Search

A decrease in the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) or replication index (RI) is routinely used to determine cytotoxicity of a test compound and therefore the choice of its appropriate test concentration for the in vitro micronucleus (MN) test conducted in the presence of cytochalasin B. As a number of laboratories prefer to conduct the in vitro MN test in the absence of cytochalasin B, it is important that selected test concentrations, based on cytotoxicity, should be similar to what they would have been if cytochalasin B had been used, and should be relevant of a true cytotoxicity. By using models to analyse the dynamics of the cell cultures with and without cytochalasin B we have compared different methods for evaluation of cytotoxicity, and demonstrate that relative decrease in population doubling or relative increase in cell counts are the most appropriate measures of cytotoxicity to compare with reduction in CBPI or RI.

In the past decade several studies comparing the in vitro chromosome aberration test (CAT) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNT) were performed. A high correlation was observed in each of the studies (>85%); however, no formal validation for the micronucleus in vitro assay had been carried out. Therefore, a working group was established by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) to perform a retrospective validation of the existing data, in order to evaluate the validity of the in vitro MNT on the basis of the modular validation approach. The primary focus of this retrospective validation was on the evaluation of the potential of the in vitro MNT as alternative to the standard in vitro CAT. The working group evaluated, in a first step, the available published data and came to the conclusion that two studies [German ring trial, von der Hude, W., Kalweit, S., Engelhardt, G. et al. (2000) In-vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells: results of a collaborative study with 26 chemicals. Mutat. Res., 468, 137-163, and SFTG International Collaborative Study, Lorge, E., Thybaud, V., Aardema, M., Oliver, J., Wataka, A., Lorenzon, G. and Marzin, D. (2006) SFTG International Collaborative Study on in-vitro micronucleus test I. General conditions and overall conclusions of the study. Mutat. Res., 607, 13-36] met the criteria for a retrospective validation according to the criteria previously defined by the working group. These two studies were evaluated in depth (including the reanalysis of raw data) and provided the information required for assessing the reliability (reproducibility) of the test. For the assessment of the concordance between the in vitro MNT and the in vitro CAT, additional published data were considered. Based on this retrospective validation, the ECVAM Validation Management Team concluded that the in vitro MNT is reliable and relevant and can therefore be used as an alternative method to the in vitro CAT. Following peer review, these conclusions were formally endorsed by the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee.

A collaborative study with 10 participating laboratories was conducted to evaluate a test protocol for the performance of the in vitro micronucleus (MN) test using the V79 cell line with one treatment and one sampling time only. A total of 26 coded substances were tested in this study for MN-inducing properties. Three substances were tested by all 10 laboratories and 23 substances were tested by three or four laboratories in parallel. Six aneugenic, 7 clastogenic and 6 non-genotoxic chemicals were uniformly recognised as such by all laboratories. Three chemicals were tested uniformly negative by three laboratories although also clastogenic properties have been reported for these substances. Another set of three clastogenic substances showed inconsistent results and one non-clastogenic substance was found to be positive by one out of three laboratories. Within the study, the applicability of the determination of a proliferation index (PI) as an internal cytotoxicity parameter in comparison with the determination of the mitotic index (MI) was also evaluated. Both parameters were found to be useful for the interpretation of the MN test result with regard to the control of cell cycle kinetics and the mode of action for MN induction. The MN test in vitro was found to be easy to perform and its results were mainly in accordance with results from chromosomal aberration tests in vitro.

Because of its rapidness, simplicity and potential for automation, the measurement of micronucleated cells in vivo is not only equivalent to the analysis of chromosome aberrations, but often even preferred within routine genotoxicity testing. In order to evaluate the correlation between the in vitro micronucleus assay (MNT) and the in vitro chromosome aberration test (CA), we collected data from four pharmaceutical companies obtained either in Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO-K5, CHO-K1, V79) or in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Among the 57 compounds included in this comparison, 45 compounds gave rise to concordant results in both assays (26 compounds negative in both assays; 19 compounds positive in both assays). The high percentage of concordance, i.e. about 79% is very promising and can be even increased to about 88% by omitting the 3 aneugenic compounds and 2 compounds inducing endoreduplicated chromosomes which were found positive only in the in vitro MNT. The results are remarkable in particular considering that most of the compounds evaluated are 'standard' pharmaceutical compounds and thus are at most weak inducers of chromosome damage. Our comparison strongly supports that the in vitro micronucleus test is a suitable alternative to the in vitro chromosome aberration assay. Moreover, the MNT has the potential of not only detecting clastogens but additionally aneuploidy inducing chemicals.

The genotoxic potency of certain classes of topoisomerase II poisons is correlated with their affinity to the topoisomerase protein rather than with the presence of 'classical' structural alerts for DNA reactivity: bacterial topoisomerase II poisons (specifically named gyrase inhibitors) are highly genotoxic in prokaryotic systems; mammalian topoisomerase II poisons are potent mutagens/clastogens in eukaryotic systems. Studies with bacterial, lower eukaryotic and mammalian genotoxicity tests were performed to draw structure-activity conclusions and address risk-benefit considerations for the class of quinolone gyrase inhibitors. All 17 gyrase inhibitors investigated in this study showed genotoxic activity in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA102 and the SOS test. The genotoxic and the toxic activities increased in a highly parallel fashion from the parent compounds, nalidixic acid and oxolinic acid, to the new generation fluoroquinolones. Generally, the most potent fluoroquinolones also show clear-cut positive effects in eukaryotic test systems, although at concentrations 100-1000-fold higher than those effective in bacteria and also 100-1000-fold higher than the minimal genotoxic concentrations of antitumour topoisomerase II inhibitors (ellipticine, teniposide, mAMSA) used as reference compounds. However, subtle structural modifications of the quinolones can strongly diminish the preferential genotoxicity in the prokaryotic test systems.