Search

Background: Autologous blood transfusion (ABT) drainage system is a new unwashed salvaged blood retransfusion system for total knee replacement (TKA). However, whether to use ABT drainage, closed-suction (CS) drainage or no drainage in TKA surgery remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficiency, safety and potential advantages regarding the use of ABT drains compared with closed-suction/no drainage.Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched in March 2015. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and pooled for statistical analysis. The primary outcome evaluated was homologous blood transfusion rate. The secondary outcomes were post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections after TKA surgery.Results: The pooled data included 1,721 patients and showed that patients in the ABT drainage group might benefit from lower blood transfusion rates (16.59 % and 37.47 %, OR: 0.28 [0.14, 0.55]; 13.05 % and 16.91 %, OR: 0.73 [0.47,1.13], respectively). Autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage have similar clinical efficacy and safety with regard to post-operative haemoglobin on days 3-5, length of hospital stay and wound infections.Conclusions: Autologous blood transfusion drainage offers a safe and efficient alternative to CS/no drainage with a lower blood transfusion rate. Future large-volume high-quality RCTs with extensive follow-up will affirm and update this system review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although enteral nutrition (EN) is effective for induction therapy in Crohn's disease (CD), it remains unclear whether partial enteral nutrition (PEN), i.e., EN, along with a daily diet, is effective for maintenance therapy in CD. It was hypothesized that PEN would be effective as a maintenance therapy in CD. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEN for maintenance therapy in CD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2019 for eligible prospective controlled trials, and then a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was clinical relapse, as defined in the primary studies. Eight studies with 429 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of clinical relapse at 0.5 to 2 years was significantly lower in patients receiving PEN (420-1800 kcal/d) than in those not receiving nutrition therapy (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.82, P <.01; number needed to treat = 5, P <.01). Patients receiving PEN exhibited a higher frequency of clinical remission maintenance at 0.5 to 1 year (67%) than did those not receiving nutrition therapy (48%; RR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64, P =.01). The total adverse event rate was comparable in the two groups (RR: 3.60, 95% CI: 0.70-18.66, P =.13). PEN may be more effective than the absence of EN therapy for the maintenance of remission in CD with a good safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]