Search

Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis (CVST) is still considered a severe clinical problem that is difficult to diagnose and manage and is linked to a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, conventional cerebral angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or more recently, MR angiography allow a more rapid and precise diagnosis, and prognosis has improved with the use of anticoagulant treatment. We report 23 cases of CVST consecutively admitted to the Institute of Neurology of the University of Parma during the period 1990-1997. In all cases diagnosis was confirmed by means of MRI or conventional angiography of brain vessels. Among the patients, 22 were female and 1 was male. In all patients, plasma levels of protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII) and antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) were evaluated. In 15 of 23 patients, the presence of factor V Leiden mutation was also determined, and found positive in 3 patients (20%). Of the 22 female patients, 15 (68%) were on low-oestrogen (containing less than 50 microg oestrogen) oral contraceptive (OC) treatment. This percentage of OC use by patients with CVST is much higher than that of the rest of the female Italian population. OC use was associated with the presence of factor V Leiden mutation in two cases, with a deficiency of protein C in 1 case and a deficiency of protein S in another.Whether low-oestrogen Ocs may induce cerebral thromboembolic events is an open matter. According to our data, it may be argued that Ocs, even if at low oestrogen content, represent a major risk factor for CVST. The use of Ocs, as is the case for systemic venous thromboembolic events, may further increase the risk of CVST in women carrying the factor V Leiden mutation or other inherited hyperthrombotic conditions.

The paper reports on rate and type of thrombotic events occurring during the observational, prospective, inception-cohort, multicenter ISCOAT study. 2,745 unselected, daily practice patients, consecutively referring to 34 Italian anticoagulation clinics to monitor the oral anticoagulant treatment, were included in the study from beginning of their first anticoagulant course. During a total follow-up of 2,011 patient-years of treatment 70 thrombotic events (3.5 per 100 patient years) were recorded in 67 patients: 20 fatal (1%), 39 major (1.9%) and 11 minor (0.6%). 34/70 events occurred within the first 90 days of treatment (relative risk - at multivariate analysis - ofor =90 days vs.90 = 20.6, C.I. 12.7-33.5; p0.0001). The risk was higher in patients agedor =70 y (1.62, C.I. 1.0-2.61; p0.05), and when indication for anticoagulant treatment was peripheral/cerebral arterial disease (1.84, C.I. 1.01-3.36; p0.05). The frequency of thrombotic events was 17.5% when international normalised ratio (INR) levels were1.5, decreasing to 2.3% for INRs within the 2-2.99 category (relative risk of INRs2.0 vs.or =2 = 1.88, C.I. 1.16-3.07; p0.05). The recorded rate of thrombotic events was lower than that reported in the few available studies. A greater risk should be expected during the first 90 days of treatment, when anticoagulation levels are2.0 INR, in patients70 years and in those with cerebrovascular/peripheral arterial disease.

Bleeding is the most serious complication of the use of oral anticoagulation in the prevention and treatment of thromoboembolic complications. We studied the frequency of bleeding complications in outpatients treated routinely in anticoagulation clinics.In a prospective cohort from thirty-four Italian anticoagulation clinics, 2745 consecutive patients were studied from the start of their oral anticoagulation (warfarin in 64%, acenocourmarol in the rest). The target anticoagulation-intensity was low (international normalised ratio [INR]or = 2.8) in 71% of the patients and high (2.8) in the remainder. We recorded demographic details and the main indication for treatment and, every 3-4 months, INR and outcome events. Such events included all complications (bleeding, thrombosis, other), although only bleeding events are reported here, and deaths. We divided bleeding into major and minor categories.43% of the patients were women. Nearly three-fifths of the patients were aged 60-79; 8% were over 80. The main indication for treatment was venous thrombolism (33%), followed by non-ischaemic heart disease (17%). Mean follow-up was 267 days. Over 2011 patient-years of follow-up, 153 bleeding complications occurred (7.6 per 100 patient-years). 5 were fatal (all cerebral haemorrhages, 0.25 per 100 patient-years), 23 were major (1.1), and 125 were minor (6.2). The rate of events was similar between sexes, coumarin type, size of enrolling centre, and target INR. The rate was higher in older patients: 10.5 per 100 patient-years in those aged 70 or over, 6.0 in those aged under 70 (relative risk 1.75, 95% Cl 1.29-2.39, p0.001). The rate was also higher when the indication was peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease than venous thromboembolism plus other indications (12.5 vs 6.0 per 100 patient-years) (1.80, 1.2-2.7, p0.01), and during the first 90 days of treatment compared with later (11.0 vs 6.3, 1.75, 1.27-2.44, p0.001). A fifth of the bleeding events occurred at low anticoagulation intensity (INR2, rate 7.7 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The rates were 4.8, 9.5, 40.5, and 200 at INRs 2.0-2.9, 3-4.4, 4.5-6.9, and over 7, respectively (relative risks for INR4.5, 7.91, 5.44-11.5, p0.0001).We saw fewer bleeding events than those recorded in other observational and experimental studies. Oral anticoagulation has become safer in recent years, especially if monitored in anticoagulation clinics. Caution is required in elderly patients and anticoagulation intensity should be closely monitored to reduce periods of overdosing.

