Search

Objective: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a relatively new treatment modality for various types of cancer, including cancer of the head and neck. The advent of the second-generation photosensitizers such as meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) (Foscan; Scotia Pharmaceuticals, Stirling, Scotland), which are more effective and less phototoxic to the skin than their forerunners, now makes this treatment a feasible alternative to surgery or radiotherapy in specific cases. To evaluate the long-term outcome of this therapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, we treated patients with PDT using mTHPC., Design: Prospective study., Setting: Tertiary cancer referral center., Patients: Twenty-five patients with 29 T1-T2 N0 tumors of the oral cavity and/or oropharynx., Intervention: Photodynamic therapy., Main Outcome Measure: Complete local tumor remission., Results: The mean follow-up of the patients after treatment was 37 months. In 25 (86%) of 29 tumors, a complete remission of the primary tumor was obtained. In the 4 recurrences, salvage was achieved by conventional therapy. In none of the patients was any long-term functional deficit detected., Conclusions: This study confirms that PDT is a powerful treatment modality that could be considered as an alternative to surgery or radiotherapy in specific cases of head and neck cancer. The major advantage of PDT over these conventional therapies is the reduction in long-term morbidity. Radiotherapy or surgery could be reserved for salvage therapy in the event of a recurrence or second primary tumors.

Clinical photodynamic therapy (PDT) schedules are based on the assumption that optimum drug-light intervals are times at which there is a maximum differential between photosensitiser retention in the tumour and surrounding normal tissue. However, vascular-mediated effects contribute to tumour destruction by PDT; therefore, plasma sensitiser levels and endothelial cell drug exposure could also be important determinants of PDT response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of tumour, tissue and plasma concentrations of the photosensitiser Foscan (meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin, mTHPC) on PDT response. Groups of BalbC nude mice, bearing human mesothelioma xenografts (H-MESO1) were injected (i.v.) with a single dose of (14)C-labelled mTHPC, or with two doses, separated by 72 h. Drug levels in plasma, tumour and normal tissues were measured at 5 min to 120 h after drug administration. The PDT tumour and skin responses were evaluated by illuminating separate groups mice at intervals of 5 min to 120 h after injection of Foscan (nonlabelled). Drug levels in both tumour and skin increased during the first 24 h after a single injection, and remained almost constant for at least 120 h. The second injection produced a further, rapid increase in mTHPC levels in tumours and skin, with steady state being maintained from 20 min to 120 h. By contrast, PDT response of both tumours and skin were maximal for illumination at 1-3 h after drug, with very little response when illumination was given 48-120 h after drug. There was no significant correlation between tumour or skin drug level and PDT response. There was, however, a significant correlation between plasma drug levels and tumour or skin response, excluding an initial distribution time of 20 min. These studies demonstrate a pronounced disassociation between tumour drug levels and optimum drug-light intervals for PDT response with Foscan. We suggest that the PDT effect, in both tumours and normal tissues, is largely mediated via vascular damage and that the selectivity of PDT is not based on differential tumour drug uptake.

A challenge in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is to improve the tumour selectivity of the photosensitizers by using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). With this aim, we developed MAb-conjugates with the hydrophobic photosensitizer meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and with the hydrophilic sensitizer aluminium (III) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (AlPcS(4)). The capacity of these photoimmunoconjugates for selective targeting of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in vivo was demonstrated previously in SCC-bearing nude mice. Preliminary in vitro PDT studies with the vulvar SCC cell line A431 showed promising phototoxicity with both sensitizers when coupled to the internalizing MAb 425. To rank the photosensitizers for their potential in photoimmunotherapy, we herein describe an extensive in vitro evaluation of mTHPC-MAb and AlPcS(4)-MAb conjugates. Both classes of conjugates were directly compared using 5 different SCC cell lines as target and 3 different MAbs (BIWA 4, E48 and 425) for tumour cell targeting. In contrast to free AlPcS(4) (IC(50) > or = 700 nM), MAb-conjugated AlPcS(4) was found to be highly phototoxic in PDT in all 5 cell lines. AlPcS(4)-BIWA 4 was most consistently effective with IC(50) values ranging from 0.06-5.4 nM. mTHPC-MAb conjugates were in general hardly effective. Phototoxicity (log IC(50)) of the AlPcS(4)-MAb conjugates was found to be strongly correlated with their total cell binding capacity (internalized and surface bound) and to be less correlated with their internalization capacity. In conclusion, these data show a high potential of AlPcS(4)-MAb conjugates in comparison to mTHPC-MAb conjugates for use in PDT., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a convenient and effective method of treating small superficial tumours. New second-generation photosensitizers offer some advantages over first-generation sensitizers such as haematoporphyrin derivatives., Objectives: To define the optimal treatment parameters (drug dose, light dose and time interval) using meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) as a photosensitizer in patients with multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs)., Methods: Light of 652 nm (100 mW cm(-2)) was used for illuminating different tumours (n = 187) with light doses of 5--15 J cm(-2). Following an intravenous injection of 0.1 mg kg(-1) mTHPC each patient (n = 5) was illuminated on 4 consecutive days. Each day at least three BCCs per patient were treated with PDT., Results: Response evaluation at 6, 12 and 18 months showed maximum responses for illumination with 10 or 15 J cm(-2) on days 1 or 2 after injection (86% complete responses). Normal tissue reactions (oedema and erythema) around the treatment site were more severe on day 1 than after longer intervals., Conclusions: mTHPC is a very effective photosensitizer; short illumination times can result in long-term cures with good cosmetic healing and with skin phototoxicity of short duration.

