1. Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS)
- Author
-
Shahriyour Andaz, Gloria Fernandes, Tyler B. Draeger, and Vanessa R. Gibson
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Thoracic Surgical Procedure ,Pulmonary care ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Enhanced recovery ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Thoracotomy ,Retrospective Studies ,Retrospective review ,Rehabilitation ,Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted ,business.industry ,Thoracic Surgery ,Pain management ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,Chest Tubes ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background Decreasing the length of stay after thoracic surgery provides both clinical and financial benefits to both the patient and the clinical system. Since 2017, our institution has seen advancements in the care of patients undergoing thoracic surgery after utilising our protocol Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS). Methods The protocol we implemented is comprehensive, including the patient’s pain management, thoracostomy tube drainage, physical therapy and rehabilitation, ventilator support and pulmonary care, as well as other features of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. In a retrospective review, we compared the overall length of stay prior to the protocol implementation to the length of stay after initiating the changes. Results We identified a median decrease of 2 days (from 6 days to 4 days) following the implementation of this protocol for all types of thoracic surgical procedures (p Conclusions Upon implementation of the ERATS protocol, we appreciated a decrease in the length of stay of thoracic surgery patients at our institution.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF