1. Costs Associated with Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Are Lower Than Anterior Temporal Lobectomy for Treatment of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
- Author
-
Taylor Haddad, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan, Anthony Stefanelli, Kevin Hines, and Caio M. Matias
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Temporal lobe ,Cohort Studies ,Epilepsy ,Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy ,medicine ,Humans ,health care economics and organizations ,Anterior temporal lobectomy ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Extracellular Fluid ,Health Care Costs ,Hyperthermia, Induced ,Middle Aged ,Direct cost ,Anterior Temporal Lobectomy ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe ,Female ,Laser Therapy ,Neurology (clinical) ,business - Abstract
Background Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive alternative to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. It has gained popularity as familiarity with technique increases and outcomes are better characterized. There has been no direct cost comparison between the 2 techniques in literature to date. The current study directly compares hospital costs associated with LITT with those of ATL patients and analyzes the factors potentially responsible for those costs. Methods Patients who underwent ATL (27) and LITT (15) were retrospectively reviewed for total hospital costs along with demographic, surgical, and postoperative factors potentially affecting cost. T-tests were used to compare costs and independent linear regressions, and hierarchical regressions were used to examine predictors of cost for each procedure. Results Mean hospital costs of admission for single-trajectory LITT ($104,929.88) were significantly less than for ATL ($134,980.04) (P = 0.001). In addition, length of stay, anesthesia costs, operative room costs, and postoperative hospitalization costs were all significantly lower in LITT. Conclusions Given the minimally invasive nature of LITT, it is associated with shorter length of stay and lower hospital costs than ATL in the first head-to-head comparison of procedural costs in literature to date. Long-term efficacy as it relates to these costs associated with LITT and ATL should be further investigated to better characterize the utility of LITT in temporal lobe epilepsy patients.
- Published
- 2022