Search

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) total body photography may improve early detection of melanoma and facilitate surveillance, leading to better prognosis and lower healthcare costs. The Australian Centre of Excellence in Melanoma Imaging and Diagnosis (ACEMID) cohort study will assess long-term outcomes from delivery of a precision strategy of monitoring skin lesions using skin surface imaging technology embedded into health services across Australia., Methods and Analysis: A prospective cohort study will enrol 15 000 participants aged 18 years and above, across 15 Australian sites. Participants will attend study visits according to their melanoma risk category: very high risk, high risk or low/average risk, every 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively, over 3 years. Participants will undergo 3D total body photography and dermoscopy imaging at study visits. A baseline questionnaire will be administered to collect sociodemographic, phenotypic, quality of life and sun behaviour data. A follow-up questionnaire will be administered every 12 months to obtain changes in sun behaviour and quality of life. A saliva sample will be collected at the baseline visit from a subsample., Ethics and Dissemination: The ACEMID cohort study was approved by the Metro South Health Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: HREC/2019/QMS/57206) and the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2019003077). The findings will be reported through peer-reviewed and lay publications and presentations at conferences., Trial Registration Number: ACTRN12619001706167., Competing Interests: Competing interests: HPS is a shareholder of MoleMap NZ and E-derm-Consult and undertakes regular teledermatological reporting for both companies. HPS is a Medical Consultant for Canfield Scientific, Blaze Bioscience and a Medical Advisor for First Derm. VM has received speakers fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Janssen and conference sponsorship from L’Oreal. PF-P has consulted for Leo, Amgen, Abbvie, UCB, Sanofi, Janssen, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer and Lilly. PF-P has received speakers fees from Janssen, Leo, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Abbvie, UCB, Novartis, Merck and Pfizer., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Overdiagnosis of early melanoma is a significant problem. Due to subtle unique and overlapping clinical and histological criteria between pigmented lesions and the risk of mortality from melanoma, some benign pigmented lesions are diagnosed as melanoma. Although histopathology is the gold standard to diagnose melanoma, there is a demand to find alternatives that are more accurate and cost-effective. In the current "omics" era, there is gaining interest in biomarkers to help diagnose melanoma early and to further understand the mechanisms driving tumor progression. Genomic investigations have attempted to differentiate malignant melanoma from benign pigmented lesions. However, genetic biomarkers of early melanoma diagnosis have not yet proven their value in the clinical setting. Protein biomarkers may be more promising since they directly influence tissue phenotype, a result of by-products of genomic mutations, posttranslational modifications and environmental factors. Uncovering relevant protein biomarkers could increase confidence in their use as diagnostic signatures. Currently, proteomic investigations of melanoma progression from pigmented lesions are limited. Studies have previously characterised the melanoma proteome from cultured cell lines and clinical samples such as serum and tissue. This has been useful in understanding how melanoma progresses into metastasis and development of resistance to adjuvant therapies. Currently, most studies focus on metastatic melanoma to find potential drug therapy targets, prognostic factors and markers of resistance. This paper reviews recent advancements in the genomics and proteomic fields and reports potential avenues, which could help identify and differentiate melanoma from benign pigmented lesions and prevent the progression of melanoma., (© 2022 The Authors. Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Systemic melanoma therapies have the potential to affect basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) development. In this study, we aim to compare the incidence of BCC and cuSCC in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with antiprogrammed cell death-1 (anti-PD1), BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) monotherapy or dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy (CombiDT) with a group of control patients having similar risk factors. We reviewed the records of melanoma patients on anti-PD1, BRAFi, or CombiDT, and patients from the High-Risk Melanoma Clinic, Westmead Hospital. We also performed an immunohistochemical analysis of BCCs under anti-PD1 compared with controls using PD1, PD-L1, CD3, CD8, and CD20 stains. For the results, in all, 340 patients were included; 82 on anti-PD1, 134 on BRAFi, 69 on CombiDT, and 55 controls. BRAFi had the highest incidence of BCC (12.7%), followed by CombiDT (10.1%) and anti-PD1 (2.4%). The incidence of BCC was significantly lower in patients on anti-PD1 (2.4% vs. 19.4%; P<0.001) compared with controls. Patients on anti-PD1 were 8.54 times less likely to develop BCC than the controls [hazard ratio, 0.117 (95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.526), P=0.005]. BRAFi and CombiDT showed no significant differences in BCC incidence compared with controls. BRAFi had the highest cuSCC incidence (23.9%), followed by anti-PD1 (7.3%) and CombiDT (2.9%). The incidence of cuSCC was significantly higher in patients on BRAFi (23.9% vs. 3.5%; P<0.001) compared with controls, but anti-PD1 and CombiDT showed no differences in cuSCC incidence compared with controls. Immunohistochemistry analysis of 10 BCC from under anti-PD1 and 8 BCC from controls patients showed that while all BCC had negative PD-L1 staining, the percentage of PD1 staining in anti-PD1 group is significantly lower than that of the control group (independent t test, 8% vs. 26%; P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that anti-PD1 therapy decreases the incidence of BCC, as a result of the PD1/PD-L1 blockade. Future studies investigating the role of anti-PD1 in suppressing or treating BCC may be warranted.

