Search

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) frequently present with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with or without associated lower back pain. While symptomatic improvement of leg and back pain has been reported, the resolution of back pain when it is a predominant presenting symptom remains underreported following MI-TLIF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes at 1 year of patients undergoing MI-TLIF with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single surgeon surgical database from 2017 to 2019 was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE Fifty one patients undergoing MI-TLIF. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog scale back pain (VAS-back), and VAS leg pain (VAS-leg). METHODS Patients were divided into two groups: Leg Pain Predominant (patients reported greater than 50% leg pain upon presentation) and Back Pain Predominant (patients reported 50% or greater back pain). Multivariate analysis was performed to determine differences between groups based upon any significantly baseline characteristics. RESULTS Preoperative demographic and radiographic outcomes were similar between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ODI, VAS-Back and VAS-leg at 1-year postoperatively. On multivariate analysis, there were differences in ODI at 1-year, 1-year back pain, and 1-year leg pain between groups with those who initially presented with leg pain having a lower ODI, VAS Back, and VAS leg. Patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria for ODI and VAS-back compared to those with predominantly back pain. CONCLUSION Following MI-TLIF, patients with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain have improvements in back pain, leg pain, and ODI regardless of their primary presenting pain complaint; however, patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet MCID criteria for improvement in their back pain and ODI score.

Background The objective of this study was to identify the predictors of the conservative management outcomes in patients with lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). Methods A prospective study was conducted between June 2010 and April 2012 in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Clinical and baseline neurologic examinations such as passive straight leg raising test (SLRT), cross SLRT, and patellar and Achilles reflexes were assessed prior to the conservative management. The patients were evaluated at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th week following commencement of the conservative management. Results We recruited and followed 171 HNP patients of which 35.7% of them had good outcome. At univariate analysis, patients with more than 12 months duration of complaint, those with dominant radicular pain, severe pain intensity (visual analogue scale 7–10), positive SLRT, positive cross SLRT, and reduced motor power of knee extensors (muscle strength grade 1–4), were associated with poor outcome. Multivariate analysis suggested that patients with dominant radicular type of pain were likely to had poor outcome compared to those with dominant back pain (odd ratio (OR) 10.57 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–96.93). Patients with reduced motor power of knee extensors also had a higher chance to have poor outcome compared to those who were normal (OR: 10.57; 95% CI: 1.15–96.93). Conclusion Type of pain and the strength of lower extremities could be able to predict the failure of conservative management in patients with lumbar disc herniation. However, further studies with the bigger sample size are warrant to validate our results.

Introduction Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a rare genetic disease characterized by development of dysplastic bone tissue leading to pain, deformities and compressive complications. Spinal involvement is rare particularly for the polyostotic form. Case report Herein, we present a case of 52-year-old man presented with isolated low back pain who received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with partial pain relief. On examination, the thoracic and lumbar spines were tender. Lumbar spine movements, attested by Shober’s test and finger-to-floor test, were limited. There was no radicular pain and neurological examination was normal. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 20 mm/1st hour, C- reactive protein 2 mg/l and white blood cell count, serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and parathormone were normal. Plain x-ray lumbar and thoracic spine and hips were normal. X-ray cervical spine and peripheral bone showed no lesions. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple osteolytic lesions with ground-glass opacity and sclerotic rims of thoracic and lumbar (L1 and L2) spine. Investigations to rule out malignancy or infections were negative. CT guided biopsy of a lumbar vertebra was performed and showed the presence of abnormal fibrous matrix surrounding an irregular shaped immature bone. The diagnosis of polyostotic FD of the spine was made. Zoledronic acid infusion was introduced and the patient felt better thereafter with no additional osteolytic lesions or new pain localization reported for 2 years on follow up. Conclusion Thoracic and lumbar spine FD is a rare localization that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of back pain.

Background: Differential diagnosis of low back pain (LBP) is complex and a prominent issue at all health-care levels; guidance may come from patients’ history cues and clinical examination signs. Human and animal studies report that diagnosis of lumbar radicular pain (LRP) may come from evaluating subjective responses of injured lumbar nerves to a strain applied at the buttock. The Buttock Applied Strain (BUAS-test) test may guide the differential diagnosis of LBP. Following an ex-adiuvantibus criterion, clinical improvement of LRP, diagnosed with the BUAS-test and congruently treated, may support this test diagnostic ability. Methods: Among 258 LRP patients, who, upon first visit (V1), tested positive on the BUAS-test (with/without positive Straight Leg Raising Test, SLRT), the effect of gabapentin prescription on painDETECT (PD) questionnaire and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) outcomes was quantified in the follow-up visit (V2). To support BUAS-test diagnostic ability, we hypothesized that, at V2, >50% of the sample would present negative PD outcome, significant ( t-test) and ⩾2 points V2-V1 differences for each of the BPI-item’s score. We used multinomial logistic regression (MLR) and χ2 analyses to evaluate the PD-V2 outcomes’ dependence upon independent variables. Results: Of the sample, 77% reported a negative PD-V2 outcome. V2-V1 differences of all BPI items were significant and >2 points. PD-V2 outcomes showed significant associations with SLRT-V1 and PD-V1, respectively, but not with gender, age group or pain site. MLR showed a significant relationship between SLRT-V1 and PD-V2 outcomes. Conclusion: Among LRP patients, diagnosed by the BUAS-test and treated with gabapentin, all prespecified endpoints were reached. These results may be considered a piece of ex-adiuvantibus evidence for the BUAS-test ability to diagnose LRP. While positive BUAS-test implies potential LRP, the co-presence with positive SLRT may imply a severer LRP condition. Further prospective research, in different settings and direct clinical measures, is needed.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Purpose: Inflammatory cytokines produced at the site of disc herniation are considered as pain generators in patients with lumbar disc disease. Whether a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) assay can be used in order to predict the quantum of inflammation surrounding nerve roots is a matter of investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the association of hs-CRP level and functional outcomes measured by the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODY) before and after epidural steroid injection (ESI) in patients with lumbar disc disease.Overview of Literature: Although many studies examining the role of hs-CRP levels and lumbar pain have been published previously, the results are equivocal, and there is no clear consensus regarding which patients will benefit from an ESI.Methods: This was a prospective study, with 77 patients in the study group and 23 participants in the control group. Baseline hs- CRP levels were obtained for both groups. Study group patients received a single ESI and were subjected to detailed pre- and postprocedure evaluation using MODY scores. For this group, hs-CRP levels were measured at 1 and 2 months after injection.Results: Out of 77 patients, 52 had acute and 25 had chronic low back pain. Thirty-six patients with acute pain obtained significant improvement, while 16 had an insignificant response to the ESI. None of the chronic cases had a significant response. The mean baseline hs-CRP (mg/L) among the study group (29.83±10.43) was significantly higher than for the controls (10.26±2.783). The baseline hs-CRP among acute cases, where post ESI MODY score at 2 months had significant reduction, was 32.19±5.126, and those with insignificant reduction was 18.13±7.949 (p

Background: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare disease, difficult to detect, high defect rate, and can be lifethreatening. It is characterized by accumulation of pus in the epidural space causing suppression of the spinal cord and spinal roots. This study will describe a case of a 35-year-old man with SEA in Indonesia. Case presentation: A 35-year-old male with pain in the lumbar region 1, radicular pain according to thoracic dermatome 10, flaccid inferior paraplegia, hypoesthesia as high as thoracic dermatome 10, and retention of alviet uri due to SEA caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius confirmed by abscess culture. Management of this patient was through an operation, debridement, and administration of antibiotic. Conclusion: This patient was diagnosed with SEA from anamnesis, physical examination, laboratory finding, and radiology finding. This case is rarely found and is a big problem for neurologists due to the difficulty of early diagnosis.

