Search

The aim of this phase II trial was to estimate the objective response rate (ORR) of two different schedules of ixabepilone [weekly or every 3 weeks (Q3W)] combined with bevacizumab, relative to a reference arm of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were randomized 3:3:2 to ixabepilone 16 mg/m(2) weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W (Arm A: n = 46); ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) Q3W (reduced to 32 mg/m(2) after four cycles of treatment) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Q3W (Arm B: n = 45); or paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion Q2W (Arm C: n = 32). Of 123 randomized patients, 122 were treated. All were followed for ≥19 months; 5 % of patients remained on study treatment at the time of this analysis. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common in Arm B (60 %) than Arms A (16 %) or C (22 %); other adverse events were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR was 48, 71, and 63 % for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival (randomized patients) was 9.6 months in Arm A, 11.9 months in Arm B, and 13.5 months in Arm C. In conclusion, ixabepilone Q3W plus bevacizumab has clinical activity as first-line therapy for MBC relative to paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, but with significantly greater risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. In addition, these data suggest that weekly dosing of ixabepilone may be less active than Q3W dosing, but with less neutropenia.

Purpose: The present study was performed to examine relationships between systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites (5-FU, 5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) and toxicity or clinical response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model for capecitabine and its three metabolites was built. Typical parameter values, characteristics of random distributions, associated with parameters, and covariates impact were estimated. Area under the curve (AUC) were computed for 5-FU and compared with grades of toxicity. Pharmacokinetic modeling was based on data collected on the first treatment cycle. Toxicity was assessed on the two first treatment cycles.Results: The study was conducted in 43 patients. The population pharmacokinetic model (a one-compartment model per compound) was able to capture the very complex absorption process of capecitabine. Statistically significant covariates were cytidine deaminase, alkaline phosphatase and dihydrouracilemia (UH2)/uracilemia (U) ratio. UH2/U ratio was the most significant covariate on 5-FU elimination and CDA on the transformation of 5'-DFCR in 5'-DFUR. A trend was observed between 5-FU AUC and thrombopenia toxicity grades, but not with other toxicities. Best clinical response was not linked to systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites.Conclusion: In our study, we propose a model able to describe, meanwhile, and its main metabolites, with a complex absorption process and inclusion of enzyme activity covariates such as CDA and UH2/U ratio. Trial registration Eudract 2008-004136-20, 2008/11/26. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the phase 3 MARIANNE trial, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with or without pertuzumab showed noninferior progression-free survival and better tolerability than trastuzumab plus a taxane (HT) for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer. This article reports the final descriptive overall survival (OS) analysis, updated safety data, and additional patient-reported outcomes and biomarker analyses.Methods: OS was assessed in 1095 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and no prior therapy for advanced disease who had been randomized to HT, T-DM1 plus a placebo (hereafter T-DM1), or T-DM1 plus pertuzumab (T-DM1+pertuzumab). A post hoc exploratory landmark analysis of OS, baseline patient and disease characteristics, and tumor biomarkers in patients with and without an objective tumor response (OR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors within 6.5 months of randomization was conducted.Results: The median OS was similar across groups (50.9, 53.7, and 51.8 months for the HT, T-DM1, and T-DM1+pertuzumab groups, respectively). Among patients with an OR, the median OS was longer with T-DM1 (64.4 months) and T-DM1+pertuzumab (not reached) versus HT (56.3 months). No baseline characteristics or biomarkers were strongly associated with OR. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was greater with HT (55.8%) than T-DM1 (47.1%) or T-DM1+pertuzumab (48.6%). The median time to clinically meaningful deterioration (a 3-point or greater change) in neurotoxicity symptoms was shorter with HT (2.1 months) and T-DM1+pertuzumab (4.2 months) than T-DM1 (6.2 months). Fewer patients reported alopecia and diarrhea and were bothered by treatment side effects in the T-DM1 arm.Conclusions: These results support T-DM1 as a first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who are deemed unsuitable for taxane-based therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Eribulin is approved for advanced breast cancers refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes. Efficacy according to sensitivity to previous therapies has been poorly explored. Materials and Methods Safety data were collected prospectively and we retrospectively collected efficacy data from the five French centres that participated in the Eribulin E7389-G000-398 expanded access program. Our main objectives were exploration of safety and analysis of eribulin efficacy (progression- free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) according to sensitivity to the last microtubule-inhibiting agent administered. Results Median eribulin treatment duration was 3.3 months for the 250 patients included in this prospective single-arm study. Two hundreds and thirty-nine patients (95.6%) experienced an adverse event (AE) related to treatment including 129 (51.6%) with grade ≥ 3 AEs. The most frequently observed toxicities were cytopenias (59.6% of included patients), gastrointestinal disorders (59.2%), and asthenia (56.4%). The most frequent grade 3-4 AE was neutropenia (37.2% with 4.8% febrile neutropenia). Median PFS and OS were 4.