Search

Aims: Although opioid‐related harms have reached new heights across North America, the size of the gap in opioid agonist therapy (OAT) delivery for opioid‐related health problems is unknown in most jurisdictions. This study sought to characterize the gap in OAT treatment using a cascade of care framework, and determine factors associated with engagement and retention in treatment. Design: A population‐based retrospective cohort study. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Participants: Individuals who sought medical care for opioid‐related health problems or died from an opioid‐related cause between 2005 and 2019. Measurements: Monthly treatment status for buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone OAT between 2013 and 2019 (i.e. 'off OAT', 'retained on OAT < 6 months', 'retained on OAT ≥ 6 months'). Findings Of 122 811 individuals in the cohort, 97 516 (79.4%) received OAT at least once during the study period. There was decreasing 6‐month treatment retention over time. Model results indicated that males had higher odds of being on OAT each month [odds ratio (OR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.23–1.28] but lower odds of OAT retention (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88–0.92), while the reverse was observed for older individuals (monthly: OR = 0.76 per 10‐year increase, 95% CI = 0.76–0.77; retention: OR = 1.36 per 10‐year increase, 95% CI = 1.34–1.38) and individuals with higher neighbourhood income (e.g. highest income quintile, monthly: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.77–0.82; highest income quintile, retention: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.11–1.20). Individuals residing in rural areas and with a history of mental health diagnoses had poorer outcomes overall, including lower odds of being on OAT each month (rural: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.73–0.78; mental health: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.87–0.92) and OAT retention (rural: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.77–0.82; mental health: OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.78–0.83), as well as higher risk of starting/stopping OAT [rural, starting OAT: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.05–1.10; mental health, starting OAT: HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18–1.23; rural, stopping OAT: HR = 1.24, 95% CI: = 1.22–1.26; mental health, stopping OAT: HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.09–1.13]. Individuals with a history of mental health diagnoses also had a higher risk of death, regardless of OAT status (off OAT death: HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.33–1.66; on OAT death: HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09–1.31). Conclusions: Factors influencing engagement and declining retention in treatment with opioid agonist therapy in Ontario's health system include age, sex and neighbourhood income, as well as mental health diagnoses or residing in rural regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite concerns surrounding high patient volumes in methadone clinics, little is known about the practice patterns of opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) providers in Ontario. We examined the distribution of these services and how physician characteristics differ based on prescribing volume.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among prescribers of methadone or buprenorphine to Ontario public drug beneficiaries in 2014 by stratifying physicians into low- (lower 50%), moderate- (51-89%) and high-volume (top 10%) prescribers. We summarized the distribution of OMT prescription days dispensed and urine drug screens (UDS) ordered using Lorenz curves and examined physician characteristics using descriptive statistics.Results: We identified 893 OMT prescribers in 2014. Physicians were mostly male (67.5%; N=603), and middle-aged (median was 50). High-volume methadone providers (N=57) prescribed approximately 56% (N=4,115,322) of the total days of methadone (Gini coefficient=0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79) while high-volume buprenorphine providers (N=64) prescribed 61% (N=589,463) of the total days of buprenorphine (Gini coefficient=0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.80). On average, each high-volume methadone prescriber treated 435 OMT patients and billed 43 UDS per patient, while each high-volume buprenorphine prescriber treated 64 OMT patients and billed 22 UDS per patient. Daily OMT patient volume was on average 74 for high-volume methadone prescribers and 6 for high-volume buprenorphine prescribers.Conclusions: OMT services are highly concentrated among a small portion of OMT providers who carry high daily patient volumes. Future research should examine the quality of primary care received by their patients to better elucidate the possible consequences of this highly unequal distribution of services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]