Search

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential predictor of antidepressant treatment response. Aims: We assess changes in IR after antidepressant treatment and whether these changes have any effect on treatment response. Also, to see whether changes in IR mediates relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) and antidepressant efficacy. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial with 95 adults experiencing a major depressive episode. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for this intent-to-treat analysis. Results: When adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, there was a significant increase in IR following treatment in the overall sample (p = 0.035). This finding was detected in treatment non-responders (p = 0.019), whereas it was not observed in responders (p = 0.329). Mediation analysis revealed that change in IR during treatment was responsible for change in MADRS as well as the relationship between baseline CRP and treatment response. Conclusions: Exacerbation of IR during antidepressant treatment mediated non-response. Conversely in treatment responders IR reduced. Like previous studies, baseline CRP moderated treatment response. This relationship was also mediated by changes in IR. These findings further elucidate the role of IR in terms of antidepressant response as well as potentially explain inflammation's relationship with the latter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Herein, we sought to determine the sensitivity to change in cognitive function, as measured by the THINC-it tool, in a sample of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving standardized antidepressant therapy. Methods: Adults meeting the DSM-5 criteria for MDD with at least moderate depressive symptom severity [ i.e. , Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 20] were treated with open-label vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day, flexibly-dosed) for 8 weeks. The previously validated THINC-it tool was the primary dependent measure. The THINC-it tool was validated against the paper and pencil version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and the Trails Making Test B (TMTB). Results: After 8 weeks of treatment, adults with MDD exhibited improvement in cognitive function relative to healthy controls (e.g. , processing speed) (p = 0.031). A subdomain measure of working memory (i.e. , symbol check; SC) exhibited significant improvement at Weeks 2 and 8 in latency (p = 0.032), SC accuracy (p = 0.046), and objective z-score (p = 0.001) independent of depressive symptoms. A linear regression analysis determined that the THINC-it tool measures of processing speed, as well as executive function were significantly associated with changes observed on the pencil and paper version the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) (p = 0.002) and in Trails Making Test B (TMTB) (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusion: The THINC-it tool demonstrates sensitivity to change in adults with MDD and is highly correlated with improvements on pencil and paper versions of DSST and TMTB. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03053362. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sleep disturbances are frequently reported in patients with major depressive disorder. We aimed to investigate the effects of vortioxetine on sleep quality and association between changes in sleep and treatment response.Methods: This study is a post-hoc analysis of a clinical trial that sought to evaluate the sensitivity to cognitive change of THINC-integrated tool in patients with major depressive disorder. In total, 92 patients (aged 18 to 65) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria for moderate or severe major depressive disorder and 54 healthy controls were included. All patients received open-label vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day, flexibly dosed) for 8 weeks. Herein, the primary outcomes of interest were changes in sleep, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index, between weeks 0, 2, and 8. The association between changes in sleep and depressive symptom severity was secondarily assessed.Results: We observed that sleep, as indicated by scores of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index, was significantly poorer in patients with major depressive disorder compared to healthy controls at weeks 0, 2, and 8 (p < 0.05). Among patients with major depressive disorder, we observed significant improvements on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Insomnia Severity Index between weeks 0 and 8 (p < 0.05). We observed a significant association between improvements on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index and improvement of depressive symptoms.Conclusion: Improvement of depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder patients treated with vortioxetine was associated with significant improvements in sleep. Furthermore, improvements in sleep were predictive of antidepressant response and were linearly correlated with improvement in overall depressive symptom severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • MDD is a mental disorder characterized by aberrant emotion regulation. • Abnormal emotional control may result from dysfunctional cognitive processing. • The emotional response is comprised of affective and expressive components. • Lower limbic structures direct the expressive and affective components. • Higher cognitive structures allow for context-based emotional response modulation. Abstract Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mental disorder characterized by aberrant emotion regulation. The capacity for emotion regulation stems from diverse neural circuits including higher level cognitive structures involved in processing contextual information, and lower level limbic structures involved in triggering emotional expression. Cognitive theories of depression posit that the MDD-specific abnormalities in emotional control derive itself from dysfunctional cognitive processes including biased attention, rumination, and altered information processing and memory. The main objectives of the current narrative review are to summarize the major neural systems involved in emotion regulation in humans, and to describe how these systems are dysregulated in MDD. The findings will be briefly discussed in the context of a conceptual framework of depression (i.e., Beck's cognitive model of depression), and neural targets of conventional treatments for depression will also be discussed. MDD exemplifies the critical importance of appropriate emotion regulation to human health and wellbeing, and demonstrates the personal and social impact of emotion dys regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Compared to the 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17), the 7-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-7) would be more practical for use in busy clinical settings. Herein, we aim to evaluate (1) whether the HAMD-7 is a reliable and valid measure that is sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms, and (2) whether early improvement of depressive symptoms, as measured by the HAMD-7, is capable of predicting response and remission in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) during acute treatment with fluoxetine or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials in MDD. Internal consistency, validity, and sensitivity-to-change of the HAMD-17 and HAMD-7 were compared during acute treatment and at 3-month follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the HAMD-17 and HAMD-7.Results: The HAMD-7 is a reliable and valid measure that is sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms. Early improvement, as measured by either the HAMD-17 or HAMD-7, was capable of predicting response and remission to acute treatment with fluoxetine or ECT with good discriminative capacity.Limitations: This is a post-hoc analysis of two open-label clinical trials with limited sample sizes. All patients were Taiwanese, which limits the generalizability of our results.Conclusions: HAMD-7 is a clinically useful measure that is capable of detecting early improvement of depressive symptoms. The HAMD-7 may have the potential to inform clinical assessment as part of measurement-based care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anhedonia is a common, persistent, and disabling phenomenon in treated adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Hitherto, relatively few antidepressant agents have been evaluated with respect to their effect on anhedonia in MDD. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a primary study that sought to evaluate the sensitivity to change of the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it) in MDD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03053362). Adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD with at least moderate depressive symptom severity [i.e., Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥20] were eligible. Subjects were recruited between October 2017 and August 2018 in Toronto, Ontario at the Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation. All subjects received open-label vortioxetine (10–20 mg/day, flexibly-dosed) for 8 weeks. Herein, the primary outcome of interest was the change from baseline to endpoint in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score, as well as the MADRS anhedonia factor. The mediational effects of improvements in anhedonia on general function and quality of life, as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and the 5-Item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5), were secondarily assessed. Results: A total of 100 subjects with MDD were enrolled in the primary study and began treatment with vortioxetine. Vortioxetine significantly improved anhedonia as evidenced by significant baseline to endpoint improvements in SHAPS and MADRS anhedonia factor scores (p < 0.0001). Improvements in the SHAPS and the MADRS anhedonia factor correlated with improvements in general function (i.e., SDS) and quality of life (i.e., WHO-5) (p < 0.0001). Notably, improvements in anhedonia were found to mediate the association between improvements in overall depressive symptom severity (i.e., MADRS total score) and social functioning (i.e., social life component of the SDS) (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The unmet need in depression is to improve patient functioning and other patient-reported outcomes (e.g., quality of life). Antidepressant interventions capable of attenuating anhedonia as well as cognitive dysfunction in MDD may help in this regard, as improvement in these domains have been associated with improvement in psychosocial function and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Learning objectives: After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to: • Characterize cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder. • Evaluate approaches to treating cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder. Cognitive dysfunction is a core psychopathological domain in major depressive disorder (MDD) and is no longer considered to be a pseudo-specific phenomenon. Cognitive dysfunction in MDD is a principal determinant of patient-reported outcomes, which, hitherto, have been insufficiently targeted with existing multimodal treatments for MDD. The neural structures and substructures subserving cognitive function in MDD overlap with, yet are discrete from, those subserving emotion processing and affect regulation. Several modifiable factors influence the presence and extent of cognitive dysfunction in MDD, including clinical features (e.g., episode frequency and illness duration), comorbidity (e.g., obesity and diabetes), and iatrogenic artefact. Screening and measurement tools that comport with the clinical ecosystem are available to detect and measure cognitive function in MDD. Notwithstanding the availability of select antidepressants capable of exerting procognitive effects, most have not been sufficiently studied or rigorously evaluated. Promising pharmacological avenues, as well as psychosocial, behavioral, chronotherapeutic, and complementary alternative approaches, are currently being investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Early change in cognition was a non-significant predictor of treatment response. • Signal-to-noise ratio was low due to high heterogeneity in the cognitive data. • Future studies should stratify patients to produce more homogenous samples. • Early cognitive change may predict response in stratified MDD subpopulations. • Early change in MADRS and baseline MADRS scores were correlated with response. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy dominates current treatment in psychiatry, including treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the current trial-and-error process of medication selection contributes to treatment failure and unnecessarily exposes patients to lengthy and insufficient treatment trials. Notably, improvements in measures of cognition have been demonstrated to occur early during treatment and prior to improvements in clinical state. Cognitions have been categorized based on emotional valence (i.e., cold versus hot cognitions). Cold cognitions describe cognitive operations that are relevant to the processing of non-emotional information. The current analysis investigates whether early changes in cold cognition can predict response after 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment in adults with MDD. This was secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label study. Cognition was assessed at week 0 and week 2 to measure early cognitive change. Depressive symptom severity was assessed at week 0 and week 8 to measure treatment response. Eighty-one subjects were analyzed using binomial logistic regression models. Early change in cognition was a non-significant predictor of response (p = 0.845, SE = 0.599, OR = 1.124), which may have resulted from high data variability. The overall predictive accuracy of the model was low (sensitivity = 37.5%, specificity = 89.8%, PPV = 70.6%, NPV = 68.8%). Future studies should include larger samples and stratify patients based on potentially moderating variables, such as baseline cognitive impairment and occupation. Stratification would likely produce more homogenous samples, reducing the amount of variability observed for early cognitive change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To assess the effect of insulin resistance (IR) on treatment response to the antidepressant, vortioxetine, in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).Methods: This is a secondary analysis of an 8-week, open-label clinical trial. Ninety-five adults in a primary care setting experiencing a major depressive episode were included. Response to vortioxetine was measured using the THINC-integrated tool, Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ-5), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Generalized estimating equation models were utilized for data analysis.Results: When adjusted for age, gender, dose, and BMI, there was a significant baseline IR by time interaction for SHAPS (p = 0.022), PDQ-5 (p = 0.037), and SDS (p = 0.013). Higher baseline IR predicted decreased early improvements in anhedonia. It also predicted poorer subjective assessments of cognition and increased functional impairment at the endpoint of treatment. For functional capacity (i.e. SDS) other covariates including severity of symptoms, illness course, other metabolic factors (e.g. cholesterol), and physical activity were included with no changes to the moderating effect of baseline IR.Limitations: This was a post-hoc analysis of a primarily non-diabetic sample. Also, only one agent was assessed.Conclusions: IR was a predictor of response to vortioxetine. This persisted after controlling for other factors including, but not limited to, BMI. These findings strengthen the link between depression and IR and may point to another novel metabolic predictor of response. These findings should be replicated using other antidepressants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) for mental disorders, using application-based (app) technology capable of passive and ambient data collection, has been insufficiently evaluated and validated with rigorous, adequately-powered, high-quality studies. Herein, we sought to validate the mind.me application for the assessment of depressive symptoms in adults. Adults (ages 18–65) who self-identified as having clinically significant depressive symptoms [i.e. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) ≥ 5] utilized the mind.me app—a mobile phone technology that collects data passively and continuously, and is capable of integrating broad multimodal data [e.g., location variance (e.g. GPS), behavioural (e.g. social network activity), and communication data (e.g. SMS texting, phone calls)]. The primary outcome was predictive accuracy (i.e. convergent validity with depressive symptom measurement, as captured by the PHQ-9). 200 subjects were enrolled in the study (mean age 46 ± 12.71). The average PHQ-9 score was 12.8 ± 6.9. The predictive accuracy of the mind.me app was 0.91 ± 0.06. The sensitivity was 0.98 and the specificity was 0.93. The mind.me app was rated by 200 users as highly usable and informative to their illness. The mind.me app exhibits robust predictive accuracy in detecting depressive symptoms in adults with clinically relevant depressive symptoms. The mind.me app more specifically demonstrates convergence with the PHQ-9. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common and debilitating mood disorder. Individuals with MDD are often misdiagnosed or diagnosed in an untimely manner, exacerbating existing functional impairments. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves the repeated sampling of an individual's symptoms within their natural environment and has been demonstrated to assist in illness assessment and characterization. Capturing data in this way would set the stage for improved treatment outcomes and serve as a complementary resource in the management and treatment of depressive symptoms.Methods: Online databases PubMed/MedLine and PsycINFO were searched using PRISMA guidelines and combinations of the following keywords: EMA, depression, smartphone app, diagnosing, symptoms, phone, app, ecological momentary assessment, momentary assessment, data mining, unobtrusive, passive data, GPS, sensor.Results: A total of nineteen original articles were identified using our search parameters and ten articles met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. Among the ten relevant studies, three studies evaluated feasibility, seven evaluated detection, and three evaluated treatment of MDD.Limitations: Limitations include that the design of all of the studies included in this review are non-randomized. It should be noted that most of the studies included were pilot studies and/or exploratory trials lacking a control group.Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that the use of passive smartphone-based applications may lead to improved management of depressive symptoms. This review aids the creation of new EMA applications, highlights the potential of EMA usage in clinical settings and drug development, emphasizes the importance for regulation of applications in the mental health field, and provides insight into future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to examine whether changes in physical activity predicted reductions in depression during the 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment with vortioxetine.Methods: One hundred individuals were recruited for the (THINC-it ®)-sensitivity to change study. Self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and depression severity were assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 8. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to examine whether increases in MVPA were associated with reduction in depression severity over the course of treatment and hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether treatment response (responders vs. non-responders) at week 8 was predicted by early change in physical activity (MVPA at week 4), after controlling for individuals' demographics (sex, age, race, education level, BMI) and baseline MVPA and depression severity.Results: After controlling for individuals' demographics, a significant increase in MVPA predicted reduction in depression severity, β = -2.06, 95% CI -3.18, -0.94, p <0.001. Individuals with more physical activity at week 4 relative to baseline had higher odds of treatment response at endpoint, OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.11 - 3.48, p <0.05. Twenty-one percent of total variance of depression severity was explained by change in MVPA.Conclusions: The study suggests that early increases in physical activity may be a behavioral marker of antidepressant treatment response. The inclusion of physical activity measures in future clinical treatment trials of depression is recommended to explore whether changes in physical activity mediate or moderate reductions in depression severity associated with the primary treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anhedonia and abnormalities in reward behavior are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD). Convergent evidence indicates that overweight/obesity (OW), a highly prevalent condition in MDD, is independently associated with reward disturbances. We therefore aimed to investigate the moderating effect of OW on the willingness to expend efforts for reward in individuals with MDD and healthy controls (HC).Methods: Forty-one adults (HC n = 20, MDD n = 21) completed the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), clinical and cognitive measures. Anthropometric parameters were assessed in all participants, and an additional evaluation of laboratorial parameters were conducted solely on those with MDD. Individuals with MDD were all on vortioxetine monotherapy (10-20 mg/day).Results: Interactions between reward magnitude, group and OW were observed (χ2 = 9.192, p = 0.010); the OW-MDD group chose the hard task significantly less than normal weight (NW)-HC (p = 0.033) and OW-HC (p = 0.034), whereas there were no differences between