Effective photodynamic therapy (PDT) depends on the optimization of factors such as drug dose, drug-light interval, fluence rate and total light dose (or fluence). In addition sufficient oxygen has to be present for the photochemical reaction to occur. Oxygen deficits may arise during PDT if the photochemical reaction consumes oxygen more rapidly than it can be replenished, and this could limit the efficacy of PDT. In this study we investigated the influence of the drug-light interval, illumination-fluence rate and total fluence on PDT efficacy for the photosensitizer meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC). The effect of increasing the oxygenation status of tumors during PDT was also investigated. PDT response was assessed from tumor-growth delay and from cures for human malignant mesothelioma xenografts grown in nude mice. Tumor-bearing mice were injected intravenously with 0.15 or 0.3 mg.kg-1 mTHPC, and after intervals of 24-120 h, the subcutaneous tumors were illuminated with laser light (652 nm) at fluence rates of 20, 100 or 200 mW.cm-2. Tumor response was strongly dependent on the drug-light interval. Illumination at 24 h after photosensitization was always significantly more effective than illumination at 72 or 120 h. For a drug-light interval of 24 h the tumor response increased with total fluence, but for longer drug-light intervals even high total fluences failed to produce a significant delay in tumor regrowth. No fluence-rate dependence of PDT response was demonstrated in these studies. Nicotinamide injection and carbogen breathing significantly increased tumor oxygenation and increased the tumor response for PDT schedules with illumination at 24 h after photosensitizer injection.

A limitation of photodynamic therapy is the lack of tumor selectivity of the photosensitizer. To overcome this problem, a protocol was developed for coupling of meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC), one of the most promising photosensitizers, to tumor-selective monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). mTHPC was radiolabeled with 131I to facilitate the assessment of the in vitro and in vivo behavior. After the modification to 131I-mTHPC-(CH2COOH)4, thus increasing the water solubility and creating a functional moiety suitable for coupling, conjugation was performed using a labile ester. Insoluble aggregates were not formed when mTHPC-MAb conjugates with a molar ratio of up to 4 were prepared. These conjugates showed a minimal impairment of the integrity on SDS-PAGE, full stability in serum in vitro, and an optimal immunoreactivity. To test the in vivo behavior of the mTHPC-MAb conjugates, the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-selective chimeric MAb U36 was used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-bearing nude mice. Biodistribution data showed that the tumor selectivity of cMAb U36-conjugated mTHPC was increased in comparison with free mTHPC, despite the fact that conjugates with a higher mTHPC:MAb ratio were more rapidly cleared from the blood. Preliminary results on the in vitro efficacy of photodynamic therapy with MAb-conjugated mTHPC showed that mTHPC coupled to the internalizing murine MAb 425 exhibited more phototoxicity than when coupled to the noninternalizing chimeric MAb U36.

Distribution of the photosensitizer Foscan (meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin, mTHPC), after i.v. or i.p. injection, was investigated in Wag/Rij rats bearing i.p. tumours. These results were compared with the efficacy of mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy for illumination intervals of 4 hr to 3 days. For the distribution experiments a single tumour (CC53I colon carcinoma) was implanted intra-abdominally in a fat pad, or a cell suspension (1 x 10(6) CC531 cells) was injected into the peritoneal cavity, which results in a dissemination of tumour nodules on the peritoneum. 14C-mTHPC was not selectively taken up in the single-tumour model after i.v. or i.p. injection, but higher concentrations were achieved for i.p. administration. For this tumour model the concentration ratios between tumour and normal tissue never exceeded a value of 3. In the disseminated-tumour model, an uptake of up to 40% of the injected dose was found per gram tumour at 4 hr after an i.p. injection and this resulted in very high (> 14) concentration ratios of tumour to normal tissues. Low uptake was found after the i.v. injection route (1% of the injected dose per gram tumour) with lower tumour/normal tissue ratios (<8). The efficacy of i.p. photodynamic therapy (IPPDT) was evaluated using the single-tumour model only. The lower abdomen was illuminated at 4 hr to 3 days after mTHPC, and tumour size was repeatedly measured via a small laparoscopy. Significant delay in tumour regrowth was achieved for 6 J x cm-2 at 1 day after i.v., or at 4 hr after i.p. mTHPC (p values 0.019 and 0.045 respectively). Response to PDT, of tumours implanted in the fat pad, was not greater for i.p. administration of the photosensitizer and there was a poor correlation between times of maximum drug uptake in tumours and optimal illumination times for PDT efficacy.