Introduction: Pain in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis is caused by osteoarthritis of a facet joint and intervertebral disc degeneration. Some inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α are present in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of pain and functional pre-operative scores with the expression of TNF-α in nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and facet joint. Methods: Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis and planned for surgical treatment were included in this study. Patients with history of fracture, neoplasm, and/or infection of the spine were excluded. Tissue samples were collected from the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, facet joint, flavum ligament and paraspinal muscles of the spine during the surgery. TNF-α expression was examined semi-quantitively and correlated with the axial and radicular pain that were measured using Visual Analog Score (VAS) score. The result was then statistically analyzed. Results: The expression of TNF-α in the paraspinal muscle (6.30±14.20) was significantly higher compared to other locations. TNF-α expression in the facet joint group was significantly correlated with the intensity of low back pain measured by VAS score (r=0.893, p < 0.001), and pre-operative functional outcome based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (r=0.948, p < 0.001). Conclusion: TNF-α expression, especially in the facet joint, is significantly associated with the pain intensity and pre-operative ODI that allow pain reduction with less invasive treatment in lumbar canal stenosis patients.

OBJECTIVE Many studies have utilized a combined cohort of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) to evaluate indications and outcomes. Intuitively, these are very different populations, and rates, indications, and outcomes may differ. The goal of this study was to compare specific patient characteristics associated with the utilization of a posterior lumbar interbody device between cohorts of patients with DS and IS, as well as to compare rates of interbody device use and patient-rated outcomes at 1 year after surgical treatment. METHODS The authors included patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion or instrumented posterolateral fusion for grade I or II DS or IS and had been enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry from 2009 to 2016. The outcome measures were score on the Oswestry Disability Index, scores for back pain and leg pain on the numeric rating scale, and mental component summary (MCS) score and physical component summary score on the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Descriptive statistics were used to compare spondylolisthesis groups, logistic regression was used to compare interbody device use, and the chi-square test was used to compare the proportions of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS In total, 119 patients had IS and 339 had DS. Patients with DS were more commonly women, older, less likely to smoke, and more likely to have neurogenic claudication and comorbidities, whereas patients with IS more commonly had radicular pain, neurological deficits, and worse back pain. Spondylolisthesis was more common at the L4–5 level in patients with DS and at the L5–S1 level in patients with IS. Similar proportions of patients had an interbody device (78.6% of patients with DS vs 82.4% of patients with IS, p = 0.429). Among patients with IS, factors associated with interbody device utilization were BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and increased baseline leg pain intensity. Factors associated with interbody device utilization in patients with DS were younger age, increased number of total comorbidities, and lower baseline MCS score. For each outcome measure, similar proportions of patients in the surgical treatment and spondylolisthesis groups achieved the MCID at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Although the demographic and patient characteristics associated with interbody device utilization differed between cohorts, similar proportions of patients attained clinically meaningful improvement at 1 year after surgery.

The study aimed to determine how much change in neurogenic claudication spinal surgeons expect in patients following lumbar decompression for lumbar spine stenosis (LSS), and radicular leg pain following microdiscectomy. Secondary aims were to identify surgeons’ preferences regarding surgical techniques for lumbar decompression, and their rating of the quality of current evidence for lumbar decompression. All Australian spine surgeons were invited, of whom 71 completed the survey (31% response rate). Only registered spinal surgeons were included. The online survey, administered using REDCap, included 4 sections: demographics and background; expected change in symptoms on a +/− 100% scale (−100% worst, 0% no change and 100% best possible); surgical preference; and rating of current evidence for lumbar decompression compared with other treatments. There were 71 complete responses, 76% were neurosurgeons (N = 54), predominantly male (96%; N = 68). On average, surgeons expected an 86% (median: 87%, inter-quartile range (IQR): 80%, 91%) improvement in neurogenic claudication following lumbar decompression for LSS and 89% (median: 91%, IQR: 85%, 95%) improvement in radicular pain following microdiscectomy. A multiple linear regression found no surgeon characteristics were associated with expected change following surgery. The preferred surgical technique for LSS was full laminectomy (58%; N = 41). Thirty-five percent of surgeons accurately rated the evidence supporting the superiority of lumbar decompression compared with non-surgical care for LSS as low quality. Spine surgeons expect large symptom improvements following lumbar decompression and microdiscectomy. Understanding of the current evidence was higher for lumbar decompression with fusion, than for decompression alone for LSS.

BACKGROUND Spinal arachnoid webs are rarely described bands of thickened arachnoid tissue in the dorsal thoracic spine. Much is unknown regarding their origins, risk factors, natural history, and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To present the single largest case series, detailing presenting symptoms and outcomes amongst operative and nonoperative patients, to better understand the role of intervention. METHODS This retrospective chart review identified 38 patients with arachnoid webs. Patient demographics, radiologic signs, symptoms, and surgical history data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Symptoms were divided by location and character. 28 patients were successfully contacted for follow up outcome surveys. RESULTS 26 patients (68%) underwent surgical intervention, 12 (32%) were managed non-operatively. 15 (39%) patients had undergone a previous unsuccessful surgery at a different site for their symptoms prior to arachnoid web diagnosis. Commonly presenting symptoms included myelopathy (68%), focal thoracic back pain (68%), lower extremity weakness (45%), numbness and sensory changes (58%), and lower extremity radicular pain (42%), upper extremity weakness (24%), and radicular pain (37%). Focal thoracic pain was associated with thoracic level (P

Background Epidural venous congestion secondary to inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis is a well-documented cause of low back pain and radiculopathy secondary to compressive effects from the epidural veins, decreased tissue perfusion, and resultant ischemia. Methods Single patient case report. Case description We report a unique case of a 62-year-old male with low back pain secondary to IVC stenosis from a chronically occluded IVC filter. The patient's pain resolved with endovascular removal of the occluded filter and recanalization of the IVC. Conclusion We demonstrated that by treating the underlying cause of secondary epidural venous engorgement (occluded IVC filter in this case), the patient experienced resolution of back pain and radiculopathy.

Low back pain (NPB) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in everyday life. NPB is pain that is felt in the lower back and is usually local pain or radicular pain or both. This pain can be caused by poor posture when standing or sitting, bending / twisting, lifting weights incorrectly and so on. The cause of NPB often occurs in inpatient nurses. This case report is located in dr. Murjani Sampit, Kotawaringin Timur, Kaliantan Tengah. The purpose of this case report is to determine the risk factors for low back pain in nurses at dr. Murjani Sampit. The method used is a questionnaire to determine individual factors and the Brief Survey method for ergonomic risk assessment. A case study was conducted on 2 inpatient nurses who had a history of Lower Back Pain. Based on the results of the ergonomic risk assessment using the Brief Survey method, the highest work risk was in the back region with a score of 4. Characteristic factors of respondents including gender, BMI, work experience, smoking behavior and exercise habits did not have a significant relationship with the incidence of NPB. Based on the results of statistical tests obtained from several case studies and research shows that only the length of sitting and the length of standing that affect the incidence of low back pain

Objective Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal (TF), interlaminar (IL) or caudal (C) injection. Methods Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations. Results Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the ten comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids. Discussion The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as a first line therapy, may have a short duration of effect and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.