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. Patients classified as responders to the last microtubule-inhibiting therapy had a longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.94; p=0.017), and tended to display a better PFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.04; p=0.086). OS improvement was still significant in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.79; p=0.002). Conclusion This work based on a prospective study suggests that identification of patients likely to be more sensitive to eribulin could be based on their previous response to microtubules inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Evidence-based definitions of ‘poor-prognosis’ or ‘aggressive’ advanced breast cancer are lacking. Patients and methods We developed a prognostic factor index using data from 2203 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Results The risk factors most closely associated with worse OS were: disease-free interval ≤24 months; liver metastases or ≥3 involved organ sites; prior anthracycline and/or taxane therapy; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); and performance status 2 or prior analgesic/corticosteroid treatment. Risk of death was increased threefold in patients with ≥3 versus ≤1 risk factors (hazard ratio 3.0 [95% CI 2.6–3.4; p < 0.001]; median 16.0 vs 38.8 months, respectively). Conclusions This prognostic index may enable identification of patients with a poorer prognosis in whom more intensive systemic regimens may be appropriate. The index may also be considered in designing new trials, although it requires validation in other datasets before extrapolation to non-bevacizumab-containing therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00448591 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To carry out a cost-minimization analysis including a comparison of the costs arising from first-line treatment by trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus trastuzumab plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: All consecutive patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-postive metastatic breast cancer who were treated at Besanc¸on University Hospital and Saint Vincent private hospital between 2001 and 2010 by first-line therapy containing trastuzumab plus taxane were retrospectively studied. Economic analysis took into account costs related to drugs, hospitalization, and healthcare travel. Results: Progression-free survival difference between the two treatments was not significant (p¼0.65). First-line treatment by trastuzumab plus taxane was estimated at approximately E68,000 (p¼0.74). The drug costs represented around 70–75% of the total cost, mainly related to the use of trastuzumab. Conclusion: Our economic analysis shows that although the costs of the two trastuzumab plus taxane regimens are similar, they may contribute to the on-going debate about the availability and use of innovative chemotherapy drugs, in particular in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer with new therapies such as trastuzumab-DM1 and pertuzumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Oncologic treatment in elderly patients is challenging, due to comorbidities, often impaired organ function, limited clinical trial evidence, inadequate guidelines and no consistent ‘elderly’ definition. We report exploratory sub-analyses of safety and efficacy in elderly patients, defined as ⩾65years old, in AVastin And DOcetaxel (AVADO) receiving first-line bevacizumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Patients and methods: Patients with HER2-negative, locally recurrent or mBC were randomised to 3-weekly docetaxel (100mg/m2) with placebo, bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg or bevacizumab 15mg/kg, for 9 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients had no prior chemotherapy for mBC. Results: Progression-free survival (PFS) was increased with bevacizumab in the elderly subpopulation (n =127), the effect being greater with higher dose (hazard ratio=0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.383–1.032] versus 0.76 [95% CI: 0.46–1.262], respectively). PFS was numerically similar in the elderly and overall populations, but the former failed to achieve statistical significance. Overall response rates for docetaxel plus placebo, bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg and 15mg/kg were 44.7%, 36.6% and 50.0%, respectively. Effects on survival were not statistically significant. Bevacizumab was well tolerated in elderly patients, the most common adverse effects were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia; there was no excess of grade⩾3 cardiovascular events. There was no clear correlation between baseline hypertension and its development during study treatment. Conclusions: In this exploratory sub-analysis in AVADO, bevacizumab plus docetaxel showed efficacy in elderly patients similar to the overall study population. There were no unexpected safety signals in patients aged 65years or older. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Ixabepilone (BMS247550) is a semisynthetic derivative of the natural product that optimizes the properties observed with epothilone B. This compound has some similarities with taxanes in targeting and stabilizing microtubules, but it also has major differences. Interestingly, ixabepilone was evaluated in patients with well-characterized resistance to taxanes and was able to overcome the overexpression of multidrug resistance and was unaffacted by mutations in the β-tubulin genes. The interest in ixabepilone was clinically confirmed in Phase II and III clinical studies, which have demonstrated a strong activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistance to taxanes and in patients suffering from other types of chemoresistant tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Previous studies demonstrated that doxorubicin and vinorelbine combinations in first-line chemotherapy are highly active in metastatic breast cancer. Mitoxantrone is an anthracenedione with low cardiotoxicity, and seems to be effective when combined with vinorelbine after prior exposure to anthracyclines. Patients and Methods: Seventy-two patients with metastatic breast cancer were included in a phase II study. All patients had previously received one anthracycline-containing regimen (doxorubicin or epirubicin) in an adjuvant setting. Vinorelbine was administered at 25 mg/m[sup 2] in a 20-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, days 1 and 8. Mitoxantrone was given at 10 mg/m[sup 2] (66 patients) or 12 mg/m[sup 2] (6 patients) in a slow i.v. infusion on day 1. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluable for response; the objective response rate was 49% (95% CI: 37–63%), including four complete and 28 partial responses, with a median duration of response of 7 months (range 2.3–27). Median overall survival was 19 months (range 2–48). Grade 3–4 granulocytopenia was observed in 46% of patients. There were 12 admissions (3% of cycles), involving 17% of patients for febrile neutropenia. Seven patients (10%) experienced grade 3 or 4 cardiotoxicity, and 1 patient died of cardiac heart failure. Other side effects were rare and mild. Conclusions: The vinorelbine and mitoxantrone combination is an active regimen with low toxic complications when cumulative doses of mitoxantrone are limited to 70 mg/m[sup 2] . The results in this phase II study make it worthwhile including this regimen in a phase III study for patients who have previously received an anthracycline-containing regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]