Preferential retention of photosensitizers in tumours has always been one of the major goals in the search for new photosensitizers and has determined the design of clinical trials with respect to the interval between drug administration and illumination. The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of tumour and plasma concentrations of Foscan (mTHPC, meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin) in relation to PDT effect. Both pharmacokinetic and tumour response studies were carried out in mice bearing s.c. RIF1 tumours. mTHPC was injected in 1 or 2 doses of 0.3 mg x kg-1. For distribution studies, 14C-labelled mTHPC was given 5 min to 48 hr before determination of plasma and tumour drug levels. Non-labelled sensitizer was used to determine the PDT efficacy for illumination at 5 min to 48 hr after drug administration. PDT efficacy was greatest for illumination at 1 to 3 hr, and for an interval of 48 hr there was no significant tumour-growth delay. In contrast, mTHPC tumour drug levels reached a maximum 6 hr after injection and remained high for 48 hr. A comparison of pharmacokinetics and response studies revealed no significant correlation between tumour mTHPC levels and tumour response. There was, however, a significant correlation between plasma drug levels and tumour response for time intervals of 1 to 48 hr. This association may imply that PDT protocols should use shorter drug-light intervals in combination with lower drug doses. This would increase safety and decrease the extent and duration of normal tissue photosensitization.

Various schedules of fractionated photodynamic therapy (PDT), delivered at two different light fluence rates, were investigated in the RIF1 tumor model in an attempt to minimize the development of hypoxia during PDT and thereby improve tumor response relative to single treatments. The photosensitizers Photofrin and meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) were used in combination with either interstitial or superficial illumination. For both methods of illumination, equal volumetric light doses gave similar tumor responses, as measured by tumor regrowth times and number of cures. Fractionation of superficial illumination did not generally improve tumor response compared with a single illumination with the same total light dose. The only fractionated schedules which demonstrated a trend for increased cure were six fractions of superficial illumination given with short (1 h) dark periods between illuminations. Using both photosensitizers, an increase in tumor regrowth time occurred when tumors were illuminated interstitially with continuous light at a linear diffuser output of 50 mW compared with 100 mW per cm diffuser length. Discontinuous illumination with alternating light and dark periods of 30 s improved the tumor response further for mTHPC-mediated PDT at a fluence rate of 100 mW cm(-1). No improvement in response was seen by discontinuous interstitial illumination after Photofrin-mediated PDT. These results demonstrate that lower fluence rates and/or fractionating the light dose delivered can improve the response of the RIF1 tumor to PDT but that the choice of dark intervals between fractions is critical.

The new photosensitizer, meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTPHC) was compared with Photofrin in the murine RIF1 tumour and in normal mouse skin. A range of mTHPC or Photofrin doses were given at intervals of 1 hr to 7 days before illumination. mTHPC-PDT resulted in much higher tumour phototoxicity with longer regrowth delays and more cures. The RIF1 tumour could be effectively treated with 30 J cm-1 (interstitial illumination) at 1 day after mTHPC, whereas 4 to 13 times higher light doses were required with Photofrin for an equivalent anti-tumour effect. High doses of mTHPC also caused more skin phototoxicity (superficial illumination) than Photofrin for the 1-day illumination interval. Evaluating both tumour and normal skin photosensitization, the largest therapeutic gain factor (TGF) for mTHPC-PDT was achieved with a low drug dose (0.15 mg kg-1) at 1 day before illumination (TGF = 5.6, relative to Photofrin PDT). The duration of cutaneous photosensitivity for mTHPC was shorter than for Photofrin. The light dose required to produce a desquamation response in 50% of the animals increased more than 20-fold over the period 1 to 7 days after high doses of mTHPC, whereas this light dose only increased by a factor of 2 from 1 to 7 days after Photofrin. The large therapeutic gains seen for mTHPC-mediated PDT compared to Photofrin, plus the rapid fading of skin photosensitization, suggest that mTHPC is a potent photosensitizer suitable for clinical testing.