41 patients with clinical features of discogenic sciatica during the last 25 years, proved later on by investigations and imaging to be a nondiscogenic in origin, The aim of the study is to inform spinal surgeons of possible differential diseases that mimic discogenic sciatica. All patients present clinically with a sciatica. They were recorded and treated accordingly and sent for investigations. Patients proved to have discogenic sciatica were excluded. Others further investigated and followed until finding a cause for the symptoms and recorded as nondiscogenic sciatica syndrome. 22 individual aetiologies were found to cause nondiscogenic including infectious, traumatic, oncogenic, degenerative, metabolic and ischemic causes. In conclusion a proper history and thorough physical examination, in addition to imaging and investigations were very useful in detecting the exact etiology of sciatica. The pain pattern and the related clinical features were the guide for the diagnosis. High index of suspicion is vital to achieve the definite diagnosis to avoid missing the diagnosis of nondiscogenic sciatica. One should maintain a high index of suspicion in patients with intractable sciatica. Keywords: [Nondiscogenic Sciatica syndrome, pseudosciatica, spine surgery, radicular pain.]

Sciatica is referred to radiculopathy involving any of the lower extremity, caused by either inflammation or compression of the nerve roots L1-S1. It can be diagnosed majorly through an appropriate history taking and physical examinations to not be misdiagnosed with other chronic low back pain conditions. A conservative management is preferred when in an acute stage of 6-8 weeks after which a surgical approached is advised. Although various studies has shown evidences that a prolonged conservative care is most fitting than a short term surgical approach (discectomy). The prevalence of sciatic symptoms ranging from 1.6% to 43%, maximum noted in the working population, has drawn attention for the need of an effective and early conservative care to downsize the symptoms causing discomfort and pain. Thus, the aim of the case report was to present with an early and effective conservative care with a blend of Maitland Mobilization, McKenzie exercises along with Neuro-Muscular Electrical Stimulation (Interferential Current) to minimize the discomfort thus easing and bolstering the individual in activities of daily living followed by an uncomplicated returning back to recreational activities. The patient was managed with a blend of Maitland Mobilization, McKenzie exercises and Interferential current for 7 days consecutively along with an individually tailored Home exercise program according the patient tolerance. Outcomes measures namely numerical pain rating scale, lower extremity functional scale and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire were evaluated before and after the 7 day intervention period to assess prognosis in pain and pain related disability. Thus the changes in pre and post intervention results stated positive outcomes in reducing pain and improving the functional activity and participation in social and recreational ventures. Keywords: Sciatica, Maitland Mobilization, Mckenzie exercise, Interferential Therapy, radicular pain.

Patients presenting to an outpatient spine clinic frequently report symptoms of low back pain with associated buttock, groin, and lower extremity pain. While many of these individuals suffer from lumbar spine radiculopathy, a number of different orthopedic pathologies can mimic these symptoms. Management depends substantially on a detailed history and physical examination, in addition to working from a broad list of differential diagnoses when evaluating these patients. It is imperative that spine practitioners have a comprehensive understanding of the differential diagnoses that may mimic those originating from the lumbar spine, especially when a patient's symptoms are atypical from classic radicular pain. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary testing and treatment, while delaying an accurate clinical assessment and treatment plan. This review highlights common orthopedic diagnoses that may present similar to lumbar spine pathologies and the evidence-based evaluation of these conditions.

BACKGROUND A high degree of vigilance is warranted for a spinal infection, particularly in a patient who has undergone an invasive procedure such as a spinal injection. The average delay in diagnosing a spinal infection is 2-4 mo. In our patient, the diagnosis of a spinal infection was delayed by 1.5 mo. CASE SUMMARY A 60-year-old male patient with a 1-year history of right-sided lumbar radicular pain failed conservative treatment. Six weeks to prior to surgery he received a spinal injection, which was followed by increasing lumbar radicular pain, weight loss and chills. This went unnoticed and surgery took place with right-sided L4-L5 combined microdiscectomy and foraminotomy via a posterior approach. The day after surgery, the patient developed left-sided lumbar radicular pain. Blood cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Magnetic resonance imaging showed inflammatory aberrations, revealing septic arthritis of the left-sided L4/L5 facet joint as the probable cause. Revision surgery took place and S. aureus was isolated from bacteriological samples. The patient received postoperative antibiotic treatment, which completely eradicated the infection. CONCLUSION The development of postoperative lower back pain and/or lumbar radicular pain can be a sign of a spinal infection. A thorough clinical and laboratory work-up is essential in the preoperative evaluation of patients with spinal pain.

Cauda equina paragangliomas are rare benign extra-adrenal neuroendocrine tumours arising from the neural crest cells associated with autonomic ganglia. These tumours are often mistaken preoperatively for ependymomas or schwannomas. Patients present with axial or radicular pain with or without neurological deficits. Recurrence, secretory features and length of follow-up are controversial. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of paraganglioma through searching a prospectively maintained histopathology database. Patient demographics, presentation, surgery, complications, recurrence, follow-up and outcome between 2004 and 2016 were studied. The primary aim was to collate and describe the current evidence base for recurrence and secretory features of the tumour. The secondary objective was to report outcome and follow-up strategy. A scoping review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Ten patients were diagnosed (M:F 7:3) with a mean age of 53.6 ± 5.1 (range 34–71 years). MRI scans revealed intradural lumbar enhancing lesions. All patients had complete microsurgical excisions without adjuvant therapy with no recurrence with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 1.4 years. Tumours were attached to the filum terminale. Electron microscopic images demonstrated abundant neurosecretory granules with no evidence of catecholamine production. A total of 620 articles were screened and 65 papers (including ours) combining 121 patients (mean age 48.8 and M:F 71:50) were included. The mean follow-up was 3.48 ± 0.46 (range 0.15–23 years). Back pain was the most common symptom (94%). Cure following surgery was achieved in 93% of the patients whilst 7% had recurrence. Total resection likely results in cure without the need for adjuvant therapy or prolonged follow-up. However, in certain situations, the length of follow-up should be determined by the treating surgeon.

INTRODUCTION : Low back pain with a life time prevalence of approximately 60-80% is recognized internationally as a major health, social and economic burden.41 Mechanical low back pain is one of the most common problems in modern society. It causes major economic problems in industrialized nations. It accounts for the second leading cause of absenteeism from work.13 Most back pain presenting in general practice is due to the dysfunction of element of mobile segment – that is, the two apophyseal joints, the ligamentous and muscular attachments. This problem often referred as mechanical pain, a general term which covers both radicular and non radicular pain, mainly includes dysfunction of the joint of the pain.1 Mechanical low back pain is described as a musculoskeletal pain which varies with physical activities and not involving root compression or series of spinal disease.9 Bed rest is considered to be an effective management of acute low back pain. There is strong evidence that supports bed rest greater than two days is not effective in the treatment of acute low back pain. Restriction of activity is impressive for recovery from mechanical low back pain. AIM: To compare the effects of McKenzie approach and Kinesio Taping technique in individuals with Mechanical low back pain. OBJECTIVES: 1. To find out the effect of McKenzie approach on level of pain in individuals with Mechanical low back pain. 2. To find out the effect of McKenzie approach on functional abilities of individuals with Mechanical low back pain. 3. To find out the effect of Kinesio Taping technique on level of pain in individuals with Mechanical low back pain. 4. To find out the effect of Kinesio Taping technique on functional abilities in individuals with Mechanical low back pain. 5. To compare the effects of McKenzie approach and Kinesio Taping technique in individuals with Mechanical low back pain. CONCLUSION: Study was to evaluate the effects of McKenzie approach and taping technique in individual with Mechanical low back pain. The pain status was measured using Visual Analogue Scale and functional abilities was measured using Modified Oswestry Disability Index Scale. 20 subjects were taken from typical population and randomly divided into 2 groups Experimental group A and Experimental group B with 10 in each group. Experimental group A was given McKenzie approach. Experimental group B was given Kinesio Taping. The values of pain and functional abilities was measured on the beginning of the treatment and end of the 4th week. The result were analyzed using student „t‟ test. The result showed there is significant difference between Experimental group A and Experimental group B. Experimental group A improved more than Experimental group B. Thus as conclusion, the current study provides evidence that McKenzie approach is more effective in reducing pain and improving functional abilities in individuals with Mechanical Low Back.

