Search

Melanoma in giant congenital nevus (M-GCN) is a rare and potentially lethal neoplasm. In children, M-GCN appears as a dermal/deep-seated melanoma (DDM-GCN) with histopathologic features difficult to distinguish from proliferative nodules (PNs-GCN). DDM-GCN in adults is an anecdotal entity and only 8 cases have been described and genetically characterized. We report the first case of DDM-GCN in a 34-year-old man characterized with a large-panel next-generation sequence (NGS) highlighting a TP53 mutation with a UV-signature (C>T substitution) in DDM but not in PNs-GCN and GCN. Curiously, DDM showed an aberrant p16 overexpression without detection of CDKN2A mutation at NGS. In line with previous studies, it supports a different pathway in children and adults: UV-induced mutations may be involved in the latter not only by CDKN2A but also by TP53 mutations, with a potentially confusing overexpression of p16 protein. While these data need to be confirmed in larger cases series, our results show that NGS could be an additional genetic diagnostic tool in DDM-GCN.

Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is considered an unfavorable prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, its detection by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) is challenging, with discordant data about its association with clinical-pathological features and no previous studies investigating the inter- (IrOA) and intra-observer (IaOA) agreement. Herein, we tested H&E and double staining (DS) for CD34/SOX10 to detect the LVI in a cohort of 92 CMs, evaluating the IrOA, the IaOA, and the association with the other clinical-pathological features. Methods: Five authors independently evaluated 92 consecutive and retrospectively enrolled cases of CMs. We assessed the IrOA (Fleiss's Kappa/FK and intraclass correlation coefficient/ICC) and the IaOA (Cohen's Kappa/CK) with both H&E and CD34/SOX10. Furthermore, we compared the LVI assessment with the two stains and analyzed the association with other clinical-pathological features [χ2 tests for dichotomous and categorical data; Student t-test (normal distribution) and Mann-Whitney U-test (non-normal distribution) for continuous data]. Results: The IrOA was almost identical with H&E (FK=0.446; ICC=0.805) and CD34/SOX10 (FK=0.454; ICC=0.810); by contrast, the IaOA was higher with H&E for one pathologist (CK: 0.809) and with CD34/SOX10 for the other one (CK: 0.563). Applying previously defined criteria, LVI was detected in 10 (9.2%) and 11 (10.1%) cases with H&E and CD34/SOX10, respectively (p = 1.000). Both H&E and CD34/SOX10 were significantly associated with vertical growth phase (H&E, p: 0.014; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.010), mitosis ≥ 1/mm2 (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.004), pT (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.001), Breslow thickness (H&E, p: 0.000; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.001), and lymph node and/or distant metastasis (H&E, p: 0.005; CD34/SOX10, p: 0.000); only H&E was associated with ulceration (p: 0.002) and distant metastasis (p: 0.000), conversely, only CD34/SOX10 was associated with lymph node metastasis (p: 0.003). Conclusions: CD34/SOX10 does not improve the IrOA and the IaOA of the LVI assessment in CM; furthermore, H&E and CD34/SOX10 show a similar profile of association with the other unfavorable clinical-pathological features of CM. As result, CD34/SOX10 could be a redundant diagnostic tool if applied for the prognostic characterization of not-selected CM in a routine diagnostic scenario.

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a tumor-associated antigen that was recently found to be expressed by malignant melanocytic lesions but not by benign ones, thus resulting useful in this diagnostic field. PRAME could also be expressed by some normal tissues and nonmelanocytic tumors, suggesting as caution should be adopted to use PRAME as a "pan-melanoma" marker for the differential diagnosis with other malignant tumors. Until now, PRAME expression was exclusively investigated through single staining with a monoclonal antibody targeting PRAME and with double staining for Melan A/PRAME found to be useful in specific diagnostic sets. Herein, we studied the expression of PRAME in 40 melanocytic lesions and 23 nonmelanocytic ones using PRAME, Melan A/PRAME, and novel double staining for HMB45/PRAME. Although our results need to be validated, they support the adoption of HMB45/PRAME, alone or in combination with PRAME and Melan A/PRAME, as a helpful marker in the diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms with a high concordance rate between primary melanoma and corresponding metastases.

Objectives Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) has a key role in regulating pluripotency of primordial germ cells and in the development of germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTT). However, its immunohistochemical expression in normal testes and its neoplastic counterpart remain largely unknown. Methods We retrospectively investigated the expression of PRAME in 26 cases of GCTT, 21 cases of germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), and 17 cases of uninvolved background testes. Results We found that PRAME was expressed more strongly by seminomatous rather than nonseminomatous GCTT (P = .000) and by pure seminoma rather than the seminoma component of seminomatous/nonseminomatous GCTT (P = .025). In addition, GCNIS and uninvolved background testes displayed high levels of PRAME expression. Conclusions PRAME is an additional marker for the differential diagnosis of GCTT and could play a key role in the transition from seminomatous to nonseminomatous GCTT.

Melanoma in giant congenital nevus (M-GCN) is a rare and potentially lethal neoplasm. In children, M-GCN appears as a dermal/deep-seated melanoma (DDM-GCN) with histopathologic features difficult to distinguish from proliferative nodules (PNs-GCN). DDM-GCN in adults is an anecdotal entity and only 8 cases have been described and genetically characterized. We report the first case of DDM-GCN in a 34-year-old man characterized with a large-panel next-generation sequence (NGS) highlighting a TP53 mutation with a UV-signature (C>T substitution) in DDM but not in PNs-GCN and GCN. Curiously, DDM showed an aberrant p16 overexpression without detection of CDKN2A mutation at NGS. In line with previous studies, it supports a different pathway in children and adults: UV-induced mutations may be involved in the latter not only by CDKN2A but also by TP53 mutations, with a potentially confusing overexpression of p16 protein. While these data need to be confirmed in larger cases series, our results show that NGS could be an additional genetic diagnostic tool in DDM-GCN.