Search

Published data on the association between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between the p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser, Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Ser), dominant model (Arg/Arg + Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser), and recessive model (Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Arg + Ser/Ser). A total of 21 studies including 22,109 cases and 29,127 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was found for Caucasians (Arg/Arg vs. Ser/Ser: OR 1.496, 95% CI 1.164-1.924; and recessive model: OR 1.492, 95% CI 1.161-1.919). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found for population-based studies (Ser/Arg vs. Ser/Ser: OR 1.085, 95% CI 1.019-1.156). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism may be associated with breast cancer development in Caucasian. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well-matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Published data on the association between microRNA-146a (miR-146a) G/C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 23 studies including 10,585 cases and 12,183 controls were used in the meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between miR-146a G/C polymorphism and cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (GC vs. CC: OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.94–1.24; GG vs. CC: OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.93–1.37; dominant model: OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.94–1.26). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, statistically significantly increased risks were found for papillary thyroid carcinoma (GC vs. CC: OR=3.44, 95% CI=1.86–6.34; GG vs. CC: OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.22–3.99; dominant model: OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.48–4.83). In the subgroup analysis by population-based controls or hospital-based controls, no statistically significantly increased risks were found. Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-146a G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma development. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), which plays an important role in detoxification pathways to protect against damage caused by reactive metabolites of chemicals, has been considered as potential gastric cancer susceptibility genes. However, the published data on the association between GSTM1 present/null polymorphism and gastric cancer risk are still inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Totally, 44 studies including 5440 cases and 11607 controls were involved in the analysis. When all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, obviously increased gastric cancer risk was found in null genotype carriers (OR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.08–1.33). When stratified by ethnicity, obviously evaluated risk was found in Asians (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.11–1.54) but not reached to statistically significance in Caucasians (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.96–1.28). In the subgroup analysis by hospital-based studies or population-based studies, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in hospital-based studies (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.07–1.67) but not reached to statistically significance in population-based studies (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.99–1.25). In summary, this meta-analysis result indicates that the GSTM1 null genotype is a low-penetrant risk factor for gastric cancer development in Asians. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]