Background This retrospective study compares the results of 2 different techniques of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI)—subpedicular (SP-TFESI) and lateral recess epidural steroid injection (LRSI) in relieving chronic lumbar radicular pain. Methods Records of 97 patients who had undergone injection for unilateral lumbar radicular pain and had a paracentral disc were analyzed. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks thereafter. Results At 24 weeks, the NRS was significantly lower than the baseline in both groups; NRS in the LRSI group was significantly lower than NRS in the SP-TFESI group at 12 and 24 weeks (P = 0.02 each). ODI score was also significantly lower in the LRSI group through the 12-week time point (P = 0.003 at 2 weeks; P = 0.009 at 4 weeks; P = 0.02 at 12 weeks). At the end of 24 weeks, a significantly greater number of patients in the LRSI group achieved minimal clinically important difference for NRS and ODI (P = 0.008 and 0.016, respectively). Conclusions At the end of 24 weeks, LRSI appears to be a superior technique in relieving unilateral lumbar radicular pain due to a paracentral disc.

Introduction Lumbar spinal stenosis is often the result of advanced degeneration of motion segments of the lumbar spine. The incidence of this case is 3.57% (3570 per 100,000) population in Southeast Asia. The main symptoms are low back pain, numbness, and weakness in the lower extremity that occur and intensify on walking caused by the load of the body weight on the spine. Loss of disc height, facet displacement and hypertrophy, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis , all contribute to impact the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen in lumbar stenosis . There is a subgroup of patients with spinal stenosis in whom the spine is unstable preoperatively or become destabilized following decompression who would benefit from fusion procedure. Objective Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by posterior lumbar interbody fusion is indicated for patients with symptoms of low back pain and lower limb radicular pain, that are unsuccessful treated with medicines and /or patients with persisting or worsening neurological deficit.However, this procedure may lead to possible complications. This case report study was conducted to show how our hospital handling spinal stenosis case. Case A 67-year-old woman presented with low back pain that has occured for two years, and had been worsening for the past 3 months. She described the pain as an intermitten ache down on her leg, the pain was severe and worsened when the patient is standing, sitting, or walking for a long time , The pain severity was measured by visual analog score (vas), graded between 7/10 to 9/10. She also complained numbness from the bilateral gluteal region to the lateral side of lower extremities, when she feel too tired. On the physical examination, She was found to have limited range of motion for flexion and extension, on the lumbar spine, due to pain. The motoric strength of both lower limbs were decreased, so did the sensory function. The Radiological examination showed a severe stenosis at lumbar spinal bone region on L4-L5 area. After the examination, the patient agreed to undergo the suggested operative procedure and gare the consent at the hospital.

Objective This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of brief training in the guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of low-back pain (LBP) in occupational health services using a cluster-randomized design. A small sample of physiotherapists and physicians from the intervention units (N=12) were given three- to seven-day training focusing on the biopsychosocial management of LBP, while professionals in the control units (N=15) received no such training. Methods Eligible patients with LBP, with or without radicular pain, aged 18-65, were invited to participate. A web-based questionnaire was sent to all recruited patients at baseline, three months and one year. The primary outcome measure was disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) over one year. Between-group differences were analyzed using linear and generalized linear mixed models adjusted for baseline-response delay as well as variables showing between-group imbalance at baseline. Results The final study sample comprised 234 and 81 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively at baseline, and 137 and 47 patients, respectively, at one year. At baseline, the mean duration of pain was longer in the intervention group (P=0.017), and pain-related fear concerning physical activity was lower (P=0.012). We observed no significant difference between the groups primary outcome measure (adjusted one-year mean difference in the ODI: 2.3; 95% confidence interval -1.0-5.7; P=0.175) or most secondary outcomes. Conclusions Brief training in guideline-oriented biopsychosocial management of LBP for occupational health professionals did not appear to be effective in reducing patients symptom over one-year follow-up compared to treatment as usual. Funding Agencies|Finnish Work Environment Fund; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; Rokua Health and Rehabilitation Foundation; University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Background: Lumbar disc herniation is the most common cause of low back pain and significant disability with economic impact too. Management of disc herniation is challenging, often confusing when surgical treatment is considered, because of frequent failures after surgery in many patients to relieve symptoms. In the current study, we aimed to compare the functional outcomes of treating PIVD with discectomy alone and discectomy associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).Materials and Methods: This study is randomised control study was conducted over 36 patients diagnosed with PIVD and operated for Discectomy (18 patients) or PLIF (18 patients) in Orthopaedic department, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan between January 2019 to June 2020 and randomly allotted in two groups.To evaluate Functional outcomes using Japanese orthopedic score (JOA) and kirkaldy-willis criteria in every follow up at 2 week, 6 week, 3 month and 6 month.Results: Calculating the functional outcome by both the criteria in all follow ups, we concluded that in early follow up that is of second post op week, discectomy shows satisfactory outcome then that of PLIF group. In 6 month last follow up, PLIF group show satisfactory outcome then that of Discectomy patients groups and p value was 0.0042 which was significant. Out of 36 patients, one patient had dura rupture intraoperatively which was repaired simultaneously and one patient had surgical site infection which resolved later on, both patients were in discectomy group. Conclusions: Although both discectomy alone and discectomy with PLIF were associated with favorable mid-term results in treating patients with PIVD, however, we recommend using discectomy with PLIF for lower radicular pain for better long term results..

Study DesignClinical audit via retrospective review of a database.PurposeTo report an early experience using ultrasound-guided lumbar spinal injection for axial and radicular pain in an Asian multiethnic cohort.Overview of LiteratureUltrasound-guided spine injection therapy is a comparatively new technique in the management of axial and radicular pain from degenerative lumbar spinal conditions, which may be a reasonable alternative to conventional fluoroscopic or computed tomography-guided injection.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted, involving all patients who underwent ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injection therapy at a single institution over 1 year. Patients were evaluated by two interventionists, who then performed standardized ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint and pararadicular spinal injections.ResultsThere were 42 patients treated at our Sports Medicine Centre; with 27 patients (64.3%) receiving facet joint injections and 18 patients (42.9%) receiving nerve root injections. The majority (90.5%) of patients experienced an improvement of >30% in pain intensity at 3 months post-injection, using the Numerical Rating Scale pain score (ppConclusionsOur initial experience confirms the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided lumbar spinal injection for the treatment of axial and radicular pain in an Asian multiethnic cohort.

