Search

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were initially identified as progenitors of skeletal tissues within mammalian bone marrow and cells with similar properties were also obtained from other tissues such as adipose and dental pulp. Although MSCs have been extensively investigated, their native behavior and in vivo identity remain poorly defined. Uncovering the in vivo identity of MSCs has been challenging due to the lack of exclusive cell markers, cellular alterations caused by culture methods, and extensive focus on in vitro properties for characterization. Although MSC site of origin influences their functional properties, these mesenchymal progenitors can be found in the perivascular space in virtually all organs from where they were obtained. However, the precise identity of MSCs within the vascular wall is highly controversial. The recurrent concept that MSCs correspond to pericytes in vivo has been supported mainly by their perivascular localization and expression of some molecular markers. However, this view has been a subject of controversy, in part, due to the application of loose criteria to define pericytes and due to the lack of a marker able to unequivocally identify these cells. Furthermore, recent evidences indicate that subpopulations of MSCs can be found at extravascular sites such as the endosteum. In this opinion review, we bring together the advances and pitfalls on the search for the in vivo identity of MSCs and highlight the recent evidences that suggest that perivascular MSCs are adventitial cells, acting as precursors of pericytes and other stromal cells during tissue homeostasis.

Pericytes (PCs) are a subset of perivascular cells that can give rise to mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) when culture-expanded, and are postulated to give rise to MSC-like cells during tissue repair in vivo. PCs have been suggested to behave as stem cells (SCs) in situ in animal models, although evidence for this role in humans is lacking. Here, we analyzed the transcriptomes of highly purified, non-cultured adipose tissue (AT)-derived PCs (ATPCs) to detect gene expression changes that occur as they acquire MSC characteristics in vitro, and evaluated the hypothesis that human ATPCs exhibit a gene expression profile compatible with an AT SC phenotype. The results showed ATPCs are non-proliferative and express genes characteristic not only of PCs, but also of AT stem/progenitor cells. Additional analyses defined a gene expression signature for ATPCs, and revealed putative novel ATPC markers. Almost all AT stem/progenitor cell genes differentially expressed by ATPCs were not expressed by ATMSCs or culture-expanded ATPCs. Genes expressed by ATMSCs but not by ATPCs were also identified. These findings strengthen the hypothesis that PCs are SCs in vascularized tissues, highlight gene expression changes they undergo as they assume an MSC phenotype, and provide new insights into PC biology., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are cultured cells that can give rise to mature mesenchymal cells under appropriate conditions and secrete a number of biologically relevant molecules that may play an important role in regenerative medicine. Evidence indicates that pericytes (PCs) correspond to mesenchymal stem cells in vivo and can give rise to MSCs when cultured, but a comparison between the gene expression profiles of cultured PCs (cPCs) and MSCs is lacking. We have devised a novel methodology to isolate PCs from human adipose tissue and compared cPCs to MSCs obtained through traditional methods. Freshly isolated PCs expressed CD34, CD140b, and CD271 on their surface, but not CD146. Both MSCs and cPCs were able to differentiate along mesenchymal pathways in vitro, displayed an essentially identical surface immunophenotype, and exhibited the ability to suppress CD3(+) lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. Microarray expression data of cPCs and MSCs formed a single cluster among other cell types. Further analyses showed that the gene expression profiles of cPCs and MSCs are extremely similar, although MSCs differentially expressed endothelial cell (EC)-specific transcripts. These results confirm, using the power of transcriptomic analysis, that PCs give rise to MSCs and suggest that low levels of ECs may persist in MSC cultures established using traditional protocols.

Genetic reprogramming of adult cells to generate induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells is a new and important step in sidestepping some of the ethical issues and risks involved in the use of embryonic stem cells. iPS cells can be generated by introduction of transcription factors, such as OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and CMYC. iPS cells resemble embryonic stem cells in their properties and differentiation potential. The mechanisms that lead to induced pluripotency and the effect of each transcription factor are not completely understood. We performed a critical evaluation of the effect of overexpressing OCT4 in mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts and found that OCT4 can activate the expression of other stemness genes, such as SOX2, NANOG, CMYC, FOXD3, KLF4, and βCATENIN, which are not normally or are very weakly expressed in mesenchymal stem cells. Transient expression of OCT4 was also performed to evaluate whether these genes are affected by its overexpression in the first 48 h. Transfected fibroblast cells expressed around 275-fold more OCT4 than non-transfected cells. In transient expression, in which cells were analyzed after 48 h, we detected only the up-regulation of FOXD3, SOX2, and KLF4 genes, suggesting that these genes are the earlier targets of OCT4 in this cellular type. We conclude that forced expression of OCT4 can alter cell status and activate the pluripotent network. Knowledge gained through study of these systems may help us to understand the kinetics and mechanism of cell reprogramming.