Search

Objective: To analyse literature reviews reporting outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions directed at improving the treatment of depression. Methods: A review of English articles was performed in June 2009 using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Only review articles comparing traditional pharmacotherapy and interventions combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments were included. Extraction of articles and quality assessment of included reviews was performed independently by two authors using the AMSTAR score. Results: The articles in the final data set included research on psychotherapeutic, multi-faceted and single-component interventions. Single-component interventions have failed to demonstrate improved outcome for patients with depression. Collaborative care and additional psychotherapy have been shown to provide more benefits for patients than pharmacotherapy alone. Both approaches have a small effect on short-term treatment, and psychotherapy is the most effective for long-term prognosis in terms of preventing relapse. Conclusion: Conclusions regarding the effects of adherence-improving and multifaceted interventions are fairly certain. However, the findings about the impact of combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy on the outcomes of depression remain tentative due to the methodological limitations of available reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate experts' opinions regarding the extent to which the introduction of pretesting for polymorphism of serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTTLPR) as a routine intervention in clinical practice would lead to better clinical outcomes for depression patients. Methods: Using an internet survey system, authors of clinical studies addressing the topic of association of 5-HTTLPR genotyping with antidepressant response were contacted to participate in a Delphi study. Results: Responses from 12 experts were used for the final analysis. According to the participants, the introduction of 5-HTTLPR genotyping will lead to 33.8, 48.2, 57.8, and 65.1% of patients reaching remission at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Conclusions: According to experts, application of 5-HTTLPR pretreatment genotyping might influence remission; however, the estimated remission rates with genotyping at first sight do not appear to be superior to existing practice, i.e. without genotyping. It is anticipated that a combination of 5-HTTLPR testing with other genomic variables, which have yet to be determined, and compliance measurements can improve clinical outcomes in the future. At present, the introduction of 5-HTTLPR genotyping is expected to be used only in special situations. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]