The vertebrate eye mediates both image-forming and non–image-forming photoreception. Image-forming photoreception (vision) enables the animal to detect and track objects in the environment, whereas non–image-forming photoreception is responsible for the measurement of ambient irradiance, so that, for example, the internal circadian biological clock can be synchronized with the astronomical day, a process called photoentrainment.1,2 The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which is considered the central circadian pacemaker of mammals, is adjusted on a daily basis to the environmental light/dark cycle1 by the detection of light by melanopsin-expressing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs).3–6 Such ipRGCs transmit this light information to the SCN by way of the retinohypothalamic tract.7,8 These cells also project to other brain areas involved in pupil constriction, promotion of sleep, gaze control, image-forming vision, and other activities.9 Moreover, ipRGCs constitute the principal conduits for rod-cone input involved in non–image-forming responses, including circadian photoentrainment.10 In fact, the destruction of these cells altered the effects of light on circadian rhythms.10–12 Therefore, the rod and cone photoreceptors and the ipRGCs are complementary in providing signals for nonvisual photoreceptive functions. In mice, at least 70% of the RGCs generated during retinal development die through programed cell death during the postnatal period13; however, as we previously demonstrated in pigmented mice, no diminution in the number of melanopsin-expressing cells occurs during postnatal development.14 ipRGCs are responsive to light from birth.15,16 Moreover, the SCN begins to function as a circadian pacemaker during late fetal development.17 Depending on the intensity of the stimulus, light was able to induce expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in the SCN at postnatal day (P) 0 to P118 or at P4.19 Taken together, these data indicate that the melanopsin-based system is functional as early as the day of birth. Previous studies have demonstrated that melanopsin expression shows daily oscillation.20–22 Such rhythm was also demonstrated in neonatal albino rats and neonatal pigmented mice,22,23 when rods and cones are not yet fully developed. Hannibal et al.21 and Mathes et al.,24 using albino rats, also reported differential regulation of melanopsin expression in response to continuous darkness (DD) or continuous light (LL). Such changes in melanopsin expression were also detected in albino rat pups.23 This suggests that ipRGCs can adapt their responsiveness to the external illumination conditions by regulating their melanopsin content even in the absence of functional rod-cone photoreceptors. Among the ipRGCs, two main morphologic types have been previously identified: M1 cells, with their dendritic arborization in the OFF sublayer of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), and M2 cells, with their dendrites forming a plexus in the ON sublayer of the IPL. Recently, two isoforms of melanopsin, Opn4S and Opn4L, have been identified. M1 cells express both melanopsin isoforms, whereas M2 cells express only the Opn4L isoform.25 Different electrophysiological responses,26 as well as different brain projections,27 were reported for these two cell subpopulations. In a previous study,22 we detected a different daily oscillation for M1 and M2 cells that was already present in the early postnatal period. Albino animals are often used as models in numerous studies concerning the retina, despite the fact that most mutations causing albinism provoke anomalous retinal development, including lower numbers of rods, incomplete development of the central retina, and chiasmatic abnormalities.28 Therefore, it should be taken into account that results obtained in albino models are not fully comparable with those of pigmented animals. To better understand the development of the ipRGCs, the present study analyzed for the first time in albino mice these cells and their main subpopulations within the postnatal period under standard 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycles. Furthermore, the effects of exposure to constant light or constant darkness on the postnatal development of these cells were also studied.