The recently published "Clinical Relevance of Epidural Steroid Injections on Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome-Related Complaints: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"1 questions whether the current practice of epidural steroid injections (ESIs) for patients suffering from lumbosacral radicular syndrome should continue. Considering the high number of epidural steroid injections that are performed yearly, the methodology may require further assessment. The authors make some statement about the evolution, the cause and the treatment algorithm of lumbosacral radicular pain, that are not completely correct. The papers included in this review are not all of high scientific quality. Papers dealing with patients who suffer lumbosacral radicular pain of 6 weeks to 21 months, which is for beyond the recommended period for the indication of sub-Acute lumbosacral radicular pain. More than one-Third of the studies included in this systematic review reported no medical imaging prior to performing the epidural injection. This heavily compromises the results of the study and the validity of the recommendation. The use of minimal important change (MIC) as an outcome parameter is inappropriate because this outcome measurement was developed to identify clinically meaningful changes within groups or individuals, not to determine significant changes between groups The authors performed 40 meta-Analyses, but most of them were based on 1-3 RCTs. Whereas meta-Analyses containing few studies can yield useful information when the studies evaluate similar patient populations, the procedures are standardized, and the outcome measures are similar, performing meta-Analyses in the presence of significant study heterogeneity, as is present in ESI clinical trials, is a roadmap for showing a biased lack of efficacy.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate factors predicting a successful outcome after ozone chemonucleolysis (OCN) in patients with radicular pain and poor response to conservative treatments. METHODS Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of good outcome after OCN. Good outcome was defined as 33% Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) reduction (model 1) or 13-point ODI improvement (model 2) at 1 month after OCN. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-three patients were analyzed. A significant pain reduction (pre-operative Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] 6.7 ± 1.5, postoperative NRS 2.6 ± 2.2, P

Objective This retrospective study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterolateral fusion (PLF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF + PLF) for the treatment of patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. Methodology A total of 77 adult patients ≥18 years with low-grade spondylolisthesis, Meyerding grades I and II, were assigned into two groups: 36 patients treated with PLF and 41 patients treated with TLIF + PLF. The PLF group is composed of the patients that were operated with pedicle screw and the TLIF + PLF group is composed of the ones that were operated with fixation and TILF by autografting. Clinical evaluation was performed using the spino-pelvic sagittal balance, Numeric Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, blood loss, operation times, and postoperative hospital stay of the PLF vs TLIF groups. The incidences of postoperative low back pain and radicular pain in the two groups were also recorded. Radiography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess spino-pelvic parameters. Results Significant restoration of spino-pelvic sagittal balance was observed in the TLIF group after surgery, and all spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters showed significant improvement in the TLIF group after surgery, while in the PLF group, all spino-pelvic sagittal parameters had improved except the segmental angle lordosis (p = 0.316), which showed no significant difference after surgery in the PLF group. Postoperative pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt significantly improved in the TLIF group in comparison to PLF groups. Hence, TLIF can achieve better postoperative spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters than PLF. There was no difference in the complication rates for each group. Both groups achieved significant improvement in postoperative clinical outcomes, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative low back pain or radicular pain between the two groups. Conclusion Both surgical procedures PLF and TLIF were effective. PLF and TLIF can result in improved clinical and radiological outcomes for patients treated for low-grade spondylolisthesis. TLIF can achieve better restoration of spino-pelvic sagittal balance parameters than PLF alone.

Introducción: La enfermedad de Parkinson afecta principalmente a personas >65 años. El cuadro degenerativo lumbar en el contexto de un canal estrecho sumado a la alteración neuromuscular y la mala calidad ósea, favorece al desequilibrio sagital y coronal. Los pacientes que necesitan cirugía tienen altas tasas de revisión y reoperación con técnicas instrumentadas y no instrumentadas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la técnica quirúrgica de descompresión mínimamente invasiva en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson y dolor radicular o claudicación neurogénica en los miembros inferiores. Materiales y Métodos:Se evaluó a pacientes con diagnóstico de canal lumbar estrecho y enfermedad de Parkinson tratados quirúrgicamente. El procedimiento se indicó por síntomas de canal estrecho o estenosis foraminal de causa degenerativa. Todos fueron tratados con una cirugía descompresiva a través de una hemilaminectomía mínimamente invasiva mediante retracción tubular y asistencia con microscopia. Resultados: De enero de 2015 a diciembre de 2017, se trató a 6 pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson y canal lumbar estrecho. Se descomprimieron 12 niveles en total, todos estuvieron internados

Background/ImportanceUltrasound (US)-guided cervical selective nerve root injections (CSNRI) have been proposed as an alternative to fluoroscopic (FL) -guided injections. When choosing US guidance, the proceduralist should be aware of potential issues confirming vertebral level, be clear regarding terminology, and up to date regarding the advantages and disadvantages of US-guided CSNRI.ObjectiveReview the accuracy and effectiveness of US guidance in avoiding vascular puncture (VP) and/or intravascular injection (IVI) during CSNRI.Evidence ReviewQueries included PubMed, CINAHL and Embase databases from 2005 to 2019. Three authors reviewed references for eligibility, abstracted data, and appraised quality.FindingsThe literature demonstrates distinct safety considerations and limited evidence of the effectiveness of US guidance in detecting VP and/or IVI. As vascular flow and desired injectate spread cannot be visualized with US, the use of real-time fluoroscopy, and if needed digitial subraction imaging, is indicated in cervical transforaminal epidural injections (CTFEIs). Given the risk of VP and/or IVI, the ability to perform and to retain FL images to document that the procedure was safely conducted is valuable in CTFEIs.ConclusionUS guidance remains to be proven as a non-inferior alternative to FL guidance or other imaging modalities in the prevention of VP and/or IVI with CTFEIs or cervical selective nerve root blocks. There is a paucity of adequately powered clinical studies evaluating the accuracy and effectiveness of US guidance in avoiding VP and/or IVI. US-guided procedures to treat cervical radicular pain has limitations in visualization of anatomy, and currently with the evidence available is best used in a combined approach with FL guidance.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic neuropathic pain and most frequently utilised for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). BurstDR™ also known as DeRidder Burst-SCS, a novel waveform, has demonstrated superiority to conventional tonic stimulation of the thoracic spine in FBSS. There are case reports of an improvement in multidimensional pain outcomes using DeRidder Burst-SCS in the cervical spine for chronic neck and cervical radicular pain. The safety and efficacy of cervical DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation still however remain undetermined. This is a prospective, multicentre feasibility trial evaluating the safety and therapeutic efficacy of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation for the treatment of chronic intractable neck pain with or without radiation to the arm, shoulder, and upper back. After baseline evaluation, subjects will undergo an SCS trial using the Abbott Invisible Trial system according to standard clinical procedures. During the trial phase, SCS leads will be implanted in the cervical epidural space. At the end of the SCS trial, subjects experiencing at least 50% pain relief will be considered for permanent implant. Pain intensity, medication usage, and other multidimensional pain outcomes will be collected. The timing of these will be at baseline, end of the SCS trial and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits. Incidence of adverse events will be collected throughout the study duration. The results of this feasibility study will validate the efficacy and safety of DeRidder Burst-SCS stimulation in the cervical spine. The results obtained in this study will potentially be used to generate a level 1 evidence-based study with formal statistical hypotheses testing. www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03159169.

