1. Cost-Effectiveness between Double and Single Fecal Immunochemical Test(s) in a Mass Colorectal Cancer Screening
- Author
-
Su-Zhan Zhang, Shu Zheng, Shan-Rong Cai, Hong-Hong Zhu, Qilong Li, Yan-Qin Huang, and Xin-Yuan Ma
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,China ,Article Subject ,Cost effectiveness ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Colonoscopy ,lcsh:Medicine ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Underserved Population ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Stage (cooking) ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Aged ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Crc screening ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,Reproducibility of Results ,General Medicine ,Health Care Costs ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,Colorectal cancer screening ,Fecal Immunochemical Test ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Occult Blood ,business ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Primary screening ,Research Article - Abstract
This study investigated the cost-effectiveness between double and single Fecal Immunochemical Test(s) (FIT) in a mass CRC screening. A two-stage sequential screening was conducted. FIT was used as a primary screening test and recommended twice by an interval of one week at the first screening stage. We defined the first-time FIT as FIT1 and the second-time FIT as FIT2. If either FIT1 or FIT2 was positive (+), then a colonoscopy was recommended at the second stage. Costs were recorded and analyzed. A total of 24,419 participants completed either FIT1 or FIT2. The detection rate of advanced neoplasm was 19.2% among both FIT1+ and FIT2+, especially high among men with age ≥55 (27.4%). About 15.4% CRC, 18.9% advanced neoplasm, and 29.9% adenoma missed by FIT1 were detected by FIT2 alone. Average cost was $2,935 for double FITs and $2,121 for FIT1 to detect each CRC and $901 for double FITs and $680 for FIT1 to detect each advanced neoplasm. Double FITs are overall more cost-effective, having significantly higher positive and detection rates with an acceptable higher cost, than single FIT. Double FITs should be encouraged for the first screening in a mass CRC screening, especially in economically and medically underserved populations/areas/countries.
- Published
- 2016