With increasing use of immunotherapies such as anti-cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies, various skin toxicities have emerged. Severity of skin toxicities varies from mild lichenoid reaction to severe toxic epidermal necrolysis. Appropriate diagnosis and management of these skin toxicities are essential for optimal patient care and to avoid unnecessary cessation of anti-cancer therapies. This review summarises a wide range of cutaneous manifestations associated with immunotherapy usage in patients with metastatic melanoma., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background/objectives: Various cutaneous side-effects have been reported with anti-melanoma systemic therapies. This study investigated the changes in melanocytic lesion pigmentation in patients on four different therapies., Methods: We analysed the serial dermatoscopic photographs of atypical melanocytic lesions taken from patients with advanced metastatic melanoma on four different systemic therapies (selective BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy, dabrafenib combined with trametinib [D&T], anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [anti-PD1] therapies, and anti-PD1 combined with ipilimumab) seen from February 2013 to May 2016. We compared these changes with the melanocytic lesions of 10 control patients., Results: In the control group, 19% of naevi lightened, 64% did not change and 17% darkened. Only the BRAF inhibitor group showed more darkened lesions than controls (37%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were more lightened naevi in the D&T therapy group (86%, P < 0.001) as well as the anti-PD1 and ipilimumab groups (59%, P < 0.001) than controls. Patients on anti-PD1 monotherapy had more lightened (49%) and fewer darkened naevi (9%) than controls, but differences were not significant., Conclusions: Our study showed that different anti-melanoma systemic therapies have different effects on the pigmentation of melanocytic lesions. BRAF inhibitor may have the propensity to cause darkening while D&T therapy and anti-PD1 caused lightening compared with controls. The findings emphasise the importance of regular dermatological monitoring in specialised clinics for patients on anti-melanoma systemic therapy. Clinicians should expect changes in the global pigmentation of melanocytic lesions but be suspicious of lesions with structural changes., (© 2017 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Diffuse melanosis cutis (DMC) is a rare presentation of metastatic melanoma associated with a particularly guarded prognosis. We report a case of a 35-year-old man with BRAF(V600E) metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib (as well as ipilimumab and whole brain radiotherapy), who is alive, 25 months after the onset of his DMC. This is significantly longer than the reported mean survival of 4 months, highlighting the importance of BRAF mutation testing and the promising survival advantage of using targeted therapies compared with conventional chemotherapeutic regimens., (© 2014 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.)

Panniculitis is a rare complication of BRAF inhibitor therapy that is used to treat patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. We present a clinicopathologic review of 9 patients who developed panniculitis while on BRAF inhibitor therapy. In 13% of patients on vemurafenib, 3% of patients on dabrafenib and 10% on combination of dabrafenib + trametinib, tender erythematous nodular lesions of panniculitis appeared on legs, arms and trunk. Histological evaluation of 8 biopsies from 7 patients showed predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate in 4, lymphocytic in 1, and mixed in 3. Lesions with neutrophilic infiltrate appeared in earlier stages of treatment than those with mixed or lymphocytic infiltrate. All biopsies showed lobular involvement and 5 also had a septal component. In addition, 1 biopsy had lichenoid inflammation in the epidermis and the other had evidence of vasculitis. Most patients responded to conservative medical management without the need to reduce or to stop BRAF inhibitor therapy. Panniculitis seems to be a rare class effect of BRAF inhibitors that is predominantly lobular and neutrophilic, although other patterns can be seen.