Transient ischemic attack (TIA) of spinal cord (SC) is very rare and characterized by sudden onset of paralysis, sensory loss, back pain. We present a patient with acute painful paraplegia and symptoms resolved within a few hours. We identified 10 patients in literature search. Five of them were male, the mean age of patients was 53.8. Para paresis/pleji was present in all. Only two patients did not have radicular pain. Vascular risk factors were hypertension in five patients, smoking in five and diabetes mellitus in one. TIA period ranged from 1 min to 24 h. The most common etiology was aortic dissection (n=6). Four patients had aortic thrombosis. Six patients were treated with medical and surgical methods; other four were treated with only medically. SC ischemia and aortic diseases should be kept in mind in short term/persistent acute spinal syndromes with pain.

BackgroundDisease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are classified as conventional DMARDs and biologic agents. A concern with DMARDs is the increased risk of infection after surgery. A practice advisory from the American Society of Anesthesiologists recommend alternatives to neuraxial injections in patients who are immunocompromized. We describe a patient who was on several DMARDs and developed inflammatory reactions in her bilateral paraspinal muscles and lumbar spine after an epidural steroid injection (ESI).Case presentationThe patient was a 79-year-old woman; she was taking methotrexate, adalimumab and prednisone for her RA. She had a left L5-S1 paramedian ESI for her L5 radiculitis. After relief of her back and radicular pain for 5 weeks, she had an acute exacerbation of her back pain. MRI showed bilateral paraspinal fluid accumulations and enhancement in her ligamentum flavum. Cultures of the aspirated fluid and biopsy specimens were negative for fungal, aerobic and anaerobic organisms. A repeat MRI 2 months later showed diminution of the fluid collection but with a new fluid accumulation near the left L4-5 facet and left L4 pedicle. Repeat cultures and gram stain of the specimens taken from the pedicle and the paraspinal muscles were negative. The patient was followed by her rheumatologist and in the pain clinic until resolution of her symptoms.ConclusionsSeveral society guidelines recommend the continuation of methotrexate but stoppage of the biologic DMARDS before surgery. The occurrence of an intense inflammatory reaction after an ESI in our patient calls for additional research on the subject and shared decision-making between the pain physician, patient and rheumatologist especially in patients on several DMARDs.

Background. The arsenal of physical methods for correcting pathological skin scars is quickly replenished, but the results of their use are often unsatisfactory. An inadequate approach to therapy, without taking into account the evaluation of their effectiveness, leads to relapses and increased growth of scar tissue or the absence of a clinically significant effect of many of them and requires strict scientific evidence in the course of benign scientific studies. Aims: Comprehensive (qualitative, quantitative, structural) analysis of evidence-based research in electronic evidence-based research databases (PEDro, PubMed, e-Library) and systematic review databases (Cochrane Library) for the period from 2000 to 2020. The clinical effects and suggested mechanisms of action of currently proven therapeutic physical factors in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease are considered in detail. The most studied of the physical methods with proven effects are high-intensity laser technologies of high-intensity laser therapy (47%), fractional radiofrequency therapy (14%), microneedling (9%) and microdermabrasion (8%), which cause the most pronounced remodeling of the extracellular matrix of the skin in the area of scars. Conclusion. It is necessary to regularly generalize and analyze existing evidence-based studies, as well as perform new high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials to study the impact of physical correction methods on post-acne scars, which serve as the basis for developing clinical recommendations.

A patient with a prior history of intradural schwannoma and disc herniation presented with radicular pain after being hit in the thigh by a dog’s tail. She was worked up and found to have a tumor of her right sciatic nerve. The tumor was resected and histology was consistent with schwannoma. The dog’s tail acted as a Tinel’s sign maneuver and led to timely identification of her peripheral nerve tumor. Peripheral nerve schwannomas can present in unusual forms, and Tinel’s maneuver may be a useful tool in diagnosis.

Background: There are different surgical modalities designed to manage aggressive vertebral hemangioma (VH) that causes neurological symptoms. The selection of the best approach is still controversial. It is crucial to safely achieve neurological recovery with the elimination of the risk of recurrence. The combined use of surgical decompression and vertebroplasty is one of the surgical modalities that are used to manage these cases. Patients and Methods: From January 2012 to January 2019, nine patients with aggressive VH were retrospectively included in the study. All of them were operated upon using combined surgical decompression and vertebroplasty. We evaluated all the patients preoperatively, immediate postoperative, 1 month, and 12 months later. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. Results: Affected spinal levels were dorsal in six cases and lumbar in three cases. There was no postoperative worsening of the preoperative neurological status. For the cases presented with sciatica, the mean VAS score has dropped from 8.33 preoperatively to 2.67 postoperatively. One month later, all of them are free from the radicular pain. For the cases presented with myelopathy, they regain their motor power in both lower limbs over a period of 4 weeks with a mean Nurick grade of 1.17. The postoperative radiological studies revealed near total occlusion of the VH with the maintenance of the vertebral body height. No clinical or radiological signs of spinal instability or recurrence are observed over the period of follow-up. Conclusions: The combined use of surgical decompression and vertebroplasty is considered a safe and effective modality in the management of aggressive VHs.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of low back pain and radicular pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the regression of LDH in patients who are considered to require surgical treatment but prefer conservative treatment. Patients who presented between January 2018 and June 2020 and who did not accept the recommended surgical treatment following a diagnosis of LDH based on clinical and radiological findings were retrospectively reviewed. All 12 of the patients included in the study showed spontaneous regression of LDH during outpatient clinical follow-up. Our study included 12 patients (seven male and five female). The mean age was 46.5 (the youngest was 30 years old; the oldest was 70 years old). Regression was observed at the L2-L3 level in two patients (10%), at the L4-L5 level in four patients (40%), and at the L5-S1 level in six patients (50%). On the follow-up examination of all patients, the severity of their pain was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale, and all patients described a reduction in pain (min: 2, max: 8). Ten patients described radicular pain at the initial examination, eight patients received physical therapy and rehabilitation treatment before the follow-up examination, and nine patients described neuropathic pain at the follow-up examination. Spontaneous regression of LDH is rare. While conservative treatments provided partial improvement in the complaints of these patients, conservative treatments usually cannot prevent the development of neuropathic pain.

Summary of Background DataNo study has evaluated the relationship between contrast dispersion patterns and outcomes after fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI).ObjectivesDetermine whether contrast dispersion patterns predict pain and functional outcomes after CTFESI.MethodsSecondary analysis of data collected during two prospective studies of CTFESI for the treatment of refractory radicular pain. Contrast dispersion patterns visualized by true anteroposterior (AP) projections during CTFESIs were categorized by flow: 1) completely external to the lateral border of the neuroforamen (zone 1); 2) within the neuroforamen but without entry into the lateral epidural space (zone 2); and 3) with extension into the lateral epidural space (zone 3). At baseline and at 1 month post-CTFESI, neck pain, arm pain, and “dominant index pain” (the greater of arm or neck pain) were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS); physical function was assessed using the Five-Item Version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-5).ResultsOne-month post-CTFESI, neck pain, arm pain, and “dominant index pain” reductions of ≥50% were observed in 39.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.2–51.8), 55.6% (95% CI, 43.0–67.5), and 44.1% (95% CI, 32.7–56.2) of participants, respectively. Regarding “dominant index pain,” 72.7% (95% CI, 40.8–91.2), 39.4% (95% CI, 24.2–57.0), and 37.5% (95% CI, 20.5–58.2) of participants reported ≥50% pain reduction when zone 1, zone 2, and zone 3 contrast flow patterns were observed. Contrast dispersion zone was not significantly associated with subgroup differences in neck pain, arm pain, or NDI-5 scores (P>0.05).ConclusionImprovements in pain and function 1 month after treatment with CTFESI did not differ significantly based on the contrast dispersion pattern. Future study is needed to confirm or refute these findings in other procedural settings, in broader patient populations, and with longer-term outcome assessment.