To evaluate the role of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as an alternative to oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, we compared in a randomized trial conventional warfarin treatment with a three-month course of enoxaparin 4000 anti-Xa units once a day subcutaneously. 187 patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), diagnosed by strain-gauge plethysmography plus D-dimer latex assay and confirmed by venography in most cases, were treated with full-dose subcutaneous heparin for ten days and then randomized to secondary prophylaxis. During the 3-month treatment period, 6 of the 93 patients who received LMWH (6%) and 4 of the 94 patients on warfarin (4%) had symptomatic recurrence of venous thromboembolism confirmed by objective testing (p = 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -3% to 7%). Four patients in the LMWH group had bleeding complications as compared with 12 in the warfarin group (p = 0.04; 95% CI for the difference, 4% to 14%). In the 9-month follow-up period, during which 34 patients on warfarin prolonged treatment for other 3 months and 14 up to one year, 10 patients in the enoxaparin group and 4 patients in the warfarin group suffered a documented recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Of these 14 late recurrences, just one occurred in patients with postoperative DVT. After one year there were 16 recurrences (17%) in the LMWH group and 8 (9%) in the warfarin group (p = 0.07; 95% CI for the difference, 1% to 16%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In our Center for the Surveillance of Anticoagulant Treatment, most of the 1700 patients followed-up are traditionally treated with acenocoumarol, while warfarin is administered nowadays to an increasing proportion of patients. To assess if the difference in the pharmacokinetics of these two drugs may determine a different laboratory quality of treatment, a retrospective study was performed on the computerized files of all 142 patients on treatment with warfarin for more than 100 days and on a control group of 142 patients treated with acenocoumarol, matched for age, sex, disease state and duration of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). The study considered 7071 assays for a total of 432 patient-years of treatment. The overall quality of treatment was significantly better in patients treated with warfarin (72% of controls within the therapeutic range versus 67% on acenocoumarol, p0.001). Also the individual quality of therapy, which was assessed as the percentage of patients with 75% or more assays in range, was in favour of warfarin (50.7% vs 34.5%, p0.05). Warfarin therapy was more stable and fewer assays were required for treatment monitoring. Confounding factors possibly influencing the treatment stability, such as interfering drugs, diagnostic or therapeutical procedures requiring withdrawal of anticoagulation, were evaluated and no significant difference between the two groups was found. The difference in the laboratory quality of OAT was marked in patients treated for prevention of arterial thromboembolism, while it was negligible in patients with venous thromboembolic disease, whose mean duration of OAT was considerably shorter. Since there is no evidence that acenocoumarol is more efficacious or safer than warfarin, the latter seems to be preferable for patients who are candidate to very prolonged OAT.