NW-MDD and HCs. Within individuals with MDD, the proportion of hard task choices was more strongly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.456, p = 0.043) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) (r = -0.467, p = 0.038), than with depressive symptoms (r = 0.290, p = 0.214).Conclusions: OW significantly moderated the association between MDD and willingness to make efforts for rewards. These findings offer novel evidence on the potential role of metabolic factors on the basis of anhedonia, and for the heuristic models proposing a pathophysiological connection between mood and metabolic disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anhedonia is defined as a diminished ability to experience interest or pleasure, and is a critical psychopathological dimension of major depressive disorder (MDD). The purpose of the current systematic review is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of pharmacological treatments on measures of anhedonia in adults with MDD. Electronic databases Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to June 1, 2018 for longitudinal studies utilizing pharmacotherapy for the treatment of anhedonia in patients with MDD. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified (i.e., evaluated the effects of pharmacotherapy on a measure of anhedonia). Among the identified studies, the efficacy of 14 different pharmacotherapies on measures of anhedonia were evaluated, including melatonergic agents (i.e. agomelatine), monoaminergic agents (i.e. moclobemide, clomipramine, bupropion, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, amitifadine and levomilnacipran, escitalopram, and sertraline), glutamatergic agents (i.e., ketamine and riluzole), stimulants (i.e., methylphenidate), and psychedelics (i.e., psilocybin). Based on the available evidence, most antidepressants demonstrated beneficial effects on measures of anhedonia as well as the other depressive symptoms. Only escitalopram/riluzole combination treatment was ineffective in treating symptoms of anhedonia in MDD. Continued research is warranted to further support the efficacy of mechanistically-distinct antidepressants in treating symptoms of anhedonia in MDD. Future research should also aim to parse out the heterogeneous effects of different pharmacotherapies on anhedonic symptoms. • Majority of antidepressants do not show pronounced collinear improvements in anhedonia and other depressive symptoms. • Therapies targeting melatonergic receptors and circadian rhythm imbalances are more direct targets for treating anhedonia. • Ketamine may be faster acting of anti-anhedonia due to direct effect on mitochondrial energy metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: No previous study has comprehensively reviewed the application of machine learning algorithms in mood disorders populations. Herein, we qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate previous studies of machine learning-devised models that predict therapeutic outcomes in mood disorders populations.Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed from inception to February 8, 2018 for relevant studies that included adults with bipolar or unipolar depression; assessed therapeutic outcomes with a pharmacological, neuromodulatory, or manual-based psychotherapeutic intervention for depression; applied a machine learning algorithm; and reported predictors of therapeutic response. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression analyses were conducted.Results: We identified 639 records: 75 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility; 26 studies (n=17,499) and 20 studies (n=6325) were included in qualitative and quantitative review, respectively. Classification algorithms were able to predict therapeutic outcomes with an overall accuracy of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] of [0.77, 0.87]). Pooled estimates of classification accuracy were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in models informed by multiple data types (e.g., composite of phenomenological patient features and neuroimaging or peripheral gene expression data; pooled proportion [95% CI] = 0.93[0.86, 0.97]) when compared to models with lower-dimension data types (pooledproportion=0.68[0.62,0.74]to0.85[0.81,0.88]).Limitations: Most studies were retrospective; differences in machine learning algorithms and their implementation (e.g., cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning); cannot infer importance of individual variables fed into learning algorithm.Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms provide a powerful conceptual and analytic framework capable of integrating multiple data types and sources. An integrative approach may more effectively model neurobiological components as functional modules of pathophysiology embedded within the complex, social dynamics that influence the phenomenology of mental disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore differences in adipokine levels (i.e., leptin and adiponectin levels) between adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and healthy controls (HC), and to discuss the possible role of adipokine regulation in the development and progression of MDD.