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) presenting as a radicular pain in the thoracic region is not uncommon, but the presentation in the lumbar and thigh region is not frequently seen. Characteristic segmental vesicular–bullous rash in a dermatomal distribution associated with pain and allodynia is a prominent feature. The pain appears before rash. It is not uncommon for clinicians to misdiagnose radicular pain caused by VZV due to prolapsed disc. We report two patients who presented to us with complaints of back pain with leg radiculopathy that were initially treated for discogenic radiculopathy and rash was wrongly attributed to hot fomentation. This case report emphasizes the importance of including varicella-zoster radiculitis in the differential diagnosis of radicular pain and clinical examination of every rash. Physical examination is must if the patient complains of rash. Appropriate and timely diagnosis can prevent unnecessary investigations.

Background Since 1929, only 171 epidural hemangioma cases have been reported. We report five epidural hemangiomas and review cases reported over the past decade in terms of radiological features and clinical findings. Methods Among patients operated on for spinal tumors at our hospital between 2009 and 2020, five had epidural hemangiomas. We retrospectively examined patient records and images and reviewed relevant English literature in PubMed from 2009 to 2019. Eighty-seven epidural hemangioma cases were reported in the last 10 years. Results Among 87 cases, the average age was 49.58 years; 43 and 44 cases were male and female, respectively. The most common lesion level was thoracic (59.8%), while common symptoms were back pain (42.5%); numbness, hypoesthesia, or anesthesia (37.9%); paraparesis (34.5%); and radicular pain (20.7%). On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 77.1% showed hypo-isointensity on T1-weighted image (WI), hyperintensity on T2WI, and homogenous enhanced patterns with contrast. Total resection was performed in most cases, with good clinical outcomes. Preoperative embolization was performed in four cases, with good surgical outcomes. The median follow-up duration of postoperative MRI was 16 months, and no case had recurrence. Conclusions Epidural hemangiomas are extremely rare and may be difficult to diagnose preoperatively. They should be considered if a dumbbell-shaped or epidural hypervascular lesion is noted. The treatment of choice for epidural hemangioma is total resection, with most cases having good clinical outcomes. Preoperative embolization may be useful for reducing bleeding. Although there were almost no recurrences after resection, careful follow-up for longer periods is required.

Pedicle fractures are rare and usually associated with repetitive stress, high-speed trauma, osteoporosis, unilateral spondylolysis, or instrumentation surgery. A review of the current literature on bilateral pedicle fractures of the lumbar spine revealed only a few cases listed as a complication of instrumentation or excessive decompression surgery. The authors present the clinical case of a 49-year-old man with exacerbating low-back pain and intermittent L5 radicular pain. The known comorbidities were rather remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and osteopenia. Radiological investigations revealed an acute bilateral pedicle fracture of L5 without any evidence of preexisting spondylolysis. An off-label minimally invasive fracture reduction and fixation was performed using traction screws and intraoperative navigation. The patient reported instant pain relief and did not show any sensorimotor deficits at discharge. The postoperative CT scan revealed an ossification of the former fracture after 3 months, with great 1-year follow-up outcome. This is the first documented report on the effectiveness of traction screws used in a patient with bilateral pedicle fractures of the L5 vertebra. This minimally invasive technique represents a promising treatment option in selected cases by sparing segmental fusion.

Objectives Temporary, percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been shown to provide analgesia for acute postoperative pain, postamputation pain, and low back pain. The implanted device stimulates the neural target for up to 60 days at which point the leads are extracted. Patients have demonstrated prolonged analgesia continuing after extraction of the leads. The purpose of this case series is to demonstrate peripheral neural targets that could feasibly be used to treat various pain syndromes prevalent in the oncologic population. Materials and methods A temporary, percutaneous PNS was implanted under ultrasound guidance in 12 oncologic chronic pain patients seen in an outpatient pain clinic who had failed medical and/or interventional management. The device was implanted for up to 60 days. Clinical progress of pain and functional capacity was monitored through regular clinical visits. Results The case series presents seven successful cases of implementation of the PNS to treat oncologic pain. Three of these cases demonstrate targeting of proximal spinal nerves to treat truncal neuropathic pain and lumbar radicular pain. The four remaining cases demonstrate successful targeting of other peripheral nerves and brachial plexus. We also share five failed cases without adequate pain relief with PNS. Conclusions PNS has potential uses in the treatment of oncologic pain. Further high-quality studies should be designed to further elucidate use of the PNS to treat oncologic pain.

The study objective is to assess the effectiveness of spinal cord electrostimulation in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Materials and methods . A study was conducted among 20 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. All patients had radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication. Most patients (n = 18) were rejected from open decompression because of severe concomitant somatic pathology. Two patients refused from open intervention, they were offered electrostimulation. All patients (n = 20) were implanted of the test epidural electrode for spinal cord electrostimulation. Outcomes were assessed by using a visual analogue scale and increasing of the distance of non-stop walking in 8 days after surgery. Among patients with chronic spinal cord electrostimulation, outcomes were assessed in 6 months after implantation. A satisfactory result was considered as a decreasing of pain more than 50 %. Results. А satisfactory result of test electrostimulation was noted in 18 patients, all of them were implanted of system of the chronic spinal cord electrostimulation. The average value of lumbar pain changed from 4.2 to 3.1 points, and the average value of leg-pain changed from 7.2 to 2.2 points. The average value of the non-stop walking distance changedfrom 58 to 245 meters. At the same time, the motor component of neurogenic claudication decreased in only 1 patient. In some patients, after regression of radicular pain, heart complaints became the main factor limiting walking. Before electrostimulation, only 3 patients had no walking restriction. After electrostimulation 7 patients had no walking restriction. Conclusion. Spinal cord electrostimulation is an effective palliative option in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND Cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) is an accepted therapeutic option for radicular upper extremity pain and less commonly for cervical axial pain despite less available literature in comparison with lumbar and lower extremity applications. METHODS This preliminary observational pilot study evaluated the efficacy of cSCS using the monophasic burst pattern in the treatment of both upper extremity radicular pain and axial neck pain. Primary outcome measures were reduction in pain scores, global pain scale (GPS) indices, and neck Oswestry disability index (nODI). RESULTS Of the 23 subjects trialed, 15 went to implantation of cSCS using burst and were followed for 1 year prospectively. Pre- and postprimary outcome measures suggested a statistically (p

Background and objective: Neck pain is one of the most common symptoms in the general population; several work-related and individual factors have been verified as being related to neck pain. This study aimed to determine the pathologic MRI findings of patients presented with neck pain and assess its association with some probable risk factors for cervical spine lesions. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study involved a convenient sample of 100 patients with neck pain referred to the radiology department of Rizgary teaching hospital in Erbil for Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination of the cervical spine from June 2013 to February 2014. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 21 to 70 years, with a mean age ± SD of 40.19 ±10.44 years. Around 42% of patients were between 30-39 years, and 60% were females. Clinical symptoms of the patients revealed that51.6% had radicular pain with cervical MR images abnormalities in 59% of the patients. The most common degenerative abnormality on MRI was disc bugle, which accounted for 37.3 % of total degenerative changes. MRI findings were most common at the C5/C6 level. A significant association was found between the cervical MRI abnormalities and the occupation and practicing neck (P = 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). However, no association was found with age, gender, BMI, and smoking habits of the patients. Also, there was a highly significant (P = 0.001) association between radicular pain, with disc bulge and disc protrusion. Conclusion: MRI is a useful investigation tool for diagnosing different clinical conditions among patients with cervical pain. Considering the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness, it is the key diagnostic tool for early detection of the degenerative changes and initiating appropriate treatment.

