Search

Objective: The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to describe the clinical and microbiological results obtained by treatment with Er:YAG laser and systemic metronidazole used as adjuncts to mechanical subgingival debridement in chronic periodontitis., Methods: Twenty-seven chronic periodontitis (CP) patients were randomly divided into three parallel groups each comprising nine individuals with at least four teeth having at least one approximal site with a probing depth (PD) of ≥5 mm and gingival index (GI) of ≥2 in each quadrant. Groups of patients received: (1) Scaling and root planing (SRP)+ Er:YAG laser (10 hz, 30 mJ/pulse, 1 min per pocket, apico-coronal direction in parallel paths with 30 degree angle tips, under water irrigation), (2) SRP+ systemic metronidazole, or (3) SRP alone. In all treatment groups, SRP was performed at 1 week intervals in two sessions. The microbiological and clinical effects of the treatments were evaluated after 90 days., Results: At the end of the experimental period, statistically significant improvements in plaque index, GI, PD and attachment level, as well as reductions in the number of total bacteria and proportions of obligately anaerobic microorganisms were observed within each group. Although intergroup comparisons revealed no significant microbiological differences, clinical parameters as attachment gain and PD reduction were found significantly higher in Group 1 compared with the other groups., Conclusions: Within its limits, this study demonstrated the possibility of better resolution of infection with combined SRP+Er:YAG laser treatment. However, microbiological results failed to demonstrate significant advantages of this combination in comparison with SRP alone or SRP+systemic metronidazole.

The present study describes results on selected clinical and microbiological parameters obtained by treatment with local (Elyzol) and systemic (Flagyl) use of metronidazole alone and/or mechanical subgingival debridement in adult periodontitis. Patients were randomly divided into local and systemic treatment groups each comprising 5 individuals in each of whom 4 sites (one site/ quadrant) with a probing depth of > or = 5 mm were selected and treated with separate treatment modalities. The overall treatment design provided 6 different test groups. Groups of quadrants received: (1) scaling and root planing; (2) local metronidazole treatment; (3) systemic metronidazole treatment; (4) local metronidazole combined with scaling and root planing; (5) systemic metronidazole combined with scaling and root planing; (6) no treatment. The microbiological and clinical effects of treatment modalities were monitored over a period of 42 days. All treatments resulted in clinical improvements (gingivitis, probing pocket depth, attachment level) except for the untreated group. Parallel to the clinical changes, all treatments reduced the number of total bacteria and proportions of obligately anaerobic microorganisms. Although both of the combined treatment groups responded to therapy with better resolution of infection that the pure mechanical and pure metronidazole treatments, local metronidazole in combination with scaling and root planing seems to be more effective in terms of producing both clinical and microbial improvements.

The present study describes selected clinical and microbiological results obtained by treatment with local (Elyzol) and systemic (Flagyl) use of metronidazole alone and/or mechanical subgingival debridement in early onset periodontitis (EOP). Twelve patients, with lesions not distributed as in classical localized juvenile periodontitis, were included. They were randomly divided into local and systemic treatment groups each comprising 6 individuals, in each of whom 4 sites (one site/quadrant) with a probing depth of > or = 5 mm were selected and treated with separate treatment modalities. The overall treatment design provided 6 different test groups. Groups of quadrants received 1) scaling and root planing 2) local metronidazole treatment 3) systemic metronidazole treatment 4) local metronidazole combined with scaling and root planing 5) systemic metronidazole combined with scaling and root planing 6) No treatment. The microbiological and clinical effects of treatment modalities were monitored over 42 days. The results demonstrated reductions in mean counts of obligate anaerobic and capnophilic microorganisms coupled with significant improvements in mean clinical measurements (gingivitis, probing depth, attachment level) in all groups, except the untreated. Scaling and root planing provided an initial clinical improvement with a selective reduction of periodontopathogens (92.6% obligate anaerobes, 42.9% capnophilic microorganisms), whereas the combination of local or systemic metronidazole with scaling and root planing were found superior in reducing capnophilic bacteria (93.7% and 93.4%, respectively). It is of critical importance to have a treatment rationale for EOP, since bacterial differences exist in the etiological subforms of periodontitis. Microbial testing may be justified before prescribing the adjunctive antibiotic and selecting the mode of delivery for the successful clinical management of EOP.