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted for all English and Chinese peer-reviewed articles from inception to November 2017. A random effects model was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) of leptin and/or adiponectin levels in subjects diagnosed with MDD versus HC within a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Thirty-three studies were included in this meta-analysis. In total, 4,372 (52.3%) subjects with MDD and 3,984 (47.7%) HC were compared. We identified significant lower adiponectin levels in MDD compared to HC with a small effect size (ES) (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.02; P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in leptin levels between MDD subjects and HC (SMD = 0.13; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.31; P = 0.170). The heterogeneity in the results of our meta-analysis could not be completely explained by dividing subjects into subgroups. Results from subgroup analyses suggested that studies involving samples with BMI ≥ 25 had lower adiponectin levels in subjects with MDD compared to HC, and older age samples (i.e., age ≥ 40) with BMI ≥ 25 had both higher leptin levels and lower adiponectin levels in MDD subjects as compared to HC.Limitations: The heterogeneity of included studies, small sample sizes, and potential publication bias were significant limitations.Conclusions: The current systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that lower adiponectin levels may be associated with MDD. Moreover, the results suggest that males expressing lower adiponectin and leptin levels have an increased likelihood of developing MDD. Future studies should aim to investigate the manifestation of depressive phenotypes in older, obese populations with altered metabolic profiles resulting from adipokine dysregulation. The review has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42018082733). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psychosocial impairment represents an important treatment target in major depressive disorder (MDD). The majority of patients with MDD do not regain premorbid levels of psychosocial functioning despite the resolution of core depressive symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the respective effects of cognitive function and depression severity on impaired psychosocial function in MDD.Methods: Adults aged 18-65 with moderate-to-severe MDD (n = 100) and age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls participated in a cross-sectional study validating the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it), a cognitive screening tool comprised of objective and subjective measures of cognitive function. Depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and psychosocial function was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).Results: Subjects with MDD reported greater impairment in psychosocial function than healthy controls, with significant differences in SDS total and domain scores (ps < .01) after controlling for age, sex, and education. Generalized linear models indicated that subjective cognitive function was most strongly associated with SDS total score (RR = .14, p = .01) and SDS domains of work/school (RR = .15, p = .03), family and home responsibilities (RR = .15, p = .02), and economic days lost (RR = .18, p =.03). Depression severity was most strongly associated with SDS social life (RR = .08, p < .01) and economic days underproductive (RR = .07, p < .01). Objective cognitive function was not significantly associated with any SDS outcomes.Limitations: The cross-sectional, observational study design limits temporal inferences. The self-report nature of measures included may have influenced associations observed. Potential medication effects are not noted.Conclusions: Cognitive deficits, as measured by the THINC-it, are associated with significant psychosocial impairment in MDD. These results provide empirical support for the assessment of both subjective and objective measures of cognition, as they are not associated with each other and have differential effects on functional trajectory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Mood disorders are associated with an increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) • In total, 69 of the 498 mood disorder participants reported a diagnosis of IBS (13.8%) • BD was associated with elevated rates of IBS compared to MDD • History of childhood sexual abuse was associated with increased rates of IBS in mood disorder participants • In the subgroups, history of sexual abuse was associated with an increased prevalence of IBS in BD, but not in MDD. The objective of the current study was to assess the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in mood disorder patients. Self-report data from the International Mood Disorders Collaborative Project were cross-sectionally analyzed to compare rates of IBS in participants with confirmed diagnoses of major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 279) or bipolar disorder (BD; n = 219). Data was sub-grouped and compared based on history of ACEs. In total, 69 of the 498 participants reported a diagnosis of IBS (13.8%). BD was associated with significantly elevated rates of IBS compared to MDD (18.5% versus 10.1% respectively). After adjusting for age and sex, history of childhood sexual abuse was associated with increased rates of IBS in mood disorder participants [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.95]. In the MDD subgroup, ACEs (all categories and individual categories) were not associated with increased rates of IBS. In the BD subgroup, history of childhood sexual abuse was associated with significantly increased rates of IBS (38% versus 14%; aOR = 3.7). In summary, BD was associated with a higher prevalence of IBS compared to MDD. Additionally, history of sexual abuse was associated with an increased prevalence of IBS in BD, but not in MDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]