMs) and anaplastic meningiomas (malignant meningiomas, MMs) has not been adequately described. OBJECTIVE To define clinical/radiographic outcomes for patients undergoing SRS for AM/MMs. METHODS An international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed to define clinical/imaging outcomes for patients receiving SRS for AM/MMs. Tumor progression was assessed with response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Factors associated with PFS/OS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 271 patients received SRS for AMs (n = 233, 85.9%) or MMs (n = 38, 14.0%). Single-fraction SRS was most commonly employed (n = 264, 97.4%) with a mean target dose of 14.8 Gy. SRS was used as adjuvant treatment (n = 85, 31.4%), salvage therapy (n = 182, 67.2%), or primary therapy (1.5%). The 5-yr PFS/OS rate was 33.6% and 77.0%, respectively. Increasing age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, P 15% (HR = 1.66, P

OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain condition that is difficult to control with conservative management. Furthermore, disabling medication-related side effects are common. This study examined how stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) affects pain outcomes and medication dependence based on the latency period between diagnosis and radiosurgery. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with type I TN at 12 Gamma Knife treatment centers. SRS was the primary surgical intervention in all patients. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment plans, medication histories, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Overall, 404 patients were included. The mean patient age at SRS was 70 years, and 60% of the population was female. The most common indication for SRS was pain refractory to medications (81%). The median maximum radiation dose was 80 Gy (range 50–95 Gy), and the mean follow-up duration was 32 months. The mean number of medications between baseline (pre-SRS) and the last follow-up decreased from 1.98 to 0.90 (p < 0.0001), respectively, and this significant reduction was observed across all medication categories. Patients who received SRS within 4 years of their initial diagnosis achieved significantly faster pain relief than those who underwent treatment after 4 years (median 21 vs 30 days, p = 0.041). The 90-day pain relief rate for those who received SRS ≤ 4 years after their diagnosis was 83.8% compared with 73.7% in patients who received SRS > 4 years after their diagnosis. The maximum radiation dose was the strongest predictor of a durable pain response (OR 1.091, p = 0.003). Early intervention (OR 1.785, p = 0.007) and higher maximum radiation dose (OR 1.150, p < 0.0001) were also significant predictors of being pain free (a Barrow Neurological Institute pain intensity score of I–IIIA) at the last follow-up visit. New sensory symptoms of any kind were seen in 98 patients (24.3%) after SRS. Higher maximum radiation dose trended toward predicting new sensory deficits but was nonsignificant (p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS TN patients managed with SRS within 4 years of diagnosis experienced a shorter interval to pain relief with low risk. SRS also yielded significant decreases in adjunct medication utilization. Radiosurgery should be considered earlier in the course of treatment for TN.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Multiple single institution retrospective studies have suggested that managing melanoma brain metastases (MBM) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) when administered concurrently (within 4 weeks) rather than sequentially (ICI and SRS administered more than 4 weeks apart). However, there is a paucity of data quantifying the risk of developing radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. MATERIALS/METHODS The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation approved the analysis. The Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare OS and local control (LC) at 1- and 2-years post SRS. Factors associated with the development of RN and OS were further analyzed using logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The null hypothesis was rejected for P < 0.05. RESULTS There were 254 patients with 1,322 MBM treated across 10 international institutions. The median follow-up was 12.9 months, median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-73 years), BRAF mutation was present in 46.6% of patients, active extracranial disease was present in 70% of patients, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90. SRS/ICI was administered concurrently in 46.5% of patients. All patients were treated on the stereotactic radiosurgery platform. The median margin dose was 20 Gy (IQR: 18-21 Gy), median number of fractions was 1 (range: 1-4), mean total brain metastasis volume was 3.4 cc and the mean V12 Gy was 8.7 cc. Radiation necrosis occurred in 14.2% of patients (5.9% Grade 1; 5.1% Grade 2; 2.8% Grade 3; 0.4% Grade 4). Overall survival at 1-year was 77.4% vs. 72.1%, and at 2-years was 63.1% vs. 46.1% (P = 0.048) for concurrent and sequential therapy, respectively. Local control at 1-year was 91.5% vs. 84.6%, and at 2-years was 84.9% vs. 75.6% (P = 0.12) for concurrent and sequential therapy, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression total treated brain metastasis volume (odds radio [OR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.20; P = 0.008) was associated with a higher risk of development of RN; however, sequential therapy (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.46-2.06; P = 0.94), and V12 (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.95-1.01; P = 0.22) were not statistically significant. On multivariate cox regression, sequential therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05-2.42; P = 0.03) and KPS (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98; P < 0.001) were prognostic factors for OS, while the presence of extracranial disease (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.66-1.59; P = 0.90) and age (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; P = 0.25) were not prognostic. CONCLUSION In appropriately selected patients with MBM, concurrent administration of SRS/ICI may be associated with improved OS without an increased risk of RN when compared to sequential therapy. The risk of RN appears to increase with irradiated brain volume; therefore, hypofractionated SRS may be considered in patients with high volume disease. Prospective data are needed to further evaluate these findings. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE E.J. Lehrer: None. J. Gurewitz: None. T.D. Malouff: ASTRO Bylaws Committee. K. Bernstein: None. D. Kondziolka: None. P. Bonney: None. S.I. Patel: Independent Contractor; Alberta Health Services. Research Grant; Alberta Cancer Foundation. Travel Expenses; University Hospital Foundation. Chair; Alberta Health Services. Co-Director; Alberta Health Services. Manage and screen wish applications; Make-A-Wish Foundation (Northern Alberta Chapter). J.D. Palmer: Research Grant; Varian Medical Systems, The Kroger Company. Consultant; Huron Consulting. Speaker's Bureau; Varian Medical Systems, Depuy Synthes. Advisory Board; Novocure. Member of panel; NCCN.K. Fakhoury: None. C.G. Rusthoven: Employee; SURVIVEiT (nonprofit cancer patient advocacy). Research Grant; Takeda. Advise regarding patient-facing medical content; SURVIVEiT.D. Mathieu: None. C. Deibert: None. P. Picozzi: None. B. Jones: None. C. Lee: None. S. Sharma: None. A. Niranjan: None. J.P. Sheehan: Neuropoint Alliance. M. Ahluwalia: None. D.M. Trifiletti: None.