We present a rare case of a patient initially presenting with unilateral abdominal wall bulging and radicular pain caused by a lateral disc herniation at Th11/12, later suffering from a hernia recurrence with bilateral disc prolapse and motor deficits. The patient underwent sequesterectomy via a right hemilaminectomy at Th11, and after 8 weeks, a bilateral sequesterectomy with semirigid fusion Th11/12 was performed. Unilateral motor deficits at the thoracic level have been discussed in case reports; a bilateral disc protrusion with abdominal wall bulging occurring as a recurrent disc herniation has never been described before.

In the present randomized prospective study, we compared the surgical invasiveness using a quantitative volumetric analysis of postoperative paravertebral muscle signal intensity changes between transforaminal full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) and open discectomy (OD).We prospectively collected the data from 50 patients with a single-level lumbar foraminal herniation, invalidating radicular pain, and adequate imaging studies available (postoperative magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]24 hours). These patients had been randomly assigned to FELD (n = 25) or OD (n = 25). Data were collected on age, sex, leg and back pain, complications, and follow-up time. Muscle segmentations were performed manually using 3DSlicer software on postoperative isovolumetric T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery MRI scans. Both sequences were processed using multiplanar reconstruction in orthogonal planes. The clinical and demographic characteristics and volumetric data were then compared between the 2 groups.We found a higher mean volume of paravertebral muscle signal alterations among the OD-treated patients in both T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery MRI (P ≤ 0.001) and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI (P ≤ 0.001) scans than among the FELD-treated patients. No differences were found between the median preoperative and postoperative leg pain between the 2 groups (P = 1.000). The median scores for postoperative back pain were significantly lower for the FELD group (P ≤ 0.001), as was the median interval from surgery to autonomous mobilization (P = 0.001).We found a significant difference in signal intensity of the paravertebral muscles between the FELD and OD groups, reflective of the minor surgical invasiveness of endoscopic discectomy. FELD resulted in less trauma to the paraspinal muscles, possibly also reducing inflammatory cytokine release and, therefore, is a valuable tool for spinal surgeons.

Background Tools for functional assessment of chronic low back pain (LBP) are lacking. Objective To determine the correlations and the responsiveness of the 400 m comfortable walk test (400 mCWT) and the 200 m fast-walk test (200 mFWT) in the functional assessment of a multimodal program. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven participants (68 females) with LBP and with or without radicular pain completed a Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, a Sorensen test, a Shirado test, a 400 mCWT and a 200 mFWT, at baseline and at the end of the program. Results No significant side effect was reported during walk tests. Walking speed was significantly increased after the program (0.18 ± 0.15 m.s-1 for the 400 mCWT and 0.17 ± 0.17 m.s-1 for the 200 mFWT). Clinical parameters were also significantly improved (82.02 ± 83.1 seconds for the Shirado, 92.1 ± 100.1 seconds for the Sorensen, -14.0 ± 12.9 for the Quebec scale). A significant relationship was found between the increase in walking speed for the two walk tests and the improvement of the Quebec scale. The gait speed improvement was close to the minimal clinically important change (95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.22) determined from the Quebec scale threshold (minimum detectable change). Conclusions Both 400 mCWT and 200 mFWT are correlated with functional parameters and are responsive for the functional assessment of LBP.

Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study in order to evaluate predictive factors of safety and therapeutic success. Materials and methods Thirty patients, from 2016 to 2018, were enrolled (age: 42–80 aa, 66.7% men and 33.3% females) with low back pain, lumbosciatalgia and/or lumbocruralgia, resistant to previous medical and physical treatments for a period not < 3 months, failure of surgical and chemiodiscolysis with ozone oxygen therapy. Each patient was subjected to a clinical evaluation (antalgic walking, sensitive deficit, interviews with specific questionnaires: ODI, RDQ,VAS) and to a radiological evaluation with MRI examination, before and 30 days after the CT-guided PRF treatment. Measurements of the thickness of the involved and not involved DRG were taken using common postprocessing software of MRI examinations in order to have measurement parameters for comparison. We analyzed the clinical course using the paired samples T test in order to evaluate modification for each clinical and radiological parameter (statistical significance p < 0.05). Results Significant improvements of the clinical outcomes with a good resolution of the pain symptoms (VAS evaluation: The score fell from 68.47 to 39.17 with a difference of 29.3 and a reduction of the 42.79% in the perceived pain, p = 0.00000152). The thickness of DRG falls from an average media of 0.586–0.448 cm (p = 0.000085), with a difference of 0.138 cm and a percentage reduction of 22.30%. Conclusions PRF treatment of the DRG may be considered for patients with chronic severe lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to conventional medical management when other noninvasive or surgical procedures fail. It is minimally invasive, inexpensive and simple to perform with no complications.

Background Epidermoid cysts can rarely arise as a late complication of lumbar puncture. We describe a young man who had a remote history of a lumbar puncture and who was subsequently found to have a lumbar spinal epidermoid cyst on imaging, after presenting with lower extremity radicular pain. Case Description A 24-year-old man with a remote history of lumbar puncture presented with lower back pain and radicular leg pain which had been ongoing for over a year. Despite conservative management, the patient's symptoms progressed to worsening back pain and left L4 radiculopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine demonstrated a peripherally enhancing, intradural, extramedullary lesion at L4-5. Diffusion-weighted imaging revealed diffusion restriction within the lesion, characteristic of an epidermoid cyst. The patient underwent an L4-5 laminectomy for resection of the intradural tumor. The lesion was noted to contain pearly white granules consistent with the appearance of an epidermoid cyst. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis. On follow-up examination, the patient demonstrated improvement of his back pain and resolution of radicular symptoms. Conclusions Lumbar spinal epidermoid cysts may be either congenital or secondary to an iatrogenic cause. This patient had a remote history of lumbar puncture during workup for meningitis as a child. As a complication of a lumbar puncture, the formation of an epidermoid cyst can occur and is thought to be the result of implanted cutaneous tissue. This case provides a comprehensive illustration of the clinical, radiographic, intraoperative, and pathologic findings consistent with an iatrogenic epidermoid cyst.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of low back pain (LBP) and/or radicular pain (RP). Over the years, different therapies have been proposed to treat symptomatic LDH, including different minimally invasive techniques and open surgical methods. Recently, percutaneous intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (RGE) DiscoGel® has emerged as an effective therapeutic option in patients with LDH. Nevertheless, only few studies addressed the reliability of this technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure. We analysed surgical and outcome data of patients with small or medium LDH treated by DiscoGel between 2012 to 2015. Outcome variables included pain relief, the limitation on physical activity and severity of depression status. Overall, complication rate was defined as the occurrence of any perioperative adverse events. A total of 94 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Pain relief was achieved in 90.6% and 88.8% of patients at 1- and 4-year follow-up, respectively. At the last follow-up, at least a satisfactory result was achieved in 92.5% of patients. Similar results were obtained in the limitation on physical activity. Depression status did not significantly change after treatment. There was no mortality, and no patients experienced permanent sequelae. In well-selected patients, DiscoGel has proved effective in maintaining excellent functional results in terms of pain relief and limitation on physical activity while minimizing the overall rate of complications related to these kinds of surgical procedures.