Search

Background: Pleural effusion can be caused by a wide range of benign and malignant conditions. Pleural biopsy and effusion cytology represent two key methods of pathological diagnosis. To compare the performance these two methods, a large cohort of matched pleural biopsy and effusion cytology with clinical follow‐up was reviewed. Methods: Pleural biopsies and effusion cytology specimens over a period of 18 years were retrieved. Cytology specimens collected within 7 days of pleural biopsy were matched. Reports were reviewed, and the cause for pleural effusion was determined by hospital disease coding and clinical data. Results: Totally, 3026 cases were included. The leading cause of benign effusion was tuberculosis (n = 650). Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) was more common in older females (p < 0.001) and mostly due to lung cancer (n = 959), breast cancer (n = 64), and mesothelioma (n = 48). The inadequate/insufficient (B1/C1) rate of biopsy was higher than cytology (15.6% vs. 0.3%) but the rates for other diagnostic categories were similar. Biopsy and cytology showed a correlation coefficient of 0.315, improving to 0.449 when inadequate/insufficient (B1/C1) cases were excluded. The ROM for benign cytology (C2) was lower than biopsy (B2) (p < 0.001). Compared with biopsy, the diagnostic accuracy was higher in cytology overall and for metastatic carcinomas (p < 0.001) but lower for hematolymphoid malignancies (p = 0.014) and mesotheliomas (p = 0.002). Conclusions: These results suggest that effusion cytology may be better for confirming benignity and diagnosing carcinomatous MPE. In these cases, pleural biopsy may be withheld to reduce procedural risks. However, for suspected hematolymphoid malignancies and mesothelioma, biopsy should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Papillary structures are frequently encountered in metastatic carcinomas from various organs and tumours of different histotypes. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the clinical parameters which can be examined in the assessment of the primary sites of metastatic carcinomas with papillary architecture. Methods: FNAC samples of metastatic carcinomas with papillary architecture were evaluated for overall cellularity, epithelial cohesion, background features, papillary architecture, cytology and IHC. The corresponding clinical information was also reviewed. Results: A total of 130 cases were included. The most common primary sites were thyroid (38.5%), lung (30.8%) and gynecological organs (22.3%); the others were pancreaticobiliary, urothelial, colorectal, and esophageal. Age (P = 0.039), biopsy site (P < 0.001) and laterality (P = 0.006) correlated with primary site. Papillary structures were confirmed on biopsy/excision of most cases (n = 85/87, 97.7%). Thyroid primaries exhibited broad papillary stalks, thin lining epithelium, fewer epithelial polymorphs, and the presence of background giant cells and histiocytes (P = 0.021‐ < 0.001). Low‐grade cytological features, nuclear grooves and inclusions (P < 0.001) were seen in thyroid primaries. High‐grade features (P < 0.001‐0.49), multinucleated tumour cells, apoptotic bodies and mitoses (P < 0.001‐0.49) were more common in lung/gynecological primaries. Multivariate analysis identified nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, chromatin character, the presence of nuclear grooves and mitosis as independent features (P = 0.001‐0.024). TTF1/TGB/PAX8 panel results showed good agreement with the cytological assessment and site of primary. Conclusion: Papillary structures and cytological features are reproducible in FNAC assessment of metastases and their corresponding primary sites. Cytological features, IHC and clinical information are invaluable in determining the primary site. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]