INTRODUCTION The suitability of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with 5-15 brain metastases (BM) is being evaluated in the ongoing CCTG CE.7 randomized trial testing SRS against HA-WBRT. Our study examines the survival of patients with 5-15 BM treated at initial SRS. METHODS Review of our Gamma Knife registry identified 163 patients who fulfilled CCTG CE.7 eligibility criteria. RESULTS 92 females (56%) and 71 males (44%) with median age of 51.6 years (23-98.9) and primary diagnoses of lung (n = 108, 28 EGFR/ALK mutations), breast (n =14, 1 Her2+), melanoma (n = 27, 9 BRAF+), and 14 other were identified. 145 had active extracranial disease (89%); median KPS was 90 (50-100). Median number of tumors at first SRS was 8.2; 114 patients (70%) had 5-9 and 49 (30%) had 10-15 tumors. 73 patients (45%) had subsequent SRS to a median of 19 (6-84) cumulative subsequent tumors at a median time to 2nd treatment of 3.9 months (0.7-30.3). 32 patients (20%) had a 3rd SRS and 24 patients (15%) had 4 or more treatments. 16 patients (10%) received WBRT after initial SRS. 73 patients (45%) were alive at time of data analysis. Median OS from initial SRS for all patients was 15.5 months and was 15, 17.6, 13.4, and 8.7 months, for breast, lung, melanoma, and other respectively. Median OS with 5-9 metastases vs 10-15 metastases was 17.5 vs. 13.3 months (p=.15). Median OS with vs without subsequent SRS was 21.8 vs 8 months (p=.0013). CONCLUSION Patients with 5-15 BM treated with initial SRS can achieve survivals that compare favorably with or better than those of WBRT. These findings potentially challenge the assumption that such patients may be better candidates for HA-WBRT than upfront SRS. Our experience supports the ongoing efforts to prospectively evaluate upfront SRS in these patients.

OBJECTIVE Meningiomas that arise primarily within the cavernous sinus are often believed to be more indolent in their growth pattern. Despite this perceived growth pattern, disabling symptoms can arise even with small tumors. While research has been done on cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) and their treatment, very little is known about their natural growth rates. With a better understanding of the growth rate of CSM, patient treatment and guidance can be can optimized and individualized. The goal of this study was to determine volumetric growth rates of untreated CSMs. METHODS Thirty-seven patients with 166 MR images obtained between May 2004 and September 2019 were reviewed, with a range of 2–13 MR images per patient (average of 4.5 MR images per patient). These scans were obtained over an average follow-up period of 45.9 months (median 33.8, range 2.8–136.9 months). All imaging prior to any intervention was included in this analysis. Volumetric measurements were performed and assessed over time. RESULTS The estimated volumetric growth rate was 23.3% per year (95% CI 10.2%–38.0%, p < 0.001), which is equivalent to an estimated volume doubling time (VDT) of 3.3 years (95% CI 2.1–7.1 years). There was no significant relationship between growth rate and patient age (p = 0.09) or between growth rate and patient sex (p = 0.78). The median absolute growth rate was 41% with a range of −1% to 1793%. With a definition of “growth” as an increase of greater than 20% during the observed period, 65% of tumors demonstrated growth within their observation interval. Growth rates for each tumor were calculated and tumors were segmented based on growth rate. Of 37 patients, 22% (8) demonstrated no growth (< 5% annual growth, equivalent to a VDT > 13.9 years), 32% (12) were designated as slow growth (annual growth rate 5%–20%, VDT 3.5–13.9 years), 38% (14) were found to have medium growth (annual growth rate 20%–100%, VDT 0.7–3.5 years), and 8% were considered fast growing (annual growth rate > 100%, VDT < 0.7 years). CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated CSM volumetric growth rates. A deeper understanding of the natural history of untreated CSMs allows for better counseling and management of patients.

Purpose Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain increasingly are living longer due to improvements in systemic therapy and local modalities. The risk of new brain metastases when these patients stop systemic therapy is unknown. Recognizing patterns of new tumor occurrence is necessary to determine the frequency of follow-up and the need for further treatment. Methods We included patients in a prospective registry who had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases, discontinued systemic therapy for at least 90 days, and underwent active surveillance. 63 patients with 73 off-periods were studied. The risk factors for the development of new tumors were determined using Cox regression and multi-state Markov modeling. Results The median time to new brain metastases off systemic therapy was 16.0 months. The probability of developing an additional new tumor at 6, 12, and 18 months was 26%, 40%, and 53%, respectively. There were no additional new tumors 22 months after stopping therapy. Patients who discontinued therapy due to intolerance or progression of the disease and those with mutations in RAS or receptor tyrosine kinase pathways (e.g. KRAS, EGFR) were more likely to develop new tumors (HR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.25–3.91, p=6.3 x 10–3; HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.09–3.77, p=0.026, respectively). Conclusion The rate of new brain metastases from NSCLC in patients off systemic therapy decreases over time and is uncommon 2 years after cessation of cancer therapy. Patients who stop therapy due to toxicity or who have RAS or receptor tyrosine kinase pathway mutations have a higher rate of new metastases and should be followed more closely.