1. Randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of andecaliximab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in advanced gastric cancer identifies biomarkers associated with survival
- Author
-
Shah, Manish A, Cunningham, David, Metges, Jean-Philippe, Van Cutsem, Eric, Wainberg, Zev, Elboudwarej, Emon, Lin, Kai-Wen, Turner, Scott, Zavodovskaya, Marianna, Inzunza, David, Liu, Jinfeng, Patterson, Scott D, Zhou, Jingzhu, He, Jing, Thai, Dung, Bhargava, Pankaj, Brachmann, Carrie Baker, and Cantenacci, Daniel VT
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Digestive Diseases ,Clinical Research ,Rare Diseases ,Cancer ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,Adult ,Aged ,Antibodies ,Monoclonal ,Humanized ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Biomarkers ,Tumor ,Female ,Follow-Up Studies ,Gene Expression Regulation ,Neoplastic ,Humans ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Nivolumab ,Prognosis ,Stomach Neoplasms ,Survival Rate ,Transcriptome ,Young Adult ,Biomarkers ,Clinical Trials ,Phase II as Topic ,Tumor ,antibodies ,neoplasm ,Immunology ,Oncology and carcinogenesis - Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) selectively cleaves extracellular matrix proteins contributing to tumor growth and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This study evaluated andecaliximab (ADX), an inhibitor of MMP9, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Phase 2, open-label, randomized multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of ADX+NIVO versus NIVO in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). We explored the correlation of efficacy outcomes with biomarkers. 144 patients were randomized; 141 were treated: 81% white, 69% male, median age was 61 years in the ADX+NIVO group and 62 years in the NIVO-alone group. The ORR was 10% (95% CI 4 to 19) in the ADX+NIVO group and 7% (95% CI 2 to 16) in the NIVO-alone group (OR: 1.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 6.1; p=0.8)). There was no response or survival benefit associated with adding ADX. AE rates were comparable in both treatment groups; the most common AEs were fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting. Programmed cell death ligand 1, interferon-γ (IFN), and intratumoral CD8+ cell density were not associated with treatment response or survival. The gene signature most correlated with shorter survival was the epithelial-to-mesenchymal gene signature; high transforming growth factor (TGF)-β fibrosis score was negatively associated with OS (p=0.036). Gene expression analysis of baseline tumors comparing long-(1+ years) and short-term (
- Published
- 2021