271 patients with acute symptomatic deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs, confirmed by strain-gauge plethysmography and/or venography, were randomly assigned to receive intermittent subcutaneous heparin calcium or heparin sodium by continuous intravenous infusion for 6-10 days. Heparin dosage was adjusted to maintain activated partial thromboplastin time values (Thrombofax reagent) at 1.3-1.9 times the basal ones. Strain-gauge plethysmography was repeated at the end of heparin treatment, and evaluation of therapy was performed by comparing the indexes of venous hemodynamics and by assessing the incidence of pulmonary embolism and of bleeding complications. In the intravenous group, Maximal Venous Outflow (MVO) increased from 20.8 +/- 12.8 to 28.4 +/- 17.5 ml/min per 100 ml of tissue and Venous Capacitance (VC) from 1.39 +/- 0.92 to 1.94 +/- 1.0 ml/100 ml of tissue (mean +/- SD). In the subcutaneous group, MVO increased from 21.0 +/- 12.7 to 27.5 +/- 18.1 and VC from 1.60 +/- 0.86 to 2.06 +/- 1.0. The median improvement of MVO and VC were 22% and 36% respectively in the IV group and 20% and 24% in the SC group. Clinical pulmonary embolism occurred in 2 patients in the intravenous group (1 fatal) and in 4 in the subcutaneous group (1 fatal). 9 major bleeding complications occurred in the intravenous group (1 fatal) and 5 in the subcutaneous group (1 fatal). The differences were not significant at the statistical analysis. The results suggest that subcutaneous intermittent heparin has a comparable efficacy to continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. To the same conclusion points an overview of the seven randomized trials which compared these treatment modalities.

Heparin administration for operations with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) usually is performed following prefixed, standardized protocols. These regimens secure an adequate level of anticoagulation, but they often involve prolonged periods of overheparinization associated with an undue risk of hemorrhage. The predictive value of preoperative studies in the anticoagulant effect of heparin was investigated in 10 patients. The study was performed both in vitro and in vivo using the Xa inhibitor assay as an index of the anticoagulation induced by heparin. Adding variable amounts of heparin in vitro to patient's plasma resulted in straight (at least up to 7 U. per milliliter) and parallel, but not coincident, dose/response curves, so confirming a different individual sensitivity to heparin. Disappearance curves of the anticoagulant effect in plasma following intravenous administration of a single standard dose of heparin in the same patients showed an even greater patient-to-patient variability, with "half-life" times ranging from 30 to 150 minutes. No relationship was found between the parameters (in vitro sensitivity to heparin and clearance rate from plasma in vivo). Moreover, neither of them could be correlated with the response to heparin, subsequently observed during ECC in the same patients. Preoperative investigations with the methods presently available are not adequate to choose individual heparin administration regimens for cardiac operations.

2 cases of acute idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura are reported. Both of them were treated with plasma exchange, antiplatelet drugs and prednisolone and both completely recovered. Plasma exchange appeared to be the critical treatment. In 1 of these cases the prostacyclinlike activity released from venous tissues and the ability of plasma to stimulate synthesis of prostacyclinlike activity from venous tissues exhausted after repeated washings were investigated. Both activities were detectable and comparable to those of a healthy control. These findings do not support the hypothesis of a major role played by the prostacyclin system in the pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

The efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline (400 mg tid orally) and acenocoumarol, administered singly or in combination, in the treatment of intermittent claudication associated with chronic occlusive arterial disease were evaluated in a multi-center, randomized, factorial, blind clinical trial involving 146 patients. The response to treatment was assessed by measuring pain-free walking time on the treadmill and by Doppler ankle/arm systolic pressure ratio at rest and after treadmill. Both pentoxifylline and acenocoumarol were significantly more effective than placebo in increasing the proportion of patients who improved their performance on the treadmill after one year of treatment. Benefit from active treatment was also apparent from the results of Doppler examinations performed after physical exercise. No significant differences were observed in comparing the effect of one active drug versus the other or versus the combined treatment. Five major hemorrhagic complications were registered in anticoagulated patients, two fatal cerebral hemorrhages and one gastrointestinal bleeding occurring in the group treated with both active drugs. The investigators conclude that (1) pentoxifylline is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication (2) the benefits of oral anticoagulant therapy are outweighed by the risk of serious bleeding, and (3) the risk of bleeding is probably increased by the combined treatment with pentoxifylline.