Search

Background: The presence of anti-HER2 agents, such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), significantly improved the prognosis of metastatic HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers (BC). However, drug resistance and disease progression are still common. In order to further improve the treatment efficacy, new clinical trials about anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy are growing rapidly. We conducted the network meta-analysis to synthesize evidences of clinical trials to identify the best therapy for metastatic HER2+ BC. Methods: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials regarding anti-HER2 agents in combination with chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancers up to May 2020 was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the results and rank the therapies. Results: Twenty-six studies, including 16 studies for first-line treatments and 10 studies for second- or later-line treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. For first-line studies, the THP (taxanes + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) regimen exhibited the highest probability to be the optimal treatment in all efficacy outcomes and moderate safety. For second- or later-line studies, the T-DM1 and XHTuC (capecitabine + trastuzumab + tucatinib) regimens ranked top two in all efficacy outcomes according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) results. T-DM1 ranked first in PFS and OS whereas XHTuC ranked first in ORR. The safety outcomes of T-DM1 and XHTuC were acceptable. Conclusions: THP was still the optimal first-line treatment for metastatic HER2+ BC. T-DM1 and XHTuC were recommended for second-line treatments. Systematic Review Registration: INPLASY.com, identifier (INPLASY202090086). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intercellular communication is crucial for breast cancer progression and metastasis. However, the role of cancer-derived exosomes and their crucial microRNA (miRNA) cargoes mediating intercellular communication requires further investigation. Methods: Cancer-derived exosomes were isolated using differential centrifugation and differentially expressed miRNAs were determined by microarrays and qRT-PCR analysis. Cell proliferation, wound-healing, Transwell invasion, and tumor xenograft assays were used for functional research. Plasma exosomal RNA was isolated to verify its role as a prognostic biomarker. Results: We found that the tumor-promoting capacity of the exosomes was positively related to their cells of origin. MiR-7641 was identified to be the most differentially expressed miRNA, both at endogenous and secretory levels in high-metastatic cancer cells. MiR-7641 could promote tumor cell progression and metastasis, and that these functions of miR-7641 could alter recipient cells via transportation of exosomes. Additionally, exosomal miR-7641 could promote tumor growth in vivo; and its levels were significantly elevated in the plasma of patients with distant metastasis. Bioinformatics analysis has suggested that miR-7641 is correlated with breast cancer survival, and several important cellular and biological processes are closely targeted by miR-7641. Conclusion: The findings indicate miR-7641 to be an important component of the cancer exosomes in promoting tumor progression and metastasis via intercellular communication. Additionally, exosomal miR-7641 may serve as a promising non-invasive diagnostic biomarker and potential targetable candidate in breast cancer treatment. BWySRQX9DMANyj4v-XQwBN Video Abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate retrospectively an association between the number of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) per total number of SLNs per patient (i.e., the SLN positive rate, or SLN-PR) and non-SLN metastasis in breast cancer. A large population (n = 2250) underwent SLN dissection from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2020; 627 (27.87%) had at least one positive SLN (SLN+). Among these, 283 underwent axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection, and formed the test group. Four external validation groups comprised 43 patients treated in 2019. SLN mappings were examined using methylene blue and indocyanine green. Lymph node ultrasound, SLN-PR, and pathological characteristics were compared between patients with and without non-SLN metastasis. An SLN-PR cutoff value was calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Associations between clinicopathological variables and SLN-PR with non-SLN metastasis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression model. The median age was 47 years (IQR: 42-56 y). The median number of resected SLNs was 4. Patients with positive non-SLNs (126/283, 44.52%) had a median of 2 positive node. SLN-PR > 0.333 was a risk factor for non-SLN positivity (area under the ROC curve, 0.726); and carried significantly higher risk of non-SLN metastasis (P < 0.001). This was validated in the external group. SLN-PR > 0.333 was associated with greater risk of non-SLN metastasis. This provides a reference to non-SLN metastasis in patients with SLN metastasis, an indication for ALN dissection and choice of adjuvant treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]