Search

Usually, after mitral leaflet tissue is resected, artificial chordae are used to obtain papillary muscle-to-mitral annulus continuity so as to preserve left ventricular performance. A modified technique that does not require resection of the posterior mitral leaflet and permits implantation of an adequate size of prosthesis is described.

Background: Satisfactory results of bileaflet preserving mitral valve replacement (MVR) had forced several institutes to preserve both leaflets during MVR. Modifications were required to prevent the preserved tissue from interfering with prosthetic valve function, to implant an adequate size of valve and to prevent left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction., Materials and Methods: Conventional MVR was performed to 51 patients (group 1) and bileaflet preserving MVR was performed to 43 patients (group 2). Mitral anterior leaflet incised from the middle of the leaflet to mitral annulus without chordal injury in group 2 patients. Sutures were placed through the mitral annulus first and then passed from the bottom to the tip of anterior leaflet. Posterior leaflet was also preserved. Prosthetic valve was put down into the mitral annulus and sutures were ligated. Excessive anterior leaflet tissue was attached to left atrial wall., Results: Cross-clamping time was 45 +/- 5.33 minutes versus 61.32 +/- 4.43 minutes (p = 0.0001) and total cardiopulmonary bypass time was 60.80 +/- 4.44 minutes versus 80.55 +/- 3.65 minutes (p = 0.0001) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Inotropy requirement was higher in group 1 (p = 0.0058). When compared with preoperative values postoperative left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) increased both at rest (from 52.74% +/- 3.88% to 62.86% +/- 3.18%, p = 0.0001) and during exercise (from 53.16% +/- 3.16% to 64.11% +/- 2.46%, p = 0.0001) in bileaflet preserving MVR group. But in conventional MVR group LVEF decreased postoperatively both at rest (from 51.45% +/- 4.27% to 48.27% +/- 3.35%, p = 0.0001) and during exercise (from 54.47% +/- 7.36% to 42.96% +/- 3.58%, p = 0.0001)., Conclusion: Leaflet preserving MVR operation not only improves the left ventricular performance but also reduces the mortality and morbidity after MVR. LVEF increases both at rest and during exercise. Risk of LVOT obstruction can be completely eliminated with our simple technique.

We present a modified bileaflet preserving mitral valve replacement technique to eliminate left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and larger size prosthesis implantation. Mitral anterior leaflet was incised from the middle of leaflet to mitral annulus. Pletgetted sutures were firstly bitten from mitral annulus and then passed from the bottom to the tip of anterior leaflet. These sutures were anchored to prosthesis. Bileaflet prosthesis was put down into the annulus and sutures were ligated on the strut of prosthesis. Posterior leaflet was also preserved. Excessive anterior leaflet tissue was attached to left atrium wall by deeply bitten sutures.

Leaflet mobilization is an important part of rheumatic mitral valve disease repair. Conventional commissurotomy techniques may not allow leaflet mobilization in some patients. We described a new technique for adequate mobilization of the posterior leaflet. First, we performed mitral commissurotomy in both commissures. The posterior leaflet was then separated from the posterior annulus from the anterolateral commissure to the posteromedial commissure. Tertiary and secondary chordae were removed. The posterior leaflet was divided vertically into two parts. After removal of the fibrous attachments, the pericardial patch was sutured to the entire posterior leaflet. The artificial chordae were re-implanted in the neo-P2 region of the porterior leaflet to achieve good coaptation. We did not use a ring after the mitral valve repair was completed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]